Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 126(7): 1155-1161, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35929947

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted healthcare access and medical treatment, including oncological care. Treatment delay in ovarian cancer could impact survival. We aimed to assess if there were delays and treatment changes in a cohort of epithelial ovarian cancer patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of epithelial ovarian cancer patients included cases diagnosed during the first 22 months of the COVID-19 pandemic in the state of Sao Paulo and those diagnosed in the 22 months preceding the outbreak. Time-to-treat was measured in days. In each group, surgery and chemotherapy proportions were assessed according to healthcare insurance status. RESULTS: A 56.2% reduction in epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosis was identified during the pandemic group compared to the prepandemic group; fewer patients were diagnosed in stage I (p < 0.01). Time-to-treat increased from 18.9 to 23 days (p < 0.01). Surgery in the public sector fell from 74.6% to 65.3% during the pandemic, compared to 87.1% to 68.8% in the private sector. CONCLUSION: There were fewer overall diagnoses, reduced stage I diagnosis, increased time-to-treat, and a reduction in the proportion of patients submitted to surgery. Brazil's public healthcare system demonstrated a higher resiliency to treatment change than the private sector.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tempo para o Tratamento , Brasil/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes
2.
J Surg Oncol ; 122(8): 1802-1807, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32851684

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The management of ovarian cancer requires complex surgical and medical interventions. Specialized care is associated with superior outcomes in early and advanced stages. This study aimed to estimate the effect of hospital characteristics on the overall survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer. METHODS: We established a cohort with data recorded by the Fundação Oncocentro de São Paulo cancer registry. We included 6111 women treated for ovarian cancer in the state of Sao Paulo from January 2000 to December 2018. From 76 hospitals analyzed, 7 were high volume (20 or more cases a year) and 69 low volume. Twenty-nine were teaching and 47 community hospitals. A 10-year survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meyer estimator and the Cox model. RESULTS: Fifty-two percent of the epithelial ovarian cancer patients were treated in high-volume hospitals. High-volume - (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.8-0.92; P < .001) and teaching - (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.99; P = .019) were hospital characteristics associated with low risk of death in 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: High-volume and teaching hospitals are associated with better overall survival in ovarian cancer. Our data suggest that both hospital characteristics are important indicators of good quality of care in ovarian cancer treatment.


Assuntos
Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais de Ensino/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/patologia , Adenocarcinoma de Células Claras/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patologia , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/cirurgia , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/mortalidade , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 69(3): 458-462, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36820776

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how the pandemic might have affected the number of elective and urgent hysterectomies for benign gynecological pathologies in a single-care tertiary center in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify if there were any changes in the need for blood transfusions. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. It involved all non-puerperal and non-oncological hysterectomies from October 2018 to July 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, the pandemic group (46 patients) and the control group (92 patients). Data were collected by reviewing the physical and electronic patient records. We carried out the statistical analysis using the RStudio software. RESULTS: The number of planned hysterectomies was 82 in the pre-pandemic group and 23 in the analysis group, representing a 71.9% decrease. When considering only urgent surgeries, 10 of them happened in the pre-pandemic group, while 23 occurred in the pandemic group, representing an increase of 130%. CONCLUSION: Elective hysterectomies may improve the quality of life of women, reducing abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Treatment delay can worsen patients' physiological and biological conditions, such as lower labor production, humor, and social aspects, increasing costs to the healthcare system.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , Feminino , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pontuação de Propensão , Qualidade de Vida , Brasil/epidemiologia , Histerectomia
4.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 68(11): 1593-1598, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36449780

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, which began in 2020, disrupted healthcare services. Reports of changes in surgical activities coincide with the outbreak period. We aimed to identify if changes could be determined in hospitalization rates of ovarian cancer patients from 2016 to 2020, comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic levels. METHODS: Aggregated data were obtained from the State of São Paulo Secretary of Health regarding ovarian cancer clinical and surgical hospitalization, both Coronavirus disease-specific ICU and infirmary bed occupation rates, average social distancing rates, coronavirus disease 2019 incidence, mortality, and lethality rates. We performed the joinpoint analysis to verify if there were changes regarding hospitalization rates during this period. We also calculated hospitalization rate ratios and tested if they were correlated with pandemic-related variables. RESULTS: Hospitalization rates in the state fell, coinciding with the pandemic. Surgical hospitalization rate ratios were inversely correlated with Coronavirus disease-specific ICU bed occupation rates during the third trimester of 2020, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient of -0.50 (95%CI -0.78 to -0.05, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the treatment of conditions that compete for the same healthcare resources.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Brasil/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Hospitalização , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
5.
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) ; 68(6): 842-846, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35584436

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has disrupted cancer screening worldwide. This study aims to analyze the changes in the rates of screening mammograms and BIRADS 4 or 5 mammograms during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in the opportunistic scenario. METHODS: We integrated three different public databases from the state of São Paulo, Brazil, to obtain the rate of screening mammograms per 1,000, and the rate of BIRADS 4 or 5 mammograms per 100,000 women aged from 50 to 69 years in the years from January 2017 to December 2020. RESULTS: The mean monthly screening mammograms decreased from 14.8/1,000 in 2019 to 9.25/1,000 in 2020, with the lowest rates being recorded in May 2020 (3.1/1,000). The mean monthly high-risk mammograms decreased from 12.8/100,000 in 2019 to 9.1/100,000 in 2020, with the lowest rates being recorded in April 2020 (4.3/100,000). CONCLUSIONS: Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic significantly decreased mammography screening in an opportunistic scenario, a warning sign for decreasing diagnosis of breast cancer in early stages, and increasing advanced stage diagnosis and mortality in the future.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , COVID-19 , Brasil/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Mamografia , Programas de Rastreamento , Pandemias
6.
Artigo em Inglês | PAHOIRIS | ID: phr-58696

RESUMO

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To determine if there was an association between intrapartum stillbirths and both traveled distance for delivery and delivery care accessibility, assessing periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. This is a population-based cohort study. Patients had birth occurring after the onset of labor; the primary outcome was intrapartum stillbirth. City of residence was classified according to the ratio between deliveries performed and total births among its residents; values lower than 0.1 indicated low delivery care accessibility. Travel distance was calculated using the Haversine formula. Education level, maternal age, and birth sex were included. In each period, relative risk was assessed by generalized linear model with Poisson variance. Results. There were 2 267 534 deliveries with birth occurring after the onset of labor. Most patients were between age 20 and 35 years, had between 8 and 11 years of education, and resided in cities with high delivery care accessibility. Low delivery care accessibility increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth in the pre-pandemic (relative risk [RR] 2.02; 95% CI [1.64, 2.47]; p < 0.01) and the pandemic period (RR 1.69; 95% CI [1.09, 2.55]; p = 0.015). This was independent of other risk-increasing factors, such as travel distance and fewer years of education. Conclusions. Low delivery care accessibility is associated with the risk of intrapartum stillbirths, and accessibility reduced during the pandemic. Delivery of patients by family physicians and midwives, as well as official communication channels between primary care physicians and specialists, could improve patient health- care-seeking behavior.


[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Determinar si hubo una asociación entre la mortinatalidad durante el parto y la distancia recorrida o la accesibilidad de la atención para el parto, mediante la evaluación de un período anterior y de otro coin- cidente con la pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos. Se realizó un estudio de cohorte de base poblacional. Se incluyó a las pacientes que dieron a luz tras el inicio de un trabajo de parto; el criterio de valoración principal fue la mortinatalidad durante el parto. Se clasificaron las ciudades de residencia conforme al cociente entre el número de partos atendidos y el total de partos habidos entre sus residentes; los valores inferiores a 0,1 indican que la accesibilidad de la atención del parto es baja. La distancia recorrida para el parto se calculó utilizando la fórmula de Haversine. Se utilizaron datos del nivel de estudios y la edad de la madre y del sexo biológico neonatal. Para cada período, se evaluó el riesgo relativo mediante un modelo lineal generalizado con varianza de Poisson. Resultados. Hubo 2 267 534 partos que se produjeron tras el inicio de un trabajo de parto. La mayoría de las pacientes tenían edades comprendidas entre 20 y 35 años, tenían entre 8 y 11 años de estudios y residían en ciudades donde la accesibilidad de la atención del parto era alta. Una accesibilidad baja de la atención del parto se asoció a un aumento del riesgo de mortinatalidad durante el parto en el período prepandémico (riesgo relativo [RR] = 2,02; IC del 95% = [1,64, 2,47]; p < 0,01) y también durante la pandemia (RR = 1,69; IC del 95% = [1.09, 2.55]; p = 0,015). Este resultado fuer independiente de otros factores que incrementan el riesgo, como la distancia recorrida para dar a luz y un menor nivel de estudios. Conclusiones. Una accesibilidad baja de la atención del parto se asocia a un mayor riesgo de mortinatalidad durante el parto; y se observó una reducción de la accesibilidad durante la pandemia. Los partos asistidos por personal de medicina de familia o de partería y los canales de comunicación oficiales entre el personal médico de atención primaria y el especializado podrían mejorar el comportamiento de las pacientes a la hora de buscar atención de salud.


[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Determinar se existe alguma relação entre a morte fetal intraparto e dois fatores: a distância percorrida para o parto e o acesso à assistência ao parto, avaliando o período antes e durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos. Este é um estudo de coorte de base populacional. As pacientes tiveram parto após o início do trabalho de parto; o desfecho primário foi morte fetal intraparto. A cidade de residência foi classificada de acordo com a razão entre os partos realizados e o total de nascimentos entre os residentes; valores inferiores a 0,1 indicavam baixo acesso à assistência ao parto. A distância percorrida foi calculada usando a fórmula de Haversine. Foram incluídos o nível de escolaridade, a idade materna e o sexo de nascimento. Em cada período, o risco relativo foi avaliado usando um modelo linear generalizado com variância de Poisson. Resultados. Foram registrados 2 267 534 partos com nascimento após o início do trabalho de parto. A maioria das pacientes tinha entre 20 e 35 anos de idade, entre 8 e 11 anos de escolaridade e residia em cidades com alto nível de acesso à assistência ao parto. O baixo acesso à assistência ao parto aumentou o risco de morte fetal intraparto no período anterior à pandemia (risco relativo [RR]: 2,02; intervalo de confiança [IC] de 95%: 1,64–2,47; p < 0,01) e durante a pandemia (RR: 1,69; IC 95%: 1,09–2,55; p = 0,015). Isso ocorreu independentemente de outros fatores de aumento de risco, como a distância percorrida e menor escolaridade. Conclusões. O baixo acesso ao atendimento de parto está associado ao risco de morte fetal intraparto, e a acessibilidade diminuiu durante a pandemia. A realização do parto por médicos de família e obstetrizes, bem como a existência de canais oficiais de comunicação entre médicos de atenção primária e especialistas, poderiam melhorar o comportamento de busca de saúde por parte das pacientes.


Assuntos
Viagem , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Tempo para o Tratamento , Mortalidade Fetal , Brasil , Viagem , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Tempo para o Tratamento , Mortalidade Fetal , Brasil , Viagem , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Tempo para o Tratamento , Mortalidade Fetal
7.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 47: e149, 2023. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1560357

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective. To determine if there was an association between intrapartum stillbirths and both traveled distance for delivery and delivery care accessibility, assessing periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. This is a population-based cohort study. Patients had birth occurring after the onset of labor; the primary outcome was intrapartum stillbirth. City of residence was classified according to the ratio between deliveries performed and total births among its residents; values lower than 0.1 indicated low delivery care accessibility. Travel distance was calculated using the Haversine formula. Education level, maternal age, and birth sex were included. In each period, relative risk was assessed by generalized linear model with Poisson variance. Results. There were 2 267 534 deliveries with birth occurring after the onset of labor. Most patients were between age 20 and 35 years, had between 8 and 11 years of education, and resided in cities with high delivery care accessibility. Low delivery care accessibility increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth in the pre-pandemic (relative risk [RR] 2.02; 95% CI [1.64, 2.47]; p < 0.01) and the pandemic period (RR 1.69; 95% CI [1.09, 2.55]; p = 0.015). This was independent of other risk-increasing factors, such as travel distance and fewer years of education. Conclusions. Low delivery care accessibility is associated with the risk of intrapartum stillbirths, and accessibility reduced during the pandemic. Delivery of patients by family physicians and midwives, as well as official communication channels between primary care physicians and specialists, could improve patient healthcare-seeking behavior.


RESUMEN Objetivo. Determinar si hubo una asociación entre la mortinatalidad durante el parto y la distancia recorrida o la accesibilidad de la atención para el parto, mediante la evaluación de un período anterior y de otro coincidente con la pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos. Se realizó un estudio de cohorte de base poblacional. Se incluyó a las pacientes que dieron a luz tras el inicio de un trabajo de parto; el criterio de valoración principal fue la mortinatalidad durante el parto. Se clasificaron las ciudades de residencia conforme al cociente entre el número de partos atendidos y el total de partos habidos entre sus residentes; los valores inferiores a 0,1 indican que la accesibilidad de la atención del parto es baja. La distancia recorrida para el parto se calculó utilizando la fórmula de Haversine. Se utilizaron datos del nivel de estudios y la edad de la madre y del sexo biológico neonatal. Para cada período, se evaluó el riesgo relativo mediante un modelo lineal generalizado con varianza de Poisson. Resultados. Hubo 2 267 534 partos que se produjeron tras el inicio de un trabajo de parto. La mayoría de las pacientes tenían edades comprendidas entre 20 y 35 años, tenían entre 8 y 11 años de estudios y residían en ciudades donde la accesibilidad de la atención del parto era alta. Una accesibilidad baja de la atención del parto se asoció a un aumento del riesgo de mortinatalidad durante el parto en el período prepandémico (riesgo relativo [RR] = 2,02; IC del 95% = [1,64, 2,47]; p < 0,01) y también durante la pandemia (RR = 1,69; IC del 95% = [1.09, 2.55]; p = 0,015). Este resultado fuer independiente de otros factores que incrementan el riesgo, como la distancia recorrida para dar a luz y un menor nivel de estudios. Conclusiones. Una accesibilidad baja de la atención del parto se asocia a un mayor riesgo de mortinatalidad durante el parto; y se observó una reducción de la accesibilidad durante la pandemia. Los partos asistidos por personal de medicina de familia o de partería y los canales de comunicación oficiales entre el personal médico de atención primaria y el especializado podrían mejorar el comportamiento de las pacientes a la hora de buscar atención de salud.


RESUMO Objetivo. Determinar se existe alguma relação entre a morte fetal intraparto e dois fatores: a distância percorrida para o parto e o acesso à assistência ao parto, avaliando o período antes e durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos. Este é um estudo de coorte de base populacional. As pacientes tiveram parto após o início do trabalho de parto; o desfecho primário foi morte fetal intraparto. A cidade de residência foi classificada de acordo com a razão entre os partos realizados e o total de nascimentos entre os residentes; valores inferiores a 0,1 indicavam baixo acesso à assistência ao parto. A distância percorrida foi calculada usando a fórmula de Haversine. Foram incluídos o nível de escolaridade, a idade materna e o sexo de nascimento. Em cada período, o risco relativo foi avaliado usando um modelo linear generalizado com variância de Poisson. Resultados. Foram registrados 2 267 534 partos com nascimento após o início do trabalho de parto. A maioria das pacientes tinha entre 20 e 35 anos de idade, entre 8 e 11 anos de escolaridade e residia em cidades com alto nível de acesso à assistência ao parto. O baixo acesso à assistência ao parto aumentou o risco de morte fetal intraparto no período anterior à pandemia (risco relativo [RR]: 2,02; intervalo de confiança [IC] de 95%: 1,64-2,47; p < 0,01) e durante a pandemia (RR: 1,69; IC 95%: 1,09-2,55; p = 0,015). Isso ocorreu independentemente de outros fatores de aumento de risco, como a distância percorrida e menor escolaridade. Conclusões. O baixo acesso ao atendimento de parto está associado ao risco de morte fetal intraparto, e a acessibilidade diminuiu durante a pandemia. A realização do parto por médicos de família e obstetrizes, bem como a existência de canais oficiais de comunicação entre médicos de atenção primária e especialistas, poderiam melhorar o comportamento de busca de saúde por parte das pacientes.

