Effectiveness of opioid switching for dyspnea and its predictors in cancer patients: a single-center retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Morphine is the most used opioid for dyspnea, but other opioids such as oxycodone and fentanyl are increasingly used, and opioid switching to these is sometimes undertaken. No studies have verified the effectiveness of opioid switching for relief of dyspnea. We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of opioid switching for dyspnea and its predictors. METHODS: All patients with opioid switching for dyspnea during hospitalization at Komaki City Hospital from January 2019 to August 2022 were included. Opioid switching was defined as a change to another opioid, and the assessment period for evaluating the effectiveness and adverse events of opioid switching was set as 1 week. Patients with Numeric Rating Scale or Japanese version of the Support Team Assessment Schedule reduction for dyspnea of at least 1, or with clear improvement based on medical records, were considered valid. Mitigating factors for dyspnea were identified using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 976 patients with opioid switching, 57 patients had opioid switching for relief of dyspnea. Of these, opioid switching was effective in 21 patients (36.8%). In a multivariate analysis, older patients (odds ratio: 5.52, 95% CI: 1.50-20.20, P < 0.01), short prognosis for post-opioid switching (odds ratio: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.04-0.87, P = 0.03) and cachexia (odds ratio: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.64, P < 0.01) were significantly associated with opioid switching effects for dyspnea. There were no serious adverse events after opioid switching. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that opioid switching for dyspnea may have some effect. Furthermore, opioid switching for dyspnea may be more effective in older patients and less effective in terminally ill patients or in those with cachexia.

The plant alkaloid conophylline inhibits matrix formation of fibroblasts.

Conophylline is a Vinca alkaloid from leaves of the tropical plant Ervatamia microphylla and has been shown to mimic the effect of the growth and differentiation factor activin A on pancreatic progenitor cells. However, activin A stimulates fibrosis of pancreatic stellate cells, whereas conophylline inhibits it, suggesting that this compound may serve as an antifibrotic drug. Here we investigated the effects of conophylline on human foreskin fibroblasts, especially focusing on extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. A gene microarray analysis revealed that conophylline remarkably suppressed expression of the gene for hyaluronan synthase 2 (HAS2) and of its antisense RNA, whereas the expression of collagen genes was unaffected. Of note, immunostaining experiments revealed that conophylline substantially inhibits incorporation of versican and collagens into the ECM in cells treated with transforming growth factor ß (TGFß), which promotes collagen synthesis, but not in cells not treated with TGFß. Moreover, a protein biosynthesis assay disclosed that conophylline decreases collagen biosynthesis, concomitant with a decrease in total protein biosynthesis, indicating that conophylline-mediated inhibition of fibrosis is not specific to collagen synthesis. Conophylline affected neither TGFß-induced nuclear translocation of SMAD family member 2/3 (SMAD2/3) nor phosphorylation of SMAD2. However, conophylline substantially inhibited phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), suggesting that conophylline inhibits HAS2 expression via TGFß-mediated activation of the ERK1/2 pathway. Taken together, our results indicate that conophylline may be a useful inhibitor of ECM formation in fibrosis.

Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin improves mortality in patients with sepsis especially for severe coagulopathy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is associated with high mortality in patients with sepsis. Several studies reporting that recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) reduced mortality in sepsis patients. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rhTM for patients with mild coagulopathy compared with those with severe coagulopathy. METHODS: We evaluated about 90-day mortality and SOFA score. SOFA score was also evaluated for the following components: respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal and coagulation. RESULTS: All 69 patients were diagnosed with sepsis, fulfilled Japanese Association for Acute Medicine criteria for DIC, and were treated with rhTM. Patients were assigned to either the mild coagulopathy group (did not fulfill the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis overt DIC criteria) or the severe coagulopathy group (fulfilled overt DIC criteria). The 90-day mortality was significant lower in severe coagulopathy group than mild coagulopathy group (P = 0.029). Although the SOFA scores did not decrease in the mild coagulopathy group, SOFA scores decreased significantly in the severe coagulopathy group. Furthermore the respiratory component of the SOFA score significant decreased in severe coagulopathy group compared with mild coagulopathy group. CONCLUSIONS: rhTM administration may reduce mortality by improving organ dysfunction especially for respiratory in septic patients with severe coagulopathy.

