Vector Analysis of 1-Year Astigmatic Outcomes From a Randomized Fellow Eye Comparison of Photorefractive Keratectomy Using 2 Excimer Laser Platforms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the astigmatic outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with a wavefront-guided (WFG) and a wavefront-optimized (WFO) excimer laser performed on two different platforms. METHODS: Setting: institutional. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 142 eyes of 71 patients with myopia of 12 diopters (D) or less and astigmatism of 3D or less were enrolled at the Byers Eye Institute at Stanford between April 2009 and March 2011. INTERVENTION: One eye of each patient underwent WFG-PRK with the VISX CustomVue Star S4 IR (Abbott Medical Optics, Abbott Park, IL) and the contralateral eye underwent WFO-PRK with the Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400-Hz laser platform (Alcon, Inc., Hüenberg, Switzerland). Alpins vector analysis of astigmatism was performed using manifest refraction measured preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively and vertexed to the corneal plane. Eyes were stratified for subgroup analysis based on preoperative manifest astigmatism. RESULTS: WFG-PRK and WFO-PRK were similar regarding surgically induced astigmatism, difference vector, magnitude of error, correction index, flattening index, and index of success. The angle of error was 60% less in the WFG group compared with the WFO group (4.9±1.1° vs. 11.8±2.4°, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: WFG-PRK with the VISX CustomVue Star S4 IR and WFO-PRK with the Alcon WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400-Hz excimer laser platform produce similar astigmatic results in myopic patients; however, the WFG mode may produce slightly more predictable astigmatic corrections.

Management of Complex Epithelial Ingrowth After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Using Fibrin Tissue Glue.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive fibrin tissue glue in the treatment of complex epithelial ingrowth after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 12 eyes in 12 patients treated for clinically significant epithelial ingrowth after LASIK with mechanical debridement of the ingrowth and placement of fibrin tissue glue. Primary outcome measurements including recurrence of ingrowth, visual acuity, and manifest refraction were evaluated at each postoperative examination. Changes in higher-order aberrometry were also evaluated. RESULTS: After epithelial ingrowth removal with adjunctive fibrin tissue glue, 11 eyes (91.7%) had no recurrence of ingrowth at the final follow-up examination. Uncorrected distance visual acuity changed from 20/20 or better in 3 eyes (25%) and 20/40 or better in 6 eyes (50%) preoperatively to 20/20 or better in 5 eyes (41.7%) and 20/40 or better in 10 eyes (83.3%) postoperatively. Nine eyes (75%) gained one or more lines of best-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). No eyes lost any lines of CDVA. There was no significant change in mean spherical equivalent (P=0.22) or mean cylinder (P=0.26) before and after surgery. Higher-order aberrations also remained stable with no significant change in root-mean-square error, coma, trefoil, and spherical aberration. There were no complications associated with the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive fibrin tissue glue seems to be a safe and effective treatment for epithelial ingrowth after LASIK. This therapy may be particularly useful in managing challenging cases of complex or recalcitrant ingrowth.

Comparison of femtosecond and excimer laser platforms available for corneal refractive surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The evolution of laser technology has left today's refractive surgeon with a choice between multiple laser platforms. The purpose of this review is to compare currently available femtosecond and excimer laser platforms, providing a summary of current evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Femtosecond lasers create LASIK flaps with better accuracy, uniformity, and predictability than mechanical microkeratomes. Newer higher-frequency femtosecond platforms elicit less inflammation, producing better visual outcomes. SMILE achieved similar safety, efficacy, and predictability as LASIK with greater preservation of corneal nerves and biomechanical strength. The emergence of wavefront technology has resulted in improved excimer laser treatments. Comparisons of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized treatments suggest that there is an advantage to using wavefront-guided platforms in terms of visual acuity and quality of vision. Topography-guided ablations are another well tolerated and effective option, especially in eyes with highly irregular corneas. SUMMARY: Advances in femtosecond and excimer laser technology have not only improved the safety and efficacy of refractive procedures, but have also led to the development of promising new treatment modalities, such as SMILE and the use of wavefront-guided and topography-guided ablation. Future studies and continued technological progress will help to better define the optimal use of these treatment platforms.

Day 1 wavefront aberrometry for prediction of refractive outcomes at year 1 in myopic LASIK.

PURPOSE: To determine amount of change in wavefront aberrometric measurements from 1 day to 1 year after myopic LASIK. METHODS: One hundred five eyes of 105 patients underwent wavefront-guided LASIK. Objective wavefront aberrometric refractions were recorded preoperatively, at postoperative day 1, and at postoperative year 1. Subjective manifest refractions were also collected at postoperative year 1. RESULTS: When comparing objective wavefront aberrometric refractions at postoperative year 1 to postoperative day 1, there was a mean 0.33 diopter spherical equivalent myopic shift. There was no significant difference in the number of eyes within 1.00 diopter of emmetropia spherical equivalent measured by wavefront aberrometric refraction at postoperative day 1 or year 1. There was a correlation of R(2) = 0.14 between degree of preoperative myopia and myopic shift. Higher-order aberrations were overall not increased at day 1 but increased significantly by year 1. Objective aberrometric refractions at postoperative day 1 can be useful in prediction of long-term refractive outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is a small myopic shift and an increase in higher-order aberrations when comparing wavefront aberrometry results at postoperative day 1 with those at postoperative 1 year.

Vector analysis of 1-year astigmatic outcomes from a prospective, randomized, fellow eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in myopes.

PURPOSE: To compare the astigmatic outcomes of LASIK with a single excimer laser platform using either wavefront-guided (WFG) or wavefront-optimized (WFO) modes. METHODS: Sixty-eight eyes of 34 patients underwent LASIK for myopia with the Wavelight Allegretto Eye-Q 400-Hz laser platform (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Hüenberg, Switzerland). One eye underwent WFG-LASIK and the contralateral eye underwent WFO-LASIK. Alpins vector analysis of astigmatism was performed using manifest refraction measured preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively and vertexed to the corneal plane. Eyes were stratified for subgroup analysis based on preoperative manifest astigmatism. RESULTS: WFG-LASIK and WFO-LASIK were similar with regard to surgically induced astigmatism, difference vector, magnitude of error, correction index, flattening index, and index of success. The angle of error was 80% less in the WFG group compared to the WFO group (1.92° ± 0.67º vs 9.66° ± 3.7º, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: WFG-LASIK and WFO-LASIK using the Alcon WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400-Hz excimer laser platform produce similar astigmatic results in myopic patients; however, the WFG mode may produce slightly more predictable astigmatic corrections.

Corneal sensation and dry eye symptoms after conventional versus inverted side-cut femtosecond LASIK: a prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: To compare corneal sensation and self-reported dry eye symptoms after femtosecond-assisted LASIK with conventional versus inverted side cuts. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 120 eyes in 60 participants with myopia. METHODS: Fellow eyes were randomized to receive femtosecond-assisted LASIK with a conventional 70-degree side cut made with the 60 kHz IntraLase FS (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA) or an inverted 130-degree side cut made with the 150 kHz IntraLase iFS (Abbott Medical Optics). Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometry (Luneau Ophthalmologia, Chartes, France) measured corneal sensation (60 mm = normal sensation; <60 mm = depressed sensation) preoperatively and at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12. Participants also completed serial dry eye surveys using the same subscales (frequency, severity, bothersome) as the validated, Rasch-tested, linear-scaled Quality of Vision questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective corneal sensation and self-reported light sensitivity, dryness, foreign body sensation, and pain/discomfort. RESULTS: Preoperative corneal sensation as measured by mean Cochet-Bonnet aethesiometry was equal between the inverted and conventional side cut groups but was better in eyes with an inverted side cut compared with a conventional side cut at all postoperative months (inverted vs. conventional: 1 month, 14.5 vs. 13.2 mm; 3 months, 24.9 vs. 18.4 mm; 6 months, 51.2 vs. 42.6 mm; 12 months, 59.8 vs. 58.3 mm; all P ≤ 0.02). None of the subjective dry eye parameters demonstrated statistically significant differences between the groups at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: The LASIK flaps with an inverted side cut are associated with superior recovery of corneal sensation compared with flaps with a conventional side cut during the first postoperative year; however, this may not translate to significant improvements in subjective dry eye symptoms.

