How Endoscopic Guidance Augments Nonvascular Image-guided Interventions.

Endoscopy can improve guidance in nonvascular procedures performed by interventional radiologists (IRs). Historically, the major limiting factors preventing the widespread use of endoscopic tools by IRs were the large diameter (>20F) and length of the endoscopes. IRs had to significantly upsize their access into vascular organs such as the kidney and liver to allow endoscope placement. With the advent of newer endoscopes with sizes smaller than 11F (approximately 4 mm in diameter), percutaneous endoscopy has become more feasible than before. IRs routinely place percutaneous drains (eg, abscess drains, biliary drains, percutaneous nephrostomies, and percutaneous cholecystostomies). Once the drain is in position and the acute infection (if present) has resolved, the IR can use the percutaneous access to perform image-guided and endoscopically guided procedures, depending on the clinical situation. Most percutaneous image- and endoscopically guided interventions performed by IRs involve procedures for biliary and gallbladder pathologic conditions. Image-guided procedures with additional endoscopic guidance can also be used to manage urinary, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic pathologic conditions. The authors review the current applications and techniques of percutaneous endoscopy in interventional radiology. In unique situations, IRs can also perform endoscopy through natural orifices (eg, the urethra) or surgically created orifices (eg, urostomies). The authors also discuss the adjunctive techniques that are enhanced or made possible because of endoscopy in interventional radiology, including but not limited to endoscopic forceps biopsies, endobiliary ablation, laser stricturotomy, lithotripsy, and stone extraction. An invited commentary by Srinivasa is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.

Treatment outcomes for ARUBA-eligible brain arteriovenous malformations: a comparison of real-world data from the NVQI-QOD AVM registry with the ARUBA trial.

BACKGROUND: Significant controversy exists about the management of unruptured cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Results from A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (ARUBA) suggested that intervention increases the risk of stroke/death compared with medical management. However, numerous study limitations raised concerns about the trial's generalizability. OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of stroke/death and functional outcomes in ARUBA-eligible patients from a multicenter database, the Neurovascular Quality Initiative-Quality Outcomes Database (NVQI-QOD). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of ARUBA-eligible patients who underwent intervention at 18 participating centers. The primary endpoint was stroke/death from any cause. Secondary endpoints included neurologic, systemic, radiographic, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: 173 ARUBA-eligible patients underwent intervention with median follow-up of 269 (25-722.5) days. Seventy-five patients received microsurgery±embolization, 37 received radiosurgery, and 61 received embolization. Baseline demographics, risk factors, and general AVM characteristics were similar between groups. A total of 15 (8.7%) patients experienced stroke/death with no significant difference in primary outcome between treatment modalities. Microsurgery±embolization was more likely to achieve AVM obliteration (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated no difference in overall death/stroke outcomes between the different treatment modalities' 5-year period (P=0.087). Additionally, when compared with the ARUBA interventional arm, our patients were significantly less likely to experience death/stroke (8.7% vs 30.7%; P<0.001) and functional impairment (mRS score ≥2 25.4% vs 46.2%; P<0.01). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that intervention for unruptured brain AVMs at comprehensive stroke centers across the United States is safe.

Direct percutaneous transcarotid approach for embolization of dural sinus malformation in a premature neonate: A case report.

CONCLUSIONS: Direct percutaneous TCAA can be a feasible access for intracranial interventions in neonates with LBW and unavailable UA access.

Case Report: Anterior Spinal Cord Ischemia Following Embolization of Cerebellar Arteriovenous Malformation: An Illustrative Case and Review of Spinal Cord Vascular Anatomy.

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a rare entity with high mortality and morbidity which can arise from causes such as atherosclerosis, aortic dissection or aneurysm, thromboembolic events or systemic hypotension, and is a potential complication of spinal surgery. Published literature contains very few reports of SCI as a complication of intracranial interventions, highlighting the uncommon nature of SCI in these circumstances. We report the occurrence of anterior SCI in a 69-year-old patient following successful embolization of a cerebellar arteriovenous malformation (AVM), marked by upper extremity weakness, lower extremity paraplegia, loss of bladder and bowel control, and hypercapnic respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated upper cervical diffusion restriction and T2/STIR hyperintensity. Unusually, SCI occurred in this case without intraprocedural catheter wedging or obvious flow limitation, prolonged procedure time, hypercoagulable state, or general hypotension. We review previous cases in the literature as well as spinal cord vascular anatomy, and discuss the possible etiologies of this complication. Spinal cord ischemia could be a very rare complication of neuroendovascular procedures even in the absence of warning signs and should be carefully evaluated in patients with suspected neurologic symptoms after such procedures.