Familial psychosocial impact of cochlear implantation.

BACKGROUND: Adult cochlear implantation rates are increasing, and the resulting change in hearing capabilities has vast impacts in the psychosocial domain of life for the cochlear implant users and their families. However, there is currently no published evidence synthesis of the ways in which adult cochlear implantation affects the psychosocial sphere of the family unit. OBJECTIVE: (1) Describe the existing literature on the psychosocial impact of cochlear implantation on adults. (2) Assess the range of impacts on the family unit and highlight areas warranting further investigation. DATA SOURCES: Ovid, CINAHL, and Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: Databases were systematically searched from January 1, 2007 to May 1, 2022. Eligibility assessment was performed via two independent investigators. Disagreements in selection were discussed and consulted on with a third investigator as needed. RESULTS: Of the 875 unique articles identified, 13 remained in the final review. The most frequently noted psychosocial impacts on the family was quality of life (100 %), family relations (85 %), conversational access (85 %), everyday hearing (77 %), and less feelings of isolation (77 %). 6 of the studies only considered the viewpoint of the CI user and did not have a congruent survey response from an individual from their family unit. CONCLUSION: This study describes the existing literature on the familial psychosocial impact of adult cochlear implantation, focusing on the general well-being, social integration, and psychological aspects noted post-implantation. This review identifies gaps in this research, with large numbers of studies on CI user benefits and little insight into the impact on the family unit. We recommend shifting research on CI impact toward a focus on the family unit, rather than individual, and an evaluation of familial influence in electing to receive a CI.

Trends and postoperative outcomes of thyroidectomy after expansion and rise of health insurance deductibles in the fiscal year.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a relationship between expansion of High Deductible Health Plans (HDHPs) and the number of thyroid surgery cases with associated postoperative outcomes in the fiscal year. METHODS: Data from TriNetX was used to evaluate the trends in thyroid surgery from 2005 and 2021 between the end of the year (Quarter 4) and the beginning of the year (Quarter 1). Risk of postoperative outcomes were statistically interrogated. RESULTS: The average rate of thyroid surgery in cases/year between Quarter 4 and Quarter 1 was similar after expansion of HDHPs (152; 146; p = 0.64). There was no increased risk of postoperative complications. The rate of surgery decreased significantly for patients with Medicare after implementation of the revised American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines (Quarter 4: p = 0.03; Quarter 1: p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are less likely to delay thyroid surgery at the end of the year despite higher deductibles.

The use of mobile devices in oculoplastic and oral and maxillofacial surgery: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The use of smartphones in the United States has more than doubled since 2011. Mobile phone applications have versatile functions in ophthalmology, otolaryngology, and plastic surgery, such as increasing patient engagement in treatment, decreasing no-shows to appointments, and providing patient education. They also provide practical advantages to the clinician, including supplementing an otoscope, laryngoscope, or ophthalmoscope. Their use in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) and oculoplastic surgery has shown effectiveness for a variety of applications, such as for photography and medical reference. Research suggests that smartphones may improve clinical outcomes and efficiency. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date systematic review of the available literature investigating mobile phone use in oculoplastic surgery and OMFS. METHODS: A query of terms relevant to oculoplastic surgery and OMFS was conducted using the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsychINFO to identify studies meeting inclusion criteria that investigated the implementation, efficacy, and outcomes of mobile device use in oculoplastic surgery and OMFS. A qualitative summary and discussion of the literature was subsequently synthesized. RESULTS: Out of a total of 289 articles reviewed, 171 were removed due to duplication across the four databases. Of the 118 studies remaining, 19 of them were included within the final qualitative review after screening the abstracts and full text for relevance. The articles were published between 2005 and 2020 from 7 different countries. Review of the relevant articles showed three settings in which mobile devices were used: communication between providers, communication between providers and patients, and as surgical supplementation. The literature review included use of mobile device photography for quality improvement, visual representation of procedures for patient education, and improved communication amongst providers and patients in the setting of oculoplastics and OMFS. CONCLUSION: Mobile device use has become ubiquitous across cultures worldwide. The literature suggests that mobile phone use in oculoplastic surgery and OMFS may improve clinical practice in multiple settings. However, further investigation is necessary to quantify the clinical benefits of mobile device use in oculoplastic and oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Sociodemographic disparities in pediatric cochlear implantation outcomes: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of sociodemographic factors on post-operative performance outcomes among PCI recipients across the world. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase was undertaken for studies analyzing the association of sociodemographic factors with measures of PCI outcomes published before July 18, 2021. Study quality assessment tools from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) were used to assess for risk of bias. RESULTS: Out of 887 unique abstracts initially retrieved, 45 papers were included in the final qualitative systematic review. Sociodemographic disparities in PCI outcomes from 4702 PCI recipients were studied in 19 countries, with 14 studies conducted in the United States of America, published within the years of 1999 to 2021. Parental education and socioeconomic status (e.g. income) were the most investigated disparities in PCI outcomes with 24 and 17 identified studies, respectively. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic status was a consistently reported determinant of PCI outcomes in the USA and elsewhere, and parental education, the most reported disparity, consistently impacted outcomes in countries outside the USA. This study is limited by our inability to perform a meta-analysis given the lack of standardization across measures of sociodemographic variables and assessment measures for PCI outcomes. Future studies should address the literature gap on racial and ethnic disparities among PCI outcomes and use standardized measures for sociodemographic variables and PCI outcomes to facilitate meta-analyses on the topic. Targeting the mechanisms of these disparities may mitigate the impact of the sociodemographic factors on PCI outcomes.

