Multiregion Trauma Center Follow-Up Protocol for Transferred Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Trauma centers routinely utilize the Injury Severity Score for performance improvement. Yet, transferring facilities do not always have access to patients' final Injury Severity Score. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this project was to develop and implement a multiregion Injury Severity Score follow-up feedback protocol for transferring facilities to receive standardized information on patient treatment and the ability to calculate an accurate follow-up Injury Severity Score of transferred patients. METHODS: This project included 25 Adult and Pediatric Level I, II, and III trauma centers within three regional trauma systems in a Midwestern state. This project included trauma centers that used one of the two different trauma registry software systems as a solution to develop and implement a protocol for follow-up feedback for transferred trauma patients. A template was created to capture data posttransfer to calculate a final Injury Severity Score. RESULTS: The feedback protocol was well received by participating regions. Implementation revealed the impact of variable trauma registry software on the ability to create multi-institution feedback programs. CONCLUSION: Trauma systems can implement similar strategies to ensure transferring trauma centers routinely receive standardized, timely patient feedback.

A Critical Pathway for Mass Casualty Incident Preparedness.

BACKGROUND: Rates of mass casualty incidents (MCIs) have been on the rise in the United States, highlighting the need for health care systems to have an emergency response plan. Trauma centers are fundamental during MCIs and serve a crucial leadership role in preparedness for them. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the design and implementation of simulated MCI drills at an American College of Surgeons verified Level I trauma center in the Midwest. METHODS: A quasi-experimental time-series design was utilized to determine MCI simulation effects on staff performance using an emergency department checklist to measure emergency department throughput time. A multidisciplinary MCI design team developed a checklist for the emergency department, which identified tasks required to complete it. The 16-item checklist, Critical Pathway Management methodology, was used to identify the critical pathway for patient throughput during a surge. Two in situ MCI simulation drills were conducted in the emergency department (October and December 2019), and Critical Pathway Management identified the primary patient throughput rate limiters as notification and inpatient nursing staff presentation. RESULTS: Emergency department throughput decreased from a mean of 15 to 11 min (reduction of 26.7%) between the two time periods after focusing on rate-limiting tasks. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement project demonstrated that the use of institution-specific checklists and Critical Pathway Management to identify critical pathways and potential rate limiters led to patient throughput improvements.

Improving a Mature Palliative Care Program at a Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Similar to the significant rise in the geriatric population in the United States, trauma centers have seen an increase in geriatric trauma patients. These patients present with additional challenges such as a higher likelihood of undertriage, mortality, and frailty. In addition, the varying presence of advanced directive documentation increases the importance of early palliative care consultations for geriatric trauma patients. OBJECTIVE: In 2018, a Level I trauma center in the Midwest reviewed the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program's Palliative Care Best Practice Guideline to identify opportunities for improvement to strengthen the collaboration between the palliative care consult service and trauma program. METHODS: The guideline drove improvements, which included documentation changes (i.e., expansion of palliative care consultation triggers, frailty assessment, advanced directives questions, depression screening, and addition of palliative care consultation section on the performance improvement program form) and training (1-hr lecture on palliative care and 5-hr palliative care simulation training) opportunities. RESULTS: A 3-month manual chart review (March 2019 through May 2019) revealed that by May 2019, 87.2% of admitted geriatric trauma patients received frailty assessments, which surpassed the benchmark (≥85%). In addition, advanced care planning questions (i.e., health care power of attorney, do not resuscitate order, or living will) exceeded the benchmarks set forth by the guideline (≥90%), with all of the questions being asked and documented in 95.7% of those same patient charts by May 2019. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement project has applicability for trauma centers that treat geriatric trauma patients; using the guidelines can drive changes to meet individual institution needs.

Practice transformations to optimize the delivery of HIV primary care in community healthcare settings in the United States: A program implementation study.

BACKGROUND: The United States HIV care workforce is shrinking, which could complicate service delivery to people living with HIV (PLWH). In this study, we examined the impact of practice transformations, defined as efficiencies in structures and delivery of care, on demonstration project sites within the Workforce Capacity Building Initiative, a Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS). METHODS AND FINDINGS: Data were collected at 14 demonstration project sites in 7 states and the District of Columbia. Organizational assessments were completed at sites once before and 4 times after implementation. They captured 3 transformation approaches: maximizing the HIV care workforce (efforts to increase the number of existing healthcare workforce members involved in the care of PLWH), share-the-care (team-based care giving more responsibility to midlevel providers and staff), and enhancing client engagement in primary HIV care to reduce emergency and inpatient care (e.g., care coordination). We also obtained Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Services Reports (RSRs) from sites for calendar years (CYs) 2014-2016, corresponding to before, during, and after transformation. The RSR include data on client retention in HIV care, prescription of antiretroviral therapy (ART), and viral suppression. We used generalized estimating equation (GEE) models to analyze changes among sites implementing each practice transformation approach. The demonstration projects had a mean of 18.5 prescribing providers (SD = 23.5). They reported data on more than 13,500 clients per year (mean = 969/site, SD = 1,351). Demographic characteristics remained similar over time. In 2014, a majority of clients were male (71% versus 28% female and 0.2% transgender), with a mean age of 47 (interquartile range [IQR] 37-54). Racial/ethnic characteristics (48% African American, 31% Hispanic/Latino, 14% white) and HIV risk varied (31% men who have sex with men; 31% heterosexual men and women; 7% injection drug use). A substantial minority was on Medicaid (41%). Across sites, there was significant uptake in practices consistent with maximizing the HIV care workforce (18% increase, p < 0.001), share-the-care (25% increase, p < 0.001), and facilitating patient engagement in HIV primary care (13% increase, p < 0.001). There were also significant improvements over time in retention in HIV care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.04; p < 0.001), ART prescription levels (aOR = 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.01; p < 0.001), and viral suppression (aOR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.02-1.04; p < 0.001). All outcomes improved at sites that implemented transformations to maximize the HIV care workforce or improve client engagement. At sites that implemented share-the-care practices, only retention in care and viral suppression outcomes improved. Study limitations included use of demonstration project sites funded by the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program (RWHAP), which tend to have better HIV outcomes than other US clinics; varying practice transformation designs; lack of a true control condition; and a potential Hawthorne effect because site teams were aware of the evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that practice transformations are a potential strategy for addressing anticipated workforce challenges among those providing care to PLWH. They hold the promise of optimizing the use of personnel and ensuring the delivery of care to all in need while potentially enhancing HIV care continuum outcomes.

Engaging HIV-positive clients in care: acceptability and mechanisms of action of a peer navigation program in South Africa.

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) could curtail the HIV epidemic, but its impact is diminished by low uptake. We developed a peer navigation program to enhance engagement in HIV care, ART adherence, and behavioral prevention. In preparation for a randomized controlled trial, the program was piloted over four months at two primary health clinics in South Africa's North West Province. Newly diagnosed, HIV-positive clients met regularly with navigators to address barriers to care, adherence, and prevention. To assess program acceptability and feasibility and characterize the mechanisms of action, we surveyed 25 clients who completed navigation services and conducted interviews with 10 clients, four navigators, and five clinic providers. Clients expressed near universal approval for the program and were satisfied with the frequency of contact with navigators. HIV stigma emerged as a primary driver of barriers to care. Navigators helped clients overcome feelings of shame through education and by modeling how to live successfully with HIV. They addressed discrimination fears by helping clients disclose to trusted individuals. These actions, in turn, facilitated clients' care engagement, ART adherence, and HIV prevention efforts. The findings suggest peer navigation is a feasible approach with potential to maximize the impact of ART-based HIV treatment and prevention strategies.

A Qualitative Study Exploring the Regional Feasibility of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) Data Collection for Orthopedic Trauma Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Behavioral health has been shown to impact both short- and long-term health outcomes in trauma patients. Recommendations for screening for behavioral health concerns in the acute setting exist, but longitudinal data collection is infrequently performed. The Trauma Quality Improvement Program describes the importance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including behavioral health data. METHODS: In this qualitative feasibility study, a multidisciplinary team participated in one-hour virtual focus groups; a semi-structured interview guide was used to ascertain feedback on a proposed PROMs study design. This study utilized a qualitative methodology to reveal thematic results from the staff feedback to determine the feasibility of the proposed study design. RESULTS: Three virtual one-hour focus groups consisting of a combination of seven trauma program managers and orthopedic practice managers were asked questions related to the feasibility of a PROMs study design before thematic saturation was reached. Through the analysis, four themes emerged: barriers, possible improvements, representation and research design. Themes included subthemes as well. Noteworthy results included the impact of an integrated orthopedic practice and the technological options available for use. CONCLUSION: This study revealed the barriers that would exist in the implementation of PROMs for orthopedic trauma patients, which may be useful when designing data collection procedures for PROMs. The results related to barriers may assist other trauma centers or regional trauma systems in designing an optimal methodology for PROMs data. Furthermore, the American College of Surgeons might consider these results prior to any mandated implementation of PROMs for trauma centers to avoid any possible burden on staff and systems.

Musculoskeletal injury survivors' resiliency: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal traumas are on the rise in the United States; however, limited studies are available to help trauma providers assess and treat concerns beyond the physical impact. Little is understood about the psychological, social, and spiritual factors that protect patients from adverse effects after a physical trauma or their experiences with each factor afterward. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review was conducted to investigate and review advancements in research related to risk and resiliency factors experienced by survivors of traumatic musculoskeletal injuries. The use of biopsychosocial-spiritual (BPS-S) framework and resiliency theory guided the analysis. METHODS: Researchers reviewed 1003 articles, but only seven met the search criteria. Due to the complexity and uniqueness of traumatic brain injuries, studies on that target population were excluded. RESULTS: Of the seven articles reviewed, three identified psychological protective factors that protect against negative health outcomes; three identified negative psychological, social, or spiritual outcomes; and none investigated social or spiritual health. CONCLUSIONS: There are significant gaps in the literature surrounding risk and resiliency factors related to the BPS-S health of musculoskeletal injury survivors.

Staff Perspectives of Mass Casualty Incident Preparedness.

Introduction Mass casualty incidents (MCI) are low-frequency, high-risk events that disrupt the day-to-day operations of medical centers. Day-to-day protocols are insufficient for effectively managing MCI events, creating a need to develop and test MCI-specific protocols. The aim of this project was to utilize interviews to gain insight into staff experience and perspective on MCIs and their institution's response plans. Methods Staff members who participated in an MCI drill were asked semi-structured interview questions regarding their perspectives on their current priorities, the information needed to perform their role, and their greatest concerns about an MCI. This quality improvement (QI) project utilized a qualitative methodology to thematically organize the results of the staff responses. Results A total of 64 staff members with various levels of patient care experience were interviewed to reach thematic saturation. The use of staff interviews helped to identify the four primary themes that emerged, which were: 1) process, 2) supplies and resources, 3) communication, and 4) roles. Furthermore, each theme also included a number of subthemes. Conclusions This project demonstrated the importance of staff experiences related to MCI simulation training and preparedness, which may be useful for future training and emergency response planning. Additionally, the results may be helpful for other institutions when building a robust MCI simulation training program or designing an emergency response plan.

Evolution of a mass casualty drill design team: A program evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: The number of mass casualty incidents (MCIs) is increasing. While many healthcare systems have not experienced an MCI, the need for preparedness is ever present. The unique challenges of MCI preparedness require the use of simulation, which has been found to be an effective model for training in medical environments. OBJECTIVE: To determine common discussion points when a multidisciplinary team designed and implemented in situ MCI simulation drills to enhance our emergency preparedness plan. DESIGN: This was a retrospective qualitative evaluation of the multidisciplinary mass casualty drill design team's weekly meeting minutes documents. These documents provided insight into the evolution of a mass casualty drill design team and the advancement of our emergency response plan. RESULTS: Continuous discussions surrounding resource restraints helped to inform the emergence of the three themes, which were "Staff," "Space," and "Stuff." These three themes were further broken down into different subthemes, but there was a continued focus on resource scarcity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the use of an MCI drill design team and in situ simulations assisted in better understanding of how hospital departments struggled with resource scarcity and provided opportunities to strengthen the emergency preparedness response plan. Incorporating a multidisciplinary mass casualty drill design team helped to ensure different perspectives and department needs were acknowledged and addressed through the in situ simulation trainings.

Addressing Behavioral Health Concerns in Trauma: Using Lean Six Sigma to Implement a Depression Screening Protocol in a Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Patients with physical injuries or chronic conditions may be impacted by mental health conditions, which significantly affect their participation and progress in treatment. The Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2) depression screening can identify patients who are at greatest risk for depression to provide better whole-person care. OBJECTIVE: The quality improvement project objective was to identify and design a process that would result in the PHQ-2 depression screening for admitted trauma patients with a minimum 75% completion rate. METHODS: Lean Six Sigma (LSS) process design methodology, DMADV (define, measure, analyze, design, and verify), drove process improvement. Medical records from before (December 2018 through February 2019) and after (March 2019 through May 2019) the intervention were evaluated using frequencies, percentages, χ, and multivariable logistic regression to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. RESULTS: PHQ-2 document location was imperative to successful compliance, which increased from 60.74% (78 of 128) to 80.56% (87 of 108). Specifically, weekend compliance increased from 42.9% (18 of 42) to 82.8% (24 of 29). CONCLUSION: LSS DMADV methodology helped health care professionals design a process to facilitate compliance with the PHQ-2 depression screening protocol in trauma patients. Adherence with this screening can help increase the number of behavioral health consultations, which in turn improves the treatment of traumatic injury survivors.