Morphometric video analysis of the engine-driven nickel-titanium Lightspeed instrument system.

Two hundred and sixteen Lightspeed instruments were evaluated microscopically for the presence of corrosion, surface debris, and alloy defects. The instruments were assessed morphometrically for consistency of physical design and dimensions by measuring and analyzing eight parameters of the instrument pilot tips, heads, and shafts. Results from visual inspection showed that none of the instruments were corroded; 23 presented surface porosities, and 17 had sharp strips of alloy. Data obtained by morphometric analysis indicated the mean diameter of the head of only 7 of 18 sizes met the +/- 0.02 mm allowable tolerance set forth by the American Dental Association (ADA) Specification No. 28. Observation and video analysis indicated that instruments of the same size adhere to the same basic design, but that morphometric variations do exist. The visual and intersize analysis indicated that the Lightspeed is not an instrument of any one determined shape that changes only in diameter. Rather, it is a series of instruments that show gradual shifts in both size and shape as the instrument size increases. Lightspeed instruments are a new type of nickel-titanium endodontic instrument that cannot be evaluated using the standards proposed by the American National Standards Institute/ADA Specification No. 28 for files and reamers.

Torsional testing of the Lightspeed nickel-titanium instrument system.

Revolutions to separation and maximum torque at failure of 216 Lightspeed instruments were determined in an instron using a clockwise rotation. After instruments failed, the distance the instrument separated from the tip was measured. Comparison of the results with existing ANSI/ADA specification no. 28 showed that the Lightspeed far exceeded the values of the specification for revolution to failure. On the other hand, torque to failure results showed that instrument sizes 20 and 25 exceeded the specification, whereas instrument sizes 30 through 50 were below the minimum values. Half-size instruments were not compared, because specifications for half-sizes do not exist. Comparison between mean torque values and instrument shaft diameters of the Lightspeed previously reported showed a near linear relationship up to and including instrument size 50, but overall torque to failure increased exponentially when related to shaft diameter (coefficient of determination = 0.9923). Lightspeed instruments separated 2.32 +/- 0.60 mm from the tip, generally within the land area or at the beginning of the shaft. Scanning electron microscopic observation of the Lightspeed instrument fracture site showed two distinct areas. There was a striated concentric area in the periphery of the fracture characteristic of a brittle or cleavage fracture and a corrugated area in the center of the fracture characteristic of a ductile fracture.