Medial Transmalleolar Portal Technique for Ankle Arthroscopic Headless Screw Fixation of Talar Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions.

This article describes a technique for arthroscopic fixation of an osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) lesion of the medial talar dome with headless compression screws. This technique involves creation of a medial transmalleolar portal using a guide and drill. The medial transmalleolar portal grants perpendicular access for screw fixation of OCD lesions in addition to the potential for osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT). Advantages include access to the medial talar dome without performing a medial malleolar osteotomy. After completion of OCD fixation, an inverted osteochondral plug can be used to backfill the portal.

Ideal Donor Site for Osteochondral Autografting of the Distal Femur Using Radius of Curvature: A 3-Dimensional High-Resolution Scanner Comparison.

OBJECTIVE: To compare radius of curvature (RoC) of distal femur osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) donor sites from the intercondylar notch and trochlear ridge with recipient sites on the distal and posterior condyles and evaluate differences between recipient sites. DESIGN: Nineteen cadaveric femurs were scanned with a 3-dimensional high-resolution sensor. Donor regions included the lateral (LTR) and medial trochlear ridges (MTR), and the lateral (LICN) and medial intercondylar notch (MICN). Recipient regions analyzed were the distal medial (DMFC), posterior medial (PMFC), distal lateral (DLFC), and posterior lateral femur condyle (PLFC). Six-millimeter OAT grafts were simulated, and average RoC of all regions was compared using an analysis of variance. Post hoc testing was performed using Fisher's least significant difference. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in RoC of the LICN compared with all 4 recipient sites (P = 0.19, 0.97, 0.11, and 0.75 for DLFC, PLFC, DMFC, and PMFC, respectively) or the LTR and MTR to the posterior condyles (LTR vs. PLFC and PMFC; P = 0.72, 0.47, MTR vs. PLFC and PMFC P = 0.39, 0.22, respectively). Significant differences were found for RoC of the MICN compared with each recipient site (P < 0.001) and between distal and posterior femoral condyles (DLFC vs. PLFC, P = 0.016; DMFC vs. PMFC, P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: The LICN is the ideal donor option for all recipient sites on the femoral condyles with respect to RoC of 6-mm OAT plugs. The MTR and LTR were acceptable donor sources for the posterior condyles, while the MICN was a poor match for all recipient sites. Additionally, the distal femur condyle and posterior femur condyle have different RoCs.

Arthroscopic Fixation of Knee Femoral Condyle Osteochondritis Dissecans Fragment With Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.

This article reviews a technique for arthroscopic fixation of an osteochondritis dissecans fragment with bone marrow aspirate concentrate augmentation. This technique involves safe harvest of bone marrow arthroscopically from the intercondylar notch, proper preparation and debridement of the parent bone, reduction of the progeny osteochondritis dissecans fragment, insertion of the bone marrow aspirate concentrate, and placement of multiple headless compression screws for fixation.

Adapting Orthopaedic Surgery Training Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Future Directions.

The COVID-19 pandemic swept across the world, altering the structure and existence of graduate medical education programs across all disciplines. Orthopaedic residency programs can adapt during these unprecedented times to continue providing meaningful education to trainees and to continue providing high-quality patient care, all while keeping both residents and patients safe from disease. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature and describe evidence-based changes that can be made in an orthopaedic residency program to ensure patient and resident safety while sustaining the principles of graduate medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. We describe measures that can be enacted now or during future pandemics, including workforce and occupational modifications, personal protective equipment, telemedicine, online didactic education, resident wellness, return to elective surgery, and factors affecting medical students and fellows. After a review of these strategies, programs can make changes for sustainable improvements and adapt to be ready for second-wave events or future pandemics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V.

The Accuracy of Common Hand Injections With and Without Ultrasound: An Anatomical Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to determine the accuracy of hand injections with and without the aid of ultrasound (U/S) into the carpal tunnel, thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, first dorsal compartment (DC) and the radiocarpal (RC) joint. METHODS: Four participants of various level of experience injected the carpal tunnel, thumb CMC, first DC, and RC joint into 40 fresh frozen cadaver specimens with blue dye and radiographic contrast. Participants 1 and 2 were injected without U/S guidance, and participants 3 and 4 were injected with U/S guidance. A successful injection was determined by both fluoroscopy and dissection/direct observation. Additional information was recorded for each injection such as median nerve infiltration and evidence of thumb CMC arthrosis. RESULTS: The overall accuracy for carpal tunnel, thumb CMC, first DC, and RC injections were 95%, 63%, 90%, and 90%, respectively. Success was compared with and without U/S guidance. Success rates were similar for each injection site, except the thumb CMC joint, where U/S participants had 25% higher accuracy. In the setting of thumb CMC arthrosis, the incidence of success was 38% for participants with no U/S aid and 72% for participants with U/S aid. There was a significant difference between participants who used U/S with the participant with more U/S experience being more successful. CONCLUSION: Carpal tunnel, first DC, and RC injections had an accuracy of greater than 90%. Thumb CMC injections have a lower accuracy (63%) and one can improve accuracy with U/S. The accuracy of U/S-guided injections is dependent on the user and their experience.