Endoscopic resection of large colorectal adenomas - clinical experience of a tertiary referral centre.

AIM: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Adenomatous polyps are typically resected endoscopically to prevent cancer while giant and complex polyps are managed surgically. No criteria clearly define the indications for surgical vs endoscopic resection. Our aim was to evaluate factors associated with the short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large (≥ 20 mm) and giant (≥ 40 mm) adenomas. METHOD: Consecutive cases with colonic adenomas larger than 20 mm resected endoscopically were included. Endoscopic, clinical and histological details of polyps were recorded as well as the need for surgical resection. RESULT: A total of 351 resections were included. The average adenoma diameter was 30.34 ± 10.66 mm. Surgery was recommended in 21 (5.98%) cases. In a multivariate analysis for efficacy, two variables were independent risk factors for surgery: adenoma size [OR 1.08 (95% CI: 1.04-1.12)] and caecal location [5.97(1.60-22.33)]. Postpolypectomy complications were documented in 85 (24.2%) cases: bleeding 69 (19.7%), perforations 8(2.3%) and significant discomfort 15(4.3%). Twenty-one patients (6.0%) developed serious complications requiring further hospitalization. In multivariate analysis for safety, independent risk factors for postpolypectomy complications included adenoma size [1.04 (1.06-1.01)], polyp morphology [sessile 2.55 (1.45-4.51), flat 2.40 (1.04-5.52)] and submucosal adrenaline injection [1.87 (1.11-3.20)]. Increments of 1 mm in adenoma diameter beyond 20 mm increased the need for surgery by 8% and the risk of complications by 4%. CONCLUSION: Resection of large or giant adenomas is generally a safe procedure. Although adenoma size and morphology are significant predictors of efficacy and safety, each case should be individually evaluated in a specialist unit for feasibility of endoscopic resection.

The outcome of ulcerative colitis patients undergoing pouch surgery is determined by pre-surgical factors.

BACKGROUND: Pouch surgery, a common intervention for ulcerative colitis (UC) complications, is often associated with the development of pouchitis. AIM: To identify predictors of pouch outcome in a cohort of patients with UC. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective unmatched case-cohort study in a tertiary IBD referral centre. Adult patients with UC were classified into the worst phenotype throughout follow-up: normal pouch, a form of chronic pouchitis (either chronic pouchitis or Crohn's like disease of pouch [CLDP]), or episodic recurrent acute pouchitis (RAP). Risk factors for pouchitis (chronic forms) were detected using statistical models. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-three pouch patients were followed up for 13.1±7.3 years. Only 71 patients (28.1%) maintained a favourable outcome of a sustained normal pouch. These patients were older at UC diagnosis (27.8±12.5 vs 23.0±11.4 years), had longer UC duration until surgery (13.4±9.5 vs 8.2±7.9 years), and had higher rates of referral to surgery due to nonrefractory (dysplasia/neoplasia) complications (42.3% vs 16.2%) compared with pouchitis patients. Median survival for sustained normal pouch was 10.8 years (95% CI 8.9-12.7 years), and it was longer in the nonrefractory group (20.3 vs 9.4 years for the refractory group, HR=2.37, 95% CI 1.25-3.52, P=.004). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with UC undergoing pouch surgery will develop pouchitis. Patients operated for nonrefractory indications have a more favourable outcome. These results may contribute to pre- and post-surgical decision-making. The findings imply that the processes determining UC severity may be similar to that causing pouchitis.