Analysing Factors Prolonging Hospital Stay After Excision of Choledochal Cyst-A Pathway Towards Enhanced Recovery After Surgery.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate factors affecting length of stay (LOS) after choledochal cyst resection in paediatric patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective study on patients operated between 2004 and 2021. Associations between clinical factors and LOS were evaluated by bivariate analysis, multiple regression, and equivalence test. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were included. Twenty-four underwent hepaticoduodenostomy as biliary reconstruction. Five suffered from major complications. The median (25th-75th percentile) operation time was 279 (182-378) min. Median LOS, time to enteral feeding, and time to abdominal drain removal were 8(6-10), 2(1-3), and 5(4-7) days, respectively. Seven factors were found significantly associated with a shorter LOS in bivariate analysis and were included in multiple regression. It revealed that early abdominal drain removal (p < 0.001), early enteral feeding (p = 0.042), and the absence of major complications (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter LOS. Equivalence test suggested that age and preoperative cholangitis had no practical effect on LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Early enteral feeding, early drain removal, and avoidance of major complications are associated with a shorter LOS.

The impact of pre-operative cholecystostomy on laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in paediatric patients.

PURPOSE: This aim of this study was to identify the pre-operative risk factors for conversion during laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in paediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective single-centre study was carried out. All paediatric patients (< 18 years) who had undergone laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst between 2004 and 2021 were reviewed. The outcome was conversion to open surgery and pre-operative factors that affected the conversion rate were analyzed. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included. Conversion was required in 24 cases (39.3%). There was no difference in the conversion rate between the first (before 2012, n = 30) and second (after 2012, n = 31) half of the series (36.7% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.674). Majority was type 1 cyst (86.8%) and the median cyst size was 4.6 cm (IQR: 2.2-6.4 cm). Antenatal diagnosis was available in 18 patients (29.5%). The median age at operation was 23.0 months (IQR: 8.0-72.0 months). Pre-operatively, 19 patients (31.1%) suffered from cholangitis and 5 (8.2%) of them required cholecystostomy. Comparing patients with successful laparoscopic surgery (L) and converted cases (C), there were no differences in the age at operation (p = 0.74), cyst size (p = 0.35), availability of antenatal diagnosis (p = 0.23) and cholangitic episodes (p = 0.40). However, a higher percentage of patients required cholecystostomy in the converted group (L vs. C = 2.7% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.05). Using logistic regression analysis, it was also a risk factor for conversion (OR = 3.5 [1.37-5.21], p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Pre-operative cholecystostomy is a potential risk factor for conversion during laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in children.

Virtual reality and augmented reality- emerging screening and diagnostic techniques in ophthalmology: A systematic review.

In health care, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) have been applied extensively for many purposes. Similar to other technologies such as telemedicine and artificial intelligence, VR and AR may improve clinical diagnosis and screening services in ophthalmology by alleviating current problems, including workforce shortage, diagnostic error, and underdiagnosis. In the past decade a number of studies and products have used VR and AR concepts to build clinical tests for ophthalmology, but comprehensive reviews on these studies are limited. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review on the use of VR and AR as a diagnostic and screening tool in ophthalmology. We identified 26 studies that implemented a variety of VR and AR tests on different conditions, including VR cover tests for binocular vision disorder, VR perimetry for glaucoma, and AR slit lamp biomicroscopy for retinal diseases. In general, while VR and AR tools can become standardized, automated, and cost-effective tests with good user experience, several weaknesses, including unsatisfactory accuracy, weak validation, and hardware limitations, have prevented these VR and AR tools from having wider clinical application. Also, a comparison between VR and AR is made to explain why studies have predominantly used VR rather than AR.