Influence of radiotherapy interruption on esophageal cancer with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy interruption (RTI) prolongs the overall total treatment time and leads to local control loss in many cancers, but it is unclear in esophageal cancer. We aimed to evaluate the influence of RTI on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: A total of 299 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma from 2017 to 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the effect of RTI on OS, PFS, and LRFS. The delayed time of radiotherapy interruption was calculated as the actual radiation treatment time minus the scheduled time. The univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the COX proportional hazards regression models, and the survival analysis was performed through the Kaplan‒Meier method, and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: The 3-year OS, PFS, and LRFS rates were 53.0%, 42.0%, and 48.0%, respectively. The univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the delayed time > 3 days was an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.10-2.55, p = 0.016), and LRFS (HR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.18-2.57, p = 0.006). The patient with a delayed time of > 3 days had poorer survival rates of OS, and LRFS than patients with a delayed time of ≤ 3 days (OS, p = 0.047; LRFS, p = 0.013), and the survival outcomes of patients with shorter delayed time (1-3 days) were slightly different from the patients without interruptions. The impact of delay time on PFS is not statistically significant, but the survival outcomes of the two groups were slightly different. CONCLUSION: There was a significant correlation between delayed time and local control of esophageal cancer. The delayed time for more than 3 days might decrease the survival outcome, and increase the local recurrence risk.

Effectiveness and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent and clinically significant condition characterized by limited treatment options. In this context, the objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in managing HFpEF. Methods: A systematic search of relevant studies was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trials comparing sacubitril/valsartan to ACEIs or ARBs in HFpEF patients were included. Inclusion criteria: LVEF>45%, NYHA II-IV, Sac/Val vs ACEI/ARB, RCTs, treatment duration >3 months, sample size ≥25 per group. Exclusion criteria: Animal studies, unclear/missing data, poor quality, case studies/expert opinions.Hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular mortality were the primary outcomes, while the additional results included mortality from all causes, improvement of NYHA class, modifications in NT-proBNP, and with LVEF. Results: Sacubitril/valsartan substantially reduced heart failure hospitalization rates compared to ACEIs and ARBs, according to a total of six studies involving 5,201 participants (Relative Risk, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.85; P = .001). Nonetheless, there were no significant improvements in mortality due to cardiovascular disease (Relative Risk, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.79-1.12; P = .563). Sacubitril/valsartan did not affect total mortality from all causes significantly (Relative Risk, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.84-1.09; P = .453), but it did enhance NYHA classification (Relative Risk, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10-1.43; P = .001). NT-proBNP levels decreased substantially (Weighted Mean Difference, -266.67; 95% CI, -525.86 to -7.47), whereas there had been little major shift in LVEF (Weighted Mean Difference, 1.49; 95% CI, -1.33 to 4.21; P = .342). Conclusions: Sacubitril/valsartan may provide superior benefits in reducing heart failure hospitalization rates, NT-proBNP levels, and improving NYHA classification in patients with HFpEF compared to ACEIs and ARBs. Sacubitril/valsartan might be considered as a preferred treatment option for HFpEF patients due to its benefits in reducing heart failure hospitalization rates and improving symptom severity.

Dynamic Changes in Bladder Morphology Over Time in Cervical Cancer Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Continuous surveillance of bladder volume (BV) is beneficial during the treatment of various urogenital diseases because the bladder is always changing its position, size and even shape at different filling phases. For this purpose, we quantified the motion of the urinary bladder. METHODS: Daily ultrasound measurements and weekly cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained from 89 patients in the supine position. BV, bladder centroid positions, and triaxial lengths in the left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and superior-inferior (SI) directions were compared across different time points. RESULTS: BV linearly increased over time, and the mean urinary filling rate (vtot) was correlated with the patients' age and water consumption. The greatest bladder centroid motion occurred longitudinally, with less movement observed laterally. The maximum bladder centroid movement was 18.8 ± 2.2 mm inferiorly and 1.8 ± 0.9 mm posteriorly for every 10% decrease in BV. The rates of changes in triaxial lengths differed across the 4 filling phases. The rate was the largest at a BV range of 10-80 mL, especially in the LR direction, with values of 5.9 ± 1.0, 3.6 ± 1.0, and 3.9 ± 1.0 mm per every 10-mL BV increase for LR, AP, and SI, respectively. With bladder filling (<80 mL), the maximum increase in triaxial length was observed in the SI direction and the rates of all changes considerably decreased, especially at BV > 600 mL. CONCLUSION: The vtot could be used to evaluate the temporal changes in the bladder. The spatial changes should be assessed according to different filling phases based on the centroid position and triaxial lengths.

The impact of digital finance on technological innovation across enterprise life cycles in China.

This study aims to fill a gap in our knowledge by analyzing how digital financing has affected technological innovation in China's firms across different growth phases. This article investigates the relationship between technological innovation efficiency and digital finance in China's A-share listed corporations between 2012 and 2022 using basic logistic modelling. Its main goal is to comprehend how digital finance affects these businesses' technological innovation efficiency from various angles. The study concludes that digital finance significantly improves the efficiency of technological innovation; more importantly, the Digital Finance Adoption Rate (DFAR) has a more significant influence than the Digital Finance Level (DFL). According to the Digital Transformation Maturity (DTM) scale, digital finance helps businesses transform digitally, increasing the effectiveness of technological innovation. State-owned businesses are more affected by the influence of digital finance on innovation efficiency than non-state-owned businesses. Other factors, including enterprise lifecycle, innovation investment, digital leadership, revenue strategies, and market rivalry, also shape the relationship between digital finance and technical innovation efficiency. To increase innovation efficiency, particularly in state-owned businesses, the study suggests expanding access to and adoption of digital finance. It also means leveraging elements such as enterprise lifecycle, innovation investment, digital leadership, revenue strategies, and market competition to spur more technological innovation. The impact of digital finance on technological innovation at different phases of organizational growth in China highlights the need for customized methods to harness its potential.