Comparative study on safety of linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of infants and neonates for Gram-positive bacterial infections.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin has been the common antimicrobial treatment for Gram-positive infection even in neonates and infants, while it is difficult to adjust blood concentration. Linezolid is also effective for Gram-positive infection, and is not necessary to monitor drug blood concentration. Primary objective of this study was to compare the safety of linezolid and vancomycin in infants and neonates for resistant Gram-positive infections. METHODS: In total, 68 patients [linezolid group (32 patients); vancomycin group (36 patients)] treated with antimicrobials at Aichi Medical University Hospital between April 2014 and March 2017. Investigation items were as follows; sex, age, gestational age, birth weight, body weight, duration of treatment, Apgar score, laboratory data, rate of patients with blood transfusion, serum levels of vancomycin, disease type, concomitant medications, clinical isolates, adverse effects during antimicrobial treatment, antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated Gram-positive bacteria. RESULTS: Any substantially abnormal laboratory values were admitted in linezolid 40.6% (13/32) and vancomycin 41.7% (15/36) groups, respectively (p = 0.93). Platelet count was significantly decreased in only linezolid group (p = 0.03). Any adverse events during antimicrobial treatment were admitted in linezolid 46.9% (15/32) and vancomycin 58.3% (21/36) groups, respectively (p = 0.34). CONCLUSION: There were no notable differences in safety of linezolid and vancomycin groups even in neonates and infants. However, platelet count was significantly decreased in only linezolid group. The careful monitoring of platelet count would be required for infants and neonates receiving linezolid treatment.

Assessment of optimal initial dosing regimen with vancomycin pharmacokinetics model in very low birth weight neonates.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacokinetic of vancomycin in very low birth weight neonates showed big variety, and limited data were available due to very minor population. These facts make it difficult to adjust its optimal initial dosage. Therefore, this study was to develop optimal dosing regimen of vancomycin in very low birth weight neonates. METHODS: Between 2010 and 2015, low birth weight neonates (≤1500 g) were included in a population pharmacokinetics analysis. Based on the pharmacokinetic parameters we estimated, we simulated individual blood concentrations of vancomycin and evaluated the probability of its pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) target attainment, such as 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24)/MIC (≥400) and blood trough concentration (10-20 µg/mL), as primary measure for several dosing regimens by Monte Carlo simulation method. RESULTS: Ten patients were prescribed vancomycin and detected its blood concentrations as routine pharmacy practice to adjust the dosage. A one-compartment model was used and clearance significantly correlated with serum creatinine and the volume of infusion. In this model, vancomycin dose at 10 mg/kg three times a day (TID) was predicted to result 86.7% of neonates for an MIC of 1 µg/mL achieving AUC/MIC of ≥400 and 30.6% of the neonates for an MIC of 2 µg/mL. Moreover, the probability of reaching the target trough concentration was 70.5% for patients treated with vancomycin 10 mg/kg TID. DISCUSSION: We recommended vancomycin 10 mg/kg TID as initial dosage regimens for low birth weight neonates infected with the pathogens showed MIC of ≤1 µg/mL.

Clinical effectiveness of daptomycin loading dose in patients infected with Gram-positive pathogens.

This study was to evaluate the loading does of daptomycin, a novel lipopeptide antibacterial active against Gram-positive pathogens, on clinical efficiency. We divided patients received daptomycin therapy into 2 groups. One of two groups comprised patients received the loading dose of daptomycin on day 1 (group 1) and the other group received normal dosage (4-6 mg/kg/day) (group 2). Inflammatory markers were assessed at least 3 days before daptomycin therapy started as their baseline, and 2 weeks from daptomycin therapy started for the evaluation of clinical efficacy. The bacteriological results were also evaluated. The occurrence of creatinine kinase (CK) elevation was evaluated as side effect. As results, the only group 1 showed significant improvements in body temperature and CRP on 4-7 days after daptomycin therapy started, while 2 groups significantly improved in WBC, body temperature and CRP on 8-14 days, respectively. The group 1 showed early improvement of body temperature (<37.5 °C) on 4-7 days, compared with the group 2 (group 1; 3 [2-7], group 2; 6 [2-11], p = 0.01). The bacteriological cure rates in both groups showed high cure rates (group 1; 20/0, group 2; 27/3, p = 0.14). The frequency of CK elevation was 0% (0/22 patients) and 3.0% (1/33 patients) in group 1 and group 2, respectively. In our conclusion, daptomycin loading dose did not prove evident clinical effectiveness, compared with the regimen without loading dose. However, we could not disclaim the potential to improve clinical response early with DAP loading dose for critically ill patients.

