Effect of size and disease on estimated deposition of drugs administered using jet nebulization in children with cystic fibrosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To develop a model that quantified the nebulizer output that was inhaled by subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) in order to predict the amount of drug likely to enter the upper airway contained in particles small enough to be deposited in the lower respiratory tract of individual patients. DESIGN: Forty-three patients (age, 6 to 18 years) with CF, with FEV(1) of 26 to 124% of predicted, breathed through a nebulizer circuit with a pneumotachograph in place at the distal end. Algorithms were developed from the measured flows through the pneumotachograph, allowing partitioning of inspiration into undiluted aerosol and fresh gas. In order to validate the algorithms, argon was added to the nebulizing gas flow and then its concentration was analyzed at the mouth by mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Predictions of the concentration of argon at the mouth were concordant with that measured by mass spectrometry, thus validating the model. Combining data from the model with in vitro nebulizer performance data, predictions for estimates for lung deposition for individuals were possible. Total estimate was independent of patient size or FEV(1). The respiratory duty cycle was 0.44 +/- 0.05 (mean +/- SD) and correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.001) with estimated deposition and minute ventilation (r = 0.60, p < 0.01). However, when expressed in milligrams per kilogram of body weight, the estimated deposition in smaller children was fourfold higher than in larger children. CONCLUSIONS: If the effect of patient size and pattern of breathing on estimated drug deposition are not considered when prescribing drugs given by nebulization, the result may be overdosing younger children, underdosing older children, or both.

The choice of jet nebulizer, nebulizing flow, and addition of albuterol affects the output of tobramycin aerosols.

The use of inhaled antibiotics in the treatment of cystic fibrosis has become widespread despite controversy in the literature as to the appropriate dosing regimen and its effectiveness. This study compared two tobramycin (T) preparations (one with and one without the addition of albuterol) using two different jet nebulizers in order to determine if drug output would be affected. Using calibrated flows from a dry compressed gas source of 6 and 8 L/min as well as a specific compressor (Pulmo-Aide), the Hudson 1720 nebulizer was compared with the newer disposable Hudson 1730. The albuterol preparation used in this study was the Ventolin (albuterol) Respirator Solution (VRS). The nebulizers were charged with (1) 2 mL T (80 mg/2 mL) with 0.5 mL VRS (5 mg/mL) and normal saline solution to make the total nebulizer charge of 3 or 4 mL, or (2) 2 mL T and either 1 or 2 mL normal saline solution. A laser diffraction analyzer (Malvern 2600) was used to determine the aerosol particle size distribution. From the distribution, the respirable fraction, which is the fraction of aerosol that could enter and remain in the lungs, was calculated. For all solutions and each particular flow, the Hudson 1730 had a larger respirable fraction of T. The addition of VRS lowered the surface tension of the solution in the nebulizer and resulted in a greater output of T. This effect was most apparent for the 3-mL volume fills of the Hudson 1720. The greatest differences were between the 3-mL nebulizer charges of T using the Hudson 1720 driven by a flow of 6 L/min, which produced 8 mg of T in the respirable fraction, compared with 35 mg produced by the Hudson 1730 driven by a flow of 8 L/min. These results suggest that different nebulizers, different nebulizer solutions, and different techniques of nebulization may result in very different amounts of T aerosol output in the respirable fraction.

A comparison of pulmonary availability between Ventolin (albuterol) nebules and Ventolin (albuterol) Respirator Solution.

The two most common albuterol preparations used for nebulization are: (1) Ventolin (albuterol) respirator solution (Glaxo Canada Inc; Montreal, Canada) of which 2.5 mg (0.5 mL) is diluted with 2 mL of normal saline solution, and (2) the preservative-free, prediluted Ventolin (albuterol) Nebules PF (Glaxo) (2.5 mg/2.5 mL). The two preparations were compared using both a Hudson 1720 "T" up-draft Neb-U-Mist jet nebulizer and a Hudson 1730 "T" up-draft Neb-U-Mist II jet nebulizer (Hudson; Temecula, Calif), which were driven by a compressor (Pulmo-Aide; Devilbiss; Somerset, Pa) and by dry compressed air at 6 and 8 L/min. Particle size distribution was measured with a particle sizer (Malvern 2600; Malvern Instruments; Malvern, UK) and drug output for the nebulizer was calculated from the differences in predrug and postdrug volume and concentration. Drug availability was defined as the amount of drug carried in particles less than 5 microns in diameter. Drug availability was greater with the albuterol respiratory solution, due to the surface activity of the preservative benzalkonium chloride, for both nebulizers but particularly for the 1720. Differences in drug availability between nebulizers exceeded fourfold depending on the preparation, the nebulizer, and the nebulizing flow. These differences could not have been predicted from the manufacturer's specifications. The results suggest that prediction of drug availability must be based on measurements with the specific preparation and the specific nebulizer used.

A comparison of the availability of tobramycin for inhalation from vented vs unvented nebulizers.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare drug output from a vented nebulizer (Pari LC Jet Plus) with a traditional unvented nebulizer (Hudson 1730 T Up-Draft 11) using aerosolized tobramycin, which is frequently used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. DESIGN: Six nebulizers of each type were filled with a 4 mL tobramycin (80 mg) solution and were driven by a compressor (Pulmo-Aide). Various inspiratory flows (VI) (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 L/min for the Pari LC Jet Plus and 0, 5, and 10 L/min for the Hudson 1730, all at 40% relative humidity) were directed through each nebulizer. Drug output was measured from changes in weight and concentration (assessed by changes in osmometry) within the nebulizer. Particle size distributions were determined by laser diffraction allowing the calculation of the amount of aerosol output in the respirable range (<5 microm). The nebulizers were first run until end-nebulization to establish total drug output and then for either 4 or 5 min to determine the rate of drug output (mg/min) before intermittent aerosol output. RESULTS: The total drug output without VI for both the unvented and the vented nebulizers was not significantly different, 55 (51, 60) mg for the Hudson 1730 vs 51 (49, 53) mg for the Pari LC Jet Plus (mean [95% confidence limits]). Inspiratory flow had no effect on the unvented Hudson 1730 nebulizer but significantly increased the rate of total drug output and the rate of drug output in the respirable range for the vented Pari LC Jet Plus nebulizer (VI=0, 3.35 [2.84, 3.85] and 1.72 [1.48, 1.96] compared with VI=20, 9.87 [9.03, 10.70] and 6.11 [5.33, 6.88] mg/min). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that the increase in the rate of drug output with VI for the vented nebulizer would result in shorter nebulization times and a relative decrease in drug loss during the expiratory phase.

Do sinusoidal models of respiration accurately reflect the respiratory events of patients breathing on nebulizers?

The amount of drug that is delivered by nebulization is a combination of the physical properties of the agent being nebulized, the performance of the nebulizer, and the pattern of breathing of the patient. To avoid biological variation, mechanical models of breathing are frequently employed during the evaluation of the performance of a device. For simplicity, many investigators use sinusoidal models of breathing to calculate the expected inhaled mass, although some use square waves and other more complex models. Most assume that the duration of inspiration (Ti) is half of the total respiratory time (Ttot). This study compared the calculated inhaled mass from which the expected pulmonary deposition was estimated from the actual pattern of breathing of 43 children with cystic fibrosis (CF) breathing from an unvented nebulizer with a low dead volume and appropriate particle size distribution with that from a sinusoidal pattern of breathing using the same tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate. The respiratory duty cycle (Ti/Ttot) was 0.45 +/- 0.05, which meant that less time was spent during inspiration than that found in a pure sinusoidal pattern. The difference between the predicted deposition from the actual pattern of breathing and that calculated from the sinusoidal model was 12 +/- 7%, which correlated with the respiratory rate (r = 0.67, P < 0.001). The degree of lung disease did not influence the discrepancy between the two values. In general, the actual VTs and respiratory rates were less in the patients than those employed in mechanical models of pediatric breathing. Although some patients had respiratory patterns that could be represented accurately with a sinusoidal model, most did not, and there were wide variations from child to child. These results suggest that there are both systematic and random errors arising from the use of a sinusoidal waveform to mimic respiratory events in patients.

Accounting for radioactivity before and after nebulization of tobramycin to insure accuracy of quantification of lung deposition.

