Access to infertility care in a low-resource setting: bridging the gap through resident and fellow education in a New York City public hospital.

PURPOSE: Improving access to care is an issue at the forefront of reproductive medicine. We sought to describe how one academic center, set in the background of a large and diverse metropolitan city, cares for patients with extremely limited access to reproductive specialists. METHODS: The NYU Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) Fellowship program provides a "fellow-run clinic" within Manhattan's Bellevue Hospital Center, which is led by the REI fellows and supervised by the REI attendings of the NYU Langone Health system. A description of the history of the hospital as well as the logistics of the fertility clinic is provided as a logistical template for implementation. RESULTS: The fellow-run fertility clinic at Bellevue hospital is held on two half days per month seeing approximately 150 new patients per year. The fertility workup, counseling, surgery, as well as ovulation induction, and early pregnancy management are offered within the construct of the fellowship and residency at NYU. Barriers to care and ways to circumvent those barriers are discussed in detail. CONCLUSION: By utilizing the ambition and construct of the OB/GYN programs, we greatly improve care for an otherwise underserved patient population by offering an efficient and optimal infertility workup and treatment in a population that would otherwise be without care. We utilize the framework of graduate medical education to provide autonomy, experience, and mentorship to both residents and fellows in our programs in an effort to provide a solution to combating inequity in infertility care.

A comparison of pregnancy outcomes between day 3 and day 5/6 embryo transfers: does day of embryo transfer really make a difference?

PURPOSE: To determine if day of embryo transfer (ET) affects gestational age (GA) and/or birth weight (BW) at a single university fertility center that primarily performs day 5/6 ET. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 2392 singleton live births resulting from IVF/ICSI at a single large university fertility center from 2003 to 2012. Patients were stratified by day 3 or day 5/6 ET. Outcome variables included patient age, gravidity, prior miscarriages, prior assisted reproduction technology cycles, number of embryos transferred, number of single ET, infertility diagnosis, neonatal sex, GA at birth, and BW. Subanalyses were performed on subgroups of preterm infants. A comparison was made between the study data and the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (SART) published data. RESULTS: There was no difference in GA at birth (39 ± 2.1 weeks for day 3 ET, 39 ± 1.9 weeks for day 5/6 ET) or BW between ET groups (3308 ± 568 g for day 3 ET, 3268 ± 543 g for day 5/6 ET). There was also no difference in the number of preterm deliveries (8.5 % for day 3 ET vs. 10.8 % for day 5/6 ET). The day 5/6 ET study data had significantly fewer pre-term deliveries than the SART day 5/6 ET data. CONCLUSION: In contrast to published SART data, GA and BW were not influenced by day of ET. Data may be more uniform at a single institution. Day 5/6 ET continues to offer improved pregnancy rates without compromising birth outcomes.

Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes in Women With Heart Disease.

Background: Women with infertility and heart disease (HD) are increasingly seeking assisted reproductive technology (ART). There is only one other study that examines the safety profile of ART in this population. This study aims to evaluate the cardiac, reproductive, and obstetric outcomes of ART in women with HD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case-control study of women with underlying congenital or acquired HD who underwent ART at a single University fertility center from 1/2010-3/2019. Women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF), oocyte cryopreservation (OC) or embryo banking (EB) with HD were included. Cases were matched 3:1 with age-, cycle type- and cycle start date- matched controls without HD. Outcomes included cardiovascular (CV), reproductive, and obstetric complications during or following ART. Results: Twenty women with HD were included. 15 (75%) had congenital HD, 1 (5%) had valvular disease, 1 (5%) had acquired cardiomyopathy, and 3 (15%) had arrhythmias. 90% were New York Heart Association class I. 55% of HD cases were modified WHO (mWHO) risk classification 1-2, 40% were mWHO 2-3 or 3, 5% were mWHO 4. Cases underwent 25 IVF, 5 OC, and 5 EB cycles and were compared with 79 controls who underwent 174 cycles. No CV complications or deaths occurred amongst cases following ART or pregnancy. There was no difference in risk of ART or obstetric outcomes amongst cases versus controls. Conclusion: For women with HD in this small, low -risk cohort, ART posed few risks that were similar in frequency to healthy controls.

Investigation of Global Gene Expression of Human Blastocysts Diagnosed as Mosaic using Next-generation Sequencing.

Embryos are diagnosed as mosaic if their chromosomal copy number falls between euploid and aneuploid. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of mosaicism on global gene expression. This study included 42 blastocysts that underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and were donated for IRB approved research. Fourteen blastocysts were diagnosed as mosaic with Next-generation Sequencing (NGS). Three NGS diagnosed euploid embryos, and 25 aneuploid embryos (9 NGS, 14 array Comparative Genomic Hybridization, 2 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism array) were used as comparisons. RNA-sequencing was performed on all of the blastocysts. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were calculated using DESeq2/3.5 (R Bioconductor Package) with p < 0.05 considered significantly differentially expressed. Pathway analysis was performed on mosaic embryos using EnrichR with p < 0.05 considered significant. With euploid embryo gene expression used as a control, 12 of 14 mosaic embryos had fewer DEGs compared to aneuploid embryos involving the same chromosome. On principal component analysis (PCA), mosaic embryos mapped separately from aneuploid embryos. Pathways involving cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis were the most disrupted within mosaic embryos. Mosaic embryos have decreased disruption of global gene expression compared to aneuploid embryos. This study was limited by the small sample size, lack of replicate samples for each mosaic abnormality, and use of multiple different PGT-A platforms for the diagnosis of aneuploid embryos.

Clinical error rates of next generation sequencing and array comparative genomic hybridization with single thawed euploid embryo transfer.

We investigated clinical error rates with single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET) diagnosed by next generation sequencing (NGS) and array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). A total of 1997 STEET cycles after IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) from 2010 to 2017 were identified; 1151 STEET cycles utilized NGS, and 846 STEET cycles utilized aCGH. Any abortions, spontaneous or elective, in which products of conception (POCs) were collected were reviewed. Discrepancies between chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, or live birth results and PGT-A diagnosis were also included. Primary outcomes were clinical error rate per: ET, pregnancy with gestational sac, live birth, and spontaneous abortion with POCs available for analysis. Secondary outcomes included implantation rate (IR), spontaneous abortion rate (SABR), and ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OPR/LBR). The clinical error rates in the NGS cohort were: 0.7% per embryo, 1% per pregnancy with gestational sac, and 0.1% rate per OP/LB. The error rate per SAB with POCs was 13.3%. The IR was 69.1%, the OPR/LBR was 61.6%, and the spontaneous abortion rate was 10.2%. The clinical error rates in the aCGH cohort were: 1.3% per embryo, 2% per pregnancy with gestational sac, and 0.4% rate per OP/LB. The error rate per SAB with POCs was 23.3%. The IR was 63.8%, the OPR/LBR was 54.6%, and the SAB rate was 12.4%. Our findings demonstrate that, although NGS and aCGH are sensitive platforms for PGT-A, errors still occur. Appropriate patient counseling and routine prenatal screening are recommended for all patients undergoing IVF/PGT-A.

Should every embryo undergo preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy? A review of the modern approach to in vitro fertilization.

Aneuploid conceptions constitute the majority of pregnancy failures in women of advanced maternal age. The best way to combat age-related decline in fertility is through preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). PGT-A allows for better embryo selection, which improves implantation rates with single embryo transfer and reduces miscarriage rates. Single embryo transfers decrease multiple gestations and adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preterm or low birth weight infants. Advancements in extended embryo culture, blastocyst biopsy techniques, and 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening platforms have made PGT-A safe and accessible for all patients who undergo in vitro fertilization. Improved genomic coverage of new sequencing platforms, such as next-generation sequencing, has increased the identification and diagnosis of mosaicism and partial aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos. Mosaic embryos have decreased viability compared to euploid embryos when transferred, but some mosaic embryos result in normal live births. Whole genome amplification artifacts may contribute to a misdiagnosis of mosaicism, or some mosaic embryos may self-correct to euploid after implantation. For this reason, patients without euploid embryos should be given the option of transferring mosaic embryos after genetic counseling. Further research is needed to characterize which mosaic embryos may be viable.

Next generation sequencing for preimplantation genetic screening improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization in single thawed euploid embryo transfer cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in single thawed euploid embryo transfer (STEET) cycles improves pregnancy outcomes compared with array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single university-based fertility center. PATIENT(S): A total of 916 STEET cycles from January 2014 to December 2016 were identified. Cases included 548 STEET cycles using NGS for PGS and controls included 368 STEET cycles using aCGH for PGS. INTERVENTION(S): Patients having a STEET after undergoing IVF and PGS with either NGS or aCGH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes were implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OP/LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate (PR), and spontaneous abortion (SAB) rate. RESULT(S): The implantation rate was significantly higher in the NGS group compared with the aCGH group (71.6% vs. 64.6%). The OP/LBR was also significantly higher in the NGS group (62% vs. 54.4%), and there were significantly more biochemical pregnancies in the aCGH group compared with the NGS group (15.1% vs. 8.7%). After adjustment for confounding variables with a multiple logistic regression analysis, OP/LBR remained significantly higher in the NGS group. The SAB rate was not significantly different in the NGS group compared with the aCGH group (12.4% vs. 12.7%). CONCLUSION(S): Preimplantation genetic screening using NGS significantly improves pregnancy outcomes versus PGS using aCGH in STEET cycles. Next-generation sequencing has the ability to identify and screen for embryos with reduced viability such as mosaic embryos and those with partial aneuploidies or triploidy. Pregnancy outcomes with NGS may be improved due to the exclusion of these abnormal embryos.

Diagnosis and clinical management of embryonic mosaicism.

Embryonic mosaicism occurs when two or more cell populations with different genotypes are present within the same embryo. New diagnostic techniques for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), such as next-generation sequencing, have led to increased reporting of mosaicism. The interpretation of mosaicism is complicated because the transfer of some mosaic embryos has resulted in live births. Mosaic embryos may represent a third category between normal (euploidy) and abnormal (aneuploidy). This category of mosaic embryos may be characterized by decreased implantation and pregnancy potential as well as increased risk of genetic abnormalities and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Euploid embryos should be preferentially transferred over mosaic embryos. Genetic counseling is necessary before the transfer of a mosaic embryo is considered. Certain types of mosaic embryos should be preferentially transferred over others. Transfer of embryos with mosaic trisomies 2, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, and 21 may pose the most risk of having a child affected with a trisomy syndrome; however, the transfer of embryos with mosaic monosomies or other mosaic trisomies are not devoid of risk. Patients must be counseled about the risk of undetected monosomies or trisomies within a biopsy specimen as well as the risk of intrauterine fetal demise or uniparental disomy with the transfer of mosaic embryos. Until more data are available, patients should be encouraged to undergo another cycle to obtain euploid embryos, when possible, rather than transferring a mosaic embryo.

Why do euploid embryos miscarry? A case-control study comparing the rate of aneuploidy within presumed euploid embryos that resulted in miscarriage or live birth using next-generation sequencing.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether undetected aneuploidy contributes to pregnancy loss after transfer of euploid embryos that have undergone array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: University-based fertility center. PATIENT(S): Cases included 38 patients who underwent frozen euploid ET as determined by aCGH, resulting in miscarriage. Controls included 38 patients who underwent frozen euploid ET as determined by aCGH, resulting in a live birth. INTERVENTION(S): Next-generation sequencing (NGS) protocols were internally validated. Saved amplified DNA samples from the blastocyst trophectoderm biopsies previously diagnosed as euploid by aCGH were reanalyzed using NGS. Cytogenetic reports of the products of conception for 20 of the pregnancies resulting in miscarriage were available for comparison. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism using NGS within embryos resulting in miscarriage and live birth. RESULT(S): Of euploid embryos analyzed by aCGH resulting in miscarriage, 31.6% were mosaic and 5.2% were polyploid by NGS. The rate of chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher in embryos resulting in miscarriage (36.8%) than in those resulting in live births (15.8%). The rate of mosaicism was twice as high among embryos resulting in miscarriage than those resulting in live birth, but this was not statistically significant. Next-generation sequencing detected more cases of mosaicism than cytogenetic analysis of products of conception. CONCLUSION(S): Undetected aneuploidy may increase the risk of first trimester pregnancy loss. Next-generation sequencing may detect mosaicism and triploidy more frequently than aCGH, which could help to identify embryos at high risk of miscarriage. Mosaic embryos, however, should not be discarded as some can result in live births.