Caspofungin versus micafungin in the incidence of hepatotoxicity in patients with normal to moderate liver failure.

BACKGROUND: One of the major adverse events of caspofungin and micafungin is hepatotoxicity, however, there are few reports compared the incidence of hepatotoxicity between caspofungin and micafungin. Herein, the primary objective of this study was to compare the incidence of hepatotoxicity between caspofungin and micafungin treatments for patients with fungal or suspected fungal infection. METHODS: In total, 201 patients [caspofungin group: 66 patients; micafungin group: 135 patients] treated with echinocandins from April 2014 to November 2015 at Aichi Medical University Hospital. Investigation item were as follows; sex, age, weight, height, duration of treatment, total dose, disease type, clinical isolates, liver enzyme levels, concomitant medications. Liver function was assessed in accordance with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0. We divided into two groups depend on their liver enzyme levels before treated with echinocandins; normal group (liver enzyme levels ≤ CTCAE Grade 1), abnormal group (liver enzyme levels ≥ CTCAE Grade 2). RESULTS: The overall incidence of serious hepatotoxicity (Grade 3 or higher) was 6.1% (4/66) in the caspofungin group and 7.4% (10/135) in the micafungin group. The proportion of patients used caspofungin and micafungin showed serious hepatotoxicity were 0% (0/47) and 6.5% (7/108) in normal group (p = 0.17), and 21.1% (4/19) and 10.7% (3/28) in abnormal group (p = 0.42). CONCLUSION: There was no notable difference in serious hepatotoxicity between the caspofungin group and the micafungin group, even though in patients with abnormal liver enzyme levels (CTCAE grade 2 or higher).

Efficacy of tedizolid against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius in thigh mixed-infection mouse model.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the antimicrobial activity of human simulated exposures of tedizolid 200 mg daily, and linezolid 600 mg every 12 h for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection (cSSSI) caused by MRSA and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius in both the neutropenic mice thigh mixed-infection models. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Tedizolid phosphate and linezolid were used for all in vivo testing. A total of one MRSA and two P. anaerobius isolates were utilized. Antimicrobial efficacy was calculated for each isolate as the change in bacterial numbers (Δlog10 CFU/ml) obtained in the treated mice after 24 h compared with the numbers in the starting control animals (0 h). RESULTS: The tedizolid and linezolid MICs for MRSA was 0.25 and 2 µg/ml. Tedizolid MIC for P. anaerobius was 0.12 µg/ml, and linezolid MICs for two P. anaerobius isolates were 0.5 and 1 µg/ml. In mixed infection model, tedizolid therapy showed similar antimicrobial activities for one MRSA and two P. anaerobius isolates evaluated, compared with linezolid therapy. Additionally, when comparing the activity of tedizolid and linezolid monotherapy between single infection and mixed infection model, antimicrobial activities of both antimicrobials were attenuated when mixed infection model was used. CONCLUSION: In the neutropenic murine thigh infection model, human simulated exposures of tedizolid and linezolid resulted in similar efficacies against MRSA, even though single and mixed infection models were used. These data support the clinical utility of tedizolid for use against MRSA and P. anaerobius in the treatment of cSSSI.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in gynecological cancer.

AIM: Risk factors for cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) vary by population. This study aimed to assess risk factors for CIN in patients with gynecological cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent cisplatin-based chemotherapy for gynecological cancer between January 2009 and December 2015 at Aichi Medical University School of Medicine were included in this study. CIN was defined according to the 'risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage kidney disease' (RIFLE) criteria and classified as either risk (Class R) or injury (Class I). Analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 112 patients enrolled, 30 had CIN. Multivariate analysis revealed that hydration with magnesium (odds ratio [OR], 0.223), history of cisplatin use (OR, 4.420), and hypoalbuminemia (OR, 4.170) were risk factors for Class R, and that frequency of cisplatin administration (OR, 5.620) and hydration with magnesium (OR, 0.216) were risk factors for Class I. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that hydration without magnesium, history of cisplatin use, frequency of cisplatin administration, and hypoalbuminemia are significant risk factors for CIN.

Retrospective study of teicoplanin loading regimen that rapidly achieves target 15-30 µg/mL serum trough concentration.

OBJECTIVES: There are several studies of assessment for teicoplanin loading dose regimen. However, the optimal loading dose achieving the target range 15-30 µg/mL has been still unclear. We investigated the probability of target attachment as teicoplanin concentration 15-30 µg/mL at the 3rd day after teicoplanin therapy started, clinical efficacy and safety in retrospective study. METHODS: In total, 42 patients treated with teicoplanin from January 2010 to July 2014 at Aichi Medical University Hospital were divided into three groups; group 1 (about 40 mg/kg for 2 days), group 2 (about 35 mg/kg for 2 days) and group 3 (about 30 mg/kg for 2 days; the previous regimen). The probability of target attachment as teicoplanin concentration, efficacy and toxicity were compared among three groups. RESULTS: The proportion of patients achieving the target range was 100% in group 1, 57.9% in group 2, and 38.9% in group 3 (p = 0.05). The percentage of patients that showed hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity was not different from three groups (hepatotoxicity: group 1, 20%; group 2, 21.1%; group 3, 16.7%: p = 0.48; nephrotoxicity: group 1, 0%; group 2, 5.3%; group 3, 16.7%: p = 0.38). Finally, there were not significant differences of clinical efficacy among three regimens, but CRP 4-7 day after teicoplanin therapy in group 1 and group 2 exhibited a significant lower value, compared with group 3. CONCLUSIONS: We suggested that 35-40 mg/kg for 2 days as a loading does would be needed for the early achieving target range (15-30 µg/mL) and improvement of infection.

Population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in different infectious disease settings and evaluation of dosing regimens.

The efficacy of arbekacin in patients with MRSA infections is influenced by the peak concentration (Cpeak)/MIC ratio (≧8). A daily arbekacin dose of 4-6 mg/kg is primarily used for the treatment of MRSA infection. However, clinical pharmacokinetic studies of arbekacin that evaluate changes in patients with different infectious diseases have been limited. This study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in different infectious diseases and to evaluate its dosing regimens. This work describes a single-centre, retrospective study. The pharmacokinetic parameters of arbekacin were calculated from individual serum-concentration data using WinNonlin ver. 6.3. A total of 331 serum samples were obtained from 170 patients. Our drug concentration-time data were well described by a two-compartment open model. The final model showed that drug clearance was related to creatinine clearance and that the total distribution volume (Vd) was related to actual body weight and the presence of bacteremia. The individual Vd in bacteremia patients was significantly higher than those of other patients (bacteremia: 29.7 ± 0.5 L, pneumonia: 20.8 ± 0.4 L, other infections: 21.4 ± 0.4 L; p < 0.05). Additionally, Monte Carlo simulation showed that target (Cpeak/MIC â‰§ 8) attainment was only 10.1%, even at a dose of 6 mg/kg, especially for MRSA bacteremia patients with an arbekacin MIC = 2 µg/mL. In conclusion, our study revealed that the Vd may be higher in bacteremia patients than in patients with other infectious diseases. Therefore, an increase in the daily dose of arbekacin should be considered for bacteremia patients.

Visual disturbance or central symptom like hallucination in patients treated voriconazole: report of six cases.