A comparison of LASIK flap thickness and morphology between the Intralase 60- and 150-kHz femtosecond lasers.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the achieved thickness and consistency of LASIK flaps created with a 60- and 150-kHz femtosecond laser. METHODS: One hundred twenty eyes of 60 patients with myopia were treated with LASIK. One eye had flap created by the Intralase FS 60-kHz femtosecond laser (Abbott Medical Optics, Abbott Park, IL) and the fellow eye was treated with the IntraLase iFS 150-kHz femtosecond laser (Abbott Medical Optics). Eyes were randomized according to ocular dominance. Flap morphology and measurements were taken with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) at the 1-month postoperative visit. RESULTS: AS-OCT showed similar regular planar morphologies in both groups. The mean thickness of the flaps in the FS 60 group was significantly higher than that of the iFS 150 group (105.4 ± 3.9 µm vs 103.9 ± 4.8 µm, P = .009). The mean deviation from targeted flap thickness was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Intralase iFS 150-kHz femtosecond laser creates flaps of similar thickness and uniformity to the Intralase FS 60-kHz femtosecond laser.

Prospective randomized contralateral eye evaluation of subjective quality of vision after wavefront-guided or wavefront- optimized photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect of wavefront-guided (WFG) and wavefront-optimized (WFO) photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on patient perceived quality of vision. METHODS: Seventy-one patients (142 eyes) were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, fellow eye controlled study. One eye was randomized to undergo WFG PRK treatment by the AMO Visx CustomVue S4 IR excimer laser system (Abbott Medical Optics, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) and the fellow eye received WFO PRK treatment by the Alcon Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer laser system (Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX). Patients answered questionnaires on their visual symptoms and quality of vision preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS: Patients in both groups reported better vision compared to baseline from 3 months onward (mean change in score of 1.56 to 2.51 in the WFO group and 1.54 to 2.28 in the WFG group, P ⩽ .003). Both groups experienced less nighttime glare from 6 months onward (P ⩽ .030). Halos, double vision, and visual clarity were initially worse (P ⩽ .025) but not significantly different after 1 month. Haze and fluctuating vision resolved after 3 months. Visual symptoms were similar between the two groups at all times (P ⩾ .059) except at 6 months, when patients felt their WFG eyes had more excellent vision (P = .029). A composite of all symptoms was also similar between the groups until 12 months when patients had fewer symptoms in their WFO eye (P = .044). CONCLUSIONS: One year after surgery, patient self-reported visual symptoms were not significantly different in eyes receiving WFG or WFO PRK. However, the average of all symptoms was lower in eyes receiving wavefront-optimized treatment.

Refractive Surgery Patient Characteristics Associated With Satisfaction Scores.

PURPOSE: To determine factors influencing patient satisfaction scores in recipients of refractive surgery. METHODS: In this prospective survey-based study, patients who had refractive surgery at an outpatient refractive clinic completed a survey of selected questions from the Press Ganey survey and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25. Correlation between patient-specific variables and survey questions were assessed using Student's t-tests. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were recruited over a 3-year period. Most were male (55%) and middle aged (mean age: 34 years). Eleven percent underwent photorefractive keratectomy surgery and the rest had laser in situ keratomileusis, with no complications. Twenty-four percent of surveyed patients reported mild to moderate eye pain postoperatively, with the rest reporting no pain. All patients reported a full score for overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: This study found persistent high patient satisfaction score across a variation of characteristics, suggesting that optimal scores are mainstay after refractive surgery procedures with excellent visual outcomes, independent of patient clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(8):e539-e543.].

A comprehensive review on corneal crosslinking.

Corneal crosslinking (CXL) represents a paradigm shift in the management of corneal ectatic disorders. Before CXL was introduced, patients would need specialty contact lenses and possible corneal transplantation. CXL involves a biochemical reaction in which ultraviolet A light is used in conjunction with Riboflavin to form crosslinks in between corneal stromal collagen. This leads to strengthening and stabilizing of the collagen lamellae, resulting in mechanical stiffening of the cornea. Multiple protocols have been proposed including epithelium on versus off and varying light intensity and duration of treatment. All protocols appear to be safe and effective with few reported complications including infection, stromal haze, scarring, and endothelial toxicity. Overall, CXL has demonstrated to halt the progression of the disease clinically and in keratometry readings and improve the quality of life for patients. It is a minimally invasive, cost-effective procedure that can be performed in an outpatient setting with a fast recovery time and long-lasting results.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Higher Order Aberrations Following Topography-Guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To examine patient-reported outcomes and higher order aberrations following topography-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: This was a prospective, nonrandomized observational study at a single academic center. Sixty eyes from 30 patients underwent bilateral topography-guided femtosecond LASIK for correction of myopia using the VisuMax 500 femtosecond laser (Zeiss; Oberkochen, Germany) and Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400 Hz Excimer Laser (Alcon/Wavelight; Erlangen, Germany) with the Contoura topography system (Alcon; Geneva, Switzerland) for topography-modified refraction. The main outcomes of this study were higher order aberrations (HOAs) and results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes with LASIK questionnaire. RESULTS: There was a small, significant increase in HOA root mean square, spherical aberration, and coma at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following topography-guided LASIK (all P < 0.05), but no change in trefoil. In addition, self-reported worry related to vision (P < 0.001) and ability to perform activities (P < 0.001) significantly improved after surgery. The prevalence of double images, glare, halos, or starbursts decreased from 73% preoperatively to 56%, and no participants reported "very" or "extremely" bothersome visual symptoms after 12 months. Dry eye symptoms per Ocular Surface Disease Index score decreased significantly at 6 (P = 0.01) and 12 (P = 0.002) months after surgery. There was a 100% satisfaction rate with visual outcomes and duration of time to improvement in vision following the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was an increase in HOAs following topography-guided LASIK, there were significant improvements in the presence of double images, glare, halos, and starbursts and vision-related quality-of-life metrics. Overall satisfaction rates in this study were high.

12-Month Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Topography-guided Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To report 12-month visual and refractive outcomes following topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia and compound myopic astigmatism correction. METHODS: This prospective, single-center observational study was conducted in an outpatient clinical practice at the Stanford University Byers Eye Institute in Palo Alto, California. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, 5% and 25% contrast sensitivity CDVA, and manifest refraction following topography-guided femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK were assessed. Refractive measurements were used to perform a vector analysis. RESULTS: Sixty eyes of 30 patients (mean age: 32.8 ± 7.0 years; range: 23 to 52 years) undergoing topography-guided LASIK for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism were analyzed. Mean postoperative UDVA was -0.09 ± 0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) at 12 months. Mean preoperative CDVA was -0.09 ± 0.09 and -0.13 ± 0.08 logMAR at postoperative 12 months. At 12 months, 26.9% of eyes had gained one or more lines of postoperative UDVA compared to baseline CDVA. Mean pre-operative 5% contrast sensitivity CDVA was 0.68 ± 0.07 and 0.64 ± 0.12 logMAR at 12 months (P = .014) following LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: Topography-guided LASIK for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction provided excellent visual and refractive outcomes that were predictable, precise, and stable up to 12 months postoperatively. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(9):e595-e603.].

