Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Osteoporos Int ; 35(3): 495-503, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37938405

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: While the United States Preventative Services Task Force recommends osteoporosis screening for women 65 years and older, there is no definitive recommendation for routine osteoporosis screening in men. The purpose of this study was to determine the age at which the odds of fragility fractures (FFx) increase in men to help guide future policy discussions evaluating an optimal screening strategy in this population. METHODS: Men older than 49 years were identified in the PearlDiver Patient Records Database. Patients were excluded if they had a prior fragility fracture, if they were at high risk for osteoporosis due to comorbidities, or if they carried a diagnosis of and/or were on treatment for osteoporosis. The prevalence of FFx was trended for each age group. A stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis was conducted to identify data-driven strata that maximize the incremental FFx risk by age for men. Logistic regression analyses controlling for potential confounders were conducted to test these identified strata. RESULTS: The incidence of FFx started to increase after the age of 64 years for men. Further, the identified data-driven age strata associated with a significant and incremental difference in fragility fractures were the following: 50-64, 65-69, 70-72, 73-75, 76-78, 79-80, and 81+. When compared to the youngest age stratum (50-64 years), multivariable regression showed the risk of fragility fracture incrementally increased starting in those aged 70-72 (RR, 1.31; 95% CI. 1.21-1.46; p < 0.001) with the highest risk in those aged 81+ (RR, 5.35; 95% CI, 5.10-5.62; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In men without a pre-existing history of osteoporosis, the risk of fragility fractures starts to increase after the age of 70. Further work building upon these data may help to identify a specific age at which routine bone health screening in males can help to minimize fractures and their associated morbidity and mortality.


Assuntos
Fraturas Ósseas , Osteoporose , Fraturas por Osteoporose , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Fraturas Ósseas/epidemiologia , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Envelhecimento , Osso e Ossos , Incidência , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/complicações , Fatores de Risco
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 26(5): 1555-62, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25619633

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Fracture risk is increased in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The effect of pre-diabetes and T2DM on bone macroarchitecture and strength has not been well investigated. In this study, we show that in women only, both pre-diabetes and T2DM are associated with decreased hip bending strength and mineralization which might lead to skeletal weakness. INTRODUCTION: Older men and women with T2DM are at increased risk for fracture despite normal bone mineral density (BMD). The discordance between bone quantity and skeletal fragility has driven investigation into additional determinants of fracture resistance in T2DM. Additionally, the effect of pre-diabetes on bone strength has not been well described. The aim of this study was to determine differences in bone macroarchitecture and strength, measured by hip geometry, in persons with normal glucose tolerance (NGT), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and T2DM. METHODS: We performed cross-sectional analyses of older (age >55 years) men (n = 472) and women (n = 473) participating in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) classified as NGT, IGT, or T2DM based on oral glucose tolerance testing. Bone strength measures included the hip geometry parameters of section modulus (Z), cross-sectional area (CSA), and buckling ratio (BR). Sex-stratified analyses were conducted using adjusted stepwise regression models. RESULTS: In women, IGT and T2DM were negatively associated with hip geometry parameters including mineralization in cross section (CSA, ß -0.076 and -0.073, respectively; both p < 0.05) and hip bending strength (Z, ß -0.097 and -0.09, respectively; both p < 0.05); conversely, IGT and T2DM were associated with improved compressive strength (BR, ß -0.31 and -0.29, respectively; both p < 0.05). There was no significant association between glycemic status and hip geometry in men. CONCLUSIONS: In women only, both IGT and T2DM were inversely associated with bone macroarchitecture and measures of bone mineralization and bending strength. The same association between worsening glycemic status and bone strength was not observed in men. These data suggest a differential effect of sex on hip geometry with evolving glucose intolerance.


Assuntos
Envelhecimento/patologia , Intolerância à Glucose/patologia , Articulação do Quadril/patologia , Idoso , Envelhecimento/fisiologia , Antropometria/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Colo do Fêmur/fisiopatologia , Intolerância à Glucose/fisiopatologia , Teste de Tolerância a Glucose/métodos , Articulação do Quadril/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Caracteres Sexuais
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31337926

RESUMO

PURPOSE: In-vivo evaluation of bone microarchitecture remains challenging because of limited resolution of conventional orthopaedic imaging modalities. We investigate the performance of flat-panel detector extremity Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) in quantitative analysis of trabecular bone. To enable accurate morphometry of fine trabecular bone architecture, advanced CBCT pre-processing and segmentation algorithms are developed. METHODS: The study involved 35 transilliac bone biopsy samples imaged on extremity CBCT (voxel size 75 µm, imaging dose ~13 mGy) and gold standard µCT (voxel size 7.67 µm). CBCT image segmentation was performed using (i) global Otsu's thresholding, (ii) Bernsen's local thresholding, (iii) Bernsen's local thresholding with additional histogram-based global pre-thresholding, and (iv) the same as (iii) but combined with contrast enhancement using a Laplacian Pyramid. Correlations between extremity CBCT with the different segmentation algorithms and gold standard µCT were investigated for measurements of Bone Volume over Total Volume (BV/TV), Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th), Trabecular Spacing (Tb.Sp), and Trabecular Number (Tb.N). RESULTS: The combination of local thresholding with global pre-thresholding and Laplacian contrast enhancement outperformed other CBCT segmentation methods. Using this optimal segmentation scheme, strong correlation between extremity CBCT and µCT was achieved, with Pearson coefficients of 0.93 for BV/TV, 0.89 for Tb.Th, 0.91 for Tb.Sp, and 0.88 for Tb.N (all results statistically significant). Compared to a simple global CBCT segmentation using Otsu's algorithm, the advanced segmentation method achieved ~20% improvement in the correlation coefficient for Tb.Th and ~50% improvement for Tb.Sp. CONCLUSIONS: Extremity CBCT combined with advanced image pre-processing and segmentation achieves high correlation with gold standard µCT in measurements of trabecular microstructure. This motivates ongoing development of clinical applications of extremity CBCT in in-vivo evaluation of bone health e.g. in early osteoarthritis and osteoporosis.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA