Continuous regional arterial infusion for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) is a drug delivery system, which dramatically increases the drug concentration in the pancreas. Previous clinical and basic studies have demonstrated the possible therapeutic efficacy of CRAI for severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). This meta-analysis of all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of CRAI for the treatment of SAP. DATA SOURCES: Up to August 10, 2014, RCTs comparing CRAI with intravenous infusion for SAP in PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded, Cochrane Library, China Academic Journals Full-Text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and Chinese Scientific Journals Database were selected by two independent reviewers. The relative risk (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for duration of elevated serum amylase and urine amylase, duration of abdominal pain, infection rate, incidence of complication, overall mortality, curative rate, hospital stay and details of subgroup analysis were extracted. Meta-analyses were made using the software Review Manager (RevMan version 5.10). RESULTS: Six RCTs with 390 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. Compared with intravenous infusion route, CRAI significantly shortened the duration of elevated urine amylase (MD=-2.40, 95% CI=-3.20, -1.60; P<0.00001) and the duration of abdominal pain (MD=-1.46, 95% CI=-1.94, -0.98; P<0.00001), decreased the incidence of complication (RR=0.35, 95% CI=0.15, 0.81; P=0.01) and overall mortality (RR=0.25, 95% CI=0.08, 0.78; P=0.02), shortened the duration of hospital stay (MD=-10.36, 95% CI=-17.05, -3.68; P=0.002), and increased the curative rate (RR=1.66, 95% CI=1.13, 2.46; P=0.01). No mortality and catheter-related infections due to CRAI administration was reported in these studies. Subgroup analysis showed that the combination of drug administration via CRAI did not significantly improve the outcomes. CONCLUSION: CRAI is effective for the treatment of SAP, and the combination of drug administration via CRAI did not have a significant effect on the improvement of the outcomes.

[The initiative of patient safety culture and its development].

Safety culture is the culture of all the connotations to a safe direction for the purpose of advancing a unified organizational behavior. Safety culture was first introduced to the field of medicine by the American researchers in the 1990s. Subsequently, researchers from different countries initiated the relevant studies and put forward five subcultures of patient safety culture. At present, the patient safety culture research is mainly conducted in the United States, China and the UK of which cross-sectional studies are the most popular study designs including the evaluation of patient safety scale, reliability and validity analysis. Non-sectional studies are focused on the study of subcultures including leadership, communication, cooperation and reports. Compared with the studies abroad, the studies on patient safety culture in China are rather late, yet also mainly on reliability and validity analysis of scales. Most participants we investigated are nurses from teaching hospitals. But in the real healthcare situation, fostering a positive safety culture is still very lacking and many ideas and behaviors are in the state of traditional blaming culture.

Effect of injection of brucea javanica oil emulsion plus chemoradiotherapy for lung cancer: a review of clinical evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Injection of brucea javanica oil emulsion (IBJOE), one of Chinese patent drugs has been widely used for lung cancer (LC) in China, and is known to provide some favorable outcomes, in particular when it combined with conventional treatment. However, little available best evidence is known about its effect and safety. This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of IBJOE plus chemoradiotherapy to alleviate symptoms of LC patients. METHODS: A complete literature searching was conducted in databases including Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, China Academic Journals Full-text Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of IBJOE with chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone for LC patients regardless of blinding, duration of treatment or duration of follow-up. All searching dates were from the beginning to December 2011. Quality of the included studies was assessed using the method by Cochrane Reviewer Handbook, and data analysis was performed using RevMan 5.10 software developed by The Cochrane Collaboration. RESULTS: The searching yielded over 1371 relevant citations, most of which did not meet the inclusion criteria. Finally, only 21 RCTs involving 1619 patients were included, and all the studies were of poor quality. Pooled analyses were performed to reveal that compared with chemoradiotherapy alone, IBJOE plus chemoradiotherapy had a better complete response rate (relative risk (RR) = 1.42; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.92; P = 0.02) and improved quality of life (RR = 1.83; 95% CI 1.63 to 2.07; P < 0.00001) measured by Karnofsky Performance Status scale. In addition, there was a significant difference on the outcome of long-term survival rate, level of immune function, and some incidences of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: IBJOE plus chemoradiotherapy may have positive effects on LC patients in response rate, improvement of quality of life, and reducing incidences of some adverse effects compared with chemoradiotherapy alone. However, the results need to be viewed with caution because of low quality of the included studies.