[Prognostic factors of acute radiodermatitis in breast cancer after adjuvant radiotherapy treated with RT3D or IMRT]. / Étude des facteurs pronostiques de radiodermite aiguë dans le cancer du sein traité par irradiation conformationnelle adjuvante avec ou sans modulation d'intensité.

PURPOSE: Real life study of prognostic factors of acute radiodermatitis in a monocentric cohort of 200 patients with breast cancer treated with RT3D or IMRT for adjuvant radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study comprises 200 patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, included consecutively. For each patient, their clinical and tumoral characteristics and the irradiation schedule was retrospectively collected. The severity of acute radiodermatitis was also collected, during the treatment and 6weeks after the end of irradiation. The objective was to identify risk factors for acute radiodermatitis grade≥2. RESULTS: The univariate analysis found that a more important BMI (p<0.001), a more important volume of PTV (p<0.001) a normofractionated schedule (p=0.002) were statistically associated to a greater risk of occurrence of grade≥2 acute radiodermatitis. The multivariate analysis found BMI>30 (OR=9.31, p=0.04), light phototype (OR=0.04, p=0.02) and histology other than invasive breast carcinomas (OR=0.07, p=0.04) to be statistically associated to the occurrence of grade≥2 acute radiodermatitis. CONCLUSION: In this monocentric retrospective study, with a prospective collection of the severity of acute radiodermatitis, no grade 3 radiodermatitis has been observed and the frequency of occurrence of grade 2 radiodermatitis was lower than previously published. In contrast to previously published results, IMRT was not associated to a lower risk of grade≥2 acute radiodermatitis. Multivariate analysis found BMI, phototype, and histology to be risk factors of grade≥2 acute radiodermatitis.

[Dose optimization in 3D pulsed dose rate brachytherapy for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A French multicenter phase II trial]. / Optimisation de la curiethérapie utérovaginale de débit pulsé des cancers du col utérin localement évolués : résultats finaux du PHRC Tridicol.

PURPOSE: We present the results of the PHRC Tridicol, a prospective French phase II study whose objective was to increase the dose delivered to the target volume during brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight centers included 48 patients, treated with concomitant radiochemotherapy, then uterovaginal brachytherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 63 months. The dose of brachytherapy delivered in biological equivalent dose (EQD2) to 90% of the High Risk CTV (D90 CTV HR) was 80Gy in median dose. The 5-year local control rate (LC) was 84%, close to the hypothesis of 86.7%. The rate of severe complications (grade 3-4) was 23% at 5 years. The rectal dose was correlated with the risk of severe complications. CONCLUSION: HR CTV dose was below the target (85Gy) due to low use of parametrial interstitial needles, as the centers did not always have an adequate applicator, or were at the time at the beginning of their learning curve. The 5-year LC rate was improved compared to that of the comparable STIC PDR group (78%) but lower than the retroEMBRACE cohort of GEC ESTRO (89%). The complication rate was higher than in the comparable group of STIC PDR but close to that of retroEMBRACE. Training brachytherapy teams in interstitial implantation or referring patients to referral centers should help improve the therapeutic index of cervical cancer.

Radiation-induced lung toxicity predictors: Retrospective analysis of 90 patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The main complication after hypofractionated radiotherapy for lung carcinoma is radiation-induced lung toxicity, which can be divided into radiation pneumonitis (acute toxicity, occurring within 6 months) and lung fibrosis (late toxicity, occurring after 6 months). The literature describes several predictive factors related to the patient, to the tumor (volume, central location), to the dosimetry and to biological factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 90 patients treated with stereotactic body irradiation for stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma between December 2010 and May 2015. RESULTS: Radiation pneumonitis was observed in 61.5% of the patients who were mainly asymptomatic (34%). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was not predictive of radiation pneumonitis, whereas active smoking was protective. Centrally located tumors were not more likely to result in this complication if the radiation schedule utilized adapted fractionation. In our study, no predictive factor was identified. Whereas the mean lung dose was a predictive factor in 3D radiotherapy, the lung volume irradiated at high doses seemed to be involved in the pathogenesis after hypofractionated radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The discovery of predictive factors for radiation pneumonitis is difficult due to the rarity of this complication, especially with an 8×7.5Gy schedule. Radiation pneumonitis seems to be correlated with the volume irradiated at high doses, which is in contrast to the known knowledge about the organs in parallel. This finding leads us to raise the hypothesis that vessel damage, organs in series, occurring during hypofractionated radiotherapy could be responsible for this toxicity.

[Cost of radiotherapy for bone metastases in France: A monocentric retrospective study]. / Coût de la radiothérapie des métastases osseuses en France : étude rétrospective monocentrique.

PURPOSE: The cost of radiotherapy is a concern for health systems. The conventional non fractionated or multifractionated schemes have shown the same efficacy in terms of pain relief but a non fractionated treatment seems less expensive. However, in general practice, multifractionated treatments are still the majority, which represents an additional cost for society. Moreover, the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy becomes more democratic and offers new curative perspectives, but at what price? MATERIAL AND METHODS: A monocentric retrospective study was conducted in a French radiotherapy department to evaluate and compare the cost of irradiation of uncomplicated bone metastases according to the selected radiotherapy regimen : 30Gy in 10 fractions, 20Gy in five fractions, 8Gy in one fraction or stereotactic body radiotherapy. RESULTS: Between January 2014 and December 2015, 91 patients receiving 116 treatments were included in the study, including 44 men (48%) and 47 women (52%) were 63 years old (25-88 years). Thirty-four treatments (29%) were performed by 30Gy in 10 fractions (30Gy group), 24 treatments (21%) by 20Gy in 5 fractions (20Gy group), 25 treatments (22%) by 8Gy in one fraction (8Gy group) and 33 treatments (28%) by stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT group). The cost of stereotactic body radiotherapy was significantly higher than that of three-dimensional treatments (P<0.001). If the cost of transport was added to this cost, stereotactic body radiotherapy remained the most expensive (P<0.001). The cost of the irradiation delivering 30Gy treatment was significantly higher than the cost of treatment with 20Gy (P=0.006) or 8Gy (P<0.001), even after adding the transport cost (P<0.001), with no significant difference between 20Gy and 8Gy (P=0.11). For the overall cost of treatment including the total cost of treatments, associated transport and reirradiation, stereotactic body radiotherapy was the most expensive treatment (P<0.001) and this cost was significantly higher in the 30Gy group than in the 20Gy group (P=0.012) or 8Gy group (P=0.001), with no significant difference between 20Gy and 8Gy (P=0.38). There was no significant difference in the cost of follow-up between 30Gy, 20Gy, 8Gy and stereotactic body radiotherapy at one month (P=0.09) but at three months (P=0.01) and six months (P=0.0001), this cost was significantly higher after a three-dimensional treatment. There was no significant difference in overall cost including initial radiotherapy, transport and overall follow-up over 6 months between groups (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is an efficient and curative irradiation technique but more expensive. It is preferred for some patients with a longer life expectancy in a non-palliative treatment setting. The treatment delivering 8Gy treatment appears to be the most cost-effective while leading to an equivalent efficiency to multifractionated treatments and preserving the quality of life of patients.

[Radiation-induced lung toxicity predictors after stereotactic radiation therapy for non-small cell lung carcinoma stage I]. / Facteurs prédictifs de toxicité pulmonaire après irradiation en conditions stéréotaxiques des carcinomes bronchopulmonaires non à petites cellules de stade I.

In case of refusal or contraindication for surgical management of a stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma, the validated alternative therapy is stereotactic irradiation. This technique reaches an equivalent tumour control rate than surgery and significantly higher than conventional radiotherapy. One of the dreaded complications is radiation induced lung toxicity (radiation pneumonitis and lung fibrosis), especially when it is symptomatic, occurring in about 10 % of cases. This article is a literature review of this complication's predictive factors.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung carcinomas: Moderate hypofractionation optimizes outcome.

OBJECTIVES: In case of inoperability or refusal of surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the most effective treatment for a stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The results obtained by this irradiation technique are considerably superior to those observed in the time of conventional 3D irradiation and its toxicities are much less important, which makes it possible in elderly patients, or those presenting cardio-pulmonary comorbidities and a poor perfomance status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 90 patients who underwent SBRT for a stage I NSCLC between 2010 and 2015. Its purpose is to describe its effectiveness in term of overall survival (OS), specific survival (SS), local control (LC), regional control (RC) and metastatic control (MC) as well as their prognostic factors, and its tolerance. RESULTS: LC, RC, MC as well as OS and SS rate at 4 years were comparable to the main prospective studies, respectively 89%, 92%, 70%, 33% and 66%. No LC prognostic factor could be identified. Radiation pneumonitis was observed with a rate of 61.5%, of which 56% were asymptomatic, and 4% of the patients had a rib fracture. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is an efficient and well-tolerated treatment for stage I non-small cell lung carcinomas.

[PET scan and NMR spectroscopy for the differential diagnosis between brain radiation necrosis and tumour recurrence after stereotactic irradiation of brain metastases: Place in the decision tree]. / TEP/tomodensitométrie et imagerie spectroscopique par résonance magnétique tridmensionnelle pour le diagnostic différentiel entre radionécrose cérébrale et rechute tumorale après irradiation en conditions stéréotaxiques de métastases cérébrales : place dans l'arbre décisionnel.

PURPOSE: After stereotactic radiation therapy for brain metastases, one of the complications is radionecrosis. Differential diagnosis with tumour recurrence can be helped by different methods of imaging, although histology remains the gold standard. According to the treatment centres, practice diverges. The objective of this single-centre retrospective study was to define the power of MRI, PET scan and NMR spectroscopy to establish a decision tree. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included patients who underwent stereotactic radiation therapy for brain metastases, and required, during follow-up, both a PET scan and NMR spectroscopy in order to differentiate a radiation necrosis and tumour recurrence. From 2010 to 2015, 25 patients were consistent with these criteria. RESULTS: Conventional MRI technique, with the T1/T2 mismatch criterion, had a specificity of 75% and a sensitivity of only 44%. A lesion quotient greater than 0.3 diagnosed a recurrence with a sensitivity of 92%. PET scan combined the best sensitivity and specificity, respectively of 92% and 69%. Whatever the thresholds used in NMR spectroscopy for choline/N-acetylaspartate and choline/creatin ratios, the power of this imaging modality did not exceed that of PET scan. CONCLUSION: The criteria described in conventional MRI cannot by themselves establish the differential diagnosis. In first intention in case of doubt, PET scan should be done, combining the best sensitivity and specificity, whereas NMR spectroscopy used in combination does not improve these factors.

[Choroidal metastasis from a lung adenocarcinoma treated by intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF and external beam radiotherapy: A case report]. / Métastases choroïdiennes d'un adénocarcinome pulmonaire traité par injections intravitréennes d'anti-VEGF et irradiation externe : à propos d'un cas.

Choroidal metastases of lung cancer are very uncommon. This localization should be suspected on blurred vision and confirmed with an ophthalmological examination. Its treatment is not entirely codified. We report a case of blurred vision secondary to bilateral choroidal metastasis in a patient with choroidal metastases from a lung adenocarcinoma, treated by intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection and external beam radiotherapy. According to a literature review, we analyzed the place of the targeted treatments used alone or combined with the radiotherapy.

[Risk of radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases]. / Risque de radionécrose après radiothérapie hypofractionnée en conditions stéréotaxiques du lit opératoire de métastases cérébrales.

PURPOSE: To investigate the factors that potentially lead to brain radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy targeting the postoperative resection cavity of brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective analysis conducted in two French centres, was performed in patients treated with trifractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (3×7.7Gy prescribed to the 70% isodose line) for resected brain metastases. Patients with previous whole-brain irradiation were excluded of the analysis. Radionecrosis was diagnosed according to a combination of criteria including clinical, serial imaging or, in some cases, histology. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors of radionecrosis including clinical and dosimetric variables such as volume of brain receiving a specific dose (V8Gy-V22Gy). RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one patients, with a total of 189 cavities were treated between March 2008 and February 2015. Thirty-five patients (18.5%) developed radionecrosis after a median follow-up of 15 months (range: 3-38 months) after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. One third of patients with radionecrosis were symptomatic. Multivariate analysis showed that infra-tentorial location was predictive of radionecrosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.97; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.47-6.01; P=0.0025). None V8Gy-V22Gy was associated with appearance of radionecrosis, even if V14Gy trended toward significance (P=0.059). CONCLUSION: Analysis of patients and treatment variables revealed that infratentorial location of brain metastases was predictive for radionecrosis after hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for postoperative resection cavities.

[Imaging methods used in the differential diagnosis between brain tumour relapse and radiation necrosis after stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastases: Literature review]. / Techniques d'imagerie utilisées dans le diagnostic différentiel entre radionécrose cérébrale et rechute tumorale après irradiation en conditions stéréotaxiques de métastases cérébrales : revue de la littérature.

After stereotactic radiosurgery for a cerebral metastasis, one of the dreaded toxicities is radionecrosis. In the follow-up of these patients, it is impossible to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour relapse either clinically or with MRI. In current practice, many imaging methods are designed such as special sequences of MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion and susceptibility-weighted imaging, diffusion), proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, positron emission tomography, or more seldom 201-thallium single-photon emission computerized tomography. This article is a required literature analysis in order to establish a decision tree with the analysis of retrospective and prospective data.