What is the impact of one's chronic illness on his or her spouse's future chronic illness: a community-based prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Integrating a joint approach to chronic disease management within the context of a couple has immense potential as a valuable strategy for both prevention and treatment. Although spousal concordance has been reported in specific chronic illnesses, the impact they cumulatively exert on a spouse in a longitudinal setting has not been investigated. We aimed to determine whether one's cumulative illness burden has a longitudinal impact on that of their spouse. METHODS: Data was acquired from a community-based prospective cohort that included Koreans aged 60 years and over, randomly sampled from 13 districts nationwide. Data from the baseline assessment (conducted from November 2010 to October 2012) up to the 8-year follow-up assessment was analyzed from October 2021 to November 2022. At the last assessment, partners of the index participants were invited, and we included 814 couples in the analysis after excluding 51 with incomplete variables. Chronic illness burden of the participants was measured by the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS). Multivariable linear regression and causal mediation analysis were used to examine the longitudinal effects of index chronic illness burden at baseline and its change during follow-up on future index and spouse CIRS scores. RESULTS: Index participants were divided based on baseline CIRS scores (CIRS < 6 points, n = 555, mean [SD] age 66.3 [4.79] years, 43% women; CIRS ≥ 6 points, n = 259, mean [SD] age 67.7 [4.76] years, 36% women). The baseline index CIRS scores and change in index CIRS scores during follow-up were associated with the spouse CIRS scores (ß = 0.154 [SE: 0.039], p < 0.001 for baseline index CIRS; ß = 0.126 [SE: 0.041], p = 0.002 for change in index CIRS) at the 8-year follow-up assessment. Subgroup analysis found similar results only in the high CIRS group. The baseline index CIRS scores and change in index CIRS scores during follow-up had both direct and indirect effects on the spouse CIRS scores at the 8-year follow-up assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The severity and course of one's chronic illnesses had a significant effect on their spouse's future chronic illness particularly when it was severe. Management strategies for chronic diseases that are centered on couples may be more effective.

Mood disorders increase mortality mainly through dementia: A community-based prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: The effects of mood disorders on mortality may be mediated by their effects on the risk of dementia, and interventions to reduce the occurrence of dementia may reduce their overall mortality. This study aimed to investigate the direct effects of depressive and bipolar disorders on the 6-year risk of mortality and also their indirect effects on mortality due to their effect on the risk of dementia. METHODS: A total of 5101 Koreans were selected from a community-based prospective cohort study, and 6-year risks of mortality and dementia in participants with depressive and bipolar disorders were estimated by Cox proportional hazard analysis. The direct and indirect effects of depressive and bipolar disorders on the risk of mortality were estimated using structural equation modeling. RESULTS: The depressive and bipolar disorder groups showed 51% and 85% higher 6-year mortality, and 82% and 127% higher risk of dementia, respectively, compared to euthymic controls. The effects of depressive and bipolar disorders on mortality were mainly mediated by their effects on the risk of dementia in a structural equation model. The direct effects of each mood disorder on mortality were not significant. CONCLUSION: Both depressive and bipolar disorders increased the risks of mortality and dementia, and the effects of mood disorders on mortality were mainly mediated through dementia. As dementia occurs later in life than mood disorders, measures to prevent it may effectively reduce mortality in individuals with a history of mood disorders, as well as being more feasible than attempting to control other causes of death.

Shared Risk Factors for Depressive Disorder Among Older Adult Couples in Korea.

Importance: Although couples may share many risk factors for depressive disorders in their lifetime, whether these factors mediate the shared risk of depressive disorders has rarely been investigated. Objectives: To identify the shared risk factors for depressive disorder in couples and investigate their mediating roles in the shared risk of depressive disorders among older adult couples. Design, Setting, and Participants: This nationwide, multicenter, community-based cohort study assessed 956 older adults from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia (KLOSCAD) and a cohort of their spouses (KLOSCAD-S) between January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2021. Exposures: Depressive disorders of the KLOSCAD participants. Main Outcomes and Measures: The mediating roles of shared factors in couples on the association between one spouse's depressive disorder and the other's risk of depressive disorders was examined using structural equation modeling. Results: A total of 956 KLOSCAD participants (385 women [40.3%] and 571 men [59.7%]; mean [SD] age, 75.1 [5.0] years) and their spouses (571 women [59.7%] and 385 men [40.3%]; mean [SD] age, 73.9 [6.1] years) were included. The depressive disorders of the KLOSCAD participants were associated with an almost 4-fold higher risk of depressive disorders in their spouses in the KLOSCAD-S cohort (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% CI, 2.06-7.19; P < .001). Social-emotional support mediated the association between depressive disorders in the KLOSCAD participants and their spouses' risk of depressive disorders by itself (ß = 0.012; 95% CI, 0.001-0.024; P = .04; mediation proportion [MP] = 6.1%) and through chronic illness burden (ß = 0.003; 95% CI, 0.000-0.006; P = .04; MP = 1.5%). Chronic medical illness burden (ß = 0.025; 95% CI, 0.001-0.050; P = .04; MP = 12.6%) and presence of a cognitive disorder (ß = 0.027; 95% CI, 0.003-0.051; P = .03; MP = 13.6%) mediated the association. Conclusions and Relevance: The risk factors shared by older adult couples may mediate approximately one-third of the spousal risk of depressive disorders. Identification of and intervention in the shared risk factors of depression among older adult couples may reduce the risk of depressive disorders in the spouses of older adults with depression.

Deep learning-based diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using brain magnetic resonance images: an empirical study.

The limited accessibility of medical specialists for Alzheimer's disease (AD) can make obtaining an accurate diagnosis in a timely manner challenging and may influence prognosis. We investigated whether VUNO Med-DeepBrain AD (DBAD) using a deep learning algorithm can be employed as a decision support service for the diagnosis of AD. This study included 98 elderly participants aged 60 years or older who visited the Seoul Asan Medical Center and the Korea Veterans Health Service. We administered a standard diagnostic assessment for diagnosing AD. DBAD and three panels of medical experts (ME) diagnosed participants with normal cognition (NC) or AD using T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. The accuracy (87.1% for DBAD and 84.3% for ME), sensitivity (93.3% for DBAD and 80.0% for ME), and specificity (85.5% for DBAD and 85.5% for ME) of both DBAD and ME for diagnosing AD were comparable; however, DBAD showed a higher trend in every analysis than ME diagnosis. DBAD may support the clinical decisions of physicians who are not specialized in AD; this may enhance the accessibility of AD diagnosis and treatment.

Exploration of Cognitive Outcomes and Risk Factors for Cognitive Decline Shared by Couples.

Importance: Although couples could share many risk factors of cognitive disorders in their lifetime, whether shared risk factors mediate the shared risk of cognitive disorders has rarely been investigated. Objective: To identify the risk factors of cognitive decline shared within couples and investigate their mediating roles in the shared risk of cognitive disorders and cognitive functions within couples. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective cohort study was launched in November 1, 2010, and 784 participants were followed up every 2 years until December 31, 2020. This nationwide, multicenter, community-based study included older couples from the Korean Longitudinal Study on Cognitive Aging and Dementia (KLOSCAD) and a cohort of their spouses (KLOSCAD-S). Exposures: The cognitive disorder of a spouse was defined as mild cognitive impairment or dementia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The mediating roles of factors shared within couples on the association between one spouse's cognitive disorder and the other's risk of cognitive disorders was examined with structural equation modeling. Results: Included were 784 KLOSCAD participants (307 women [39.2%] and 477 men [60.8%]; mean [SD] age, 74.8 [4.8] years) and their spouses (477 women [60.8%] and 307 men [39.2%]; mean [SD] age, 73.6 [6.2] years). The cognitive disorder of the KLOSCAD participants was associated with almost double the risk of cognitive disorder of their spouses in the KLOSCAD-S cohort (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.12-2.69; P = .01). History of head injury (ß = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.09-0.90; P = .02) and age (ß = 2.57; 95% CI, 1.37-3.76; P < .001) mediated the association between cognitive disorder in the KLOSCAD participants and their spouses' risk of cognitive disorder. Physical inactivity mediated the association through major depressive disorder (ß = 0.33, 95% CI, 0.09-0.57, P = .006 for physical inactivity; ß = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.13-0.44, P < .001 for major depressive disorder). These factors similarly mediated the association between spousal cognitive disorder and cognitive functions such as memory and executive function. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the risk factors shared within couples may mediate approximately three-quarters of the spousal risk of cognitive disorders. Identification of and intervention in the shared risk factors of dementia within couples may reduce the risk of cognitive disorders in the spouses of people with dementia.

A Review of the Literature on Culture-Negative Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Epidemiology, Diagnosis and Treatment.

Purpose: The prevalence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) has increased with the increasing incidence of arthroplasty surgery. Considering identification of causative microorganisms is crucial for treatment of PJI, culture-negative (CN) PJI is a significant clinical issue. The purpose of the present study is to describe epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of CN PJI based on review of the literature to help prevent delayed diagnosis and improve clinical outcomes of CN PJI. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases were searched for articles on CN PJI. Only clinical studies written in English were included. Basic science studies, letters to the editor, case reports and review articles on PJI were excluded. Results: Seven studies were included in this study. The prevalence of CN PJI ranged from 0% to 42.1%. The major risk factors for CN PJI were prior antibiotic use and presence of postoperative wound drainage. Vancomycin and cephalosporins were the most commonly used antibiotics for CN PJI. Two-stage revision arthroplasty followed by 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy produced the most successful treatment outcomes. Conclusions: In most clinical studies on CN PJI, a definite diagnostic method for identifying causative microorganisms or optimal treatment strategy for CN PJI were not clearly described. Therefore, further studies are needed to establish standard diagnostic methods for identifying infecting organisms and treatment strategies for CN PJI.