Characteristics and risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 in children tested in the early phase of the pandemic: a cross-sectional study, Italy, 23 February to 24 May 2020.

BackgroundVery few studies describe factors associated with COVID-19 diagnosis in children.AimWe here describe characteristics and risk factors for COVID-19 diagnosis in children tested in 20 paediatric centres across Italy.MethodsWe included cases aged 0-18 years tested between 23 February and 24 May 2020. Our primary analysis focused on children tested because of symptoms/signs suggestive of COVID-19.ResultsAmong 2,494 children tested, 2,148 (86.1%) had symptoms suggestive of COVID-19. Clinical presentation of confirmed COVID-19 cases included besides fever (82.4%) and respiratory signs or symptoms (60.4%) also gastrointestinal (18.2%), neurological (18.9%), cutaneous (3.8%) and other unspecific influenza-like presentations (17.8%). In multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity were: exposure history (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 39.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 17.52-90.55; p < 0.0001), cardiac disease (AOR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.19-5.02; p < 0.0001), fever (AOR: 3.05%; 95% CI: 1.67-5.58; p = 0.0003) and anosmia/ageusia (AOR: 4.08; 95% CI: 1.69-9.84; p = 0.002). Among 190 (7.6%) children positive for SARS-CoV-2, only four (2.1%) required respiratory support and two (1.1%) were admitted to intensive care; all recovered.ConclusionRecommendations for SARS-CoV-2 testing in children should consider the evidence of broader clinical features. Exposure history, fever and anosmia/ageusia are strong risk factors in children for positive SARS-CoV-2 testing, while other symptoms did not help discriminate positive from negative individuals. This study confirms that COVID-19 was a mild disease in the general paediatric population in Italy. Further studies are needed to understand risk, clinical spectrum and outcomes of COVID-19 in children with pre-existing conditions.

Biological and Clinical Changes in a Pediatric Series Treated with Off-Label JAK Inhibitors.

Off-label use of medications is still a common practice in pediatric rheumatology. JAK inhibitors are authorized in adults in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis. Although their use is not authorized yet in children, JAK inhibitors, based on their mechanism of action and on clinical experiences in small series, have been suggested to be useful in the treatment of pediatric interferon-mediated inflammation. Accordingly, an increased interferon score may help to identify those patients who might benefit of JAK inhibitors. We describe the clinical experience with JAK inhibitors in seven children affected with severe inflammatory conditions and we discuss the correlation between clinical features and transcriptomic data. Clinical improvements were recorded in all cases. A reduction of interferon signaling was recorded in three out of seven subjects at last follow-up, irrespectively from clinical improvements. Other signal pathways with significant differences between patients and controls included upregulation of DNA repair pathway and downregulation of extracellular collagen homeostasis. Two patients developed drug-related adverse events, which were considered serious in one case. In conclusion, JAK inhibitors may offer a valuable option for children with severe interferon-mediated inflammatory disorders reducing the interferon score as well as influencing other signal pathways that deserve future studies.

5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide-transformylase and inosine-triphosphate-pyrophosphatase genes variants predict remission rate during methotrexate therapy in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

For children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) who fail to respond to methotrexate, the delay in identifying the optimal treatment at an early stage of disease can lead to long-term joint damage. Recent studies indicate that relevant variants to predict methotrexate response in JIA are those in 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide-transformylase (ATIC), inosine-triphosphate-pyrophosphatase (ITPA) and solute-liquid-carrier-19A1 genes. The purpose of the study was, therefore, to explore the role of these candidate genetic factors on methotrexate response in an Italian cohort of children with JIA. Clinical response to methotrexate was evaluated as clinical remission stable for a 6-month period, as ACRPed score and as change in Juvenile Arthritis Disease score. The most relevant SNPs for each gene considered were assayed on patients' DNA. ITPA activity was measured in patients' erythrocytes. Sixty-nine patients with JIA were analyzed: 52.2 % responded to therapy (ACRPed70 score), while 37.7 % reached clinical remission stable for 6 months. ATIC rs2372536 GG genotype was associated with improved clinical remission (adjusted p value = 0.0090). For ITPA, rs1127354 A variant was associated with reduced clinical remission: (adjusted p value = 0.028); this association was present even for patients with wild-type ITPA and low ITPA activity. These preliminary results indicate that genotyping of ATIC rs2372536 and ITPA rs1127354 variants or measuring ITPA activity could be useful to predict methotrexate response in children with JIA after validation by further prospective studies on a larger patient cohort.

Responses of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis to methotrexate: a genomic outlook.

INTRODUCTION: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic disease characterized by persistent joint inflammation. JIA is the most common pediatric chronic rheumatic disease and no curative therapy is currently available. Methotrexate (MTX) is an important treatment for JIA even though a high inter-individual variability in response is observed in patients. Among the factors of this variability, genetics and epigenetics might play an important role. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the results of pharmacogenetic and pharmacoepigenetic studies regarding MTX response in JIA. Studies considering epigenetic factors in JIA patients are still very limited, therefore this review includes also studies performed in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Moreover, the relevance of biomarkers measured in blood or urine of JIA patients in relation to MTX treatment is discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Nowadays, even though many pharmacogenomics studies have been published, a specific genetic marker predictor of MTX efficacy or adverse events has not yet been identified. Encouraging results are available and great expectations rely on the study of epigenetics. Future studies are needed in order to identify genetic and epigenetic biomarkers that can be implemented in the clinical practice.

Genetic and immunologic findings in children with recurrent aphthous stomatitis with systemic inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent aphthous stomatitis with systemic signs of inflammation can be encountered in inflammatory bowel disease, Behçet's disease (BD), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). In addition, it has been proposed that cases with very early onset in childhood can be underpinned by rare monogenic defects of immunity, which may require targeted treatments. Thus, subjects with early onset recurrent aphthous stomatitis receiving a clinical diagnosis of BD-like or SLE-like disease may deserve a further diagnostic workout, including immunologic and genetic investigations. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how an immunologic, genetic and transcriptomics assessment of interferon inflammation may improve diagnosis and care in children with recurrent aphthous stomatitis with systemic inflammation. METHODS: Subjects referred to the pediatric rheumatologist for recurrent aphthous stomatitis associated with signs of systemic inflammation from January 2015 to January 2020 were enrolled in the study and underwent analysis of peripheral lymphocyte subsets, sequencing of a 17-genes panel and measure of interferon score. RESULTS: We enrolled 15 subjects (12 females, median age at disease onset 4 years). The clinical diagnosis was BD in 8, incomplete BD in 5, BD/SLE overlap in 1, SLE in 1. Pathogenic genetic variants were detected in 3 patients, respectively 2 STAT1 gain of function variants in two patients classified as BD/SLE overlap and SLE, and 1 TNFAIP3 mutation (A20 haploinsufficiency) in patients with BD. Moreover 2 likely pathogenic variants were identified in DNASE1L3 and PTPN22, both in patients with incomplete BD. Interferon score was high in the two patients with STAT1 GOF mutations, in the patient with TNFAIP3 mutation, and in 3 genetic-negative subjects. In two patients, the treatment was modified based on genetic results. CONCLUSIONS: Although recurrent aphthous stomatitis associated with systemic inflammation may lead to a clinical diagnosis of BD or SLE, subjects with early disease onset in childhood deserve genetic investigation for rare monogenic disorders. A wider genetic panel may help disclosing the genetic background in the subset of children with increased interferon score, who tested negative in this study.

Case Report: Use of Anakinra in Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome During COVID-19 Pandemic.

During COVID-19 outbreak, a large number of children with severe inflammatory disease has been reported. This condition, named Pediatric Multi-inflammatory Syndrome temporally associated with COVID-19 (PIMS-TS) or Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (MIS-C), shares some clinical features with Kawasaki disease and is frequently complicated by myocarditis or shock. It has been suggested that MIS-C belongs to the group of cytokine storm syndromes triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection. So far, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and systemic glucocorticoids are the most common therapeutic approaches reported in this group of patients. However, the use of anakinra in patients with severe forms of COVID-19 is showing promising results. Here we reported two patients with multisystem inflammatory syndrome complicated with shock. Both the patients presented a poor response to IVIG and systemic glucocorticoids and received anakinra. Treatment with IL-1 receptor antagonist showed a rapid improvement of clinical conditions and biochemical analysis in both patients and demonstrated a good safety profile. Thus, we look forward for future controlled clinical trials with the aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of anakinra in patients with MIS-C and established precise criteria for its use.