Clinical Utility of the Transthoracic Echocardiogram for Isolated Lacunar Infarcts: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a prominent and financially burdensome disease. Lacunar strokes are traditionally attributed to small vessel disease rather than cardioemboli, which typically occlude larger arteries. Thus, the benefit of screening for potential sources of cardioemboli in lacunar stroke patients is unclear. We evaluated the clinical utility of the transthoracic echocardiogram performed in patients with lacunar strokes. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis of ischemic stroke patients from January 2013 through December 2017 was performed. Brain magnetic resonance imaging was used to select patients with a single lacunar infarct. Patients presenting with acute symptoms of cardiac disease or an abnormal electrocardiogram were excluded. Transthoracic echocardiogram results were reviewed, and their utility in decision-making was evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 442 patients at our institution diagnosed with ischemic stroke during the inclusion period, 89 met inclusion criteria. Transthoracic echocardiogram detected a patent foramen ovale in 5.6% of patients, mitral annular calcification in 9.0% of patients, and abnormal wall motion in 4.5% of patients. For all patients, there were no findings that prompted anticoagulation, antibiotic, or surgical intervention. The cost of an inpatient transthoracic echocardiogram is $4100, resulting in $364,900 in unnecessary health care spending. CONCLUSIONS: Transthoracic echocardiogram appears to have minimal therapeutic value in most patients with lacunar strokes. In stroke patients with no acute symptoms of cardiac disease and a normal electrocardiogram, it may be reasonable to forgo the transthoracic echocardiogram if the brain magnetic resonance imaging shows an isolated lacunar infarct.

Comparison of Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography-Based 3-Dimensional Navigation and Fluoroscopy in Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion for Cervical Spondylosis.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a highly successful procedure to treat spinal cord or nerve root compression; however, complications can still occur. With advancements in imaging, 3-dimensional (3D) reconstruction allows real-time instrument tracking in a surgical field relative to the patient's anatomy. Here, we compare plate positioning and short-term outcomes when using 3D navigation to fluoroscopy in ACDF for degenerative spine disease. METHODS: All ACDFs for cervical spondylosis performed by 6 surgeons at a single center between 2010 and 2018 were included. ACDFs were divided into those performed using 3D navigation or fluoroscopy. Records were assessed for patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiology score, number of operated interspaces, operative time, length of stay, perioperative complications, and 90-day readmissions. Postoperative images were reviewed for lateral and angular plate deviations. RESULTS: A total of 193 ACDFs performed with 3D navigation and 728 performed with fluoroscopy were included. After controlling for demographics and surgical characteristics, using 3D navigation was associated with less lateral plate deviation (P = 0.048) and longer operative times per interspace (P < 0.001) but was not associated with angular plate deviation (P = 0.724), length of stay (P = 0.393), perioperative complications (P = 0.844), and 90-day readmissions (P = 0.539). CONCLUSIONS: Using 3D navigation in ACDF for degenerative disease is associated with slightly more midline plate positioning and comparable short-term outcomes as using fluoroscopy and can be a suitable alternative. Advantages of using this technology, such as improved visualization of anatomy, should be weighed against disadvantages, such as increased operative time, on a per-patient basis.