Effect of deep brain stimulation on postoperative body mass index: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is FDA-approved for several movement disorders; such as Parkinson's disease, dystonia, and neuropsychiatric disorders. There are various reports of Body mass index (BMI) changes following different DBS targets in various disorders. AIM: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the impact of DBS on patients' Body Mass Index (BMI) and provide an in-depth overview of its underlying mechanisms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted research according to PRISMA guidelines. Our study assessed comprehensively electronic databases, including Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, web of science, and the Cochrane Library, up to May 2024. The random-effect model analysis was performed by the Comprehensive Meta-analysis software (CMA) version 3.0. As well, Cochran's Q test was used to determine the statistical heterogeneity of included studies. RESULT: This systematic review ultimately included 49 studies, 46 of which entered the meta-analysis. The total number of patients was 1478, consisting of Parkinson's disease (PD), dystonia, and the obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. The most common DBS target was subthalamic nucleus, followed by globus pallidus internus (GPi). Our meta-analysis depicted the BMI of participants significantly mount after DBS electrode implantation (SMD = -0.542, 95%CI: -0.678 to -0.406, and P-value < 0.001). However, moderate to high heterogeneity was detected among the studies (I2 = 67.566%). Additionally, the Daily energy intake (DEI) of patients significantly decreased after DBS (SMD: 0.457, 95%CI; 0.205 to 0.709, and P-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: STN and GPi DBS can lead to weight gain through distinct central pathways in various movement and neuropsychiatric disorders, posing a potential risk for obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome.

Orbital histiocytosis; From A to Z.

PURPOSE: Histiocytosis is one of the most challenging diseases in medical practice. Because of the broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, systemic involvements, unknown etiology, and complex management, different types of histiocytosis are still a big question mark for us. Orbital histiocytosis is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of histiocytes in orbital tissues. It could affect the orbit, eyelid, conjunctiva, and uveal tract. Orbital histiocytosis can cause limited eye movement, proptosis, decreased visual acuity, and epiphora. In this study, we review the novel findings regarding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of different types of histiocytosis, focusing on their orbital manifestations. METHOD: This review was performed based on a search of the PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases or relevant published papers regarding orbital histiocytosis on October 9th, 2023. No time restriction was proposed, and articles were excluded if they were not referenced in English. RESULTS: 391 articles were screened, most of them being case reports. The pathophysiology of histiocytosis is still unclear. However, different mutations are found to be prevalent in most of the patients. The diagnostic path can be different based on various factors such as age, lesion site, type of histiocytosis, and the stage of the disease. Some modalities, such as corticosteroids and surgery, are used widely for treatment. On the other hand, based on some specific etiological factors for each type, alternative treatments have been proposed. CONCLUSION: Significant progress has been made in the detection of somatic molecular changes. Many case studies describe various disease patterns influencing the biological perspectives on different types of histiocytosis. It is necessary to continue investigating and clustering data from a broad range of patients with histiocytosis in children and adults to define the best ways to diagnose and treat these patients.

Preventive Medications in Pediatric Migraine: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Pediatric migraine substantially impacts quality of life and academic performance among children and adolescents. Understanding the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for migraine prophylaxis in this population is crucial for developing effective treatment strategies. Objective: To conduct a comprehensive network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety associated with pharmacological treatments for pediatric migraine prophylaxis among pediatric patients with a migraine diagnosis and assess interventions involving various oral pharmacological interventions compared with each other and placebo. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS were searched for publications up to September 2023. Search terms and indexing were chosen to encompass relevant studies, focusing on randomized clinical trials in pediatric migraine prophylaxis. Study Selection: Inclusion criteria targeted randomized clinical trials involving pediatric patients with migraine. Studies were selected based on their examination of oral pharmacological interventions. The search yielded an initial 9162 citations. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data extraction adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines. Five investigators independently extracted study data into a spreadsheet in duplicate. Study-level estimates were calculated, employing a random-effects model for primary and secondary outcomes due to identified heterogeneity. Data analysis was conducted from December 2023 to March 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was migraine frequency (number of attacks per month). Secondary outcomes included a 50% or greater responder rate, headache duration, headache intensity, and disability (assessed by pediatrics migraine-specific disability tool). Adverse events were also evaluated. Results: The analysis incorporated 45 trials with 3771 participants. Compared with placebo, pregabalin (ratio of means [RoM], 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.79) and topiramate with vitamin D3 (RoM, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.65) were associated with reduction in migraine frequency. Flunarizine (RoM, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81), levetiracetam (RoM, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.30-0.72), riboflavin (RoM, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32-0.77), cinnarizine (RoM, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.88), topiramate (RoM, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89), and amitriptyline (RoM, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97) were also associated with reduction in migraine frequency, but these findings were drawn from individual studies. For the 50% or greater responder rate, flunarizine and α-lipoic acid (risk ratio [RR], 8.73; 95% CI, 2.44-31.20), flunarizine (RR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.38-11.55), pregabalin (RR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.13-3.14), and cinnarizine (RR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.04-2.05) were associated with significantly greater effectiveness than placebo. Compared with placebo, propranolol and cinnarizine (RoM, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.28-0.72), pregabalin (RoM, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.33-0.96), valproate (RoM, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.72), levetiracetam (RoM, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50-0.77), and cinnarizine (RoM, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.54-0.76) were significantly associated with reduction in headache intensity. However, no treatments were associated with significant improvements in quality of life or reduction of the duration of migraine attacks. Adverse events were higher with amitriptyline (RR, 3.81; 95% CI, 1.41-10.32), topiramate (RR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.60-11.75), and valproate (RR, 5.93; 95% CI, 1.93-18.23) compared with placebo. Conclusions and Relevance: In this network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials, topiramate and pregabalin were associated with reduction in headache frequency and intensity. Although there were also other drugs that showed statistically significant results (flunarizine, riboflavin, amitriptyline, and cinnarizine), more studies were required for a robust conclusion. None of the drugs were associated with improved quality of life or attack duration, underscoring the need for further research to develop more comprehensive treatment strategies and explore the potential of combination therapies, especially those involving vitamins. Future studies should focus on validating these findings and expanding the treatment landscape for pediatric migraine management.