Effectiveness of multidisciplinary team conference on decision-making surrounding the application of continuous deep sedation for terminally ill cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous deep sedation (CDS) is a way to reduce conscious experience of symptoms of severe suffering in terminally ill cancer patients. However, there is wide variation in the frequency of its reported. So we conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the prevalence and features of CDS in our palliative care unit (PCU). METHODS: We performed a systemic retrospective analysis of the medical and nursing records of all 1581 cancer patients who died at the PCU at Higashi Sapporo Hospital between April 2005 and August 2011. Continuous deep sedation can only be administered safely and appropriately when a multidisciplinary team is involved in the decision-making process. Prior to administration of CDS, a multidisciplinary team conference (MDTC) was held with respect to all the patients considered for CDS by an attending physician. The main outcome measures were the frequency and characteristics of CDS (patient background, all target symptoms, medications used for sedation, duration, family's satisfaction, and distress). We mailed anonymous questionnaires to bereaved families in August 2011. RESULTS: Of 1581 deceased patients, 22 (1.39%) had received CDS. Physical exhaustion 8 (36.4%), dyspnea 7 (31.8%), and pain 5 (22.7%) were the most frequently mentioned indications. Continuous deep sedation had a duration of less than 1 week in 17 (77.3%). Six patients (0.38%) did not meet the appropriate criteria for CDS according to the MDTC and so did not receive it. Although bereaved families were generally comfortable with the practice of CDS, some expressed a high level of emotional distress. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our results indicate that the prevalence of CDS will be decreased when it is carried out solely for appropriate indications. Continuity of teamwork, good coordination, exchange of information, and communication between the various care providers are essential. A lack of any of these may lead to inadequate assessment, information discrepancies, and unrest.

[Successful Management of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Heparin in a Patient with Previous History of Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia].

Anti-coagulant management of cardiopulmonary bypass for the patient complicated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is difficult. A woman of late 50's with a previous history of HIT was scheduled for mitral valve replacement, tricuspid valvuloplasty and coronary artery bypass graft. We knew that heparin antibody was negative by serologic and functional assay before the operation. According to the HIT guideline, we planned to use heparin only during cardiopulmonary bypass and to use argatroban for other catheters. Although the platelet count continued decreasing up to the 5th postoperative day unless the transfusion of platelets, heparin antibody was negative on the first postoperative day. But, it was thought that HIT would develop from 5 days to 10 days after using heparin. Therefore, we had to examine heparin antibody on the 5th postoperative day at least for the patients with a history of HIT. In the future, it is important to observe the patient carefully and examine heparin antibody.

[Optimal analgesic effect of continuous supraclavicular brachial plexus block with ropivacaine after shoulder surgery].

BACKGROUND: Optimal dose of local anesthetics for supraclavicular brachial plexus block (BPB) is still unknown. We prospectively investigated the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided continuous supraclavicular BPB with ropivacaine at different infusion rates. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients scheduled to undergo shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to four groups; receiving no continuous BPB (control group, n = 10), BPB with 0.2% of ropivacaine at an infusion rate of 4 ml x hr(-1) (n = 12), BPB with 6 ml x hr(-1) (n = 12) or BPB with 8 ml x hr(-1) (n = 5). All patients were permitted to receive nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) after surgery. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for postoperative pain was assessed and frequencies of the requirement of NSAIDs were recorded in each group. RESULTS: The pain scores during 24 hours after surgery in the 6 ml x hr(-1) group (3-24 mm) were significantly lower than those in the 4 ml x hr(-1) group (4-42 mm) and control group (6-56 mm). Mean frequency of administrations of NSAIDs for 24 hours after surgery in the 6 ml x hr(-1) (0.8 +/- 0.8) group was significantly lower than that in the control group (1.7 +/- 1.0). Continuous administration in two cases in the 8 ml x hr(-1) group was discontinued due to leakage of local anesthetics and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous supraclavicular BPB with 0.2% ropivacaine at 6 ml x hr(-1) is effective for the pain management after shoulder surgery and is not an excess dose.

Epidural analgesia for the treatment of colic attack with retrocaval ureter in late pregnancy complicated with marginal placenta previa: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Retrocaval ureter was diagnosed in a woman complaining of ureteric pain in the last trimester of pregnancy. We describe the rationale behind the administration of epidural analgesia for her colic attack. CASE PRESENTATION: A 41-year-old pregnant woman was hospitalized with a diagnosis of a marginal placenta previa at 34 weeks and 5 days of pregnancy. Her right ureter encircled the dorsal aspect of the inferior vena cava (IVC) and was compressed by a growing fetus, causing hydronephrosis. Her right lower back pain was exacerbated every day, till an epidural catheter was inserted. Her estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and hematocrit worsened, and an elective cesarean section was performed. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia only provided pain relief for a few days. When a pregnant woman presents with a retrocaval ureter and severe pain, short-term epidural analgesia should be considered after evaluating the complex medical condition and size of the fetus.

Olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

CONTEXT: Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) can severely impair patients' quality of life (QOL). Psychotropics, especially olanzapine, have a strong antiemetic effect. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether olanzapine could reduce the frequency of CINV and improve patients' QOL during chemotherapy. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-four patients scheduled to receive highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients received a 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist, steroid, and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist. Patients were randomly assigned to take 5 mg/day of oral olanzapine (OL group, n = 22) or placebo (control group, n = 22) daily from the day before chemotherapy (Day 0) to Day 5. The primary endpoint was the rate of patients who achieved total control (no vomiting, no use of rescue medications, and maximum nausea of <5/100mm on a visual analogue scale). The secondary endpoint was Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire score on Days 0 and 6. RESULTS: The rate of patients achieving total control was significantly higher in the OL group (86% and 64% in acute and delayed phases, respectively) than in the control group (55% and 23%, P = 0.045, P = 0.014, respectively). Furthermore, the OL group experienced a better QOL than the control group, as reported on the Functional Living Index-Emesis questionnaire (P = 0.0004). CONCLUSION: The addition of 5mg/day of oral olanzapine to standard therapy can reduce the frequency of CINV and improve QOL of patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.