Use of biologics for treatment of autoimmune inner ear disease.

OBJECTIVE: Biologic medications are novel therapeutics in the treatment of Autoimmune Inner Ear Disease (AIED), an etiology of Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SNHL). The goal of this study is to review the currently available literature on the efficacy of biologic medications on autoimmune-mediated hearing loss and associated symptomology among patients with AIED. METHODS: A systematic review of Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies investigating the impact of biologic medications on hearing outcomes. Bias assessment was independently conducted by three authors and studies were stratified based on risk of bias. RESULTS: Of 174 unique abstracts screened, 12 articles met inclusion criteria for formal review. One randomized control trial, seven prospective cohort studies, and four retrospective cohort studies were included. Seven biologic medications, Etanercept, Infliximab, Adalimumab, Golimumab, Rituximab, Anakinra, and Canakinumab, were identified targeting three unique molecular targets, TNF-α, CD20, and IL-1. CONCLUSION: The effects of biologic medications in treating SNHL was highly variable without clear efficacy of a drug or drug category, likely due to rarity of disease, multifactorial etiologies of AIED, and cohort heterogeneity. However, several medications alleviate symptoms associated with AIED, such as vertigo and tinnitus. While biologic medications may be promising therapeutics in AIED patients, the evidence is currently inconclusive. Large-scale randomized control trials and prospective cohort reviews are required to establish the efficacy of biologic medications in treating hearing loss.

Qualitative analysis of sinus surgery posts on popular social media platforms.

INTRODUCTION: Social media platforms are constantly evolving and expanding to new populations, exposing their users to various topics and serving as an informal educational resource. Medical ideas and topics are freely discussed online, making understanding of what is present on these platforms of particular importance to the practicing medical professional. In the field of otolaryngology, the public social media portrayal of sinus surgery has not been previously reported. METHODS: Social media posts using keywords related to sinus surgery on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok were qualitatively analyzed and categorized based on media type, author, subject, timing, depiction, and popularity. RESULTS: The total number of posts included in final analysis was 1798, with a majority stemming from Instagram (68.5%), then Facebook (20.2%) and finally TikTok (11.3%). The most common type of media analyzed was images (69.0%) and patients were more often authors of posts (45.1%) as compared to physicians (34.8%). The subjects of the posts were nearly equally reassurance regarding surgery (41.3%) and educational or informational posts (38.8%) and were most commonly timed in the postoperative period (41.3%). Sinus surgery was depicted in a positive fashion most frequently (56.6%), notably compared against the negative portrayal at 3.2%. Negative posts most commonly cited postoperative pain or bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Most social media posts analyzed in this multi-platform study depicted sinus surgery in a positive fashion. Patients tended to post in the postoperative or perioperative period, whereas physicians tender to post intraoperative educational posts. Negative posts were most commonly centered around postoperative pain. Cautious interpretation of these results could be used for improving patient care and outreach in the digital age.

