EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy with antegrade stent placement in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a propensity score-matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is a rescue procedure when ERCP fails. Peritonitis and recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) are adverse events (AEs) associated with EUS-HGS. Antegrade stent placement across a malignant distal biliary obstruction (DBO) followed by EUS-HGS (EUS-HGAS) creates 2 biliary drainage routes, potentially reducing peritonitis and prolonging time to RBO (TRBO). We compared the outcomes of the 2 techniques. METHODS: Data of consecutive patients with malignant DBO who underwent attempted EUS-HGS or EUS-HGAS across 5 institutions from January 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A matched cohort of patients was obtained using 1-to-1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was TRBO, and secondary outcomes were AEs except for RBO and overall survival. RESULTS: Among 360 patients, 283 (176 and 107 in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively) were eligible. The matched cohorts included 81 patients in each group. AEs developed in 10 (12.3%) and 15 (18.5%) patients (P = .38) in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively. RBO occurred in 18 and 2 patients in the HGS and HGAS groups, respectively (P < .001). TRBO was significantly longer in the HGAS group (median, 194 days vs 716 days; hazard ratio, .050; 95% confidence interval, .0066-.37; P < .01). However, no significant differences occurred in overall survival between the groups (median, 97 days vs 112 days; hazard ratio, .97; 95% confidence interval, .66-1.4; P = .88). CONCLUSIONS: EUS-HGAS extended TRBO compared with EUS-HGS, whereas AEs, except for RBO and overall survival, did not differ. The longer TRBO of EUS-HGAS could benefit patients with longer life expectancy.

Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using self-expandable metallic stent for afferent loop syndrome: A single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy is a procedure used to connect the stomach and dilated afferent loop using a stent under endoscopic ultrasound for afferent loop syndrome. However, the actual efficacy and safety of this procedure remain unclear. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using a laser-cut-type fully covered self-expandable metallic stent and an anchoring plastic stent for afferent loop syndrome. METHODS: Technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, recurrent intestinal obstruction rates, time to recurrent intestinal obstruction, and technical and clinical success rates of re-intervention were evaluated in intended patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for afferent loop syndrome from October 2018 to August 2022. RESULTS: In 25 intended patients with afferent loop syndrome who intended endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy, the technical success rate was 100% (25/25), whereas the clinical success rate was 96% (24/25). Two patients experienced grade ≥ 3 early adverse events, including one with intra-abdominal abscess and one with hypotension. Both events were attributed to intestinal fluid leakage. No late adverse events were observed. The recurrent intestinal obstruction rate was 32% (8/25), and the median time to recurrent intestinal obstruction was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval: 2.8-not available). The technical and clinical success rates of re-intervention were both 100% (8/8). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent and an anchoring plastic stent is effective and safe as a treatment procedure for afferent loop syndrome.

Immune-related adverse event-associated sclerosing cholangitis due to immune checkpoint inhibitors: imaging findings and treatments.

OBJECTIVES: Immune-related adverse event-sclerosing cholangitis caused by treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors is rare, and the diagnostic criteria and treatment strategy remain unclear. In this study, we confirmed the clinicopathological features of immune-related adverse event-sclerosing cholangitis and clarified its diagnosis and appropriate management. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 10 patients diagnosed with immune-related adverse event-sclerosing cholangitis and identified by electronic database searches. RESULTS: Blood tests revealed liver dysfunction with a predominance of biliary tract enzymes in all patients; however, jaundice was present in only one patient. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed diffuse hypertrophy of the extrahepatic bile duct wall as the most frequent finding; however, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography showed various imaging features, such as the pruned-tree appearance of intrahepatic bile ducts, in all patients. Transpapillary bile duct biopsy showed inflammatory cell infiltration using immunostaining, with a predominance of cluster of differentiation 8-positive T cells in 63% of the cases. Initial steroid therapy was effective in two cases. Mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus were used in steroid-refractory cases. Although six patients showed improvements, all of the remaining patients died owing to immune-related adverse event-sclerosing cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Various bile duct imaging findings of immune-related adverse event-sclerosing cholangitis were revealed; transpapillary bile duct biopsy may be useful in the diagnosis of immune-related adverse event-sclerosing cholangitis. Despite the combination of multiple immunosuppressive agents, prognosis of immune-related adverse event-sclerosing cholangitis remains poor. Longer follow-up and larger clinical studies are necessary to establish its treatment strategy.

Clinical features of germline BRCA1/2 or ATM pathogenic variant positive pancreatic cancer in Japan.

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing interest into the role of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (gBRCA PV) and gATM PV and likely PV (PV and LPV; PV + LPV) in the carcinogenesis and treatment of pancreatic cancer (PC), but the clinical features have not been well described. METHODS: Patients with confirmed gBRCA PV and gATM PV + LPV PC treated at our hospital between April 2016 and December 2021, were retrospectively evaluated for clinical characteristics and outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients harbored gBRCA PV and three patients harbored gATM PV + LPV. Of the gBRCA PV patients, 81.8 % received platinum-based chemotherapy with favorable treatment outcomes with an objective response rate of 50.0 % (95 % CI: 23.0-77.0), median progression free survival (PFS) of 334 days, and median overall survival (OS) of 926 days from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy. The annual number of patients with gBRCA PV was two patients per year before January 2021 (when BRACAnalysis became available in Japan), and ten patients during the 10 months thereafter. Four patients (20 %) with gBRCA PV developed soft-tissue metastasis with progression. Two patients with gATM PV + LPV received platinum-based chemotherapy and the best response of those patients was partial response and stable disease and their OS from the initiation of first-line chemotherapy was 1192 and 989 days, and PFS was 579 and 140 days, respectively. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of gBRCA PV-positive PC has increased revealed in recent years. These tumors appear to be sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, with long term survival observed in gATM PV + LPV-positive patients.

Fine-needle biopsy with 19G needle is effective in combination with endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for genomic profiling of unresectable pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) has been approved in Japan since June 2019, enabling mutation-specific therapy. Although tissue sampling via endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) is standard in pancreatic cancer, reports on obtaining appropriate samples for CGP, especially for the OncoGuide NCC Oncopanel System (NOP) and FoundationOne CDx (FOne), are lacking. Therefore, we investigated the success rate and factors related to appropriate EUS-TA sampling for CGP analysis suitability in unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UR-PDAC). METHODS: Participants comprised 150 UR-PDAC patients who underwent EUS-TA and tumor sample evaluation for CGP analysis suitability between June 2019 and December 2021. The proportion of patients meeting the criteria was evaluated considering tumor size, puncture lesion, presence of metastasis, type and size of puncture needle, suction method, number of punctures, and puncture route. RESULTS: In total, 39.2% (60/153) of samples met NOP analysis suitability criteria and 0% met FOne analysis suitability criteria. The suitability rate was significantly higher with 19G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) (56.0%; 42/75) than with 22G FNB (32.6%; 14/43) and 22G fine-needle aspiration (11.4%; 4/35). Nineteen-gauge needle (odds ratio [OR] 2.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-5.57; P = 0.021) and FNB (OR 3.57; 95% CI 1.05-12.20; P = 0.041) were independent factors contributing to NOP analysis suitability. Among 30 patients who underwent actual NOP analysis, the analysis success rate was 100% (30/30). CONCLUSION: In sample collection via EUS-TA, 19G and FNB needles contribute to NOP analysis suitability.

Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Gemcitabine plus Nab-Paclitaxel versus Gemcitabine Alone in Older Adults with Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) has been a standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer (uPC); however, the current treatment status and usefulness in older adults with uPC remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the patient background and compare the efficacy and safety of GnP versus other treatments in older adults with uPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, we enrolled 233 eligible patients aged ≥76 years with pathologically proven, clinically uPC, and no history of chemotherapy from 55 Japanese centers during September 2018-September 2019. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Geriatric assessments were performed upon registration and after 3 months. To adjust for confounders, we conducted propensity score-matched analyses. RESULTS: GnP, gemcitabine alone (Gem), best supportive care, and other therapies were administered to 116, 72, 16, and 29 patients, respectively. In the propensity score-matched analysis, 42 patients each were selected from the GnP and Gem groups. The median OS was longer in the GnP group than in the Gem group (12.2 vs. 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37-1.13). The median PFS was significantly longer in the GnP group than in the Gem group (9.2 vs. 3.7 months; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.64). The incidence of severe adverse events was higher with GnP than with Gem; however, the difference was not significant. CONCLUSION: GnP is more efficacious than Gem in patients aged ≥76 years with uPC despite demonstrating a higher incidence of severe adverse events.

Efficacy of chemotherapy for patients with metastatic or recurrent pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The usual treatment for metastatic or recurrent PASC is systemic chemotherapy in accordance with the PDAC treatment strategy. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy, especially the benefit of recent combination therapies, in patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 116 patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC treated with first-line chemotherapy between April 2001 and December 2017 at 24 Japanese institutions. RESULTS: Combination chemotherapies included gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP, n = 28), fluorouracil/leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FFX, n = 10), gemcitabine + S-1 (GS, n = 10), and others (n = 9). Monotherapies included gemcitabine (n = 51) and S-1 (n = 8). The median overall survival (OS) was 6.5, 7.3, and 4.3 months for the whole cohort, the combination therapy group, and the monotherapy group, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that combination therapy showed a better trend in OS than monotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.20). GnP or FFX were selected in 58.7% of patients after FFX was approved in Japan, and revealed a median OS, median progression-free survival, and objective response rate of 7.3 months, 2.8 months, and 26.9% in GnP and 7.2 months, 2.3 months, and 20.0% in FFX respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy. GnP and FFX showed similar and clinically meaningful efficacy for patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC.

Endoscopic duodenal stent placement versus gastrojejunostomy for unresectable pancreatic cancer patients with duodenal stenosis before introduction of initial chemotherapy (GASPACHO study): a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic duodenal stent placement is an alternative technique to gastrojejunostomy for gastric outlet obstruction due to pancreatic cancer. We compared the efficacy of endoscopic duodenal stent placement with that of gastrojejunostomy for treating patients with pancreatic cancer who are candidates for intensive combination chemotherapies as the first line of treatment. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 100 patients from 18 institutions in Japan. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) cytologically or histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, (2) good performance status, (3) gastric outlet obstruction scoring system score of 0-1 and (4) no history of treatment for pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the background characteristics of patients in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement (n = 57) and gastrojejunostomy (n = 43) groups. The median overall survival in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement and gastrojejunostomy groups was 5.9 and 6.0 months, respectively. Clinical success was achieved in 93 cases; the median time to food intake resumption was significantly shorter in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement group (median: 3 days, n = 54) than in the gastrojejunostomy group (median: 5 days, n = 43). Chemotherapy was introduced in 63% of the patients in both groups after endoscopic duodenal stent placement or gastrojejunostomy. Chemotherapy was started earlier in the endoscopic duodenal stent placement group (median: 14 days) than in the gastrojejunostomy (median: 32 days) group. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic duodenal stent placement showed similar or better clinical outcomes than gastrojejunostomy. Thus, it might be a promising option in patients with good performance status.

A novel endoscopic technique using fully covered self-expandable metallic stents for benign strictures after hepaticojejunostomy: the saddle-cross technique (with video).

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the number of patients with hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures has increased. Balloon dilation and placement of multiple plastic stents have proven effective for hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures. However, for refractory strictures, there is often a need for repeated endoscopic procedures within a short period. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the new saddle-cross technique, which uses two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 20 patients with benign hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures who underwent placement of two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents at the National Cancer Center, Japan, from November 2017 to June 2021. RESULTS: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% (20/20). The median time of the procedure was 61 (range 25-122) min. The scheduled stent removal rate was 70% (14/20). Spontaneous dislodgement of the stent was observed on computed tomography in five patients (25.0%). The non-restenosis rate 12 months after the saddle-cross technique was 88.2% (15/17). Procedure-related early adverse events included mild ascending cholangitis in three patients (15.0%) and sepsis in one patient (5.0%). Procedure-related late adverse events included mild ascending cholangitis in three patients (15.0%) and bile duct hyperplasia in one patient (5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The saddle-cross technique performed using two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents resulted in promising long-term stricture resolution with a high technical success rate. Based on these findings, the saddle-cross method can be considered an option for the standard procedure for benign hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures.

The influence of UGT1A1 polymorphisms on modified FOLFIRINOX dose in double-variant-type patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: UGT1A1 polymorphisms should be considered when using irinotecan-containing regimens, especially in patients with a double-variant-type (DV), including homozygous for UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 and heterozygous for both UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6. We investigated the safety and efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) in patients having DV. METHODS: Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received FOLFIRINOX between January 2015 and December 2019 were included in this study. Non-DV patients received the standard mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 150 mg/m2) as first-line (non-DV1) or second-line therapy (non-DV2); however, DV patients received mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) as the second-line therapy (DV2). We retrospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of the lowered irinotecan dose in the DV2 group relative to the non-DV1 (safety) or non-DV2 (safety and efficacy) groups. RESULTS: A total of 235 patients were eligible for this study with 118 patients in the non-DV1, 106 in the non-DV2, and 11 in the DV2 groups. Major grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (33.9, 31.1, and 18.2%) and febrile neutropenia (6.8, 3.8, and 9.1%) in the non-DV1, non-DV2, and DV2 groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 3.4 months in the non-DV2 group, and 4.4 months in the DV2 group. The overall survival from the date of starting second-line chemotherapy was 8.8 months in the non-DV2 group and 11.5 months in the DV2 group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, the safety and efficacy of mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 80 mg/m2) in DV patients were comparable with the standard mFOLFIRINOX (irinotecan 150 mg/m2) in non-DV patients.

A feasibility study of a peer discussion group intervention for patients with pancreatobiliary cancer and their caregivers.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this feasibility study was to examine the impacts of a peer discussion group intervention called "the pancreatobiliary cancer salon" on psychological distress among patients with pancreatobiliary cancer and their caregivers. METHODS: We recruited patients with pancreatic or biliary tract cancer and their caregivers. We conducted a within-group pre-post comparison study. Participants were grouped by the type of cancer and treatment. Each group consisted of four to five patients or caregivers. Hospital staff members facilitated group discussions where participants freely talked for 1 h. We evaluated participants' psychological condition using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and their impressions of the pancreatobiliary cancer salon. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 42 patients and 27 caregivers who joined the salon for the first time. Thirty-five patients (83.3%) had pancreatic cancer. Thirty-one patients (71.4%) had unresectable pancreatobiliary cancer and 14 patients (33.3%) were being treated with second-line or third-line chemotherapy at the time of the survey. Twenty-two patients (52.4%) participated in the salon within 6 months after diagnosis. Most participating caregivers were the patient's spouse/partner (51.9%) or child (34.6%). Both patients and caregivers experienced high levels of satisfaction with the pancreatobiliary cancer salon. Both patients and caregivers had significantly lower psychological distress as assessed by POMS after the salon. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: A peer discussion group intervention might be well-received and has potential to benefit for patients with pancreatobiliary cancer and their caregivers.

Novel endoscopic technique for trisegment drainage in patients with unresectable hilar malignant biliary strictures (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Three or more stents may be needed in patients with extensive stricturing in Bismuth type IIIa/IV hilar malignant strictures. Partial stent-in-stent (PSIS) deployment has been the primary intervention for hilar malignant biliary stricture (MBS). However, simultaneous side-by-side (SBS) stent placement has become feasible with the development of the <6F diameter stent delivery system. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of a new hybrid method combining PSIS and SBS stent placement for trisegment biliary drainage. METHODS: This study included 17 consecutive patients with Bismuth IIIa or IV malignant strictures who underwent endoscopic drainage using the hybrid method. Diameters of the delivery stents were 5.4F (n = 10) and 5.7F (n = 7). RESULTS: The technical success rate was 82% (14/17), and the median length of procedures was 54 minutes. Two patients required predilatation for deployment of the third self-expandable metallic stent through the mesh of the first deployed stent. Two patients (12%) developed cholecystitis as early adverse events, and 1 patient (6%) developed liver abscess as a late adverse event. The time to recurrent biliary obstruction among those with successful initial trisegmental drainage was 189 days (95% confidence interval, 124-254). CONCLUSIONS: The hybrid method for unresectable hilar MBS is an effective endoscopic drainage method, and the ease of these procedures is partly attributed to the thinner stent delivery system.

Effect of Antithrombotic Therapy and Long Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Procedure Time on Early and Delayed Postoperative Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Recent updated guidelines of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology recommend the use of a single dose of antiplatelet agents in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, the postoperative bleeding risk after gastric ESD associated with the continuation or interruption of antithrombotic therapy remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate whether certain factors including interrupted antithrombotic therapy could affect early and delayed post-ESD bleeding risk. METHODS: Three hundred sixty-four patients with gastric neoplasms were treated with ESD at our hospital between October 2005 and December 2012. Seventy-four patients with interrupted antithrombotic therapy were undertaken with ESD. Early and delayed postoperative bleeding patterns were estimated. Various clinical characteristics such as gender, age, tumor location, tumor size, ESD procedure time, platelet count, and comorbidity were evaluated. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p = 0.042) in the ESD procedure time between the patients with postoperative bleeding and those without it. There was no significant difference in postoperative bleeding between the patients on antithrombotic therapy and not on it. Moreover, interrupted antithrombotic therapy and platelet count were significantly (p = 0.0461 and p = 0.0059, respectively) associated with early postoperative bleeding in multivariate analysis. In addition, in univariate analysis, ESD procedure time was significantly (p = 0.041) associated with delayed postoperative bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Antithrombotic therapy and prolonged ESD procedure time were significantly associated with early and delayed postoperative bleeding, respectively.