Survival with Cemiplimab in Recurrent Cervical Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent cervical cancer have a poor prognosis. Cemiplimab, the fully human programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody approved to treat lung and skin cancers, has been shown to have preliminary clinical activity in this population. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients who had disease progression after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy, regardless of their programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive cemiplimab (350 mg every 3 weeks) or the investigator's choice of single-agent chemotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival. Progression-free survival and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 608 women were enrolled (304 in each group). In the overall trial population, median overall survival was longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group (12.0 months vs. 8.5 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.84; two-sided P<0.001). The overall survival benefit was consistent in both histologic subgroups (squamous-cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma [including adenosquamous carcinoma]). Progression-free survival was also longer in the cemiplimab group than in the chemotherapy group in the overall population (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89; two-sided P<0.001). In the overall population, an objective response occurred in 16.4% (95% CI, 12.5 to 21.1) of the patients in the cemiplimab group, as compared with 6.3% (95% CI, 3.8 to 9.6) in the chemotherapy group. An objective response occurred in 18% (95% CI, 11 to 28) of the cemiplimab-treated patients with PD-L1 expression greater than or equal to 1% and in 11% (95% CI, 4 to 25) of those with PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. Overall, grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 45.0% of the patients who received cemiplimab and in 53.4% of those who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Survival was significantly longer with cemiplimab than with single-agent chemotherapy among patients with recurrent cervical cancer after first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; EMPOWER-Cervical 1/GOG-3016/ENGOT-cx9 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03257267.).

Rucaparib versus standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer and a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (ARIEL4): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Few prospective studies have compared poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to chemotherapy for the treatment of BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma. We aimed to assess rucaparib versus platinum-based and non-platinum-based chemotherapy in this setting. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study (ARIEL4), conducted in 64 hospitals and cancer centres across 12 countries (Brazil, Canada, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Poland, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, the UK, and the USA), we recruited patients aged 18 years and older with BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and who had received two or more previous chemotherapy regimens. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (2:1), using an interactive response technology and block randomisation (block size of six) and stratified by progression-free interval after the most recent platinum-containing therapy, to oral rucaparib (600 mg twice daily) or chemotherapy (administered per institutional guidelines). Patients assigned to the chemotherapy group with platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive disease were given paclitaxel (starting dose 60-80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15); those with fully platinum-sensitive disease received platinum-based chemotherapy (single-agent cisplatin or carboplatin, or platinum-doublet chemotherapy). Patients were treated in 21-day or 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, assessed in the efficacy population (all randomly assigned patients with deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations without reversion mutations), and then in the intention-to-treat population (all randomly assigned patients). Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of assigned study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02855944; enrolment is complete, and the study is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2017, and Sept 24, 2020, 930 patients were screened, of whom 349 eligible patients were randomly assigned to rucaparib (n=233) or chemotherapy (n=116). Median age was 58 years (IQR 52-64) and 332 (95%) patients were White. As of data cutoff (Sept 30, 2020), median follow-up was 25·0 months (IQR 13·8-32·5). In the efficacy population (220 patients in the rucaparib group; 105 in the chemotherapy group), median progression-free survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 7·3-9·1) in the rucaparib group versus 5·7 months (5·5-7·3) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·64 [95% CI 0·49-0·84]; p=0·0010). In the intention-to-treat population (233 in the rucaparib group; 116 in the chemotherapy group), median progression-free survival was 7·4 months (95% CI 6·7-7·9) in the rucaparib group versus 5·7 months (5·5-6·7) in the chemotherapy group (HR 0·67 [95% CI 0·52-0·86]; p=0·0017). Most treatment-emergent adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-emergent adverse event was anaemia or decreased haemoglobin (in 52 [22%] of 232 patients in the rucaparib group vs six [5%] of 113 in the chemotherapy group). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 62 (27%) patients in the rucaparib group versus 13 (12%) in the chemotherapy group; serious adverse events considered related to treatment by the investigator occurred in 32 (14%) patients in the rucaparib group and six (5%) in the chemotherapy group. Three deaths were considered to be potentially related to rucaparib (one due to cardiac disorder, one due to myelodysplastic syndrome, and one with an unconfirmed cause). INTERPRETATION: Results from the ARIEL4 study support rucaparib as an alternative treatment option to chemotherapy for patients with relapsed, BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated ovarian carcinoma. FUNDING: Clovis Oncology.

Prognostic significance of pretreatment VEGF, survivin, and Smac/DIABLO serum levels in patients with serous ovarian carcinoma.

The second mitochondria-derived activator of caspase (Smac/DIABLO), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and survivin are known to play a significant role in the growth and development of numerous tumors. Serum concentrations of VEGF, survivin, and Smac/DIABLO were analyzed in 92 patients with serous ovarian cancer and 94 healthy controls. Values were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes. The median pretreatment serum VEGF and survivin levels in patients with serous ovarian carcinoma were significantly higher, while Smac/DIABLO levels were significantly lower than that in healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the best cutoff point for VEGF was determined to be 345 pg/ml; with 83 % sensitivity and 65 % specificity. For survivin, the cutoff point was 110 pg/ml and for Smac/DIABLO was 75 pg/ml, with 82 and 62 % sensitivity and 43 and 87 % specificity, respectively. In the patients group, higher VEGF and survivin levels and lower Smac/DIABLO levels in sera were significantly associated with poorer overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Preoperative measurement of serum VEGF, survivin, and Smac/DIABLO may be of help in early detection of serous ovarian cancer and may provide important information about the patient's outcome and prognosis.

Pretreatment serum levels of bFGF and VEGF and its clinical significance in endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we examined the frequency of serum elevation as well as the prognostic significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) in endometrial cancer (EC) type I and a biologically aggressive variant of EC type II. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pretreatment serum levels of bFGF and VEGF were evaluated by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for cancer patient samples with type I EC (n=70) and type II EC (n=64) and compared to a cohort of normal individuals (n=64). Values were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics and outcome. RESULTS: Median pretreatment VEGF values were 470.4pg/ml (range, 164.3-598.4pg/ml) for type I EC, 608.8pg/ml (range, 354.2-783.6pg/ml) for type II of EC patients and 215.6pg/ml (range, 128.3-332.9pg/ml) for normal healthy subjects (p<0.001). Elevated serum VEGF concentration correlated significantly with advanced FIGO stage in type II EC (p=0.011). Median values of bFGF were 10.7pg/ml (range, 0.5-22.5pg/ml) for type I EC, 21.2 (range, 0.5-62.4pg/ml) for type II EC and 1.1 (range, 0-7.2pg/ml) in controls (p<0.0001). The pretreatment bFGF levels correlated with advancing tumor stages in types I and II EC (p <0.05). Multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard regression models revealed that high bFGF serum level correlated with shorter overall survival (OS) in type I EC (HR, 0.39, p<0.001) and in type II EC (HR, 0.47, p=0.01) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 0.53, p=0.03 and HR, 0.51, p=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: High preoperative bFGF levels predict a poor prognosis in patients with EC, and the prognostic value is independent of established prognostic parameters. These data suggest that bFGF might potentially serve as a marker in prognosis and offer a possibility to individualize treatment regimen.

Utility of HE4 to identify patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer who may require lymphadenectomy.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to establish whether preoperative serum levels of HE4 and CA125 could be a good predictor for lymphadenectomy in the early stage of endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Preoperative serum HE4 and CA125 were measured in 78 postmenopausal patients treated surgically. The ROC curves were generated to determine the optimal cutoff values of HE4 and CA125 levels with optimum sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: Based on ROC curve, we found that the HE4 value of 78pmol/l is the best cutoff to identify candidates who may require lymphadenectomy with the sensitivity of 86.6% and the specificity of 67.2% (NPV=88.4% and PPV=51.2%). The area under the curve (AUC) equals 0.814 (95% CI=0.721-0.886). The cutoff level of CA125 that shows the prognostic indices is 26U/ml, with the sensitivity of 66.6% and the specificity of 61.2% (NPV=69.4% and PPV=44.3%). For CA125 the AUC amounts to 0.671 (95% CI=0.568-0.764). We also found a statistically significant difference, comparing HE4 and CA125 AUC (0.814 vs. 0.671, respectively, p<0.001). The combination of HE4 and CA125 established in our study as the cutoff point has the sensitivity of 81.2% and the specificity of 65.9% with NPV=83.4% and PPV=47.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that in the early stage of endometrioid endometrial cancer, HE4 can serve as a preoperative tool that can help to identify postmenopausal women who may require lymphadenectomy.

Preoperative HE4, CA125 and ROMA in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant adnexal masses.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate HE4, CA125 and ROMA in the preoperative differentiation benign ovarian diseases from epithelial ovarian cancer depending on the menopausal status. METHODS: In order to estimate markers' concentrations in the serum of women with benign ovarian disease (n = 128) and with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (n = 96) the electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA) technique has been applied. RESULTS: Using the ROC analysis, although no statistical differences were found among their AUCs, the ROMA algorithm seems to be effective in gathering the diverse performance of HE4 and CA125. The AUC for HE4, CA125 and ROMA for all patients were: 0.895; 0.879 and 0.918, respectively. At established new optimal cutoff values for HE4, CA125 and ROMA we found higher specificity in postmenopausal compared to premenopausal women (96.9 vs 89.8 % and 97.7 vs 84.1 % and 95.9 vs 89.1 %, respectively). The sensitivity of HE4 in pre- and postmenopausal women was similar (83.5 vs 83.8 %), while for CA125 was the highest in premenopausal women (87.0 vs 84.1 %). For HE4, CA125 and ROMA the negative predictive value was high (97.6, 93.9 and 94.4 %, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The ROMA algorithm shows the best diagnostic performance to distinguish epithelial ovarian cancer from benign ovarian disease. We found the high specificity of HE4 and CA125 while differentiating ovarian benign diseases from epithelial ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women and the high sensitivity of CA125 in detecting epithelial ovarian cancer in premenopausal patients.

Serum levels of IL-6, IL-8 and CRP as prognostic factors in epithelial ovarian cancer.

In the present study, associations between pretreatment interleukin 6 (IL-6), interleukin 8 (IL-8) and C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) were analyzed using commercially available, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 118 patients and 64 control subjects. Values were correlated with clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes. Control variables included age, stage, grade, histological type and residual tumor size. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to study the associations between IL-6, IL-8 and CRP levels, control variables, overall survival and disease-free survival. The median IL-6, IL-8 and CRP serum levels in EOC were significantly higher than in the normal control group; 11.5 pg/mL (range, 3.4-62.6) versus 2.9 (1.1-12.3) pg/mL (p<0.001) and 21.8 pg/mL (range, 16.4-105.3) versus 9.3 (4.3-32.4) pg/mL (p<0.001) and 9.51 mg/L (range, 0.3-129.2) versus 1.2 (0.1-11.5) mg/L (p = 0.001), respectively. High levels of IL-6, IL-8 and CRP were associated with reduced overall survival (P = 0.003, P = 0.035, P = 0.046) and disease-free survival (P<0.001, P = 0.026, P = 0.043), respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that IL-6, IL-8 and CRP serum levels independently predicted disease-free survival (P = 0.011, P = 0.001 and P = 0.021), and overall survival (P = 0.004, P = 0.014 and P = 0.016), respectively. EOC is associated with extensive changes in the serum cytokine environment, highlighting the importance of further investigations of relative cytokine level changes. Preoperative serum IL-6, IL-8, and CRP levels seem promising for distinguishing EOC patients from healthy controls; however, their clinical value is still to be confirmed. High levels of IL-6, IL-8, and CRP in EOC patients have been suggested to be a poor prognostic factor for OS and DFS.