RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Household contacts of cholera patients have a 100 times higher risk of developing a cholera infection than the general population. To compare the genetic relatedness of clinical and water source Vibrio cholerae isolates from cholera patients' households across three outbreaks, we analyzed these isolates using whole-genome-sequencing (WGS) and multilocus variable-number tandem-repeat analysis (MLVA). RESULTS: The WGS analyses revealed that 80% of households had source water isolates that were more closely related to clinical isolates from the same household than to any other isolates. While in another 20% of households an isolate from a person was more closely related to clinical isolates from another household than to source water isolates from their own household. The mean pairwise differences in single nucleotide-variant (SNV) counts for isolates from the same household were significantly lower than those for different households (2.4 vs. 7.7 p < 0.0001), and isolates from the same outbreak had significantly fewer mean pairwise differences compared to isolates from different outbreaks (mean: 6.2 vs. 8.0, p < 0.0001). Based on MLVA in outbreak 1, we observed that the majority of households had clinical isolates with MLVA genotypes related to other clinical isolates and unrelated to water source isolates from the same household. While in outbreak 3, there were different MLVA genotypes between households, however within the majority of households, the clinical and water source isolates had the same MLVA genotypes. The beginning of outbreak 2 resembled outbreak 1 and the latter part resembled outbreak 3. We validated our use of MLVA by comparing it to WGS. Isolates with the identical MLVA genotype had significantly fewer mean pairwise SNV differences than those isolates with different MLVA genotypes (mean: 4.8 vs. 7.7, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, consistent with WGS results, the number of pairwise differences in the five MLVA loci for isolates within the same household was significantly lower than isolates from different households (mean: 1.6 vs. 3.0, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that transmission patterns for cholera are a combination of person-to-person and water-to-person cholera transmission with the proportions of the two modes varying within and between outbreaks.
Assuntos
Cólera/epidemiologia , Cólera/microbiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Vibrio cholerae/genética , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Cólera/transmissão , Genoma Bacteriano , Genótipo , Humanos , Análise de Sequência de DNA , Sequências de Repetição em Tandem , Vibrio cholerae/isolamento & purificação , Microbiologia da ÁguaRESUMO
The risk for cholera infection is >100 times higher for household contacts of cholera patients during the week after the index patient seeks hospital care than it is for the general population. To initiate a standard of care for this high-risk population, we developed Cholera-Hospital-Based-Intervention-for-7-Days (CHoBI7), which promotes hand washing with soap and treatment of water. To test CHoBI7, we conducted a randomized controlled trial among 219 intervention household contacts of 82 cholera patients and 220 control contacts of 83 cholera patients in Dhaka, Bangladesh, during 2013-2014. Intervention contacts had significantly fewer symptomatic Vibrio cholerae infections than did control contacts and 47% fewer overall V. cholerae infections. Intervention households had no stored drinking water with V. cholerae and 14 times higher odds of hand washing with soap at key events during structured observation on surveillance days 5, 6, or 7. CHoBI7 presents a promising approach for controlling cholera among highly susceptible household contacts of cholera patients.
Assuntos
Cólera/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Hospitais , Higiene , Purificação da Água , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Cólera/epidemiologia , Cólera/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Características da Família , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Vibrio cholerae/isolamento & purificação , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Household members of cholera patients are at a 100 times higher risk of cholera infections than the general population because of shared contaminated drinking water sources and secondary transmission through poor household hygiene practices. In this study, we investigated the bactericidal concentration of free chlorine required to inactivate Vibrio cholerae in household drinking water in Dhaka, Bangladesh. In laboratory experiments, we found that the concentrations of free chlorine required to inactivate 105 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of V. cholerae serogroups O1 and O139 were 0.1 mg/L and 0.2 mg/L, respectively. The concentration of free chlorine generated by a single chlorine tablet (sodium dichloroisocyanurate [33 mg]) after a 30-minute reaction time in a 10-L sealed vessel containing Dhaka city municipal supply water was 1.8 mg/L; and the concentration declined to 0.26 mg/L after 24 hours. In field measurements, water collected from 165 households enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a chlorine and handwashing with soap intervention (Cholera-Hospital-Based-Intervention-for-7-Days [CHoBI7]), we observed significantly higher free chlorine concentrations in the 82 intervention arm households (mean = 1.12 mg/L, standard deviation [SD] = 0.52, range = 0.07-2.6 mg/L) compared with the 83 control households (0.017 mg/L, SD = 0.01, range = 0-0.06 mg/L) (P < 0.001) during spot check visits. These findings suggest that point-of-use chlorine tablets present an effective approach to inactivate V. cholerae from drinking water in households of cholera patients in Dhaka city. This result is consistent with the findings from the RCT of CHoBI7 which found that this intervention led to a significant reduction in symptomatic cholera infections among household members of cholera patients and no stored drinking water samples with detectable V. cholerae.