Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 17568, 2023 10 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845257

RESUMO

To investigate clinical data and computed tomographic (CT) imaging features in differentiating gastric schwannomas (GSs) from gastric stromal tumours (GISTs) in matched patients, 31 patients with GSs were matched with 62 patients with GISTs (1:2) in sex, age, and tumour site. The clinical and imaging data were analysed. A significant (P < 0.05) difference was found in the tumour margin, enhancement pattern, growth pattern, and LD values between the 31 patients with GSs and 62 matched patients with GISTs. The GS lesions were mostly (93.5%) well defined while only 61.3% GIST lesions were well defined.The GS lesions were significantly (P = 0.036) smaller than the GIST lesions, with the LD ranging 1.5-7.4 (mean 3.67 cm) cm for the GSs and 1.0-15.30 (mean 5.09) cm for GIST lesions. The GS lesions were more significantly (P = 0.001) homogeneously enhanced (83.9% vs. 41.9%) than the GIST lesions. The GS lesions were mainly of the mixed growth pattern both within and outside the gastric wall (74.2% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.05) compared with that of GISTs. No metastasis or invasion of adjacent organs was present in any of the GS lesions, however, 1.6% of GISTs experienced metastasis and 3.2% of GISTs presented with invasion of adjacent organs. Heterogeneous enhancement and mixed growth pattern were two significant (P < 0.05) independent factors for distinguishing GS from GIST lesions. In conclusion: GS and GIST lesions may have significantly different features for differentiation in lesion margin, heterogeneous enhancement, mixed growth pattern, and longest lesion diameter, especially heterogeneous enhancement and mixed growth pattern.


Assuntos
Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal , Neurilemoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/patologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Neurilemoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Neurilemoma/patologia
2.
Insights Imaging ; 14(1): 125, 2023 Jul 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37454355

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of a radiomics model based on dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) venous-phase iodine map (IM) and 120 kVp equivalent mixed images (MIX) in predicting the Lauren classification of gastric cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 240 patients undergoing preoperative DECT and postoperative pathologically confirmed gastric cancer was done. Training sets (n = 168) and testing sets (n = 72) were randomly assigned with a ratio of 7:3. Patients are divided into intestinal and non-intestinal groups. Traditional features were analyzed by two radiologists, using logistic regression to determine independent predictors for building clinical models. Using the Radiomics software, radiomics features were extracted from the IM and MIX images. ICC and Boruta algorithm were used for dimensionality reduction, and a random forest algorithm was applied to construct the radiomics model. ROC and DCA were used to evaluate the model performance. RESULTS: Gender and maximum tumor thickness were independent predictors of Lauren classification and were used to build a clinical model. Separately establish IM-radiomics (R-IM), mixed radiomics (R-MIX), and combined IM + MIX image radiomics (R-COMB) models. In the training set, each radiomics model performed better than the clinical model, and the R-COMB model showed the best prediction performance (AUC: 0.855). In the testing set also, the R-COMB model had better prediction performance than the clinical model (AUC: 0.802). CONCLUSION: The R-COMB radiomics model based on DECT-IM and 120 kVp equivalent MIX images can effectively be used for preoperative noninvasive prediction of the Lauren classification of gastric cancer. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The radiomics model based on dual-energy CT can be used for Lauren classification prediction of preoperative gastric cancer and help clinicians formulate individualized treatment plans and assess prognosis.

3.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 28(6): 532-539, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36550752

RESUMO

PURPOSE The stomach is the most common site of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). In this study, clinical model, radiomics models, and nomogram were constructed to compare and assess the clinical value of each model in predicting the preoperative risk stratification of gastric stromal tumors (GSTs). METHODS In total, 180 patients with GSTs confirmed postoperatively pathologically were included. 70% was randomly selected from each category as the training group (n = 126), and the remaining 30% was stratified as the testing group (n = 54). The image features and texture characteristics of each patient were analyzed, and predictive model were constructed. The image features and the rad-score of the optimal radiomics model were used to establish the nomogram. The clinical application value of these models was assessed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA). The calibration of each model was evaluated by the calibration curve. RESULTS The Area Under the Curve (AUC) value of the nomogram was 0.930 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.886- 0.973) in the training group and 0.931 (95% CI: 0.869-0.993) in the testing group. The AUC values of the training group and the testing group calculated by the radiomics model were 0.874 (95% CI: 0.814-0.935) and 0.863 (95% CI: 0.76 5-0.960), respectively; the AUC values calculated by the clinical model were 0.871 (95% CI: 0.811-0.931) and 0.854 (95% CI: 0.76 0-0.947). CONCLUSION The proposed nomogram can accurately predict the malignant potential of GSTs and can be used as repeatable imaging markers for decision support to predict the risk stratification of GSTs before surgery noninvasively and effectively.


Assuntos
Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal , Nomogramas , Humanos , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Estômago , Medição de Risco
5.
Front Oncol ; 11: 644165, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34055613

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To develop a radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to predict the lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and provide decision-making support for clinicians. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 334 patients with surgically resected and pathologically confirmed ESCC, including 96 patients with LVI and 238 patients without LVI. All enrolled patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a testing cohort at a ratio of 7:3, with the training cohort containing 234 patients (68 patients with LVI and 166 without LVI) and the testing cohort containing 100 patients (28 patients with LVI and 72 without LVI). All patients underwent preoperative CECT scans within 2 weeks before operation. Quantitative radiomics features were extracted from CECT images, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was applied to select radiomics features. Logistic regression (Logistic), support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree (Tree) methods were separately used to establish radiomics models to predict the LVI status in ESCC, and the best model was selected to calculate Radscore, which combined with two clinical CT predictors to build a combined model. The clinical model was also developed by using logistic regression. The receiver characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curve (DCA) analysis were used to evaluate the model performance in predicting the LVI status in ESCC. RESULTS: In the radiomics model, Sphericity and gray-level non-uniformity (GLNU) were the most significant radiomics features for predicting LVI. In the clinical model, the maximum tumor thickness based on CECT (cThick) in patients with LVI was significantly greater than that in patients without LVI (P<0.001). Patients with LVI had higher clinical N stage based on CECT (cN stage) than patients without LVI (P<0.001). The ROC analysis showed that both the radiomics model (AUC values were 0.847 and 0.826 in the training and testing cohort, respectively) and the combined model (0.876 and 0.867, respectively) performed better than the clinical model (0.775 and 0.798, respectively), with the combined model exhibiting the best performance. CONCLUSIONS: The combined model incorporating radiomics features and clinical CT predictors may potentially predict the LVI status in ESCC and provide support for clinical treatment decisions.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA