Randomized controlled pilot trial of prazosin for prophylaxis of posttraumatic headaches in active-duty service members and veterans.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of prazosin for prophylaxis of headaches following mild traumatic brain injury in active-duty service members and military veterans. BACKGROUND: Prazosin is an alpha-1 adrenoreceptor antagonist that reduces noradrenergic signaling. An open-label trial in which prazosin reduced headache frequency in veterans following mild traumatic brain injury provided the rationale for this pilot study. METHODS: A 22-week parallel-group randomized controlled trial  which included 48 military veterans and active-duty service members with mild traumatic brain injury-related headaches was performed. The study design was based on International Headache Society consensus guidelines for randomized controlled trials for chronic migraine. Following a pre-treatment baseline phase, participants with at least eight qualifying headache days per 4 weeks were randomized 2:1 to prazosin or placebo. After a 5-week titration to a maximum possible dose of 5 mg (morning) and 20 mg (evening), participants were maintained on the achieved dose for 12 weeks. Outcome measures were evaluated in 4-week blocks during the maintenance dose phase. The primary outcome measure was change in 4-week frequency of qualifying headache days. Secondary outcome measures were percent participants achieving at least 50% reduction in qualifying headache days and change in Headache Impact Test-6 scores. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis of randomized study participants (prazosin N = 32; placebo N = 16) demonstrated greater benefit over time in the prazosin group for all three outcome measures. In prazosin versus placebo participants, reductions from baseline to the final rating period for 4-week headache frequency were -11.9 ± 1.0 (mean ± standard error) versus -6.7 ± 1.5, a prazosin minus placebo difference of -5.2 (-8.8, -1.6 [95% confidence interval]), p = 0.005 and for Headache Impact Test-6 scores were -6.0 ± 1.3 versus +0.6 ± 1.8, a difference of -6.6 (-11.0, -2.2), p = 0.004. The mean predicted percent of participants at 12 weeks with ≥50% reduction in headache days/4 weeks, baseline to final rating, was 70 ± 8% for prazosin (21/30) versus 29 ± 12% for placebo (4/14), odds ratio 5.8 (1.44, 23.6), p = 0.013. The trial completion rate of 94% in the prazosin group (30/32) and 88% in the placebo group (14/16) indicated that prazosin was generally well tolerated at the administered dose regimen. Morning drowsiness/lethargy was the only adverse effect that differed significantly between groups, affecting 69% of the prazosin group (22/32) versus 19% of the placebo group (3/16), p = 0.002. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study provides a clinically meaningful efficacy signal for prazosin prophylaxis of posttraumatic headaches. A larger randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm and extend these promising results.

Retrospective and Prospective Memory Among OEF/OIF/OND Veterans With a Self-Reported History of Blast-Related mTBI.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospective and retrospective memory abilities in Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), and Operation New Dawn (OND) Veterans with and without a self-reported history of blast-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). METHODS: Sixty-one OEF/OIF/OND Veterans, including Veterans with a self-reported history of blast-related mTBI (mTBI group; n=42) and Veterans without a self-reported history of TBI (control group; n=19) completed the Memory for Intentions Test, a measure of prospective memory (PM), and two measures of retrospective memory (RM), the California Verbal Learning Test-II and the Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised. RESULTS: Veterans in the mTBI group exhibited significantly lower PM performance than the control group, but the groups did not differ in their performance on RM measures. Further analysis revealed that Veterans in the mTBI group with current PTSD (mTBI/PTSD+) demonstrated significantly lower performance on the PM measure than Veterans in the control group. PM performance by Veterans in the mTBI group without current PTSD (mTBI/PTSD-) was intermediate between the mTBI/PTSD+ and control groups, and results for the mTBI/PTSD- group were not significantly different from either of the other two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that PM performance may be a sensitive marker of cognitive dysfunction among OEF/OIF/OND Veterans with a history of self-reported blast-related mTBI and comorbid PTSD. Reduced PM may account, in part, for complaints of cognitive difficulties in this Veteran cohort, even years post-injury. (JINS, 2018, 24, 324-334).

Effect of blast-related mTBI on the working memory system: a resting state fMRI study.

Reduced working memory is frequently reported by Veterans with a history of blast-related mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), but can be difficult to quantify on neuropsychological measures. This study aimed to improve our understanding of the impact of blast-related mTBI on the working memory system by using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore differences in functional connectivity between OEF/OIF/OND Veterans with and without a history of mTBI. Participants were twenty-four Veterans with a history of blast-related mTBI and 17 Veterans who were deployed but had no lifetime history of TBI. Working memory ability was evaluated with the Auditory Consonants Trigrams (ACT) task. Resting state fMRI was used to evaluate intrinsic functional connectivity from frontal seed regions that are known components of the working memory network. No significant group differences were found on the ACT, but the imaging analyses revealed widespread hyper-connectivity from the frontal seed regions in the Veterans with a history of mTBI relative to the deployed control group. Further, within the mTBI group, but not the control group, better performance on the ACT was associated with increased functional connectivity to multiple brain regions, including cerebellar components of the working memory network. These results were present after controlling for age, PTSD symptoms, and estimated premorbid IQ, and suggest that long-term alterations in the functional connectivity of the working memory network following blast-related mTBI may reflect a compensatory change that contributes to intact performance on an objective measure of working memory.