Psychosocial outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment: An overview of the relevant literature.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the psychosocial assessments utilized with individuals with conductive and/or mixed hearing loss as part of a broader effort by the Auditory Rehabilitation Outcomes Network (AURONET) group to develop a core set of patient-centred outcome measures. DESIGN: A review of articles published between 2006 and 2016 was completed. Included studies had more than three adult participants, were available in English, and reported a psychosocial outcome from any treatment of mixed and/or conductive hearing loss. STUDY SAMPLE: Sixty-six articles from seven databases. RESULTS: Sixty-six articles met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Within this set, 15 unique psychosocial or patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were identified, with the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) being the most frequently dispensed. Five of the fifteen were only administered in one study. In-house questionnaires (IHQs) were reported in 19 articles. CONCLUSIONS: Only 66 (22%) of the 300 articles with outcomes contained a PRO. Some of the mostly frequently employed PROs (e.g., APHAB) were judged to include only social items and no psychological items. Lack of PRO standardization and the use of IHQs make psychosocial comparisons across treatments in this population difficult for patients, clinicians and stakeholders.

Hearing outcome measures for conductive and mixed hearing loss treatment in adults: a scoping review.

OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation options for conductive and mixed hearing loss are continually expanding, but without standard outcome measures comparison between different treatments is difficult. To meaningfully inform clinicians and patients core outcome sets (COS), determined via a recognised methodology, are needed. Following our previous work that identified hearing, physical, economic and psychosocial as core areas of a future COS, the AURONET group reviewed hearing outcome measures used in existing literature and assigned them into different domains within the hearing core area. DESIGN: Scoping review. STUDY SAMPLE: Literature including hearing outcome measurements for the treatment of conductive and/or mixed hearing loss. RESULTS: The literature search identified 1434 studies, with 278 subsequently selected for inclusion. A total of 837 hearing outcome measures were reported and grouped into nine domains. The largest domain constituted pure-tone threshold measurements accounting for 65% of the total outcome measures extracted, followed by the domains of speech testing (20%) and questionnaires (9%). Studies of hearing implants more commonly included speech tests or hearing questionnaires compared with studies of middle ear surgery. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of outcome measures are currently used, highlighting the importance of developing a COS to inform individual practice and reporting in trials/research.

Cannabis & ENT: State certification-An expanding yet unregulated system.

OBJECTIVES: 1) Ascertain the status of cannabis legalization by state, 2) Explore the process required to obtain cannabis credentials for both the patient and the physician, 3) Determine the level of interest of otolaryngologists in the medicinal cannabis, and 4) Explore possible research directions into efficacy and potential complications. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive study. METHODS: Internet searches were conducted to identify each state's Medical Cannabis Program website. The qualifying conditions, list of approved-practitioners, process required for both practitioners and patients for approval were noted. Lists of approved practitioners were analyzed to determine the prevalence of board-certified otolaryngologists. RESULTS: Of the 33 states that authorize medicinal cannabis, eight provide lists of approved-practitioners, six of which provide specialty information. A total of 24 Otolaryngologists can be found of the 5944 physicians on these six lists. All otolaryngologists were located in highly-populated metropolitan areas with a mean number of 29.9 years in practice. Significant variations exist between each state including legal definitions and qualifying conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of consistent regulation across the country drives uncertainty regarding the adoption of medicinal cannabis. Very few otolaryngologists in the country are registered to certify patients for medical cannabis. While the medicinal use of cannabis may currently have limited applications within otolaryngology, many areas that have yet to be explored.

The use of text-messaging for telecommunications with patients in otolaryngology: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: To compile and analyze the available literature regarding the use of text-messaging for communicating with patients in otolaryngology. STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. METHODS: Using the PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsychINFO databases, a review of the literature examining for articles that discuss the usage and applications of text-messaging services in otolaryngology-based practice was conducted. Studies were categorized into six groups by content, depending upon their specific applications: Access, Engagement, Expert Model, Monitoring, No-Show, and Triage. RESULTS: From 402 search results, we obtained 59 results that met inclusion criteria, from which there were 11 distinct studies included in this review. All studies found that the use of smartphones in otolaryngology is feasible and can lead to improved outcomes or increased patient engagement in their treatment. The study which was coded "Expert Model" provided a framework for creating a text-message-based platform for application in otolaryngology. CONCLUSION: The current literature suggests that using mobile text-messaging is a feasible method of increasing patient engagement in treatment, improving outcomes, and monitoring patients' treatment progress and concerns over time. However, further research is required to quantify the benefits of the varied uses of text-messaging for different patient populations.

Ludwig's angina and steroid use: A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Ludwig's angina, a rapidly progressive cellulitis causing airway obstruction, has traditionally been managed with antibiotics and surgical intervention. More controversial is the use of steroids in the management of patients with this condition. This article summarizes the literature of steroid use in the management of Ludwig's angina. METHODS: The study used a narrative review method alongside the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched for cases of Ludwig's angina with documented steroid use in patient management. Inclusion criteria were articles in the English language with direct patient outcomes. There were 17 articles selected with 31 patient cases. RESULTS: Most reports of steroid use in Ludwig's angina in the literature are case reports, with one retrospective review, and one letter to the editor. Dexamethasone was the steroid of choice in most cases reviewed. All patient cases reported used antibiotics alongside their steroid use, and 27 out of 31 patient cases required surgery. Most patients recovered with no further sequelae or complications. Three (9.68%) patients suffered mortality due to unrelated causes. CONCLUSIONS: Primary literature reporting the use of steroids in the management of Ludwig's angina includes few cases. While the role steroids have in these cases remains uncertain, the articles summarized do not suggest an adverse influence, and may suggest a benefit.

What is the evidence for cannabis use in otolaryngology?: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: Review of the English literature for all studies involving cannabis and Otolaryngology. METHODS: PubMed was searched using a combination of the terms cannabis, marijuana, otolaryngology, hearing, tinnitus, vestibular, rhinology, sinusitis, laryngology, voice, airway, head and neck, head and neck cancer, facial trauma, spasm, pediatric otolaryngology, sleep medicine, obstructive sleep apnea, and other variations. Literature included in the review provided substantive research on cannabis in Otolaryngology. RESULTS: Seventy-nine unique publications were found in the literature. The majority were published in the last decade and pertain to the subspecialty of Head and Neck; specifically, its association with incident cancers. A small number of studies exist that suggest cannabis may be a useful therapy for Otolaryngological patients suffering from blepharospasm, the effects of radiation, and the psychological sequelae of receiving a cancer diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Further research is required to determine the potential therapeutic roles and adverse effects of cannabis on conditions related to Otolaryngology. This study serves the Otolaryngological researcher with the most current, comprehensive literature review for the exploration into possible projects to undertake.

Financial outcomes of transoral robotic surgery: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the current cost impact and financial outcomes of transoral robotic surgery in Otolaryngology. DATA SOURCES: A narrative review of the literature with a defined search strategy using Pubmed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS: Using keywords ENT or otolaryngology, cost or economic, transoral robotic surgery or TORs, searches were performed in Pubmed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science and reviewed by the authors for inclusion and analysis. RESULTS: Six total papers were deemed appropriate for analysis. All addressed cost impact of transoral robotic surgery (TORs) as compared to open surgical methods in treating oropharyngeal cancer and/or the identification of the primary tumor within unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma. Results showed TORs to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Transoral robotic surgery is currently largely cost effective for both treatment and diagnostic procedures. However, further studies are needed to qualify long-term data.

Identifying eustachian tube dysfunction prior to hyperbaric oxygen therapy: Who is at risk for intolerance?

