Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 41: 179-183, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32059934

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The American Heart Association (AHA) recently established the Resuscitation Quality Improvement (RQI) program, which requires physicians to perform quarterly cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skill checks. The aim of this study was to determine if timing of last training impacted skill performance of emergency physicians. METHODS: A convenience sample of emergency medicine (EM) physicians was asked to complete a Basic Life Support (BLS) scenario on a manikin. Participants passed the scenario if they successfully performed high-quality CPR. Participants completed a survey to assess clinical experience and timing of prior BLS training. Outcomes were comparisons of skills check pass rates for physicians recently trained in BLS (≤90 days) and those trained >90 days ago and those trained >2 years ago. RESULTS: A total of 113 individuals were included in the study: 87 attending physicians and 26 residents. Overall 92.9% correctly performed CPR with the proper assessment, compression rate, compression depth and rescue breaths. There was no difference between success rates in EM physicians who had BLS training within 90 days (91.7%) and physicians who had not had BLS within 90 days, (93.1%). (p = 1.00) There was no difference in the pass rate of those trained within 90 days (91.7%) to those trained >2 years ago (90.9%) (95CI 0.088, 0.096). CONCLUSION: There was no difference between delivery of high-quality CPR in EM physicians who had recent BLS training and those who did not.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar/educação , Competência Clínica , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Autorrelato , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Oncoimmunology ; 8(1): e1507669, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30546944

RESUMO

Nearly half of melanoma patients develop brain metastases during the course of their disease. Despite advances in both localized radiation and systemic immunotherapy, brain metastases remain difficult to treat, with most patients surviving less than 5 months from the time of diagnosis. While both treatment regimens have individually shown considerable promise in treating metastatic melanoma, there is interest in combining these strategies to take advantage of potential synergy. In order to study the ability of local radiation and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy to induce beneficial anti-tumor immune responses against distant, unirradiated tumors, we used two mouse models of metastatic melanoma in the brain, representing BRAF mutant and non-mutant tumors. Combination treatments produced a stronger systemic anti-tumor immune response than either treatment alone. This resulted in reduced tumor growth and larger numbers of activated, cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, even in the unirradiated tumor, indicative of an abscopal effect. The immune-mediated effects were present regardless of BRAF status. These data suggest that irradiation of brain metastases and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy together can induce abscopal anti-tumor responses that control both local and distant disease.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA