A patient-centered, coordinated care approach delivered by community and pediatric primary care providers to promote responsive parenting: pragmatic randomized clinical trial rationale and protocol.

BACKGROUND: Economically disadvantaged families receive care in both clinical and community settings, but this care is rarely coordinated and can result in conflicting educational messaging. WEE Baby Care is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial evaluating a patient-centered responsive parenting (RP) intervention that uses health information technology (HIT) strategies to coordinate care between pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infant and Children (WIC) community nutritionists to prevent rapid weight gain from birth to 6 months. It is hypothesized that data integration and coordination will improve consistency in RP messaging and parent self-efficacy, promoting shared decision making and infant self-regulation, to reduce infant rapid weight gain from birth to 6 months. METHODS/DESIGN: Two hundred and ninety mothers and their full-term newborns will be recruited and randomized to the "RP intervention" or "standard care control" groups. The RP intervention includes: 1) parenting and nutrition education developed using the American Academy of Pediatrics Healthy Active Living for Families curriculum in conjunction with portions of a previously tested RP curriculum delivered by trained pediatric PCPs and WIC nutritionists during regularly scheduled appointments; 2) parent-reported data using the Early Healthy Lifestyles (EHL) risk assessment tool; and 3) data integration into child's electronic health records with display and documentation features to inform counseling and coordinate care between pediatric PCPs and WIC nutritionists. The primary study outcome is rapid infant weight gain from birth to 6 months derived from sex-specific World Health Organization adjusted weight-for-age z-scores. Additional outcomes include care coordination, messaging consistency, parenting behaviors (e.g., food to soothe), self-efficacy, and infant sleep health. Infant temperament and parent depression will be explored as moderators of RP effects on infant outcomes. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic patient-centered RP intervention integrates and coordinates care across clinical and community sectors, potentially offering a fundamental change in the delivery of pediatric care for prevention and health promotion. Findings from this trial can inform large scale dissemination of obesity prevention programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Restrospective Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03482908 . Registered March 29, 2018.

Encouraging appropriate gestational weight gain in high-risk gravida: A randomized controlled trial.

Trial Design: Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) can increase pregnancy morbidity and is particularly problematic for women with pregestational obesity. A lifestyle modification intervention was introduced to gravida with obesity to decrease excessive GWG as compared to usual care (UC). Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted to improve healthy lifestyle behaviors to manage appropriate GWG. Consenting participants with prepregnancy obesity and singletons ≤17 weeks were randomized to (1) Usual Care (UC): usual written educational materials and counseling by obstetric provider or (2) Enhanced Care (EC): UC plus (a) personalized letter from physician detailing appropriate GWG; (b) access to individualized GWG chart; (c) ongoing counseling with registered dietitian/nutritionist (RDN). The primary outcome was proportion with GWG ≤9.1 kg, as this is upper limit recommended by Institute of Medicine (IOM). Total GWG and GWG as less than/within/greater than IOM recommendations (in aggregate and stratified by obesity class), and pregnancy/neonatal outcomes were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Results: Analyses included 105 participants in EC and 109 in UC arms. The groups had similar demographics: 46% with class I obesity, 26% class II, and 28% class III. There were no group differences for any GWG, pregnancy, or neonatal outcomes when analyzed in aggregate. As compared to those randomized to the EC arm, participants in UC arm with class I obesity gained 1.4 kg less and those with class II obesity were significantly more likely to gain within IOM guidelines (14.8% vs. 40.0%, adjusted p = 0.04). Participants with class III obesity randomized to EC arm were more likely to gain within IOM guidelines as compared to participants randomized to UC arm (29.0% vs. 6.7%, adjusted p = 0.02). Conclusion: There were no differences in GWG observed between groups when analyzing participants in aggregate. However, a physician's letter detailing appropriate GWG, patient portal access to a personalized GWG chart, and RDN consultation were helpful for encouraging GWG within IOM guidelines for women with prepregnancy class III obesity. Women with class I or II obesity had better GWG outcomes without these additional interventions.

Family-Based Telehealth Initiative to Improve Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children With Obesity and Its Utility During COVID-19: A Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Guidelines recommend primary care providers refer children with obesity to behavioral interventions, but given limited program availability, access, and parental engagement, referrals remain rare. We developed telehealth coaching interventions for families whose children received care at a health system in Pennsylvania, United States in 2019-2020. Intervention referrals were facilitated by the pediatrician and/or project team for 6-12-year-old children with obesity following well-child visits. Participants chose one of three 26-week interventions focused on healthy eating, physical activity, or a hybrid clinical/nutrition intervention. Interventions engaged parents as change agents, enhancing self-efficacy to model and reinforce behavior and providing resources to help create a healthy home environment. We enrolled 77 of 183 eligible parent/child dyads. We used mixed methods to evaluate the interventions. Repeated measures models among participants showed significant reductions in obesogenic nutrition behaviors post-intervention and at 1-year follow-up, including a reduction in sugar-sweetened beverage intake of 2.14 servings/week (95% confidence interval: -3.45, -0.82). There were also improvements in obesoprotective nutrition behaviors (e.g., frequency of family meals, parental self-efficacy related to meal management). One year post-baseline, we observed no significant differences in changes in body mass index (BMI) z-scores comparing child participants with matched controls. Given potential impacts of COVID-19 community restrictions on study outcomes, we conducted qualitative interviews with 13 participants during restrictions, which exemplified how disrupted routines constrained children's healthy behaviors but that intervention participation prepared parents by providing cooking and physical activities at home. Findings support the potential of a telehealth-delivered nutrition intervention to support adoption of healthy weight behaviors.

Impact of Sustained Weight Loss on Cardiometabolic Outcomes.

Obesity increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. We sought to determine the impact of obesity maintenance, weight regain, weight loss maintenance, and magnitudes of weight loss on future risk and time to developing these cardiometabolic conditions. This was a retrospective cohort study of adults receiving primary care at Geisinger Health System between 2001 and 2017. Using electronic health records, patients with ≥3-weight measurements over a 2-year index period were identified and categorized. Obesity maintainers (OM) had obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²) and maintained their weight within ±3% from baseline (reference group). Both weight loss rebounders (WLR) and weight loss maintainers (WLM) had obesity at baseline and lost >5% body weight in year 1; WLR regained ≥20% of weight loss by end of year 2 and WLM maintained ≥80% of weight loss. Incident type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, and time-to-outcome were determined for each study group and by weight loss category for WLM. Of the 63,567 patients included, 67% were OM, 19% were WLR, and 14% were WLM. The mean duration of follow-up was 6.6 years (SD, 3.9). Time until the development of electronic health record-documented type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia was longest for WLM and shortest for OM (log-rank test p <0.0001). WLM had the lowest incident type 2 diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.676 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.617 to 0.740]; p <0.0001), hypertension (adjusted HR 0.723 [95% CI 0.655 to 0.799]; p <0.0001), and hyperlipidemia (adjusted HR 0.864 [95% CI 0.803 to 0.929]; p <0.0001). WLM with the greatest weight loss (>15%) had a longer time to develop any of the outcomes compared with those with the least amount of weight loss (<7%) (p <0.0001). In an integrated delivery network population, sustained weight loss was associated with a delayed onset of cardiometabolic diseases, particularly with a greater magnitude of weight loss.

Effects of sustained weight loss on outcomes associated with obesity comorbidities and healthcare resource utilization.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the impact of long-term non-surgical weight loss maintenance on clinical relevance for osteoarthritis, cancer, opioid use, and depression/anxiety and healthcare resource utilization. METHODS: A cohort of adults receiving primary care within Geisinger Health System between 2001-2017 was retrospectively studied. Patients with ≥3 weight measurements in the two-year index period and obesity at baseline (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) were categorized: Obesity Maintainers (reference group) maintained weight within +/-3%; Weight Loss Rebounders lost ≥5% body weight in year one, regaining ≥20% of weight loss in year two; Weight Loss Maintainers lost ≥5% body weight in year one, maintaining ≥80% of weight loss. Association with development of osteoarthritis, cancer, opioid use, and depression/anxiety, was assessed; healthcare resource utilization was quantified. Magnitude of weight loss among maintainers was evaluated for impact on health outcomes. RESULTS: In total, 63,567 patients were analyzed including 67% Obesity Maintainers, 19% Weight Loss Rebounders, and 14% Weight Loss Maintainers; median follow-up was 9.7 years. Time until osteoarthritis onset was delayed for Weight Loss Maintainers compared to Obesity Maintainers (Logrank test p <0.0001). Female Weight Loss Maintainers had a 19% and 24% lower risk of developing any cancer (p = 0.0022) or obesity-related cancer (p = 0.0021), respectively. No significant trends were observed for opioid use. Weight loss Rebounders and Maintainers had increased risk (14% and 25%) of future treatment for anxiety/depression (both <0.0001). Weight loss maintenance of >15% weight loss was associated with the greatest decrease in incident osteoarthritis. Healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher for Weight Loss Rebounders and Maintainers compared to Obesity Maintainers. Increased weight loss among Weight Loss Maintainers trended with lower overall healthcare resource utilization, except for hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: In people with obesity, sustained weight loss was associated with greater clinical benefits than regained short-term weight loss and obesity maintenance. Higher weight loss magnitudes were associated with delayed onset of osteoarthritis and led to decreased healthcare utilization.

Communicating personalized risk of diabetes and offering weight reduction program choice: Recruitment, participation, and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Low patient recruitment into diabetes prevention programs is a challenge. The primary aim of this study was to demonstrate that an increased recruitment rate can be achieved by communicating personalized risk of progression to type 2 diabetes, estimating risk reduction with weight loss, and offering program choice. Secondary aims included program participation rate, weight loss, and short-term decreased diabetes risk. METHODS: In this single-arm study, persons with prediabetes from 3 primary care sites received a letter that communicated their personalized risk of progression to diabetes within 3-years, estimated risk reduction with 5, 10, 15 % weight loss, reported in pounds, and offered a choice of 5 free, 6-month, programs. A one-sided test was used to compare the recruitment rate against the maximum expected rate of (10 %). RESULTS: Recruitment response rate was 25.3 % (81/328, 95 % CI=[20.0 %, 29.4 %]) which was significantly higher than expected (p < 0.0001). Overall, 65 % of participants completed >75 % of contacts. BMI, HbA1c, and diabetes risk (all p < 0.0001) improved at 6 months; BMI (p < 0.0001) and HbA1c (p < 0.05) improved at 12 months. CONCLUSION: Recruitment response rate was better than expected. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Communicating personalized risk and reduction estimates with a choice of programs resulted in favorable outcomes, sustained at 1-year.

Advanced Health Information Technologies to Engage Parents, Clinicians, and Community Nutritionists in Coordinating Responsive Parenting Care: Descriptive Case Series of the Women, Infants, and Children Enhancements to Early Healthy Lifestyles for Baby (WEE Baby) Care Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomically disadvantaged newborns receive care from primary care providers (PCPs) and Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) nutritionists. However, care is not coordinated between these settings, which can result in conflicting messages. Stakeholders support an integrated approach that coordinates services between settings with care tailored to patient-centered needs. OBJECTIVE: This analysis describes the usability of advanced health information technologies aiming to engage parents in self-reporting parenting practices, integrate data into electronic health records to inform and facilitate documentation of provided responsive parenting (RP) care, and share data between settings to create opportunities to coordinate care between PCPs and WIC nutritionists. METHODS: Parents and newborns (dyads) who were eligible for WIC care and received pediatric care in a single health system were recruited and randomized to a RP intervention or control group. For the 6-month intervention, electronic systems were created to facilitate documentation, data sharing, and coordination of provided RP care. Prior to PCP visits, parents were prompted to respond to the Early Healthy Lifestyles (EHL) self-assessment tool to capture current RP practices. Responses were integrated into the electronic health record and shared with WIC. Documentation of RP care and an 80-character, free-text comment were shared between WIC and PCPs. A care coordination opportunity existed when the dyad attended a WIC visit and these data were available from the PCP, and vice versa. Care coordination was demonstrated when WIC or PCPs interacted with data and documented RP care provided at the visit. RESULTS: Dyads (N=131) attended 459 PCP (3.5, SD 1.0 per dyad) and 296 WIC (2.3, SD 1.0 per dyad) visits. Parents completed the EHL tool prior to 53.2% (244/459) of PCP visits (1.9, SD 1.2 per dyad), PCPs documented provided RP care at 35.3% (162/459) of visits, and data were shared with WIC following 100% (459/459) of PCP visits. A WIC visit followed a PCP visit 50.3% (231/459) of the time; thus, there were 1.8 (SD 0.8 per dyad) PCP to WIC care coordination opportunities. WIC coordinated care by documenting RP care at 66.7% (154/231) of opportunities (1.2, SD 0.9 per dyad). WIC visits were followed by a PCP visit 58.9% (116/197) of the time; thus, there were 0.9 (SD 0.8 per dyad) WIC to PCP care coordination opportunities. PCPs coordinated care by documenting RP care at 44.0% (51/116) of opportunities (0.4, SD 0.6 per dyad). CONCLUSIONS: Results support the usability of advanced health information technology strategies to collect patient-reported data and share these data between multiple providers. Although PCPs and WIC shared data, WIC nutritionists were more likely to use data and document RP care to coordinate care than PCPs. Variability in timing, sequence, and frequency of visits underscores the need for flexibility in pragmatic studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03482908; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03482908. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12887-018-1263-z.

Integrating and coordinating care between the Women, Infants, and Children Program and pediatricians to improve patient-centered preventive care for healthy growth.

New care delivery models call for integrating health services to coordinate care and improve patient-centeredness. Such models have been embraced to coordinate care with evidence-based strategies to prevent obesity. Both the Special Supplemental Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program and pediatricians are considered credible sources of preventive guidance, and coordinating these independent siloes would benefit a vulnerable population. Using semistructured focus groups and interviews, we evaluated practices, messaging, and the prospect of integrating and coordinating care. Across Pennsylvania, WIC nutritionists (n = 35), pediatricians (n = 15), and parents (N = 28) of an infant or toddler participated in 2016. Three themes were identified: health assessment data sharing (e.g., iron, growth measures), benefits and barriers to integrated health services, and coordinating care to reduce conflicting educational messages (e.g., breastfeeding, juice, introduction of solids). Stakeholders supported sharing health assessment data and integrating health services as strategies to enhance the quality of care, but were concerned about security and confidentiality. Overall, integrated, coordinated care was perceived to be an acceptable strategy to facilitate consistent, preventive education and improve patient-centeredness.