Trans-tract electrocoagulation can decrease the need for postoperative nephrostomy tube after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery.

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of trans-tract electrocoagulation at the end of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal or ureteral stones. METHODS: The present study included patients who underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery from May 2010 to March 2018. After June 2013, the trans-tract electrocoagulation procedure, to coagulate bleeding from the access tract using a resectscope was carried out at the end of the operation. We compared the patients' background and surgical outcomes between patients with and without trans-tract electrocoagulation. RESULTS: Between the trans-tract electrocoagulation (n = 225) and non-trans-tract electrocoagulation (n = 72) groups, the stone number was significantly smaller (1:2:3 or more, 126:72:27 vs 59:10:3, P = 0.001) and the initial stone-free rates were significantly higher (80% vs 72%, P = 0.006) in the trans-tract electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract electrocoagulation group. Patients experienced a higher nephrostomy tube-free rate (67% vs 26%, P < 0.0001), shorter postoperative catheterization time (2.8 ± 3.8 vs 5.4 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.002) and shorter hospital stay (6.5 ± 3.6 vs 8.8 ± 5.0 days, P = 0.0001) in the trans-tract electrocoagulation group than in the non-trans-tract electrocoagulation group. CONCLUSIONS: Trans-tract electrocoagulation in endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery is a safe and efficient procedure that decreases the need for nephrostomy tube placement after surgery.

Use of the anterior prostatic urethral mucosa preservation technique during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate can reduce postoperative stress urinary incontinence.

INTRODUCTION: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an effective and safe surgery for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, some patients exhibit postoperative urinary incontinence. Here, we compared surgical outcomes and incidence of stress urinary incontinence between HoLEP with and without anterior prostatic urethral mucosa preservation (APUMP). METHODS: All patients in this study underwent HoLEP with APUMP technique (APUMP group) and without APUMP technique (no-APUMP group). Enucleation weight, enucleation time, max flow rate increase at 3 months, and urinary incontinence rates immediately after catheter removal and at 1 month after surgery were compared between the groups. RESULTS: In the APUMP (n = 340) and no-APUMP (n = 75) groups, the median enucleation weights were 34.5 and 35.0 g, respectively (p = .982). The corresponding median enucleation times were 33.0 and 46.5 min (p < .01), and median max flow rate increases at 1 month were 10.5 and 9.9 mL/s (p = .89). The urinary incontinence rates immediately after catheter removal were 4.1% and 14.7% (p < .01), and were 3.8% and 12.0% (p < .01) at 1 month after surgery. CONCLUSION: HoLEP using the APUMP technique could be performed with a shorter operative time while maintaining efficacy. The incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence could be decreased by APUMP, indicating that such preservation facilitates the maintenance of urinary continence after surgery.