Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacogenomics J ; 15(4): 354-62, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25532759

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease with genetic profiles and clinical outcomes dependent on the anatomic location of the primary tumor. How location has an impact on the molecular makeup of a tumor and how prognostic and predictive biomarkers differ between proximal versus distal colon cancers is not well established. We investigated the associations between tumor location, KRAS and BRAF mutation status, and the messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of proteins involved in major signaling pathways, including tumor growth (epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)), angiogenesis (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2)), DNA repair (excision repair cross complement group 1 (ERCC1)) and fluoropyrimidine metabolism (thymidylate synthase (TS)). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 431 advanced CRC patients were analyzed. The presence of seven different KRAS base substitutions and the BRAF V600E mutation was determined. ERCC1, TS, EGFR and VEGFR2 mRNA expression levels were detected by reverse transcriptase-PCR. BRAF mutations were significantly more common in the proximal colon (P<0.001), whereas KRAS mutations occurred at similar frequencies throughout the colorectum. Rectal cancers had significantly higher ERCC1 and VEGFR2 mRNA levels compared with distal and proximal colon tumors (P=0.001), and increased TS levels compared with distal colon cancers (P=0.02). Mutant KRAS status was associated with lower ERCC1, TS, EGFR and VEGFR2 gene expression in multivariate analysis. In a subgroup analysis, this association remained significant for all genes in the proximal colon and for VEGFR2 expression in rectal cancers. The mRNA expression patterns of predictive and prognostic biomarkers, as well as associations with KRAS and BRAF mutation status depend on primary tumor location. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and determine the underlying mechanisms.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias do Colo/genética , Proteínas de Ligação a DNA/genética , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Endonucleases/genética , Receptores ErbB/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , RNA Mensageiro/biossíntese , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Neoplasias Retais/genética , Receptor 2 de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular/genética
2.
Lung Cancer ; 83(2): 163-7, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24331409

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations are associated with diverse biologic functions as well as prognostic and predictive impact in non-small cell-lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC). In CRC, benefit from monoclonal antibody therapies targeting EGFR is generally limited to patients whose tumors have wild-type (WT) KRAS, whereas data suggest that this association is not present for NSCLC. We hypothesized that the unique tobacco-related carcinogenesis of NSCLC results in a divergence of KRAS MT genotype compared with CRC, contributing to differences in outcomes from EGFR-targeted therapies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tumor from 2603 patients (838 CRC and 1765 NSCLC) was analyzed for KRAS mutations. DNA was extracted from microdissected formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded specimens (FFPE) and 7 different base substitutions in codons 12 and 13 of KRAS were determined. RESULTS: KRAS mutation genotype differed significantly between NSCLC and CRC in frequency (25% vs. 39%; p<0.001), smoking-associated G>T transversions (73% versus 27%; p<0.001), and ratio of transversions to transitions (3.5 vs. 0.79; p<0.001). In NSCLC GLY12Cys mutations, resulting from a codon 12 GGT>TGT substitution, were observed in 44% compared to 10% for CRC. In contrast, codon 12 or 13 GLY>ASP substitutions (resulting in a G>A transition) were more frequent in CRC (42%) compared with NSCLC (21%). CONCLUSION: In this large dataset, KRAS mutation patterns are quantitatively and qualitatively distinct between NSCLC and CRC, reflecting in part differences in tobacco-related carcinogenesis. In light of differences in predictive value for EGFR-directed monoclonal antibody therapy and prognosis for specific KRAS mutations between NSCLC and CRC, these data provide an underlying biologic rationale.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Mutação/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas/genética , Proteínas ras/genética , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Carcinogênese/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Receptores ErbB/imunologia , Frequência do Gene , Genótipo , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras) , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/genética , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA