Noncompliance to iodine supplementation recommendation is a risk factor for iodine insufficiency in Portuguese pregnant women: results from the IoMum cohort.

PURPOSE: After a recommendation for iodine supplementation in pregnancy has been issued in 2013 in Portugal, there were no studies covering iodine status in pregnancy in the country. The aim of this study was to assess iodine status in pregnant women in Porto region and its association with iodine supplementation. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Centro Hospitalar Universitário São João, Porto, from April 2018 to April 2019. Pregnant women attending the 1st trimester ultrasound scan were invited to participate. Exclusion criteria were levothyroxine use, gestational age < 10 and ≥ 14 weeks, non-evolutive pregnancy at recruitment and non-signing of informed consent. Urinary iodine concentration (UIC) was measured in random spot urine by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Median UIC was 104 µg/L (IQR 62-189) in the overall population (n = 481) of which 19% had UIC < 50 µg/L. Forty three percent (n = 206) were not taking an iodine-containing supplement (ICS) and median UIC values were 146 µg/L (IQR 81-260) and 74 µg/L (IQR 42-113) in ICS users and non-users, respectively (p < 0.001). Not using an ICS was an independent risk factor for iodine insufficiency [adjusted OR (95% CI) = 6.00 (2.74, 13.16); p < 0.001]. Iodised salt use was associated with increased median iodine-to-creatinine ratio (p < 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: A low compliance to iodine supplementation recommendation in pregnancy accounted for a mild-to-moderately iodine deficiency. Our results evidence the need to support iodine supplementation among pregnant women in countries with low household coverage of iodised salt. Trial registration number NCT04010708, registered on the 8th July 2019.

Novel method for evaluating in vitro activity of anidulafungin in combination with amphotericin B or azoles.

A combination of drugs possessing different targets has been used as salvage therapy, although without scientific support. In vitro studies validating such combinations are scarce, and the methodology is very laborious and time-consuming. This study proposes a flow cytometric (FC) protocol as an alternative to evaluate the effect of the combination of anidulafungin (AND) with amphotericin B (AMB) and azoles (fluconazole and voriconazole), tested upon 39 and 36 Candida strains, respectively. The concentration assayed in the combination was 0.5× MIC of each drug. The membrane potential marker DiBAC(4)(3) [Bis-(1,3-dibutylbarbituric acid) trimethine oxonol] was used for AND-AMB, and the metabolic marker FUN-1 was used for AND-azoles. Drug interaction was determined by calculating a staining index (SI): the sum of the percentage of depolarized cells (DC) after treatment with drug combinations divided by the DC of the drug alone, and the sum of the mean intensity of fluorescence (MIF) displayed by cells treated with drug combinations divided by the MIF of the drug alone for FUN-1. An SI of <1 means antagonism, an SI between 1 and 4 means no interaction, and an SI of >4 means synergism. The combination of AND and AMB by FC and checkerboard was synergistic for 46 and 43% of isolates and antagonistic for 5 and 8%, respectively. For the combination of AND and azoles, it was synergistic for 36% and antagonistic for 3% by FC and synergistic for 44% and antagonistic for 3% by checkerboard. When the FC method was compared to the gold standard checkerboard method, the agreement was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] of 0.88 to 0.94), sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI of 0.73 to 0.95), and specificity was 0.95 (95% CI of 0.84 to 1). Thus, FC is a rapid and reliable method (<2 h) to assess the effect of antifungal combinations.