An International Continence Society (ICS)/ International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) joint report on the terminology for the assessment and management of obstetric pelvic floor disorders.

AIMS: The terminology of obstetric pelvic floor disorders should be defined and reported as part of a wider clinically oriented consensus. METHODS: This Report combines the input of members of two International Organizations, the International Continence Society (ICS) and the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA). The process was supported by external referees. Appropriate clinical categories and a sub-classification were developed to give coding to definitions. An extensive process of 12 main rounds of internal and 2 rounds of external review was involved to exhaustively examine each definition, with decision-making by consensus. RESULTS: A terminology report for obstetric pelvic floor disorders, encompassing 357 separate definitions, has been developed. It is clinically-based with the most common diagnoses defined. Clarity and user-friendliness have been key aims to make it usable by different specialty groups and disciplines involved in the study and management of pregnancy, childbirth and female pelvic floor disorders. Clinical assessment, investigations, diagnosis, conservative and surgical treatments are major components. Illustrations have been included to supplement and clarify the text. Emerging concepts, in use in the literature and offering further research potential but requiring further validation, have been included as an Appendix. As with similar reports, interval (5-10 year) review is anticipated to maintain relevance of the document and ensure it remains as widely applicable as possible. CONCLUSION: A consensus-based Terminology Report for obstetric pelvic floor disorders has been produced to support clinical practice and research.

A fiber-optic sensor-based device for the measurement of vaginal integrity in women.

AIMS: Pelvic floor disorders (PFDs) in women are a major public health concern. Current clinical methods for assessing PFDs are either subjective or confounded by interference from intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). This study introduces an intravaginal probe that can determine distributed vaginal pressure during voluntary exercises and measures the degree of vaginal tissue support independent of IAP fluctuations. METHODS: An intravaginal probe was fabricated with 18 independent fiber-optic pressure transducers positioned along its upper and lower blades. Continuous pressure measurement along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls during the automated expansion of the probe enabled the resistance of the tissue to be evaluated as a function of displacement, in a manner reflecting the elastic modulus of the tissue. After validation in a simulated vaginal phantom, in vivo measurements were conducted in the relaxed state and during a series of voluntary exercises to gauge the utility of the device in women. RESULTS: The probe reliably detected variations in the composition of sub-surface material in the vaginal phantom. During in-vivo measurements the probe detected distributed tissue elasticity in the absence of IAP change. In addition, the distribution of pressure along both anterior and posterior vaginal walls during cough, Valsalva and pelvic floor contraction was clearly resolved with a large variation observed between subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Our data highlight the potential for the probe to assess the integrity of the vagina wall and support structures as an integrated functional unit. Further in vivo trials are needed to correlate data with clinical findings to assist in the assessment of PFDs.

TVT Abbrevo and Miniarc suburethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence - A randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Single incision slings (SIS) were introduced in an attempt to decrease the complications associated with retropubic and transobturator slings. The TVT Abbrevo is a modification of the TVT-O with a reduced length and less immediate postoperative pain. The Miniarc SIS has been shown to be equivalent to outside-in transobturator sling, Monarc at 12 month follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate objective and subjective outcomes of MiniArc SIS and TVT Abbrevo midurethral sling (MUS) in women with stress urinary incontinence. METHODS: Female subjects who were assessed and referred for stress urinary incontinence surgery were eligible to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria included women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency previous failed midurethral or fascial sling, untreated detrusor overactivity or significant voiding dysfunction. Patients' randomisation was performed with computer-generated blocks of 4-8, with concealed allocation. Assuming an objective cure rate of 90% for TVT AbbrevoTMwith a power of 80%, a sample size of 79 in each arm was required to detect a clinical difference of 15%, using a one sided alpha of 0.05. The target recruitment number was 220 allowing for an attrition rate of 15%. Institution ethics approval (11261B) was obtained and the trial was registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12611001151921). Routine preoperative assessment was conducted for objective data, whilst patient reported outcome tools (PRO) were utilised for subjective outcomes. These include ICIQ UI SF, ICIQ OAB, IIQ7, EQ5D, PISQ12, PGIs & PGII. TVT AbbrevoTM or MiniarcTMwere performed in a standardized fashion, together with any concomitant prolapse surgery. Review was conducted at 6 weeks and at 6 and 12 months. Objective cure was defined as a negative cough stress test with a comfortably full bladder. Subjective cure was defined as no report of leakage with physical exertion. All Data was collected and outcomes were analysed statistically. RESULTS: Between February 2011 and January 2016,a total of 246 women were randomized to receive MiniArc (121) or TVT Abbrevo (125). Baseline characteristics were clinically balanced in both groups. At 6 months subjective (94.4% vs 95.7% p=0.74) and Objective (92.9% vs 95.9% p=0.49) cure rates were high and not statistically different. At 12 months there were also no differences in subjective (73.6% vs 76.9% p=0.73) or objective (90.5% vs 96.0% p=0.21) cure rates. No differences were found in functional outcomes or when adjusted for potential confounding factors such as age, parity, BMI or menopausal status. CONCLUSION: We found no significant differences in subjective and objective cure rates at 6 and 12months between MiniArc and TVT Abbrevo.