8.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 69(3): 458-462, Mar. 2023. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1422657

RESUMO

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate how the pandemic might have affected the number of elective and urgent hysterectomies for benign gynecological pathologies in a single-care tertiary center in the State of São Paulo, Brazil, and to identify if there were any changes in the need for blood transfusions. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study. It involved all non-puerperal and non-oncological hysterectomies from October 2018 to July 2021. Patients were divided into two groups, namely, the pandemic group (46 patients) and the control group (92 patients). Data were collected by reviewing the physical and electronic patient records. We carried out the statistical analysis using the RStudio software. RESULTS: The number of planned hysterectomies was 82 in the pre-pandemic group and 23 in the analysis group, representing a 71.9% decrease. When considering only urgent surgeries, 10 of them happened in the pre-pandemic group, while 23 occurred in the pandemic group, representing an increase of 130%. CONCLUSION: Elective hysterectomies may improve the quality of life of women, reducing abnormal bleeding and pelvic pain. Treatment delay can worsen patients' physiological and biological conditions, such as lower labor production, humor, and social aspects, increasing costs to the healthcare system.

9.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.) ; 68(11): 1593-1598, Nov. 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1406587

RESUMO

SUMMARY OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, which began in 2020, disrupted healthcare services. Reports of changes in surgical activities coincide with the outbreak period. We aimed to identify if changes could be determined in hospitalization rates of ovarian cancer patients from 2016 to 2020, comparing pre-pandemic and pandemic levels. METHODS: Aggregated data were obtained from the State of São Paulo Secretary of Health regarding ovarian cancer clinical and surgical hospitalization, both Coronavirus disease-specific ICU and infirmary bed occupation rates, average social distancing rates, coronavirus disease 2019 incidence, mortality, and lethality rates. We performed the joinpoint analysis to verify if there were changes regarding hospitalization rates during this period. We also calculated hospitalization rate ratios and tested if they were correlated with pandemic-related variables. RESULTS: Hospitalization rates in the state fell, coinciding with the pandemic. Surgical hospitalization rate ratios were inversely correlated with Coronavirus disease-specific ICU bed occupation rates during the third trimester of 2020, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient of −0.50 (95%CI −0.78 to −0.05, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the treatment of conditions that compete for the same healthcare resources.

10.
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992) ; 68(6): 842-846, June 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1387170

RESUMO

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has disrupted cancer screening worldwide. This study aims to analyze the changes in the rates of screening mammograms and BIRADS 4 or 5 mammograms during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in the opportunistic scenario. METHODS: We integrated three different public databases from the state of São Paulo, Brazil, to obtain the rate of screening mammograms per 1,000, and the rate of BIRADS 4 or 5 mammograms per 100,000 women aged from 50 to 69 years in the years from January 2017 to December 2020. RESULTS: The mean monthly screening mammograms decreased from 14.8/1,000 in 2019 to 9.25/1,000 in 2020, with the lowest rates being recorded in May 2020 (3.1/1,000). The mean monthly high-risk mammograms decreased from 12.8/100,000 in 2019 to 9.1/100,000 in 2020, with the lowest rates being recorded in April 2020 (4.3/100,000). CONCLUSIONS: Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic significantly decreased mammography screening in an opportunistic scenario, a warning sign for decreasing diagnosis of breast cancer in early stages, and increasing advanced stage diagnosis and mortality in the future.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA