Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol ; 64(1): 79-88, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32991819

RESUMO

Preclinical mouse models that recapitulate some characteristics of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) will facilitate focused study of pathogenesis and virus-host responses. Human agniotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) serves as an entry receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to infect people via binding to envelope spike proteins. Herein we report development and characterization of a rapidly deployable COVID-19 mouse model. C57BL/6J (B6) mice expressing hACE2 in the lung were transduced by oropharyngeal delivery of the recombinant human adenovirus type 5 that expresses hACE2 (Ad5-hACE2). Mice were infected with SARS-CoV-2 at Day 4 after transduction and developed interstitial pneumonia associated with perivascular inflammation, accompanied by significantly higher viral load in lungs at Days 3, 6, and 12 after infection compared with Ad5-empty control group. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in pneumocytes in alveolar septa. Transcriptomic analysis of lungs demonstrated that the infected Ad5-hACE mice had a significant increase in IFN-dependent chemokines Cxcl9 and Cxcl10, and genes associated with effector T-cell populations including Cd3 g, Cd8a, and Gzmb. Pathway analysis showed that several Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were enriched in the data set, including cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, the chemokine signaling pathway, the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway, the measles pathway, and the IL-17 signaling pathway. This response is correlative to clinical response in lungs of patients with COVID-19. These results demonstrate that expression of hACE2 via adenovirus delivery system sensitized the mouse to SARS-CoV-2 infection and resulted in the development of a mild COVID-19 phenotype, highlighting the immune and inflammatory host responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection. This rapidly deployable COVID-19 mouse model is useful for preclinical and pathogenesis studies of COVID-19.


Assuntos
Células Epiteliais Alveolares/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Expressão Gênica , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Transdução de Sinais/imunologia , Adenoviridae/genética , Adenoviridae/metabolismo , Células Epiteliais Alveolares/metabolismo , Células Epiteliais Alveolares/virologia , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/biossíntese , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/genética , Enzima de Conversão de Angiotensina 2/imunologia , Animais , COVID-19/genética , COVID-19/metabolismo , COVID-19/patologia , Citocinas/genética , Citocinas/imunologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Camundongos , Camundongos Transgênicos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais/genética , Transdução Genética
2.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 1745, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35365631

RESUMO

Neurological manifestations are a significant complication of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), but underlying mechanisms aren't well understood. The development of animal models that recapitulate the neuropathological findings of autopsied brain tissue from patients who died from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are critical for elucidating the neuropathogenesis of infection and disease. Here, we show neuroinflammation, microhemorrhages, brain hypoxia, and neuropathology that is consistent with hypoxic-ischemic injury in SARS-CoV-2 infected non-human primates (NHPs), including evidence of neuron degeneration and apoptosis. Importantly, this is seen among infected animals that do not develop severe respiratory disease, which may provide insight into neurological symptoms associated with "long COVID". Sparse virus is detected in brain endothelial cells but does not associate with the severity of central nervous system (CNS) injury. We anticipate our findings will advance our current understanding of the neuropathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and demonstrate SARS-CoV-2 infected NHPs are a highly relevant animal model for investigating COVID-19 neuropathogenesis among human subjects.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Animais , Encéfalo , Células Endoteliais , Humanos , Primatas
3.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol ; 290(5): F1177-86, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16332932

RESUMO

Angiotensin (ANG) type 1A (AT(1A)) receptor-null (AT(1A)(-/-)) mice exhibit reduced afferent arteriolar (AA) constrictor responses to ANG II compared with wild-type (WT) mice, whereas efferent arteriolar (EA) responses are absent (Harrison-Bernard LM, Cook AK, Oliverio MI, and Coffman TM. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F538-F545, 2003). In the present study, the renal arteriolar constrictor responses to norepinephrine (NE) and/or ANG II were determined in blood-perfused juxtamedullary nephrons from kidneys of AT(1A)(-/-), AT(1B) receptor-null (AT(1B)(-/-)), and WT mice. Baseline AA diameter in AT(1A)(-/-) mice was not different from that in WT mice (13.1 +/- 0.9 and 12.6 +/- 0.9 microm, n = 7 and 8, respectively); however, EA diameters were significantly larger (17.3 +/- 1.4 vs. 11.7 +/- 0.4 microm, n = 10 and 8) in AT(1A)(-/-) than in WT mice. Constriction of AA (-40 +/- 8 and -51 +/- 6% at 1 microM NE) and EA (-29 +/- 6 and -38 +/- 3% at 1 microM NE) in response to 0.1-1 microM NE was similar in AT(1A)(-/-) and WT mice. Baseline diameters of AA (13.5 +/- 0.7 and 14.2 +/- 0.9 microm, n = 9 and 10) and EA (15.4 +/- 1.0 and 15.0 +/- 0.7 microm, n = 11 and 9) and ANG II (0.1-10 nM) constrictor responses of AA (-25 +/- 4 and -31 +/- 5% at 10 nM) and EA (-32 +/- 6 and -35 +/- 7% at 10 nM) were similar in AT(1B)(-/-) and WT mice, respectively. ANG II-induced constrictions were eliminated by AT(1) receptor blockade with 4 microM candesartan. Taken together, our data demonstrate that AA and EA responses to NE are unaltered in the absence of AT(1A) receptors, and ANG II responses remain intact in the absence of AT(1B) receptors. Therefore, we conclude that AT(1A) and AT(1B) receptors are functionally expressed on the AA, whereas the EA exclusively expresses the AT(1A) receptor.


Assuntos
Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina/biossíntese , Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina/genética , Angiotensina II/farmacologia , Animais , Arteríolas , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Masculino , Camundongos , Néfrons/fisiologia , Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Vasoconstrição
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA