Monitoring aspirin treatment in patients with thrombocytosis: comparison of the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 with optical aggregometry.

Aspirin provides satisfactory protection against thrombotic episodes in essential thrombocythemia (ET), but at higher platelet counts has been less effective. Our aim was to compare the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 with optical aggregometry in order to determine a reliable method in monitoring aspirin's influence on platelet function in patients with thrombocytosis. We studied 36 patients with thrombocytosis. Sixteen of them, receiving aspirin, composed group A, while group B consisted of 20 patients not taking aspirin. In all patients, we compared the platelet function measured by classic optical aggregation tests with closure times (CT) obtained by the PFA-100. The definition of platelet responses as normal or pathological showed that PFA-100 collagen and/or epinephrine (CEPI) CTs and epinephrine-induced aggregometry is the pair of methods with the higher agreement in monitoring of platelet dysfunction due to ASA treatment (a=94%). Satisfactory results were also obtained for group B (a=81%). The comparison between PFA-100 CEPI CTs and arachidonic acid-induced aggregometry exhibited moderate agreement both in the total number of patients and in group A (a=79% and 94%, respectively). PFA-100 collagen and/or ADP (CADP) CTs and ADP-induced aggregometry were not concordant. The PFA-100 system appears to be a reliable and rapid method in the assessment of aspirin's antiplatelet effect in patients with thrombocytosis. Regarding aggregometry, the selection of the inducer, its concentration and cut-off points is crucial in defining the response to antiaggregating agents. It still remains to determine whether there is any relevance between the measurements obtained by these methods and clinical outcome in thrombocythemic patients.

Association between the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 4G/5G polymorphism and venous thrombosis. A meta-analysis.

The effect of the 675 insertion/deletion (4G/5G) polymorphism of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) gene on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains controversial. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis of published data regarding this issue. A comprehensive electronic search was carried out up until September 2006. A total of 22 articles were included in the analysis that was performed using random effects models. Eighteen papers, concerning patients without another known risk factor, comprised 2,644 cases and 3,739 controls. The alleles contrast (4G vs. 5G allele) yielded a statistically significant odds ratio (OR) of 1.153 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.068-1.246). In a sub-analysis of five studies that included 256 cases with another genetic risk factor and 147 controls, the combined per-allele OR was still significant (OR: 1.833,95% CI: 1.325-2.536). On the contrary, the analysis of five studies regarding cases with a non-genetic risk factor for VTE (antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, Behcet disease) provided insignificant results in all aspects. There was no evidence for heterogeneity and publication bias in all analyses. Based on our findings, the 4G allele appears to increase the risk of venous thrombosis, particularly in subjects with other genetic thrombophilic defects. Recommendation for detection of this polymorphism in evaluating thrombophilia in such patients might be considered.

Direct evidence for normalization of platelet function resulting from platelet count reduction in essential thrombocythemia.

Essential thrombocythemia is characterized by persistent elevation and functional disturbances of platelets. Both the platelet function analyzer-100 (PFA-100) collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) cartridge and aggregometry with epinephrine are considered sensitive and valid methods in detecting abnormal platelet function in essential thrombocythemia. We attempted to confirm that restoration of abnormal platelet function results from platelet count reduction in essential thrombocythemia, by using these two methods. Thirty-nine essential thrombocythemia patients were divided into two groups on the basis of their platelet count. Group A participants (n = 20) exhibited platelet counts greater than 500 × 10/l, whereas group B participants (n = 19) had platelet counts below this limit. Hematological parameters, plasma von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen and activity levels were assessed. Platelet function was analyzed by the PFA-100 and light transmission aggregometry with epinephrine, collagen, and ADP. The point mutation JAK2 V617F was identified and its effect on platelet function tests was also investigated. By using logistic regression analysis, white blood cell count, vWF activity level, and the measurements of aggregation in response to epinephrine were significantly different between the two groups. Epinephrine-induced aggregation retained the statistical significance in the multivariable procedure (P : 0.002). PFA-100 CEPI closure times were lower - but not statistically significant - in group B. Neither the JAK2 V617F positivity nor different cytoreductive treatments had any influence on ex-vivo platelet function tests. Our findings demonstrate normalization of platelet function resulting from platelet count reduction in essential thrombocythemia and reinforce the concept of lowering platelet counts in these patients.

The role of the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100 and platelet aggregometry in the differentiation of essential thrombocythemia from reactive thrombocytosis.

INTRODUCTION: The most crucial component of all diagnostic criteria for essential thrombocythemia (ET) has been the exclusion of reactive thrombocytosis (RT). Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the PFA-100 collagen-epinephrine (CEPI) cartridge test and epinephrine-induced aggregometry individually, but mainly combined, in the differentiation of ET from RT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 26 patients with ET and 25 with RT were studied. Platelet function was analyzed by the PFA-100 and by light transmission aggregometry with epinephrine and ADP. The JAK2 mutational status was identified and hematological parameters, plasma von Willebrand factor antigen and activity levels were also assessed. RESULTS: The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and the negative predictive value (NPV) of PFA-100 CEPI vs epinephrine-induced aggregometry in the differentiation of ET from RT were estimated as follows: Se (%): 78.9 vs 84.6, Sp (%): 92.0 vs 96.0, PPV (%): 88.2 vs 95.7, NPV (%): 85.2 vs 85.7, respectively. When both of these methods were combined, a lower sensitivity of 68.4%, but a specificity of 100% was attained. The PPV observed with this double abnormal combination was 100% and the NPV 80.6%. Lastly, when we assessed the abnormality for either CEPI CT or epinephrine-induced aggregometry, the sensitivity was 100%, the specificity 88.0%, PPV 86.4% and NPV 100%. Thus, an abnormal combination was strongly suggestive of ET, while normal results with both methods excluded ET. CONCLUSIONS: If our results are replicated by further studies, these two methods could be used very effectively as adjunct markers in the differentiation between ET and RT.