PURPOSE: Determine whether specific risk factors, symptoms and clinical examination findings are associated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) intolerance and subsequent tympanotomy tube placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case series with chart review was conducted from 2007 to 2016 of patients undergoing HBOT clearance at a tertiary care university hospital in an urban city. Eighty-one (n=81) patient charts were reviewed for risk factors, symptoms and clinical examination findings related to HBOT eustachian tube dysfunction and middle ear barotrauma. Relative risk was calculated for each variable to determine risk for HBOT intolerance and need for tympanotomy tube placement. Risk factor, symptom, physical examination and HBOT complication-susceptibility scores were calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Mean risk factor, clinical and HBOT complication-susceptibility scores were significantly higher in patients who did not tolerate HBOT compared to patients who tolerated HBOT. Patients reporting a history of otitis media, tinnitus, and prior ear surgery were at a higher risk for HBOT intolerance. Patients reporting a history of pressure intolerance and prior ear surgery were more likely to undergo tympanotomy tube placement. Patients noted to have otologic findings prior to HBOT were at a higher risk for both HBOT intolerance and tympanotomy tube placement. CONCLUSIONS: A thorough otolaryngological evaluation can potentially predict and identify patients at risk for HBOT intolerance and tympanotomy tube placement.

Cochlear implantation in 13q deletion syndrome.

PURPOSE: The advent of cochlear implantation has been followed by an explosion in surgical and technological advances with subsequent alterations in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss management. Many individuals with rare genetic abnormalities who once may have not been considered candidates for cochlear implantation are now benefiting from cochlear implantation. One of these unusual syndromes is the 13q deletion syndrome. The clinical features of 13q deletion syndrome, a rare chromosomal abnormality, were originally described in the early 1960s, though the literature currently lacks defined phenotypic abnormalities. Patients with 13q deletion syndrome present with varying degrees of cognitive and growth delay, craniofacial dysmorphisms, and congenital malformations. The etiology of the sensorineural hearing loss has not been elucidated, and genes associated with other syndromes which include sensorineural hearing loss have been proposed as the causative agents. We describe the unique clinical and surgical considerations for 13q deletion syndrome and review the considerations when deliberating on cochlear implantation in syndromic hearing loss. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: Successful cochlear implantation in a patient with 13q deletion syndrome. CONCLUSION: Many patients with 13q deletion syndrome suffer from sensorineural hearing loss, and when appropriately selected may likely benefit from cochlear implantation. Many other syndromic patients following careful selection may also benefit from cochlear implantation and should not be excluded from consideration until appropriately evaluated.

An Investigation of the Impact of Expanding High-Deductible Health Plans on Patient Decision for Cochlear Implant Surgery and Postoperative Outcomes.

HYPOTHESIS: After the expansion of high deductibles, patients will delay cochlear implant (CI) surgery to the end of the year, and the risk of postoperative known risks will increase. BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act was associated with increased enrollment in high-deductible health plans (HDHPs), which resulted in rising health insurance deductibles. Health insurance plans can cover a patient's cost of healthcare once the deductible is met. Patients have been shown to be economic rational decision makers and make decisions based on cost rather than health. They wait for their deductible to be met, typically at the end of the year, then proceed to have costly care. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of rising health insurance deductibles on the rate and postoperative outcomes of cochlear implantation and to assess changes by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. METHODS: TriNetX was used to accumulate summary data on patients who obtained a CI between 2005 and 2022 at the beginning (quarter 1) and the end of the year (quarter 4) from the electronic medical records of 75 healthcare organizations. The trends in average rate of cochlear implantation and resultant postoperative known risks or complications were statistically evaluated. RESULTS: After expansion of HDHPs, the rate of cochlear implantation between quarter 4 (19 cases per year) and quarter 1 (17 cases/year) was similar (p = 0.18). For all patient groups, the case volume significantly increased. Between quarter 4 and quarter 1, postoperative tinnitus was more common in the beginning of the year (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients receiving CIs significantly increased despite the expansion of HDHPs. Tinnitus was a rare postoperative known risk in the beginning of the year. Patients are less likely concerned about cost of CI surgery because of the impact of hearing loss on quality of life.

