Japanese Society of Medical Oncology clinical guidelines: Molecular testing for colorectal cancer treatment, 5th edition.

Molecular testing to determine optimal therapies is essential for managing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). In October 2022, the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology published the 5th edition of the Molecular Testing Guideline for Colorectal Cancer Treatment. In this guideline, in patients with unresectable CRC, RAS/BRAF V600E mutational and mismatch repair tests are strongly recommended prior to first-line chemotherapy to select optimal first- and second-line therapies. In addition, HER2 testing is strongly recommended because the pertuzumab plus trastuzumab combination is insured after fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan in Japan. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based RAS testing is also strongly recommended to assess the indications for the readministration of anti-EGFR antibodies. Both tissue- and ctDNA-based comprehensive genomic profiling tests are strongly recommended to assess the indications for targeted molecular drugs, although they are currently insured in patients with disease progression after receiving standard chemotherapy (or in whom disease progression is expected in the near future). Mutational and mismatch repair testing is strongly recommended for patients with resectable CRC, and RAS/BRAF V600E mutation testing is recommended to estimate the risk of recurrence. Mutational and mismatch repair and BRAF testing are also strongly recommended for screening for Lynch syndrome. Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease (MRD) testing is strongly recommended for estimating the risk of recurrence based on clinical evidence, although MRD testing was not approved in Japan at the time of the publication of this guideline.

Trifluridine/Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab for Vulnerable Patients With Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study (WJOG14520G).

BACKGROUND: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab has shown clinical benefit for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapy. However, few data have been available for patients with pretreated mCRC who are intolerant of intensive therapy (vulnerable). METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study (WJOG14520G; TWILIGHT) of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab for vulnerable patients with pretreated mCRC. Eligibility criteria included previous chemotherapy (although patients treated with all key cytotoxic agents, a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, were excluded) and intolerance of full-dose combination therapy with oxaliplatin or irinotecan at the start of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab. RESULTS: The median age of 93 evaluable patients was 79 years (range, 21-90). Intolerance of intensive therapy was attributable to an older age in 60 (65%) patients, serious concomitant disease in 24 (26%) patients, and a poor performance status in 19 (20%) patients. FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab was administered as second-line treatment in 74 (80%) patients and as third- or fourth-line treatment in 19 (20%) patients. The objective response rate was 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%-12.2%), and the disease control rate was 67.9% (95% CI, 56.6%-77.8%). With a median follow-up time of 21.6 months, median overall survival and progression-free survival were 18.6 months (95% CI, 12.1-23.2) and 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.0-8.3), respectively. Neutropenia of grade ≥3 developed in 50 (54%) patients, whereas 2 (2%) patients experienced febrile neutropenia, and no treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSION: Our data show the potential efficacy and acceptable safety profile of FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab for vulnerable patients with pretreated mCRC.

Nivolumab versus irinotecan as third- or later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: a multi-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nivolumab (NIVO) and irinotecan (IRI) and to identify clinical factors that facilitate treatment selection. METHODS: Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) who underwent NIVO or IRI treatment between November 2016 and June 2018 at three institutions were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma pretreated with fluoropyrimidines and taxanes, no previous NIVO or IRI treatment, and adequate organ function. Main outcome measures were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Interaction between treatment groups and clinical factors regarding OS were tested using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for relevant variables. RESULTS: Both NIVO (n = 71) and IRI (n = 61) groups had similar baseline characteristics, except for sex distribution. NIVO and IRI groups had ORR of 20% and 6%, median PFS of 1.6 and 1.8 months, and median OS of 6.4 and 6.4 months, respectively. Interaction analysis did not reveal any significant interaction between NIVO and IRI related to OS for various factors. NIVO group tended to have fewer ≥ grade 3 adverse events than IRI group, especially neutropenia (3% vs. 28%) and febrile neutropenia (1% vs. 8%). In the NIVO group, one patient developed pneumonitis, and four patients developed skin reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Although no remarkable differences in efficacy were found between IRI and NIVO for AGC, NIVO had a better safety profile compared to IRI. We found no clinical markers that can assist treatment decisions.

Implication of changes in PD-L1 expression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-FU (NAC-DCF) and adjuvant nivolumab monotherapy are the standard care for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, no effective biomarkers have been found in perioperative setting. We investigated how programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) changes before and after NAC-DCF and how it relates to the therapeutic effect of NAC-DCF in resectable ESCC. METHODS: PD-L1 expression in paired diagnostic biopsy and surgically resected tissues from ESCC patients who underwent surgical resection after receiving two or three NAC-DCF cycles was evaluated. PD-L1 positivity was defined as a combined positive score (CPS) of 10% ≤ . Gene expression analysis was conducted using samples before NAC-DCF. RESULTS: Sixty-six paired samples from 33 patients were included in PD-L1 expression analysis, and 33 Pre-NAC samples acquired by diagnostic biopsy were included in gene expression analysis. Pretreatment, 3 (9%), 13 (39%), and 17 (52%) patients harbored tumors with CPS ranges of < 1%, 1%-10%, and 10% ≤ , respectively. After NAC-DCF, 5 (15%), 15 (45%), and 13 (39%) tumors presented CPS ranges of < 1%, 1%-10%, and 10% ≤ , respectively. The concordance rate between Pre-and Post-NAC-DCF samples was 45%. Patients with PD-L1-negative tumors both before and after NAC-DCF (n = 9) had shorter survival and different gene expression profile characterized by upregulation in WNT signaling or neutrophils. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial PD-L1 expression alteration was observed, resulting in low concordance rate before and after NAC-DCF. Tumors persistently lacking PD-L1 had distinct gene expression profile with worse clinical outcomes, raising the need for further investigation.

TRESBIEN (OGSG 2101): encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab for early recurrent stage II/III BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer.

The BRAF V600E mutation accounts for approximately 5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and is an extremely poor prognostic factor. However, there are no clear recommendations regarding first-line therapy for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently, a novel combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab, showed a higher response rate than standard chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. Here we describe our plan for the TRESBIEN study (OGSG 2101), which is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate whether encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab are effective for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. The planned number of subjects is 25.

An ongoing study to evaluate encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab for people with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer. BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) is a type of cancer caused by change (mutation) in a gene called BRAF. It is one of the most difficult types of CRC to treat because currently available drugs do not effectively treat the disease. Recently, two novel treatments, encorafenib and cetuximab, have been approved for use together in several countries for the treatment of advanced or metastatic BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. In Japan, these drugs are also approved to be given with another treatment called binimetinib, an approach called triplet therapy. This article describes the ongoing TRESBIEN study that is looking at how effective and how safe triplet therapy is for the treatment of people with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after they have additional (adjuvant) chemotherapy. This study is ongoing, and the researchers are currently recruiting new participants. TRESBIEN will evaluate the percentage of participants whose tumors shrink with triplet therapy. The study will also look at any side effects. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs051210152 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials https://jrct.niph.go.jp/search?language=en&page=1).

Myxoid liposarcoma originating in the retroperitoneum with metastasis to the calcaneus: a rare case report and review of literature.

Myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) is known to have a variety of metastatic manifestations. We report a MLPS originating in the pelvis with metastasis to the calcaneus. The patient was a 72-year-old man who developed lumbar pain and right lower extremity pain 2 years ago. He visited a nearby clinic and underwent a radiographic examination. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a tumor in the right retroperitoneum. A CT-guided needle biopsy was performed, and pathological examination revealed myxoid liposarcoma. Wide surgical resection was not performed due to the patients' wishes, technical difficulties, and magnitude of the invasion, and the patient received heavy particle radiation therapy (HPRT) of 70.4 Gy. After HPRT, the tumor mass was slightly reduced. However, 11 months after HPRT, a recurrent lesion in the liver was observed. Although HPRT was performed again for the metastatic liver lesion (70.4 Gy), the tumor increased in size. Furthermore, 1 month later, the patient complained of pain in the left foot, and CT and magnetic resonance imaging revealed an osteolytic lesion in the calcaneus. A biopsy was performed, and pathological examination showed a metastatic lesion of myxoid-type liposarcoma. The patient wore a short lower limb orthosis and was able to walk but died 1 month later. Oncologists should note that MLPS can metastasize to the calcaneus.

Second-line chemotherapy after early disease progression during first-line chemotherapy containing bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The ML18174 study, which showed benefits of bevacizumab (BEV) continuation beyond progression (BBP) for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), excluded patients with first-line progression-free survival (PFS) shorter than 3 months. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of second-line chemotherapy after early disease progression during first-line chemotherapy containing bevacizumab. METHODS: The subjects of this study were mCRC patients who experienced disease progression < 100 days from commencement of first-line chemotherapy containing BEV initiated between Apr 2007 and Dec 2016. Second-line chemotherapy regimens were classified into two groups with and without BEV/other anti-angiogenic agents (BBP and non-BBP) and efficacy and safety were compared using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were identified as subjects of this study. Baseline characteristics were numerically different between BBP (n = 37) and non-BBP (n = 25) groups, such as performance status (0-1/> 2/unknown: 89/8/3 and 56/40/4%), RAS status (wild/mutant/unknown: 32/54/16 and 76/16/8%). Response rate was 8.6% in BBP group and 9.1% in non-BBP group (p = 1.00). Median PFS was 3.9 months in BBP group and 2.8 months in non-BBP group (HR [95%CI]: 0.79 [0.46-1.34], p = 0.373, adjusted HR: 0.87 [0.41-1.82], p = 0.707). Median overall survival was 8.5 months in BBP group and 5.4 months in non-BBP group (HR 0.66 [0.38-1.12], p = 0.125, adjusted HR 0.53 [0.27-1.07], p = 0.078). CONCLUSION: In mCRC patients who experienced early progression in first-line chemotherapy, second-line chemotherapy showed poor clinical outcomes regardless use of anti-angiogenic agents.

Safety and efficacy of cetuximab-containing chemotherapy after immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a single-center retrospective study.

Immunotherapy has been shown to prolong survival in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in front-line use; however, subsequent systemic therapy has not been optimized. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cetuximab-containing chemotherapy after immunotherapy. We retrospectively analyzed patients with recurrent or metastatic SCCHN who underwent cetuximab-containing regimens after progression on immunotherapy. Of the 22 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 21 received paclitaxel and cetuximab, and 1 carboplatin and fluorouracil and cetuximab after immunotherapy. Nine patients achieved a partial response, 10 patients had stable disease as their best response on cetuximab-containing chemotherapy, yielding an overall response rate and disease control rate of 40.9 and 86.4%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 5.2 months, and the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Ten patients developed grade 3-4 adverse events, including neutropenia (31.8%), acneiform rash (9.1%), anemia (4.5%), hypertransaminasemia (4.5%) and stomatitis (4.5%). The most frequent cetuximab-related toxicities across all grades were skin reactions (77.3%), hypomagnesemia (40.9%), stomatitis (27.3%), paronychia (13.6%) and keratitis (4.5%). There was no treatment-related death. Taken together, cetuximab-containing chemotherapy was effective and feasible even after immunotherapy.

A triplet combination of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab as first-line treatment in RAS wild-type, metastatic colorectal cancer: a dose-escalation phase Ib study.

BACKGROUND: The triplet-agent (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; FOLFOXIRI) combined with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody as a first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has shown promising results in Western trials. This phase Ib study assessed the safety of FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab in Japanese patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated RAS wild-type mCRC received weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 at week 1 and subsequently 250 mg/m2) plus FOLFOXIRI that consisted of irinotecan (100, 120, and 150 mg/m2 defined as dose levels 0, 1, and 2), followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and l-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 and then 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2. The dose level of irinotecan was escalated starting at dose level 1 in a 3 + 3 manner. The primary endpoint was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended phase-2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Nine patients were enrolled. The MTD was not reached at dose level 2 and the RP2D was 150 mg/m2 irinotecan. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (44%), fatigue (11%), paronychia (22%), and acneiform rash (11%). No dose-limiting toxicities occurred in any of the enrolled patients. No treatment-related death was observed. The ORR was 89% (95% confidence interval 52-100%). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of the combination of cetuximab and FOLFOXIRI was acceptable and promising anti-tumor activity was demonstrated, supporting further study in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC.