The ability to predict drug deposition of inhaled drugs used in cystic fibrosis (CF) is important if there is a need to target specific doses of drug to the lungs of individual patients. The gold standard of measuring pulmonary deposition is the quantification of an aerosolized radiolabel either mixed with the drug solution or tagged directly to the compound of interest. Accuracy of the quantification could be assured if there is agreement between the amount of radioactivity before and after administration. Before administration, the radiolabel is concentrated in the well of the nebulizer, whereas after administration, it is distributed throughout the nebulizer, the expiratory filter and connectors, and the upper airway, stomach, trachea, and lung. Not only is the geometry of the distribution that is presented to the gamma camera different, but there are different attenuation factors for the various body tissues. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the quantification of deposition. Secondary goals were to compare in vitro nebulizer performance with that measured in vivo during the deposition study. Eighty milligrams of tobramycin and technetium bound to human serum albumin was administered to 10 normal adults using a Pari LC Jet Plus (Pari Respiratory Equipment, Inc., Richmond, VA) breath-enhanced nebulizer. Techniques were developed that allowed for the accounting of 99 +/- 2% of the initial radioactivity. The fraction of the rate of lung deposition to total body deposition was the in vivo respirable fraction (0.62 +/- 0.07), which closely agreed with in vitro measurements of respirable fraction (0.62 +/- 0.04). Drug output measured from the change in weight and concentration in the nebulizer systematically overestimated drug output measured by the deposition study. The results indicate that 11.8 of the initial 80 mg would be deposited in the lungs. This technique could be adapted to accurately quantify the amount of deposition on any inhaled therapeutic agent, but caution must be used when extrapolating performance of a nebulizer on the bench to expected deposition in patients.

Exercise ability in survivors of severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

There is limited information concerning the exercise performance of long-term survivors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and much of what is available pertains to those with relatively mild disease. The present study was undertaken to describe exercise responses in patients with a history of severe BPD, defined as those patients with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of BPD who required supplemental oxygen at least until they were 44 wk postconceptual age and who were discharged home on oxygen. Fifteen children with a history of severe BPD were matched for gestational age with 15 children who had previously had respiratory distress syndrome but who did not develop BPD (Prem). These Prem control children were subsequently compared with 13 healthy control children born at term (Control) who were of similar postnatal age. Participants underwent pulmonary function testing, progressive exercise testing on a cycle ergometer, and a steady-state exercise test with cardiac output determined by CO2-rebreathing. Despite the patients with BPD having a lower FEV1 than those in the Prem group, who had lower values than the Control group (BPD, 64 +/- 21%; Prem, 85 +/- 11%; Control, 95 +/- 8%), the exercise capacity did not differ between the BPD and the Prem and between the Prem and the Control groups (BPD, 84 +/- 15%; Prem, 81 +/- 17%; Control, 91 +/- 12%). However, the BPD patients used a greater percentage of their ventilatory reserve (VEmax/40 FEV1: BPD, 93 +/- 20%; Prem, 67 +/- 12%; Control, 59 +/- 13%). Of the four patients with BPD who had significant oxygen desaturation with exercise, three had the lowest values for FEV1. Cardiac output was appropriate for oxygen consumption in most patients.

Long-term pulmonary sequelae of severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term pulmonary sequelae of survivors of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) of sufficient severity to have required supplemental oxygen for at least 1 month after term. STUDY DESIGN: Fifteen patients with a mean age of 1.1 years were matched to preterm infants of similar gestational age and age at time of study. Pulmonary function testing included spirometry, plethysmographic lung volumes, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity, and in 9 of 15 subjects with BPD, measurement of lung static elastic recoil pressures. RESULTS: The subjects with BPD had a mean expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 64% +/- 21% predicted (4 had an FEV1 < 50% predicted) compared with 85% +/- 11% (P < .01) for the preterm children in the control group. Subjects with BPD had a significant degree of gas trapping with a residual volume to total lung capacity ratio of 37% +/- 13% compared with 25% +/- 4% for the control group (P < .01). An inverse relationship was seen between the FEV1 and the time on supplemental oxygen (r = -0.84, P < .0001), with 3 of the 4 children whose FEV1 was < 50% requiring oxygen for more than 900 days. Those with the greatest degree of airflow limitation and gas trapping had the greatest abnormalities in both shape and position of the pressure volume curves of the lung. CONCLUSION: Severe BPD may result in moderate to severe long-term abnormalities in pulmonary function tests.