Visual disturbance or central symptom like hallucination is well known to be one of the common drug adverse events in response to voriconazole (VRCZ). We observed 123 patients treated VRCZ from April 2012 to January 2016. Two of these cases experienced visual disturbance and 4 of these cases experienced central symptom. Six patients appeared visual disturbance or central symptom within 1 week after administration of VRCZ (visual disturbance; 3 days [2-42 days], central symptom; 6 days [3-9 days]) and disappeared visual disturbance or central symptom at an early date after discontinuation of administration or decreasing dose of VRCZ. The trough concentration of VRCZ in patients who experienced central symptom was similar with that in-patients who did not experience adverse events by VRCZ (case 3; 3.79µg/ mL, case 4; 1.28µg/mL vs 3.73µg/mL [0.09-13.27 µg/mL]). On the other hand, the trough concentration of VRCZ in patients who experienced visual disturbance was higher than that in patients who did not experience adverse events by VRCZ (case 5; 7.49µg/mL, case 6; 4.45µg/ mL vs 3.73µg/mL [0.09-13.27µg/mL]). In conclusion, we thought that the risk factor of visual disturbance was the increasing concentration of VRCZ. Therefore, we should monitor the onset of visual disturbance or central symptom in patients treated with VRCZ, especially central symptom that the concentration is unconcerned.

Therapeutic and preventive antiemetic effect of aprepitant in Japanese patients with thoracic malignancies who truly need it.

PURPOSE: Neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonist is recommended for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) and has recently been introduced to oncology practice in Japan. However, whether all patients undergoing HEC truly need NK-1 receptor antagonist remains unknown, and increasing medical costs due to uniform use of NK-1 receptor antagonist are a concern. This study was conducted to examine the prevalence of patients who needed aprepitant at the time of its introduction in Japan, and therapeutic and preventive effects of aprepitant on HEC or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with thoracic malignancies who were to undergo HEC or MEC received 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonists and dexamethasone to prevent CINV. Aprepitant was administered to treat CINV occurring in the first course, or to prevent CINV in the second course. Frequency of vomiting, degree of nausea, and quality of life with respect to CINV were assessed. RESULTS: In total, 96 patients were enrolled. Aprepitant was not administered in 57 and 88 % of patients who received HEC and MEC, respectively. In patients treated with aprepitant (n = 18), therapeutic use of aprepitant after occurrence of CINV (n = 9) decreased average scores in numerical rating scale for nausea from 7.44 to 5.44 (p = 0.10), and average frequency of vomiting per day from 2.11 to 0.11 (p = 0.03). Prophylactic use of aprepitant in the second course (n = 18) increased the proportion of patients with no significant nausea from 6 % (first course) to 50 % (second course; p = 0.007), and those with no vomiting from 33 to 89 % (p = 0.002). Aprepitant use also significantly improved quality of life with respect to CINV in the second course. CONCLUSION: More than half of patients receiving HEC and 88 % of patients receiving MEC did not use aprepitant. Aprepitant showed significant therapeutic and preventive effects on CINV in patients who truly needed it.

Bicytopenia, especially thrombocytopenia in hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis patients treated with linezolid therapy.

One of the major adverse events associated with linezolid treatment is pancytopenia. However, there are few reports about the tolerability of linezolid among patients undergoing hemodialysis. This study retrospectively investigated the frequency of bicytopenia (thrombocytopenia and erythropenia) secondary to linezolid treatment in patients undergoing and not-undergoing hemodialysis. In total, 181 patients treated with linezolid from January 2010 to July 2012 at Aichi Medical University Hospital were divided into three groups; patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD group), those with creatinine clearance (CLCR) of <50 mL/min (CLCR < 50 group) and those with CLCR of ≥ 50 mL/min (CLCR ≥ 50 group). The incidence of thrombocytopenia, and changes in the platelet (PLT) counts during and after linezolid therapy were compared among three groups. Thrombocytopenia (<75% of the baseline level) occurred in 125 patients (69.1%). PLT reached its nadir 3-4 days after the end of linezolid therapy. In particular, the PLT nadir in HD group occurred earlier than that in non-HD groups (HD, 11.5 days [4-31 days]; CLCR < 50, 14 days [5-43 days]; CLCR ≥ 50, 15.5 days [4-49 days]; p = 0.11). HD group exhibited the greatest rate of reduction of PLT (HD, 24.0% [0.4-93.8%]; CLCR < 50, 23.8% [0.8-92.9%]; CLCR ≥ 50, 22.4% [0.92-92.9%]; p = 0.003). Finally, HD group exhibited the slowest recovery of PLT to its baseline level (HD, 10 days [5-29 days]; CLCR < 50, 9 days [2-16 days]; CLCR ≥ 50, 8 days [3-17 days]; p = 0.09). The incidence of erythropenia was not significantly different among three groups. These results indicate the need to monitor the PLT count during and after linezolid treatment in patients undergoing hemodialysis.