Evaluation of Disturbances in Hearing, Tinnitus, and Dizziness as Signs of COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: There have been reports and studies indicating audiovestibular disturbances in COVID-19 patients with variations in the percentage of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The purpose of this study is to compare the incidence of newly diagnosed SNHL, sudden idiopathic hearing loss (SIHL), tinnitus, and vestibular disturbances between infected and uninfected patients, as well as to identify population groups at risk. METHODS: This study used TriNetX to obtain statistics on COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-) patients from 61 healthcare organizations. Propensity score with 1:1 matching was used to control confounding variables. This study evaluated the relative risk of developing audiovestibular disturbances up to 1 month after a COVID-19 test and further investigated the incidence in COVID-19 (+) subset groups. RESULTS: Between COVID-19 (+) and COVID-19 (-) patients who had an audiogram, there was no statistically significant difference in SNHL or SIHL (SNHL: relative risk [RR] = 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46-1.04; SIHL: RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.42-2.40). Race/ethnicity or specified comorbidity did not affect the incidence of SNHL or SIHL. There was a statistically significant difference in tinnitus and vestibular disturbances between the COVID-19 (+) and the COVID-19 (-) groups (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.01-1.66; RR = 2.33, 95% CI = 2.19-2.48). CONCLUSION: New onset hearing loss is not more common in patients with a positive COVID-19 test than those with a negative COVID-19 test. Audiologic evaluation is needed to verify reported hearing disturbances. Although statistically significant in specific population groups, tinnitus and vestibular disturbances may not be clinically significant due to the low incidence.

Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes and Economic Behavior Trends of Tympanoplasty and Mastoidectomy With Expansion of High Deductible Health Plans.

HYPOTHESIS: With rising deductibles, patients will delay ear surgeries toward the end of the year, and there will be an increase in postoperative complications. BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA), passed on March 23, 2010, expanded high deductible health plans. The deductible can provide support for patients with high medical costs, but high deductibles deter patients from seeking necessary preventive health care and having elective procedures. Patients may defer care toward the end of the year until the deductible is met. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between expanding high deductible health plans and the repeal of the ACA's individual mandate on December 22, 2017, with the economic behavior trends of tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy in the fiscal year and surgical outcomes. METHODS: TriNetX was used to obtain summary statistics of patients who had tympanoplasty and/or mastoidectomy from 58 health care organizations. TriNetX is a global federated database that contains de-identified patient data from the electronic medical records of participating health care institutions. This study evaluated the trends in ear surgeries from 2005 to 2021 in the fiscal quarters 1 and 4. Relative risk of developing postoperative complications was statistically interrogated. RESULTS: The average rate of ear surgeries measured in cases/year was higher in Quarter 4 than in Quarter 1 after the expansion of higher deductible health plans (180; 124; p < 0.0001). After the repeal of the ACA's individual mandate, the rate of ear surgeries in Quarter 4 significantly decreased compared to post-ACA (-3.7; 287; p = 0.0002). No statistically significant differences were notable in postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The expansion of high deductible health plans with a rise in deductibles is associated with an increase in ear surgeries toward the end of the year. The repeal of the ACA's individual mandate is associated with a decreased rate of ear surgeries compared to post-ACA implementation. Despite financial concern, there was no increase in postoperative complications toward the end of the year.

Laryngectomy: Social media analysis of patient perception.

BACKGROUND: Social media continues to grow as a relevant information source for the lay public and medical professionals. METHODS: A search of posts on Facebook and Instagram was conducted using the hashtag #laryngectomy. Posts were categorized based upon perspective, media type, timeframe, topic, tone, and popularity. RESULTS: Final analysis included 929 Instagram posts and 355 Facebook posts. Most Facebook posts were made by companies (38%) and physicians (17%) with information (30%) and advertisements (22%) being common topics. Patients (40%) were the largest group of Instagram authors with lifestyle (39%) being the most common topic. Greater than 90% of posts were either neutral or positive in tone across both platforms. CONCLUSIONS: Patient perspective was most commonly represented on Instagram, whereas Facebook more commonly included posts by physicians and companies. The majority of posts carried a neutral or positive tone, which is consistent with positive quality of life patients have shown postoperatively.