Demographic, belief, and situational factors influencing the decision to utilize emergency medical services among chest pain patients. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) study.

BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence suggests that people value emergency medical services (EMS) but that they may not use the service when experiencing chest pain. This study evaluates this phenomenon and the factors associated with the failure to use EMS during a potential cardiac event. METHODS AND RESULTS: Baseline data were gathered from a randomized, controlled community trial (REACT) that was conducted in 20 US communities. A random-digit-dial survey documented bystander intentions to use EMS for cardiac symptoms in each community. An emergency department surveillance system documented the mode of transport among chest pain patients in each community and collected ancillary data, including situational factors surrounding the chest pain event. Logistic regression identified factors associated with failure to use EMS. A total of 962 community members responded to the phone survey, and data were collected on 875 chest pain emergency department arrivals. The mean proportion of community members intending to use EMS during a witnessed cardiac event was 89%; the mean proportion of patients observed using the service was 23%, with significant geographic differences (range, 10% to 48% use). After controlling for covariates, non-EMS users were more likely to try antacids/aspirin and call a doctor and were less likely to subscribe to (or participate in) an EMS prepayment plan. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that indecision, self-treatment, physician contact, and financial concerns may undermine a chest pain patient's intention to use EMS.

Bucket-related drownings in the United States, 1984 through 1990.

The purpose of the study is to document the incidence of bucket-related drowning in the United States and to identify factors associated with this type of submersion injury. Analysis of Consumer Product Safety Commission data revealed 160 bucket-related drownings for the years 1984 through 1989, representing a mortality rate of 0.367 per 100,000 persons (younger than 2 years old) per year in the United States. Eighty-eight percent of bucket drownings occurred in toddlers aged 7 to 15 months old. Black children were six times more likely to drown in a bucket than white children of similar age (P less than .0001). Male toddlers were at significantly greater risk than females (P less than .01). A seasonal trend present in the data indicated that infants are more likely to drown in warmer than in colder months (P less than .01). States with the highest rates of bucket drowning were Vermont (2.1/100,000), Arizona (1.5/100,000), and Illinois (1.0/100,000). Through passive and active educational strategies, perhaps this fatal home injury can be prevented.

Influence of trauma system implementation on process of care delivered to seriously injured patients in rural trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: Statewide trauma systems are implemented by health care policy makers whose intent is to improve the process of care delivered to seriously injured patients. In Oregon, Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) training was mandated for all physicians employed in the emergency department of trauma centers. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that mandatory ATLS training favorably influenced processes of care. METHODS: Seriously injured patients treated at 9 rural Level 3 and Level 4 hospitals were studied before (PRE) and after (POST) implementation of Oregon's trauma system. The processes of care evaluated on the basis of chart review were 20 diagnostic and therapeutic interventions advocated in the ATLS course. A cumulative process score (CPS) between 0 and 1 was assigned on the basis of the processes of care delivered. A CPS of 1 indicated optimal process of care. RESULTS: Mean CPS for 506 PRE period patients (0.44 +/- 0.27) was significantly lower than the mean CPS for 512 POST period patients (0.57 +/- 0.27) with an unpaired t test (P <.001). For the subgroup with injury severity score of 16 to 34, the mean CPS of survivors (0.67 +/- 0.19) was significantly higher than the mean CPS of decedents (0.57 +/- 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: Process of care for seriously injured patients improved after categorization of rural trauma centers in Oregon. Evidence shows improved process of care may have benefitted patients with serious but survivable injuries. Measurement of process of care is an alternative to mortality analysis as an indication of the quality of care.

Statewide variation in the treatment of patients hospitalized with spleen injury.

HYPOTHESIS: Surgeons' treatment decisions for patients with spleen injuries in Washington State from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1994, were different in rural compared with urban communities. DESIGN AND SETTINGS: Retrospective cohort analyses using the Death and Illness History Database for the state of Washington, which provides a cross-linked record of an individual's sequential hospitalizations. Counties were defined as metropolitan, urban, or rural on the basis of population density. PATIENTS: A total of 1905 patients (1927 hospitalizations) with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, discharge diagnosis code of 865. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician management decisions (perform a celiotomy or repair the spleen) were stratified by geographic region. RESULTS: Throughout the state, there was substantial variability in the treatment of spleen-injured patients. Factors associated with higher odds of splenectomy included older age, overall severity of injury, treatment in rural hospitals, and treatment in the earlier years of study. While the frequency of splenic salvage increased over time, hospital length of stay, rehospitalization, and 30-day mortality did not increase. CONCLUSIONS: Injury to the spleen is a common problem for which management decisions vary by geographic region, indicating that a single management protocol does not universally apply. To evaluate appropriateness of care by process measures, such as splenic injury management, will require that decision makers grant some latitude in management variability based on factors such as practice setting.

Specifications for calculation of risk-adjusted odds of death using trauma registry data.

BACKGROUND: Logistic regression models, with coefficients developed from normative populations, can be applied to a trauma registry cohort to predict the risk-adjusted frequency of death. Quality of care is judged based on differences between predicted and observed mortality frequency. The goal of these analyses was to determine if decedents who died in the emergency department had independent variables associated with risk of death identical to those who died after hospital admission. METHODS: This case-control study is based upon decedents in a trauma registry matched to survivors. Backward stepwise linear logistic regression models contained independent variables selected to reflect patients' status before treatment. RESULTS: Beta coefficients and independent variables selected for models of expired emergency department patients were different from those of hospital death patients. CONCLUSIONS: To achieve a more precise determination of risk-adjusted mortality for injured patients at a trauma center, two separate analyses are appropriate: death in emergency department and death after hospital admission.

Assessing rater performance without a "gold standard" using consensus theory.

This study illustrates the use of consensus theory to assess the diagnostic performances of raters and to estimate case diagnoses in the absence of a criterion or "gold" standard. A description is provided of how consensus theory "pools" information provided by raters, estimating rater competencies and differentially weighting their responses. Although the model assumes that raters respond without bias (i.e., sensitivity = specificity), a Monte Carlo simulation with 1,200 data sets shows that model estimates appear to be robust even with bias. The model is illustrated on a set of elbow radiographs, and consensus-model estimates are compared with those obtained from follow-up data. Results indicate that with high rater competencies, the model retrieves accurate estimates of competency and case diagnoses even when raters' responses are biased.

A randomized controlled trial to assess decay in acquired knowledge among paramedics completing a pediatric resuscitation course.

BACKGROUND: Critical pediatric illness or injury occurs infrequently in out-of-hospital settings, making it difficult for paramedics to maintain physical assessment, treatment, and procedure skills. OBJECTIVES: To document the ability of paramedics to retain clinical knowledge over a one-year interval after completing a pediatric resuscitation course and to determine whether clinical experience or retesting improves retention. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled study assessing retention of knowledge in pediatric resuscitation soon after, six months after, and 12 months following completion of a pediatric advanced life support course. Forty-three paramedics participated in pre- and post-pediatric resuscitation course testing and were randomly assigned to one of four groups. Group 1 received a knowledge examination (KE) and mock resuscitation scenarios (MR) at six months. Group 2 received only the KE at six months. Group 3 received the MR only at six months. Group 4 received no intermediate testing. All groups were reassessed at 12 months. RESULTS: Pediatric clinical knowledge (as measured by KE) rose sharply immediately after the course but returned to baseline levels within six months. There was no difference between the groups in knowledge scores at 12 months, despite the interventions at six months. CONCLUSIONS: Although intensive out-of-hospital pediatric education enhances knowledge, that knowledge rapidly decays. Emergency medical services programs need to find novel ways to increase retention and ensure paramedic readiness.

Evaluation of protocols allowing emergency medical technicians to determine need for treatment and transport.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether emergency medical technicians (EMTs) can safely apply protocols to assign transport options and to assess agreement between groups of providers on application of the protocols. METHODS: Developed protocols categorized patients as: 1) needs ambulance; 2) go to the emergency department (ED) by alternative means; 3) contact primary care provider (PCP); or 4) treat and release. After education on the application of the protocols, first responders and ambulance EMTs categorized patients at the scene prior to transport but did not change current practice. Ambulance reports were reviewed using a predetermined list of critical events that signified the need for an ambulance. RESULTS: The EMTs categorized 1,300 study patients as follows: 1,023 (79%) needed ambulance transport, 200 (15%) could go to the ED by alternative means, 63 (5%) could contact a PCP, 14 (1%) could be treated and released. Categorizations by a first responder and the transporting EMT were compared for 209 patients. Collapsing categories to "need ambulance/do not need ambulance" showed fair concordance (kappa = 0.51). Initially, 30 of 277 (11%) patients determined not to need an ambulance appeared to experience a critical event. After review, 23 patients had events that may not warrant advanced life support transport. Seven (3%) had critical events in the ambulance warranting ambulance transport. Most were miscategorized by the EMT. Overall sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients needing ambulance transport were 94.5% and 32.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From 3% to 11% of patients determined on scene not to need an ambulance had a critical event. Emergency medical services systems need to determine an acceptable rate of undertriage. Further study is needed to determine whether better adherence to the protocols might increase safety.

Impact of a statewide trauma system on rural emergency department patient assessment documentation. OHSU Rural Trauma Research Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of rural ED patient assessment documentation with state trauma system implementation, hospital trauma categorization level (i.e., Level-3 vs Level-4), injury diagnosis, and patient demographics. METHODS: A pre- vs post-system implementation (historical control) analysis of trauma documentation was performed using a sample of rural ED trauma patients from 4 Level-3 and 5 Level-4 trauma hospitals. The medical records of patients with specific index diagnoses in 4 anatomic regions (head, chest, liver/spleen, and femur/open-tibia) were reviewed for 3-year periods before statewide trauma system implementation and after hospital categorization. Vital sign, % inspired O2, and O2 saturation determinations were identified relative to the first and the last vital signs documented on the ED record. If not documented in the medical chart within 5 minutes of the first or last ED vital sign assessment, these measurements were considered missing. Separately, neurologic documentation (initial and final) also was sought for patients meeting criteria for an index head injury. RESULTS: Of 1,057 patients entered into the database, 532 were evaluated during the pre-system period and 525 were evaluated during the post-system period. Overall, 47% had a head injury, 34% had a chest injury, 23% had a femur/open-tibia injury, and 12% had a spleen/liver injury. There were 142 (13%) patients with an injury in > 1 index area. Except for initial systolic blood pressure, documentation of all other initial and final patient vital signs increased significantly (p < 0.05). Documentation of the Glasgow Coma Scale score (initial and final; p = 0.0001) and a final pupil examination on head-injured patients (p = 0.025) also increased. The effects of hospital level, injury diagnosis, and patient demographics on documentation rate were minimal. CONCLUSION: The study found overall improved ED documentation of trauma patient status in association with implementation of a statewide trauma system. This improvement in documentation suggests an enhanced process of care with trauma system participation.

Rural hospital transfer patterns before and after implementation of a statewide trauma system. OHSU Rural Trauma Research Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trauma transfer practices in rural Oregon before and after implementation of a statewide trauma system. METHODS: A pre- vs post-system implementation (historical control) analysis of trauma transfer practices was performed using a sample of rural ED trauma patients from 4 Level-3 and 5 Level-4 trauma hospitals. Medical records of patients with specific index injury diagnoses in 4 anatomic regions (head, chest, liver/ spleen, and femur/open-tibia) were reviewed for a 3-year period before statewide trauma system implementation and 3 years after hospital trauma designation. RESULTS: Of 1,057 patients entered into the database, 532 were evaluated during the pre-system period and 525 were evaluated during the post-system period. Overall, 47% had head injuries, 34% had chest injuries, 23% had femur/open-tibia injuries, and 12% had spleen/liver injuries. There were 142 (13%) patients with an injury in > 1 index area. After trauma system implementation, there was a significant increase in the proportion of ED trauma patients transferred from Level-4 trauma hospitals (32% vs 68%, p < 0.001), with a corresponding decrease in the number of hospital admissions to these facilities (63% to 29%, p < 0.001). Significant increases in the proportion transferred from Level-4 trauma hospital EDs were noted for all index injury categories (p < 0.001). Trauma patients presenting to Level-4 EDs were significantly more likely to be transferred to Level-2 facilities (66% vs 82%, p = 0.030), while patients at Level-3 facilities were significantly more likely to be transferred to Level-1 centers (2% vs 14%, p = 0.002) following trauma system implementation. Multiple logistic regression modeling indicated that implementation of the statewide trauma system was an independent predictor of rural trauma patient transfer from Level-4 hospitals, while transfers from Level-3 facilities were dependent on type of injury. CONCLUSION: Implementation of the Oregon statewide trauma system was associated with a redistribution of rural trauma patients to trauma hospitals with greater therapeutic resources.