Analysis of Nausea and Vomiting Frequency Following Opioid Dose Escalation and Its Risk Factors: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study.

Background and Objective: Opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) is known to develop not only upon opioid introduction but also during opioid dose escalation, but the actual details are unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of OINV in opioid dose escalation at a single center and to identify risk factors. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of hospitalized patients with cancer who underwent increased intake of oral oxycodone extended-release tablets at Komaki City Hospital between January 2016 and December 2019 was performed. Associations between the incidence of OINV and multiple factors were analyzed, including patient demographics, opioid daily dose, comorbidities, history of nausea after opioid introduction, and prophylactic antiemetic drugs. Results: Of the 132 patients analyzed, 56 (42.4%; grades 1 and 2, 36 and 20, respectively) developed opioid-induced nausea after opioid dose escalation, 26 (19.7%; grades 1 and 2, 19 and 7, respectively) developed opioid-induced vomiting, 58 (43.9%) had either opioid-induced nausea or vomiting. Thirty-five of 60 patients (55.0%) developed OINV among those who received prophylactic antiemetic drugs at opioid dose escalation. Performance status (≥2) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.36, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.15-4.84, p = 0.02) and history of nausea for opioid introduction (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.20-7.10, p = 0.02) were detected as risk factors for the development of OINV. Conclusion: This study revealed a high incidence of OINV during opioid dose escalation, indicating that careful monitoring is required as at the time of opioid introduction. Further validation by a prospective study is required.

Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin administration improves sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and mortality: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Early treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) can be associated with improved patient outcomes. The Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW) and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria are the most specific for diagnosis of septic DIC. The revised Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) criteria are able to diagnose sepsis-induced DIC in the early stage. Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) has recently been used for treating DIC. Previous studies have shown a benefit of using rhTM for D,IC diagnosed by the JMHW or ISTH criteria, but not the JAAM criteria. The purpose of this study was to sequentially evaluate coagulation biomarkers and the DIC score after giving rhTM treatment to patients with sepsis-induced DIC diagnosed according to the JAAM criteria. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study. Critically ill patients were included if diagnosed with sepsis-induced DIC according to the JAAM criteria. They were either treated without rhTM (control group) or with rhTM (treatment group). The primary outcome was the DIC score on day 7. The secondary outcome was 28-day mortality from the start of DIC treatment. Changes in the results of coagulation tests were assessed over time from the start of treatment to day 7. RESULTS: Twelve and 23 patients were assigned to the treatment and control groups, respectively. The DIC score on day 7 was significantly higher in the treatment group (3.3 ± 1.4) than in the control group (4.9 ± 1.8, p < 0.05). Estimated survival showed lower in treatment group than control group. There was significant difference between the control group and the treatment group (p < 0.05). The D-dimer level on day 7 was significantly lower in the treatment group (7.5 ± 4.1 µg/mL) than in the control group (30.9 ± 33.6 µg/mL, p < 0.05). Life-threatening bleeding did not occur. Our results indicated that rhTM improved sepsis-induced DIC and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin may improve sepsis-induced DIC diagnosed according to the JAAM criteria without an increased bleeding risk.

[Preparation of dealcholized onetaxotere®, docetaxel injection formulation and its pharmacokinetics in rats].

Onetaxotere®(OTAX)injection, which is a docetaxel(DOC)injection formulation, cannot be administered to those patients with alcohol intolerance or hypersensitivity, because it contains ethanol as a dissolving agent. To broaden treatment options for those patients, we tried to eliminate ethanol from OTAX injection. Under sterile conditions, dealcoholization was carried out using nitrogen gas in a hot water bath at 50°C. By this method, the ethanol included in OTAX injection was almost completely removed and DOC in the formulation was stable for 28 days. When the dealcoholized or untreated OTAX injection was intravenously injected in rats, no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters of DOC were observed between those with dealcoholized and untreated OTAX injections. It is expected that dealcoholized OTAX may be useful in patients with alcohol-related difficulties.

Total body fluid is the factor that affects the pharmacokinetics of tolvaptan, and its efficacy, in acute worsening heart failure patients.

The optimal starting dose of tolvaptan to effectively improve fluid retention in patients with heart failure (HF) is unknown. This study explored the factors affecting the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics of tolvaptan in patients with decompensated HF. We prospectively enrolled patients who were slated to receive tolvaptan because of volume overload associated with chronic HF. Blood samples were collected to measure tolvaptan concentrations before and 4, 8, 12-15, 24, and 144 h after administration. Additionally, demographic parameters, coadministered drugs, and body fluid composition were evaluated. Multiple regression analysis to detect PK parameters for the prediction of body weight (BW) loss at day 7 after the initiation of tolvaptan treatment and PK analysis to explore the factors affecting the PKs of tolvaptan were performed. In total, 165 blood samples were obtained from 37 patients. The predictors of weight loss on day 7 were area under the curve (AUC0-∞ ) of tolvaptan. PK analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation between CL/F and Vd/F, but no correlation between CL/F and kel (r = .95 and .06, respectively). A significant correlation was observed between total body fluid and Vd/F, and this correlation remained statistically significant even after adjusting for BW (r = .49, p < .05). Fat was also significantly correlated with Vd/F before adjusting for BW, on the other the correlation disappeared after adjusting BW. The optimal dose of tolvaptan based on total body fluid levels in individual patients could result in the alleviation of fluid retention in patients with HF.

Efficacy and Safety of Oxaliplatin-based Regimens as First-line Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is mainly a disease of the elderly. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin-based regimens as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited mCRC patients aged ≥75 years who were treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy from October 2011 to November 2020. Primary outcome was median progression-free survival (PFS) and incidence of adverse events, while secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), relative dose intensity (RDI) and tumor response rate. RESULTS: The study enrolled 41 patients with mCRC aged ≥75 years. Median PFS and OS were 9.3 months and 38.9 months, respectively. Median rate of starting dose per standard dose and median RDI of L-OHP were 94.6% [interquartile range (IQR)=80.0-100] and 52.4% (IQR=30.2-71.1), respectively. The most common adverse events of grade ≥3 were neutropenia (21.4%), high blood pressure (16.7%), and anorexia (14.3%). CONCLUSION: Although the RDI of L-OHP drug was low, the PFS, OS, and incidence of adverse events were similar to previous reports of oxaliplatin-based regimens not limited to the elderly. Oxaliplatin-based regimens as first-line chemotherapy may be safely and effectively adapted to patients aged ≥75 years with mCRC by continuing chemotherapy with implementation of a reduction and discontinuation of anticancer drugs depending on adverse events.

Polaprezinc prevents oral mucositis associated with radiochemotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer.

Oral mucositis is frequent but serious adverse event associated with radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy in head and neck cancer severely impairs health-related quality of life, leading to poor prognosis due to discontinuation of the therapy. Although a number of compounds have been tested for prophylaxis of oral mucositis, few of them are satisfactory. We investigated the effect of polaprezinc (zinc L-carnosine), a gastric mucosal protective drug, on radiochemotherapy-induced oral mucositis, pain, xerostomia and taste disturbance in patients with head and neck cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive polaprezinc (n = 16) or azulene oral rinse as the control (n = 15). The incidence rates of mucositis, pain, xerostomia and taste disturbance were all markedly lower in polaprezinc group than in control. Moreover, the use of analgesics was significantly (p = 0.003) less frequent and the amount of food intake was significantly (p = 0.002) higher in polaprezinc group than in control. On the other hand, tumor response rate in patients with neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was not significantly affected by polaprezinc, in which the response rate (complete plus partial response) was 88% for polaprezinc and 92% for control (p = 1.000). Therefore, it is highly assumable that polaprezinc is potentially useful for prevention of oral mucositis and improvement of quality of life without reducing the tumor response.