Cognitive complaint in early Parkinson's disease: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Subjective cognitive complaint (SCC) is a criterion recommended by the Movement Disorder Society (MDS) task force for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Until now there were few specific tools for detecting SCC in PD. We sought to develop a new tool to assess SCC specifically dedicated for PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We set a group of experts in movements disorders and neurocognition to develop an easy-to-use tool based on a visual analogue scale (VAS) for five cognitive domains: memory, executive functions, spatial orientation, attention, and language. We use it to assess SCC twice (at a one-month interval) in PD patients with disease duration of less than 5 years. Comprehensibility of the VAS was assessed. Controls were assessed with the same VAS. Patients with PD also underwent neuropsychological testing. RESULTS: VAS was easily understandable by the 70 patients with PD. We found significant SCC for the patients with PD vs controls in three cognitive domains: executive functions (1.7 ± 1.9 vs 0.8 ± 1.1; P < .001), language (2.3 ± 2.5 vs 1.0 ± 1.3, P < .001), and attention (2.1 ± 2.2 vs 1.2 ± 1.2; P < .01). Reproducibility between the two evaluations of patients with PD was good. There was no relationship between SCC and the results of neuropsychological testing. CONCLUSIONS: SCC seems to appear early in PD, in three cognitive domains (executive functions, language, and attention), and VAS might be a good way to detect SCC in PD, but need to be validated.

Diagnosis clinical criteria of sport related concussion: Toward an operational criteria definition in France.

OBJECTIVE: An expert working group was set up at the initiative of the French Ministry of Sports with the objective of harmonising the management of sport related concussion (SRC) in France, starting with its definition and diagnosis criteria. RESULTS: Definition: A clinical definition in 4 points have been established as follows: Concussion is a brain injury: 1) caused by a direct or indirect transmission of kinetic energy to the head; 2) resulting in an immediate and transient dysfunction of the brain characterised by at least one of the following disorders: a) Loss of consciousness, b) loss of memory, c) altered mental status, d) neurological signs; 3) possibly followed by one or more functional complaints (concussion syndrome); 4) the signs and symptoms are not explained by another cause. Diagnosis criteria: In the context of the direct or indirect transmission of kinetic energy to the head, the diagnosis of concussion may be asserted if at least one of the following signs or symptoms, observed or reported, is present within the first 24hours and not explained by another cause: 1) loss of consciousness; 2) convulsions, tonic posturing; 3) ataxia; 4) visual trouble; 5) neurological deficit; 6) confusion; 7) disorientation; 8) unusual behaviour; 9) amnesia; 10) headaches; 11) dizziness; 12) fatigue, low energy; 13) feeling slowed down, drowsiness; 14) nausea; 15) sensitivity to light/noise; 16) not feeling right, in a fog; 17) difficulty concentrating. CONCLUSION: Sharing the same definition and the same clinical diagnostic criteria for concussion is the prerequisite for common rules of management for all sports and should allow the pooling of results to improve our knowledge of this pathology.

Clinical determinants of migraine preventive treatment: contribution of SMILE, an observational survey of primary care migraine management in France.

METHODS: SMILE was an observational study carried out in France among office-based general practitioners (GPs) and neurologists from November 2005 to July 2006 to assess the determinants of prescription of migraine preventive therapy in primary care medicine. A total of 1467 GPs and 83 neurologists were included, treating 5417 and 248 migraine sufferers, respectively. RESULTS: The main factors leading physicians to deem a patient eligible for preventive treatment were perceived medication overuse and frequency of headaches, and secondarily, severity of headaches and functional impact. On the other hand, patient satisfaction with the acute treatment of attacks and triptan use, and secondarily, a long migraine history were found to influence patient eligibility negatively. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Noticeably, psychiatric disorders (anxiety, stress) did not appear, aside from somatic factors, among the determinants that significantly influence physicians' judgment about the option of establishing a preventive treatment. However, they are important features of migraine condition and should be listed among the factors guiding choices about migraine preventive therapy.

Anxiety, stress and coping behaviours in primary care migraine patients: results of the SMILE study.

The objectives of the SMILE study were to assess anxiety, stress, depression, functional impact and coping behaviours in migraine patients consulting in primary care in France. General practitioners (n = 1467) and 83 neurologists included 5417 consulting migraine patients. Of these patients, 67% were found anxious, of whom 59% were also depressive. Patients with both anxiety and depressive dimensions showed a profile similar to that of chronic migraine patients (severe attacks, poor treatment effectiveness and pronounced stress, functional impact and maladaptive behaviours). A quantitative progression in the levels of stress, maladaptive coping behaviours and functional impact was noted from patients with neither dimension to those with both anxious and depressive dimensions. Stress and maladaptive coping strategies were found to be major determinants of anxiety. Anxious and depressive dimensions were associated with elevated consumption of acute treatments for migraine and low treatment effectiveness. Stress and anxiety should be looked for carefully in migraine patients.

SMILE: first observational prospective cohort study of migraine in primary care in France. Description of methods and study population.

The SMILE study was conducted among migraine patients consulting in primary care in France. The first phase aimed to describe the study sample of patients at entry to the study, especially emotional dimension (Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale), functional impact (abridged Migraine Specific Questionnaire), stress (Perceived Stress Scale) and coping behaviours (brief COPE inventory avoidance subscale, Coping Strategies Questionnaire catastrophizing subscale), as well as treatments used and their effectiveness and treatments prescribed at end of consultation. Results indicate that consulting migraine patients suffer frequent migraine attacks, exhibit substantial levels of anxiety, functional impact and stress, and often use maladaptive coping strategies. Abortive treatments appear ineffective in most patients (74%). Patients with more affected psychometric variables and treatment ineffectiveness are more likely to be deemed eligible for prophylactic treatment. These data highlight the seriousness of migraine and maladjustment of patients consulting in primary care.

[New imaging methods by nuclear magnetic resonance in multiple sclerosis]. / Imagerie nouvelle par résonance magnétique nucléaire au cours de la sclérose en plaques.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has rapidly attained a major position among the examinations used in the diagnostic approach of multiple sclerosis because it is highly sensitive in demonstrating lesions. However, these lesional images may have several meanings, and there is the problem of distinguishing between oedema, which is said to reflect recent lesions, and gliosis which is thought to betray old lesions. The intrinsic MRI parameters studied (i.e. relaxation times) are unable to make this distinction, whereas it is provided by paramagnetic contrast media such as gadolinium. There is no correlation between the changes observed at MRI and the severity of the disease. Another problem is the accuracy of lesion localization, since visualization is predominantly macroscopic. This raises several questions about the demonstration of correlations between clinical signs and site of the lesion(s). At the moment, several teams of neuroradiologists are trying to find the most reliable method to determine the size of the lesion. The possible prognostic value of this size and its changes as time goes by are other parameters to be considered once the basic diagnosis has been made.

Mild Alzheimer's disease: a "position paper".

Under the auspices of the Societe Francaise de Geriatrie et Gerontologie, a multi-disciplinary group of specialists in geriatrics, neurology, epidemiology, psychiatry, neuroradiology and nuclear medicine met with the aim of drawing up references on the methods for diagnosing and treating mild Alzheimer's disease. The critical analysis of international literature, conducted by Professor Bruno Vellas for the scientific committee, has served to support study of the latest knowledge in 2008. The multi-disciplinary group met on 14 and 15 May 2008 in order to set out the questions that this study must answer and to allocate draft studies. Thus, it has been possible to conduct a study focused on mild Alzheimer's disease, giving particular attention to diagnostic procedure, specific methods of treatment and the benefits of making a diagnosis.