Subclassification of pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) varies. The current study aimed to further classify patients with pT3 UTUC into different survival outcome groups based on tumor location and site of invasion. METHODS: This retrospective study included 323 patients with pT3 UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy at 11 hospitals in Japan. Histological and clinical data were obtained via a chart review. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses showed the effect of different variables on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 72 years. Patients with pT3 UTUCs were divided into two groups: those with renal parenchymal invasion only (pT3a, n = 95) and those with peripelvic or periureteral fat invasion (pT3b, n = 228). pT3b UTUC was significantly associated with hydronephrosis, low preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), histological nodal metastasis, nuclear grade 3, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), carcinoma in situ, and positive surgical margin. Based on the univariate analyses, patients with pT3b UTUC had a significantly lower 5-year RFS (42.4% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.0001), 5-year CSS (54.3% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.0002), and 5-year OS (47.8% vs. 76.8%, p < 0.0001) than those with pT3a UTUC. According to the multivariate analyses, nodal metastasis, LVI, adjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative eGFR, nuclear grade (RFS only), surgical margin (RFS only), and Charlson comorbidity index (OS only), but not pT3b stage, were associated with survival. CONCLUSION: Compared with pT3a UTUC, pT3b UTUC was significantly associated with worse histological features, consequently resulting in unsatisfactory survival outcomes.

Increasing age predicts adverse pathology including intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and cribriform patterns in deferred radical prostatectomy after upfront active surveillance for Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer: analysis of prospective observational study cohort.

BACKGROUND: In men undergoing upfront active surveillance, predictors of adverse pathology in radical prostatectomy specimens, including intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and cribriform patterns, remain unknown. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether adverse pathology in radical prostatectomy specimens could be predicted using preoperative patient characteristics. METHODS: We re-reviewed available radical prostatectomy specimens from 1035 men prospectively enrolled in the PRIAS-JAPAN cohort between January 2010 and September 2020. We defined adverse pathology on radical prostatectomy specimens as Gleason grade group ≥3, pT stage ≥3, pN positivity or the presence of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or cribriform patterns. We also examined the predictive factors associated with adverse pathology. RESULTS: All men analyzed had Gleason grade group 1 specimens at active surveillance enrolment. The incidence of adverse pathologies was 48.9% (with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or cribriform patterns, 33.6%; without them, 15.3%). The addition of intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or cribriform patterns to the definition of adverse pathology increased the incidence by 10.9%. Patients showing adverse pathology with intraductal carcinoma of the prostate or cribriform patterns had lower biochemical recurrence-free survival (log-rank P = 0.0166). Increasing age at active surveillance enrolment and before radical prostatectomy was the only predictive factor for adverse pathology (odds ratio: 1.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.19, P = 0.0178; odds ratio: 1.12, 95% confidence interval: 1.02-1.22, P = 0.0126). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age could be a predictive factor for adverse pathology. Our findings suggest that older men could potentially derive advantages from adhering to the examination schedule in active surveillance.

Clinical outcomes of intraductal carcinoma or cribriform in radical prostatectomy specimens of men opting for active surveillance: data from the PRIAS-JAPAN study.

BACKGROUND: Among early stage prostate cancer patients, intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) and invasive cribriform are key prognostic factors; however, their presence and clinical significance following active surveillance (AS) are unknown. In men who opted for AS, we aimed to examine the presence and impact of IDC-P or cribriform, utilizing radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens. METHODS: We re-reviewed 137 RP specimens available in the PRIAS-JAPAN prospective cohort between January 2010 and September 2020. We assessed the presence of IDC-P or cribriform, and compared the patients' characteristics and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence-free survival after RP between groups with and without IDC-P or cribriform. In addition, we examined the predictive factors associated with IDC-P or cribriform. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with IDC-P or cribriform presence was 34.3% (47 patients). IDC-P or cribriform pattern was more abundant in the higher Gleason grade group in RP specimens (P < 0.001). The rates of PSA recurrence-free survival were significantly lower in the IDC-P or cribriform groups than in those without them (log rank P = 0.0211). There was no association between IDC-P or cribriform on RP with the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4,5 score on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before RP even with adjustments for other covariates (OR, 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.511-3.980, P = 0.497). CONCLUSIONS: IDC-P or cribriform comprised approximately one-third of all RP specimens in men who underwent RP following AS, confirming their prognostic significance.

Enfortumab vedotin versus platinum rechallenge in post-platinum, post-pembrolizumab advanced urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score-matched study.

OBJECTIVE: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) was approved for advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) in 2021 after the EV-301 trial showed its superiority to non-platinum-based chemotherapy as later-line treatment after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors including pembrolizumab. However, no study has compared EV with rechallenging platinum-based chemotherapy (i.e., "platinum rechallenge") in that setting. METHODS: In total, 283 patients received pembrolizumab for advanced UC after platinum-based chemotherapy between 2018 and 2023. Of them, 41 and 25 patients received EV and platinum rechallenge, respectively, as later-line treatment after pembrolizumab. After excluding two patients with EV without imaging evaluation, we compared oncological outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), between the EV (n = 39) and platinum rechallenge groups (n = 25) using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: Analyses on crude data (n = 64) showed no significant differences between the two groups regarding patients' baseline characteristics. PFS (5 months) and OS (11 months) in the EV group were comparable to those (8 and 12 months, respectively) in the platinum rechallenge group. After PSM (n = 36), the baseline characteristics between the two groups became more balanced, and PFS (not reached) and OS (not reached) in the EV group were comparable to those (8 and 11 months, respectively) in the platinum rechallenge group. CONCLUSIONS: EV and platinum rechallenge showed equivalent oncological outcomes, even after PSM, and both treatments should therefore be effective treatment options for post-platinum, post-pembrolizumab advanced UC.

Overexpression of HIF1α in Hunner Lesions of Interstitial Cystitis: Pathophysiological Implications.

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to elucidate biological changes in Hunner lesions, which underlie the pathophysiology of Hunner-type interstitial cystitis, by characterizing their whole transcriptome and immunopathological profiles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paired bladder mucosal biopsies, 1 sample each from the Hunner lesion and nonlesion area, were obtained from 25 patients with Hunner-type interstitial cystitis. The samples were subjected to whole-transcriptome profiling; immunohistochemical quantification of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD20, CD138, mast cell tryptase, cytokeratin and HIF1α; and quantitative polymerase chain reaction for IFN-α, IFN-ß, IFN-γ, TNF, TGF-ß1, HIF1α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-12A. The results were compared between the lesion and nonlesion areas. RESULTS: RNA sequencing identified 109 differentially expressed genes and 30 significantly enriched biological pathways in Hunner lesions. Up-regulated pathways (24) included HIF1α signaling pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, RAS signaling pathway and MAPK signaling pathway. By contrast, down-regulated pathways (6) included basal cell carcinoma and protein digestion and absorption. The mRNA levels of HIF1α, IFN-γ and IL-2, and the HIF1α protein level were significantly higher in lesion areas. Otherwise, there were no significant differences between the lesion and nonlesion samples in terms of mRNA levels of inflammatory cytokines or histological features such as lymphoplasmacytic and mast cell infiltration, epithelial denudation and CD4/CD8 T-lymphocyte ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate significant overexpression of HIF1α and up-regulation of its related biological pathways in Hunner lesions. The results indicate that ischemia, in conjunction with inflammation, plays a pathophysiological role in this subtype of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome, particularly in Hunner lesions.

Clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes of urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction.

BACKGROUND: The ureterovesical junction is the boundary between the urinary bladder and upper urinary tract. Because treatment strategies for bladder cancer and upper tract urothelial carcinoma are entirely different, urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction requires special attention. Nevertheless, studies focusing on the disease are lacking. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive patients with urothelial carcinoma treated via either transurethral resection of bladder tumor (n = 2791) or radical nephroureterectomy (n = 292) between 2000 and 2020 and identified those with bladder cancer involving the ureteral orifice (n = 64) and those with upper tract urothelial carcinoma involving the intramural ureter (≤2 cm) (n = 41). After excluding overlapping cases (n = 24), 80 patients with urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction were analyzed. RESULTS: The initial symptoms or reasons for diagnosing urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction were hematuria (n = 30), hydronephrosis (n = 21), follow-up examinations for prior urothelial carcinoma (n = 13), screening examinations (n = 7), frequent urination (n = 6) and unknown causes (n = 3). During a median follow-up period of 42 months, 18 patients died of urothelial carcinoma. The definitive surgical treatments for urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction were transurethral resection of bladder tumor alone (n = 26), radical nephroureterectomy (n = 41) and radical cystectomy (n = 13), with different treatments having different cancer-specific survivals. Multivariate analyses identified T stage (≥T2) as an independent predictor of shorter cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Given the positional property of urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction, the profiles of patients with the disease were highly heterogeneous. Further optimization of treatment strategies for urothelial carcinoma involving the ureterovesical junction is urgently warranted for better clinical outcomes.

Impact of adherence to criteria on oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy in patients opting for active surveillance: data from the PRIAS-JAPAN study.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate whether oncological outcomes of radical prostatectomy differ depending on adherence to the criteria in patients who opt for active surveillance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 1035 patients enrolled in a prospective cohort of the PRIAS-JAPAN study. After applying the exclusion criteria, 136 of 162 patients were analyzed. Triggers for radical prostatectomy due to pathological reclassification on repeat biopsy were defined as on-criteria. Off-criteria triggers were defined as those other than on-criteria triggers. Unfavorable pathology on radical prostatectomy was defined as pathological ≥T3, ≥GS 4 + 3 and pathological N positivity. We compared the pathological findings on radical prostatectomy and prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival between the two groups. The off-criteria group included 35 patients (25.7%), half of whom received radical prostatectomy within 35 months. RESULTS: There were significant differences in median prostate-specific antigen before radical prostatectomy between the on-criteria and off-criteria groups (6.1 vs. 8.3 ng/ml, P = 0.007). The percentage of unfavorable pathologies on radical prostatectomy was lower in the off-criteria group than that in the on-criteria group (40.6 vs. 31.4%); however, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.421). No significant difference in prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival was observed between the groups during the postoperative follow-up period (median: 36 months) (log-rank P = 0.828). CONCLUSIONS: Half of the off-criteria patients underwent radical prostatectomy within 3 years of beginning active surveillance, and their pathological findings were not worse than those of the on-criteria patients.