One-year outcomes from a prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in myopes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare wavefront (WF)-guided and WF-optimized LASIK in myopes. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, eye-to-eye study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 72 eyes of 36 participants with myopia with or without astigmatism. METHODS: Participants were randomized to receive WF-guided or WF-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400-Hz excimer laser platform (Alcon, Inc., Hüenberg, Switzerland). LASIK flaps were created using the 150-kHz IntraLase iFS (Abbott Medical Optics, Santa Ana, CA). Evaluations included measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), <5% and <25% contrast sensitivity, and WF aberrometry. Patients also completed a validated questionnaire detailing symptoms on a quantitative scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety, efficacy, predictability, refractive error, UDVA, CDVA, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations (HOAs). RESULTS: The frequency with which the WF-guided and WF-optimized groups achieved postoperative UDVA of ≥ 20/16 or ≥ 20/20 and the frequency with which the groups lost 1 or 2 or more lines or maintained their preoperative CDVA were not statistically different from each other (all P > 0.05). The frequency with which the WF-guided group attained a refractive error within ± 0.25 diopters of emmetropia was higher than in the WF-optimized group (67.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 50.4-84.8 vs. 41.2%, 95% CI, 23.2-59.2; P = 0.03). The WF-guided group's mean UDVA was better than the WF-optimized group's UDVA by approximately 1 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study line (-0.17 ± 0.11 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], slightly <20/12 Snellen vs. -0.13 ± 0.12, slightly >20/16; P = 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in contrast sensitivity, astigmatism, coma, or higher-order root mean square error between the groups (all P > 0.05), but the WF-guided group had less trefoil compared with the WF-optimized group (0.14 ± 0.07 vs. 0.20 ± 0.09; P < 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in subjective parameters between the groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Wavefront-guided and WF-optimized LASIK using the Alcon WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400-Hz excimer laser platform provide similar results in myopic patients; however, the WF-guided approach may yield small gains in visual acuity, predictability, and HOAs.

Pupil size and LASIK: a review.

PURPOSE: To provide a literature review on the evidence both for and against pupil size as an independent predictor of adverse visual outcomes after LASIK. METHODS: Peer-reviewed publications on the effect of pupil size on LASIK outcomes since 2002 are reviewed. Particular attention was paid to the following attributes of each publication: type of study, number of patients or eyes, mean age, mean level of myopia, mean pupil size, testing conditions, ablation zone diameter, presence or absence of blend zones, and mean follow-up period. RESULTS: Among the 19 studies examined, none correlates a persistent relationship between pupil size and night vision complaints (NVCs) beyond 3 months when LASIK was performed with a 6.0-mm optical zone or larger ablation. The studies that did explicitly determine a correlation either included some or all patients with ablation zones smaller than 6.0 mm or did not specify ablation diameter at all. Among the studies that had drawn more mixed conclusions, the studies either covered short follow-up intervals (1 to 3 months) or showed a progressive improvement in NVCs over time in a relatively small patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS: As keratorefractive technology continues to evolve, the role of pupil size warrants further investigation; however, based on the literature reviewed herein, modern LASIK has negated the role of the low light pupil in predicting adverse visual outcomes after LASIK outside of the early postoperative period.

Comparison of Subjective Visual Experiences and Ocular Symptoms After Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized LASIK in a Prospective Fellow Eye Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the subjective visual experience and ocular symptoms of fellow eyes treated with wavefront-optimized laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (WFO-LASIK) and wavefront-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (WFG-LASIK). DESIGN: Prospective randomized fellow eye, controlled study. METHODS: A total of 200 eyes of 100 subjects from a single academic center were enrolled and randomly assigned to treatment with WFO-LASIK in one eye and WFG-LASIK in the fellow eye. Subjects filled out a validated 14-part questionnaire for each eye at the preoperative visit and at postoperative months 1, 3, 6, and 12. RESULTS: In comparing the number of subjects who reported symptoms in the WFG- vs WFO- LASIK eyes, there was no difference in the number reporting any visual experience (glare, halos, starbursts, hazy vision, blurred vision, distortion, double or multiple images, fluctuations in vision, focusing difficulties, and depth perception; all P > .05) or ocular symptoms (photosensitivity, dry eye, foreign body sensation, ocular pain; all P > .05). There was no preference for WFG-LASIK-treated (28%) or the WFO-LASIK-treated eye (29%), with the majority of subjects reporting no preference (43%; χ2P = .972). Of the subjects who preferred one eye or the other, the preferred eye saw statistically better than the fellow eye (0.8 ± 1.4 Snellen line, P = .0002). There was no other difference in subjective visual experience, ocular symptoms, or refractive characteristics when taking into account eye preference. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of subjects had no eye preference. For subjects who did have eye preference, the only detectable difference was better visual acuity in the preferred eye.

Patient-reported quality of vision in a prospective randomized contralateral-eye trial comparing LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported quality of vision and visual symptoms in participants undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). SETTING: Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. DESIGN: Prospective randomized contralateral-eye clinical trial. METHODS: Patients with myopia were randomized to receive wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK in one eye and SMILE in the fellow eye. Participants reported the presence and severity of adverse visual symptoms through the Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis questionnaire and reported which eye had better vision at the preoperative and the postoperative 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month visits. RESULTS: 80 eyes of 40 participants were treated. There was no difference in the presence or severity of double vision, glare, halos, or starbursts between eyes that underwent LASIK or SMILE at each visit ( P ≥ .85 for each comparison). Scaled scores for the presence of visual symptoms improved from the preoperative visit to the postoperative month 12 visit for double vision (88 vs 97, P = .03), glare (77 vs 92, P = .02), halos (68 vs 87, P < .01), and starbursts (60 vs 86, P < .01). At the postoperative month 12 visit, 17 (46%) of 37 participants preferred the vision from the eye that underwent LASIK compared with 7 (19%) of 37 who underwent SMILE. The preferred eye was correlated with uncorrected distance visual acuity ( r = 0.52, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of visual symptoms were similar for LASIK and SMILE, and visual symptoms improved with time. More patients preferred vision from the eye that underwent LASIK compared with SMILE.

Patient-Reported Outcomes With Wavefront-Guided Laser in Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL) Study Outcomes From a Single Institution.

PURPOSE: To determine patient-reported outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using wavefront-guided technology at a single institution. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 62 participants underwent examination and questionnaire at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The questionnaire included questions from validated questionnaires and new items to assess patient satisfaction with current vision and LASIK surgery, and existence/degree of visual symptoms. RESULTS: At month 1, patients reported an improvement in far vision (P = .01), activity limitations (P ≤ .001), and less worry about vision (P ≤ .001), as well as new visual symptoms, including halos (P ≤ .001) and double images (P = .03). At month 3, patients still noted an improvement in near vision (P = .05), far vision (P ≤ .001), activity limitation (P ≤ .001), and worry (P ≤ .001) along with halos (P = .05), double images (P = .01), and dry eye (P = .01). A total of 3.3% of patients at month 1 and 0% at month 3 had difficulty performing any activity due to symptoms, and 34.6% and 25.0% of patients reported decreased quality of life at months 1 and 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: After LASIK, patients experience new visual symptoms. Patients have high rates of satisfaction overall but with some patients reporting a decrease in quality of life 1 month after surgery; quality of life improves by postoperative month 3, with 25% patients reporting a decrease in visual well-being after surgery. [J Refract Surg. 2023;39(3):198-204.].

Prospective, randomized comparison of self-reported postoperative dry eye and visual fluctuation in LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy.

PURPOSE: We sought to prospectively compare postoperative symptoms of dry eye, visual fluctuations, and foreign body sensation in patients undergoing LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-eight eyes of 34 patients were treated with wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK. METHODS: One eye was treated with LASIK and the fellow eye was treated with PRK. Eyes were randomized by ocular dominance. Patients completed a questionnaire preoperatively and at each postoperative visit evaluating symptoms of dry eye, dry eye severity, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in self-reported dry eye with secondary outcome measure of visual fluctuations and foreign body sensation scores after LASIK and PRK. RESULTS: Both groups of eyes experienced significant increases in symptoms of dry eye, vision fluctuation, and foreign body sensation after LASIK and PRK at postoperative months 1, 3, and 6. However, by the 12-month postoperative visit, there was no increase in dry eye symptoms over the preoperative baseline levels in either group. Patients undergoing PRK experienced significantly higher levels of vision fluctuation at postoperative month 1 than those undergoing LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: Both LASIK and PRK caused an increase in dry eye symptoms and severity, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation over baseline in the early postoperative period. At postoperative month 1, PRK caused greater vision fluctuations than LASIK. By 1 year postoperatively, all symptoms of dry eye, vision fluctuations, and foreign body sensation returned to their baseline, preoperative levels.

Prospective, Randomized Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Refractive Surgeries.

PURPOSE: Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) are keratorefractive surgeries that can improve uncorrected visual acuity in myopic patients. Comparison of visual outcomes in myopic patients treated with LASIK and SMILE is needed. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized contralateral eye-controlled trial. METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective, randomized contralateral eye comparison of WFG-LASIK and SMILE (NCT03067077). Myopic patients with low levels of astigmatism were treated with WFG-LASIK in one eye and SMILE in the fellow eye from March 2017 to March 2021. Treatments were randomized by ocular dominance. WFG-LASIK and SMILE were performed. Postoperative evaluation at 1 day consisted of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), wavefront aberrometry, and a slit-lamp examination. On subsequent postoperative visits at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, UDVA, manifest refraction, 5% and 25% low-contrast visual acuity, wavefront aberrometry, and slit-lamp examination were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was UDVA at 12 months. RESULTS: Eighty-eight eyes of 44 patients with myopia were enrolled in the study. Seventy-four eyes of 37 patients had successful treatments and completed 12 months of follow-up. At postoperative month 12, there were a significantly higher proportion of WFG-LASIK eyes that had ≥20/20 UDVA compared with SMILE eyes (94% vs 83%, P < .05). There was no difference between spherical equivalent between WFG-LASIK eyes and SMILE eyes (-0.17 ± 0.25 vs -0.29 ± 0.38, P > .05); there was no difference in higher order aberrations, including coma, trefoil, and spherical aberrations (P > 0.05); and there were a significantly higher proportion of WFG-LASIK eyes that had improved 5% and 25% low-contrast visual acuity compared with SMILE eyes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: WFG-LASIK and SMILE both offered marked improvements in corrected distance visual acuity and excellent predictability in both eyes. Compared with SMILE, WFG-LASIK resulted in faster visual recovery, better low-contrast visual acuity, and greater gains in uncorrected visual acuity.

Effect of corneal epithelial remodeling on visual outcomes of topography-guided femtosecond LASIK.

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of epithelial remodeling on visual outcomes over a 9 mm diameter corneal surface after topography-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia correction using spectral-domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). SETTING: Outpatient clinical practice at the Stanford University Byers Eye Institute in Palo Alto, California. DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized observational study. METHODS: Visual acuity, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), 5% and 25% contrast sensitivity CDVA, manifest refraction, and corneal epithelial thickness after topography-guided femtosecond LASIK were analyzed. Corneal epithelial thickness was mapped across 13 sections and 3 concentric zones using AS-OCT preoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: 60 eyes of 30 patients with a mean age of 32.8 years (range 23 to 52 ± 7.03 years) undergoing myopic LASIK correction were assessed. In eyes with complete follow-up data (n = 30), mean preoperative UDVA was logMAR 1.48 ± 0.45 and logMAR -0.11 ± 0.08 at postoperative 12 months. Mean preoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.08 ± 0.11 and logMAR -0.13 ± 0.07 at 12 months. Linear mixed modeling demonstrated a significant correlation between improvement in UDVA and decreased superior and nasal corneal epithelial thickness and between improvement in CDVA and increased central epithelial thickness 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in UDVA and CDVA at 12 months after topography-guided femtosecond LASIK was correlated with nonuniform epithelial remodeling, including epithelial thickening in the central zone and thinning in the superior and nasal sections as measured by AS-OCT.