Clinical Impact of a Shortened Infusion Duration of Ramucirumab in Japanese Patients -A Model-Based Approach.

AIM: We evaluated the safety and potential clinical impact of shortened ramucirumab infusion in Japanese patients from clinical studies. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess any association between infusion rate and increased risk of an immediate infusion-related reaction(IRR). Population pharmacokinetic modeling was used to simulate concentration-time profiles and exposure parameters following a 30- or 60-minute infusion with ramucirumab. RESULTS: From 8 pooled ramucirumab clinical studies, 55 of 559(9.8%)Japanese patients experienced at least one immediate IRR(any grade). When grouped according to infusion rate quartile, the incidence of immediate any-grade IRR was similar across quartiles. Infusion rate was not significantly associated with an increased risk of an immediate IRR; odds ratio per 1 mg/min increase was 0.912, 95% confidence interval 0.724 to 1.149, p=0.436. Patients aged ≥65 years may have a reduced risk of an immediate IRR compared with those aged <65 years, and premedication use was also associated with a reduced risk. Ramucirumab pharmacokinetic profiles were comparable following a 30- or 60-minute infusion. CONCLUSIONS: A shortened infusion duration of ramucirumab is unlikely to affect the efficacy or safety profile in Japanese patients and may be clinically beneficial for patients and health care providers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: RAINBOW-NCT01170663, RAISE- NCT01183780, REACH-NCT01140347, REACH-2-NCT02435433, RAINFALL-NCT02314117, RANGE-NCT02426125, RELAY-NCT02411448, I4T-MC-JVCG-NCT01703091.

Phase I Study of Alternate-Day Administration of S-1, Oral Leucovorin, and Bevacizumab for Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

LESSONS LEARNED: The recommended S-1 dose was 40 mg/m2 , twice daily on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday, with oral leucovorin and bevacizumab. Compared with daily administration, the alternate-day administration of S-1 with oral leucovorin may reduce mucositis with promising antitumor activity in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Daily S-1 plus oral leucovorin administration in a 1-week-on/1-week-off schedule has promising efficacy in gastrointestinal cancer but is associated with high risk of mucositis and diarrhea. METHODS: This phase Ib, 3+3 dose-escalation trial included patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving S-1 (40 mg/m2 ) and leucovorin (25 mg) orally twice daily (level 1, even-numbered days; level 2, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday) and intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) every 2 weeks. Enrollment continued at the recommended dose level in the expansion cohort. RESULTS: We enrolled 21 patients (3 and 18 patients in levels 1 and 2, respectively). Briefly, 12 and 9 patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 and 1, respectively, and 8 and 13 patients had 1-3 and ≥4 prior treatment lines, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was not observed, and level 2 was confirmed as the recommended dose. Common grade 3-4 adverse events at level 2 were anemia (22%), anorexia (6%), and diarrhea (6%). In the entire cohort, response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival were 10%, 71%, and 4.2 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The recommended S-1 dose was 40 mg/m2 , twice daily on Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and Sunday, with 25 mg oral leucovorin twice daily and 5 mg/kg bevacizumab every 2 weeks. Compared with the daily administration, alternate-day administration of S-1 plus leucovorin may reduce mucositis with promising antitumor activity in refractory mCRC.

Retrospective observational study of salvage line ramucirumab monotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab monotherapy as a second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) prolongs survival compared to the best supportive care. However, in clinical practice, ramucirumab monotherapy is sometimes used as third- or later-line treatment for AGC refractory to fluoropyrimidine and taxanes. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of salvage-line ramucirumab monotherapy for treating AGC. METHODS: The subjects of this retrospective study were advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma patients who received ramucirumab monotherapy after failure of 2 or more prior regimens containing fluoropyrimidine and taxanes but not ramucirumab. RESULTS: From June 2015 to April 2017, 51 patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6-2.2) and 5.1 (95% CI = 4.0-6.8) months, respectively. The objective response and disease control rates were 2 and 17%, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs; e.g., anemia, fatigue, hypertension, proteinuria, intestinal bleeding) occurred in seven (13%) patients, but no grade 4 AEs and treatment-related deaths were observed. A neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) of < 2.5 and previous gastrectomy were associated with better PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage-line ramucirumab monotherapy has acceptable toxicity and comparable efficacy to second-line treatment; therefore, we consider physicians might choose this therapy as a salvage-line treatment option for AGC refractory to the standard therapies.

A Prospective Trial Evaluating the Safety of a Shortened Infusion of Ramucirumab in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.

LESSONS LEARNED: A shortened infusion of ramucirumab (from 60 to 20 minutes) was safe and feasible without infusion-related reactions.Twenty-minute infusions of ramucirumab can be an option for patients with no infusion-related reactions during the first 60-minute treatment. BACKGROUND: Ramucirumab is usually administered over 60 minutes, during which it is unlikely to cause infusion-related reactions (IRRs). This prospective study evaluated the safety of a shortened infusion of ramucirumab. METHODS: Patients who received their first dose of ramucirumab in a 60-minute infusion without developing IRRs were eligible and received their second ramucirumab dose for 20 minutes. The primary study endpoint was incidence of IRR during the first short-term infusion, and the secondary endpoints were incidence of IRR at any time and adverse events other than IRR. RESULTS: Of the 40 patients enrolled (median age, 68.5 years), 20 (55%) were male, 27 (67.5%) had stage IV gastric cancer, 25 (62.5%) received ramucirumab in combination with taxane-based chemotherapy, and 24 (60%) received only a single administration of ramucirumab prior to their enrollment. Notably, no IRR was observed during the first short-term infusion (IRR rate, 0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-0.72%). Among the 149 short-term infusions performed, there were no instances of IRRs or unexpected adverse events related to the treatment (Table 1). CONCLUSION: For patients without development of IRRs upon the first ramucirumab administration, shortening infusion time (from 60 to 20 minutes) is safe and feasible.

Panitumumab Provides Better Survival Outcomes Compared to Cetuximab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Prior Bevacizumab within 6 Months.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies cetuximab (Cmab) and panitumumab (Pmab) have shown survival benefit for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This study aimed to compare Pmab and Cmab according to the interval between bevacizumab discontinuation and anti-EGFR antibody initiation (bevacizumab-free interval; BFI). METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated mCRC patients who received Cmab or Pmab in combination with irinotecan at two institutions. Inclusion criteria were histologically confirmed mCRC, with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumor, refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, oxali platin, and irinotecan. RESULTS: One-hundred-seventy-eight patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Among them, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between the Pmab (n = 44) and Cmab groups (n = 134). Of 132 patients with BFI < 6 months, the median OS was 13.3 and 11.5 months in the Pmab (n = 39) and Cmab (n = 93) groups, respectively (p = 0.043). The median PFS was 5.8 and 4.9 months in the Pmab and Cmab groups, respectively (p = 0.055). Multivariate analysis for OS confirmed the superiority of Pmab. CONCLUSION: Pmab showed more favorable outcomes in patients treated with bevacizumab within the last 6 months. The interval between prior bevacizumab and subsequent anti-EGFR therapy may be useful for determining the optimal anti-EGFR therapy.

Systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with early recurrence after adjuvant S-1 monotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: S-1 monotherapy is one of the standard adjuvant treatments for patients with stage II and III gastric cancers. Early recurrence after S-1 adjuvant therapy has a poor prognosis. This study aimed to clarify the treatment outcomes of systemic chemotherapy and explore encouraging regimens. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study. Among gastric cancer patients who underwent curative gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 monotherapy, patients who experienced a recurrence while receiving adjuvant therapy or within 6 months after completion and started systemic chemotherapy at four institutions between 2005 and 2015 were eligible. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were included. The main treatment regimens were weekly paclitaxel (n = 38, 34%), irinotecan plus cisplatin (n = 31, 28%), capecitabine plus cisplatin (n = 7, 6%), and irinotecan monotherapy (n = 6, 5%). For all patients, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.7 and 11.4 months, respectively. Among 77 patients with measurable lesions, the overall response and disease control rates were 24.7% and 62.3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses for overall survival showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 2 [hazard ratio (HR) 3.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78-7.73] and undifferentiated histological type (HR 2.04; 95% CI 1.35-3.44) were independent prognostic factors, and treatment regimens were not prognostic. Exploratory comparisons did not show statistically significant differences between treatment regimens. CONCLUSIONS: This study of the largest number of patients with early recurrence after S-1 adjuvant monotherapy demonstrated that the prognosis for patients treated by all regimens was similar and poor.

Efficacy of Second-Line Bevacizumab-Containing Chemotherapy for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer following First-Line Treatment with an Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody.

OBJECTIVE: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies and bevacizumab are commonly used, sequentially, as palliative chemotherapies for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, little is known about the efficacy of second-line treatments containing bevacizumab after first-line treatment with an anti-EGFR antibody. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients who received second-line bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy and evaluated the effect of prior use of anti-EGFR antibody on the efficacy of the second-line treatment. RESULTS: As first-line treatments, 35 of these patients received only cytotoxic chemotherapy (cohort A), 58 received bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy (cohort B), and 35 received anti-EGFR-containing chemotherapy (cohort C). The median progression-free survival (PFS) with the second-line bevacizumab-containing therapy was 8.3 months in cohort C, 6.9 months in cohort A (hazard ratio [HR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-2.51), and 5.6 months in cohort B (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.18-3.22). Multivariate analysis showed that PFS in cohort C was the same as that in cohort A, but better than that in cohort B. The overall response rate in cohort C (25.7%) was also similar to that in cohort A (20.0%), but better than that in cohort B (10.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Prior use of anti-EGFR antibody did not adversely affect the efficacy of subsequent bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy.

Real-World Treatment Sequencing in Vulnerable Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding treatment sequence for vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting are lacking. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess treatment outcomes in second-line or later chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Vulnerable patients with mCRC who received less intensive treatment ('vulnerable') regimens, i.e. fluoropyrimidines with or without biologics (FP), reduced-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics (Doublet), and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monotherapy (Anti-EGFR), as first-line therapy between June 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients from 15 hospitals were analyzed. The median age was 78 years (range 28-90), and 44 patients (21%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 2. In the entire population, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 7.6 and 21.4 months, respectively. Following the failure of first-line therapy in 195 patients, 74 (38%), 24 (12%), and 13 (7%) patients received vulnerable regimens, full-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics, and other regimens, respectively, whereas 84 (43%) received best supportive care (BSC). In patients receiving vulnerable regimens as second-line therapy, the median TTF and OS were 4.4 and 13.7 months, respectively, while response rate and disease control rate were 18% and 62%, respectively. In 84 patients who received BSC, the median OS was 3.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC showed clinically meaningful outcomes; however, few patients received second-line therapy, and survival among patients who received BSC was dismal.

The combination of soluble forms of PD-1 and PD-L1 as a predictive marker of PD-1 blockade in patients with advanced cancers: a multicenter retrospective study.

Introduction: The clinical relevance of soluble forms of programmed cell death-1 (sPD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (sPD-L1) remains unclear. We here investigated the relation between the efficacy of PD-1 blockade and pretreatment plasma levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 across a broad range of cancer types. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 171 patients with advanced solid tumors who received nivolumab or pembrolizumab monotherapy regardless of treatment line. The concentrations of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 were measured with a fully automated immunoassay (HISCL system). Results: The study subjects comprised patients with head and neck cancer (n = 50), urothelial cancer (n = 42), renal cell cancer (n = 37), gastric cancer (n = 20), esophageal cancer (n = 10), malignant pleural mesothelioma (n = 6), or microsatellite instability-high tumors (n = 6). High or low levels of sPD-1 or sPD-L1 were not significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) for PD-1 blockade in the entire study population. Comparison of treatment outcomes according to combinations of high or low sPD-1 and sPD-L1 levels, however, revealed that patients with low sPD-1 and high sPD-L1 concentrations had a significantly poorer PFS (HR of 1.79 [95% CI, 1.13-2.83], p = 0.01) and a tendency toward poorer OS (HR of 1.70 [95% CI, 0.99-2.91], p = 0.05) compared with all other patients. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the combination of low sPD-1 and high sPD-L1 levels is a potential negative biomarker for PD-1 blockade therapy.