Assessment of chest pain onset and out-of-hospital delay using standardized interview questions: the REACT Pilot Study. Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the consistency of responses to a standardized 2-part "key" question (Key-Q) about acute symptom onset in patients presenting with chest pain when measured using alternative questions (Qs) about symptom perception and decisions to seek treatment. METHODS: A structured patient interview was performed at 3 university teaching hospitals and 1 community hospital. Convenience samples of adult patients presenting to these EDs with chest pain were asked specific questions related to their symptoms and recognition of illness. Information obtained included the 2-part Key-Q: "What are the symptoms that brought you here today?" and "When did those symptoms start?" The alternative Qs (in order of use) were as follows: Q1 = "When did your very first symptom or sensation begin?"; Q2 = "When did your symptoms lead you to think something was wrong or that you were ill?"; Q3 = "When did your symptoms become serious enough for you to seek medical care?"; and Q4 = "When did you actually call 9-1-1/emergency medical services (EMS) or go to the hospital?" The documented ED arrival time, demographic variables, and whether the patient arrived by ambulance were obtained from the medical record. Patients also were queried regarding potential barriers to seeking medical care and their cardiac risk factors. RESULTS: Of the 135 patients surveyed, 9 were unsure of the date and time of symptom onset. For the 126 patients with analyzable data, the mean (+/- SD) patient age was 62 +/- 16 years, and 59% were male. The general sequence of events reported from acute symptom onset until hospital care was Q1/Key-Q-->Q2-->Q3-->Q4-->ED arrival. The median differences and interquartile ranges (IQRs) in minutes between Q times and the Key-Q response were: Q1 = 0 (0-0); Q2 = 30 (0-210); Q3 = 140 (30-720); Q4 = 265 (90-1,215); and ED arrival = 340 (120-1,230). The interval from the Key-Q response until calling 9-1-1/EMS or going to the hospital was shorter for those who used an ambulance and for those who did not consult a physician first. The interval from the Key-Q response until considering symptoms to be serious was shorter for those with a family history of heart disease, but longer for non-white patients. CONCLUSION: The Key-Q elicited a response recalled near the time of first symptoms and generally before the patient had concluded something was "wrong or that he or she was ill." Measurement of the out-of-hospital delay in chest pain patients using the Key-Q appears promising.

Do patients refusing transport remember descriptions of risks after initial advanced life support assessment?

OBJECTIVE: To determine patient recall and understanding of instructions given to patients who refuse transport after initial paramedic assessment and medical treatment. METHODS: Following patient consent, a phone interview was completed for consecutive persons living in a large urban area for whom 9-1-1 was contacted but who subsequently refused transport after advanced life support (ALS) assessment. Subjects were asked about their recall of explained risks and benefits of transport, their understanding of those risks at the time of assessment, and subsequent use of medical care, including hospitalization. RESULTS: From October 1, 1996, to February 23, 1997, 324 people refused transport after ALS arrival. Sixty-eight people could not be contacted, providing a response rate of 79% (256/324). Six percent were subsequently admitted to the hospital for the same problem and an additional 59% sought care from a health care provider (66 ED visits, 63 personal physician, 16 urgent care, 5 other). There were no unexpected deaths. Ninety (35%) respondents were still experiencing symptoms at the time of phone contact. Despite the routine practice of providing a verbal explanation of risks and written instructions, only 141 (55%) recalled receiving written instructions and 56 (22%) recalled an explanation of risks. Twenty-six percent believed they did not fully understand their conditions or circumstances surrounding the 9-1-1 call when they refused transport and 18% would now take an ambulance if the same incident were to recur. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients refusing transport do not recall receiving verbal or written instructions and would reconsider their transport decision, raising doubts about people's ability to make informed decisions at a time of great vulnerability. The majority of patients accessed health care after refusing transport and 6% were hospitalized.

Missed opportunities to impact fast response to AMI symptoms.

The potential for reducing cardiovascular disease mortality rates lies both in prevention and treatment. The earlier treatment is administered, the greater the benefit. Thus, duration of time from onset of symptoms of acute myocardial infarction to administration of treatment is important. One major factor contributing to failure to receive efficacious therapy is the delay time from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) symptom onset to hospital arrival. This paper examines the relationship of several factors with regard to intentions to seek care promptly for symptoms of AMI. A random-digit dialed telephone survey (n = 1294) was conducted in 20 communities located in 10 states. People who said they would wait until they were very sure that symptoms were a heart attack were older, reported their insurance did not pay for ambulance services, and reported less confidence in knowing signs and symptoms in themselves. When acknowledging symptoms of a heart attack, African-Americans and people with more than a high school education reported intention to act quickly. No measures of personal health history, nor interaction with primary care physicians or cardiologists were significantly related to intention to act fast. The study confirms the importance of attribution and perceived self-confidence in symptom recognition in care seeking. The lack of significant role of health history (i.e. those with chronic conditions or risk factors) and clinician contact highlights missed opportunities for health care providers to educate and encourage patients about their risk and appropriate action.

Evidence of case management effect on traumatic-brain-injured adults in rehabilitation.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence for effectiveness of case management during recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI) in adults. After an overview of TBI incidence, prevalence, and problems, and a brief explanation of case management, the study methods are described, the findings are discussed and recommendations are made for future research. Medline, HealthSTAR, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched and 83 articles met the criteria for review. The strongest studies (n = 3) were critically appraised and their design features and data were placed in two evidence tables. Due to methodological limitations, there was neither clear evidence of effectiveness nor of ineffectiveness. For future research, we recommend controlled research designs, standardization of measures, adequate statistical analysis and specification of health outcomes of importance to persons with TBI and their families.

Assessing the effectiveness and optimal structure of trauma systems: a consensus among experts.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a consensus exists among experts regarding the effect of organized trauma systems on patient outcomes based on peer-reviewed, published evidence. Second, to ascertain whether experts agree on the optimal structure of trauma systems. METHODS: A multistage, longitudinal survey was administered to trauma system experts participating in a national symposium designed to assess the published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness. Survey questions assessed published evidence by evaluating study designs, potential biases, and sample case mix. Trauma system structure was assessed by asking participants to rate the merit of previously identified key trauma system characteristics. Analyses were conducted using consensus theory. RESULTS: Ninety symposium participants (99%) completed all five surveys. Respondents considered the evidence to be "moderately supportive" of trauma system effectiveness when considering severely injured patients in urban settings. Several key trauma system characteristics were identified as mandatory or highly desirable components of trauma system implementation and maintenance. Experts currently favor exclusive rather than inclusive trauma systems. CONCLUSION: A consensus does exist among trauma system experts regarding the effectiveness of trauma systems and the optimal structure of trauma systems. Additional research is needed to determine whether trauma system benefits extend to other patient subgroups in other geographic regions. Consensus theory provides an impressive model for assessing rater agreement by controlling for response bias and providing a probability measure to determine whether a true consensus exists.

Pediatric window-cord strangulations in the United States, 1981-1995.

OBJECTIVE: To document the prevalence of pediatric asphyxial death from window-covering cords in the United States and identify associated risk factors. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of existing death certificate and incident files compiled by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission. SETTING: United States, 1981 through 1995. PATIENTS: Children aged 1 month to 8 years suffering unintentional traumatic asphyxiation from a window-covering cord. RESULTS: A total of 183 fatal window-cord strangulations were reported for the years 1981 through 1995, representing a mortality rate of 0.14 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.18) per 100000 persons (< or =3 years old) per year in the United States. Ninety-three percent of victims were 3 years of age or younger. Pull cords on venetian-type horizontal window coverings accounted for 86% of documented injuries. Infant victims were more likely to become entangled while put down for a nap and toddlers were more likely to be suspended by the cord after falling or jumping from a height (P=.002). Window coverings remained anchored and did not undrape when substantial weight was suspended in the draw-cord loop. CONCLUSIONS: Window-covering cords represent a substantial strangulation hazard compared with other potentially harmful household products that were modified based on voluntary standards to mitigate the risk of injury. Product design modifications and parental education will be necessary to avert this type of fatal home injury.