Comparison of full-dose gemcitabine/cisplatin, dose-reduced gemcitabine/cisplatin, and gemcitabine/carboplatin in real-world patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: While gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) is the gold standard regimen for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC), either dose-reduced GC or gemcitabine/carboplatin (GCa) is an alternative option for "cisplatin-unfit" patients. However, few studies have compared outcomes with these commonly used regimens in the real-world setting. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with aUC who received full-dose GC, dose-reduced GC, or GCa as first-line salvage chemotherapy at two university hospitals between 2016 and 2020. Progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival, as well as best overall response and adverse event profiles, were compared among these three regimens. RESULTS: Of 105 patients, 41, 27, and 37 patients received full-dose GC, dose-reduced GC, and GCa, respectively. Significant differences were noted in the patients' baseline age, primary site, and renal function among the three regimens. Sixty-nine (65.7%) patients died during a median follow-up period of 14 months. There was no significant difference among the three regimens for all survival outcomes and best overall response. However, the complete response rate of dose-reduced GC (2/27, 7.4%) appeared inferior to that of full-dose GC (9/41, 22.0%) or GCa (6/37, 16.2%). Regarding adverse event profiles, no significant difference was observed among the three regimens, except for significantly fewer cases with elevated alanine aminotransferase in the GCa group compared with the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study compared the oncological and toxicological outcomes of full-dose GC, dose-reduced GC, and GCa in real-world patients with aUC. Unlike in the clinical trial setting, there were almost no significant differences among the three regimens.

Comparison of the medical costs between active surveillance and other treatments for early prostate cancer in Japan using data from the PRIAS-JAPAN study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the medical costs of active surveillance with those of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy, brachytherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and hormone therapy for low-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: The costs of protocol biopsies performed in the first year of surveillance (between January 2010 and June 2020) and those of brachytherapy and radiation therapy performed between May 2019 and June 2020 at the Kagawa University Hospital were analyzed. Hormone therapy costs were assumed to be the costs of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs for over 5 years. Active surveillance-eligible patients were defined based on the following: age <74 years, ≤T2, Gleason score ≤6, prostate-specific antigen level ≤10 ng/ml, and 1-2 positive cores. We estimated the total number of active surveillance-eligible patients in Japan based on the Japan Study Group of Prostate Cancer (J-CAP) study and the 2017 cancer statistical data. We then calculated the 5-year treatment costs of active surveillance-eligible patients using the J-CAP and PRIAS-JAPAN study data. RESULTS: In 2017, number of active surveillance-eligible patients in Japan was estimated to be 2808. The 5-year total costs of surveillance, prostatectomy, brachytherapy, radiation therapy, and hormone therapy were 1.65, 14.0, 4.61, 4.04, and 5.87 million United States dollar (USD), respectively. If 50% and 100% of the patients in each treatment group had opted for active surveillance as the initial treatment, the total treatment cost would have been reduced by USD 6.89 million (JPY 889 million) and USD 13.8 million (JPY 1.78 billion), respectively. CONCLUSION: Expanding active surveillance to eligible patients with prostate cancer helps save medical costs.

Improved survival in real-world patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study comparing a period before the introduction of pembrolizumab (2003-2011) and a more recent period (2016-2020).

OBJECTIVES: Although the treatment strategy for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has drastically changed since pembrolizumab was introduced in 2017, studies revealing current survival rates in aUC are lacking. This study aimed to assess (1) the improvement in survival among real-world patients with aUC after the introduction of pembrolizumab and (2) the direct survival-prolonging effect of pembrolizumab. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 531 patients with aUC undergoing salvage chemotherapy, including 200 patients treated in the pre-pembrolizumab era (2003-2011; earlier era) and 331 patients treated in a recent 5-year period (2016-2020; recent era). Using propensity score matching (PSM), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the earlier and recent eras, in addition to between the recent era, both with and without pembrolizumab use, and the earlier era. RESULTS: After PSM, the recent era cohort had significantly longer CSS (21 months) and OS (19 months) than the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 12 months). In secondary analyses using PSM, patients treated with pembrolizumab had significantly longer CSS (25 months) and OS (24 months) than those in the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 11 months), whereas patients who did not receive pembrolizumab in the recent era had similar outcomes (CSS and OS: 14 months) as the earlier era cohort (CSS and OS: 12 months). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aUC treated in the recent era exhibited significantly longer survival than those treated before the introduction of pembrolizumab. The improved survival was primarily attributable to the use of pembrolizumab.