Geographic Variation in Operative Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Variation in surgical management exists nationally. We hypothesize that geographic variation exists in adhesive small bowel obstruction (aSBO) management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a national commercial insurance claims database (MarketScan) sample (2017-2019) was performed in adults with hospital admission due to aSBO. Geographic variation in rates of surgical intervention for aSBO was evaluated by state and compared to a risk-adjusted national baseline using a Bayesian spatial rates Poisson regression model. For individual-level analysis, patients were identified in 2018, with 365-d look back and follow-up periods. Logistic regression was performed for individual-level predictors of operative intervention for aSBO. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred forty-five patients were included. State-level analysis revealed rates of operative intervention for aSBO were significantly higher in Missouri and lower in Florida. On individual-level analysis, age (P < 0.01) and male sex (P < 0.03) but not comorbidity profile or prior aSBO, were negatively associated with undergoing operative management for aSBO. Patients presenting in 2018 with a history of admission for aSBO the year prior experienced a five-fold increase in odds of representation (odds ratio: 5.4, 95% confidence interval: 3.1-9.6) in 2019. Patients who received an operation for aSBO in 2018 reduced the odds of readmission in the next year by 77% (odds ratio: 0.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.5). The volume of operations performed within a state did not influence readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical management of aSBO varies across the continental USA. Operative intervention is associated with decreased rates of representation in the following year. These data highlight a critical need for standardized guidelines for emergency general surgery patients.

Pre-Injury Statin Exposure is Associated With Improved Outcomes in Injured Patients That Receive Whole Blood.

Introduction: Whole blood (WB) is associated with improved mortality while lowering blood product utilization. Furthermore, statin medications are associated with favorable outcomes in traumatic brain injury and risk reduction of venous thromboembolism. However, the use of statin medications has not been evaluated in those receiving WB. The objective of this study is to determine the effects of pre-injury statin exposure on patients receiving WB.Methods: Patients that underwent WB first resuscitation and received pre-injury statins were compared to those that did not receive pre-injury statins. Demographics as well as complication rates, blood product transfusion volumes, and mortality were evaluated. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to determine independent predictors of mortality.Results: In the study period, 785 patients received WB as part of their resuscitation. One hundred and thirty five patients (17.3%) took statin medications prior to injury. Patients that were exposed to a pre-injury statin had a lower mortality rate than those that were not exposed (21.5% vs 32.5%, P = .01). After adjusting for imbalances, age, ISS, Glasgow Coma Scale, admission systolic blood pressures, and pre-injury statin use were independent predictors of mortality following multiple logistic regression. When evaluating outcomes based on statin intensity, the use of high-intensity statins was associated with lower mortality (OR: .37, 95% CI: .13-.93), whereas moderate and low-intensity statins were not.Conclusion: In patients resuscitated with WB, pre-injury statins use was associated with improved outcomes. Specifically, patients that received high-intensity pre-injury statins appeared to be the population that benefited.

The COST of liver disease: The Cirrhosis Outcomes Score in Trauma Study.

BACKGROUND: Cirrhosis in trauma patients is an indicator of poor prognosis, but current trauma injury grading systems do not take into account liver dysfunction as a risk factor. Our objective was to construct a simple clinical mortality prediction model in cirrhotic trauma patients: Cirrhosis Outcomes Score in Trauma (COST). METHODS: Trauma patients with pre-existing cirrhosis or liver dysfunction who were admitted to our ACS Level I trauma center between 2013 and 2021 were reviewed. Patients with significant acute liver trauma (AAST Grade ≥ 3) or those that developed acute liver dysfunction while admitted were excluded. Demographics as well as ISS, MELD, complications, and mortality were evaluated. COST was defined as the sum of age, ISS, and MELD. Univariate and multivariable analysis was used to determine independent predictors of mortality. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess the ability of COST to predict mortality. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients were analyzed of which the majority were males 214 (67.3%) who suffered blunt trauma 305 (95.9%). Mortality at 30-days, 60-days, and 90-days was 20.4%, 23.6%, and 25.5%, respectively. COST was associated with inpatient, 30-day, and 90-day mortality on regression analyses and the AUROC for COST predicting mortality at these respective time points was 0.810, 0.801, and 0.813. CONCLUSION: Current trauma injury grading systems do not take into account liver dysfunction as a risk factor. COST is highly predictive of mortality in cirrhotic trauma patients. The simplicity of the score makes it useful in guiding clinical care and in optimizing goals of care discussions. Future studies to validate this prediction model are required prior to clinical use.

Duration of time on intensive insulin therapy predicts severe hypoglycemia in the surgically critically ill population.

BACKGROUND: Hypoglycemia has emerged as a barrier to the practice of intensive insulin therapy. Current literature suggests that hypoglycemia occurs at variable rates and has different effects on outcomes in surgical and medical populations. We sought to determine the incidence, independent predictors, and effect on outcome of severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dl) in a surgical population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all critically ill surgical patients treated with IIT from October 2004 to February 2007. Euglycemia (goal 80-110 mg/dl) was maintained using automated computerized titration of an insulin infusion. The primary outcome of interest was any episode of severe hypoglycemia (≤ 40 mg/dl). Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent predictors of developing severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: A total of 60,298 data entries (1,118 patients) for glucose were analyzed. There were 64 severe hypoglycemic episodes in 52 patients (4.6% of the patients). There was a significant increase in deaths among patients who experienced at least one episode of hypoglycemia when compared with those who did not (26.9% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.03). Logistic regression revealed that the time spent on the protocol was the best predictor of developing a hypoglycemic event when controlling for other known risk factors of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive insulin therapy can be implemented with a low percentage of patients (4.6%) experiencing severe hypoglycemia. Mortality rate was higher for patients experiencing hypoglycemia. The duration of the time spent on the protocol was the best predictor of hypoglycemia, suggesting that hypoglycemia is a mathematic probability of prolonged illness, not a reflection of illness severity or demographic features.

Equivalent Operative Outcomes for Emergency Colon Cancer Resections Among Acute Care Surgeons and Specialists in Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Improved screening has decreased but not eliminated the need for emergent surgery for colon cancer (CC), many of which are performed by acute care surgery (ACS) surgeons. This retrospective review compares outcomes for CC resections on the ACS service to the surgical oncology and colorectal services (SO/CRS). METHODS: Retrospective review was performed for CC operations between 2014 and 2019. Data for margin status, cancer stage, number of lymph nodes dissected, time to medical oncology follow-up, and time to initiation of chemotherapy were collected. Patients with curative resection, who chose comfort care, presented on alternative services or with non-CC indications as well as those were lost to follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: 36 ACS patients and 269 SO/CRS patients underwent CC resections. Most ACS patients presented emergently compared to the SO/CC group (83.3% vs 1%, P < .05) as well as with more advanced tumor stage. There were no statistically significant differences for presence of metastatic disease, number of lymph nodes obtained, or time to post-surgical care (in days) and chemotherapy initiation (in days). 3 (8%) EGS patients had positive margins compared to 6 (2%) CRS/SO patients due to the presence of perforated tumors in the ACS group (p < .05). There were no statistically significant differences in 30- day or 1-year mortality despite the emergent presentation of the ACS patients. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that despite emergent presentation and advanced disease burden, ACS surgeons provide quality care to CC patients, both in the operating room and in coordination of care.

Successful Non-Operative Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: Is it Really a Success?

BACKGROUND: In adhesive small bowel obstructions (ASBOs), literature has shown that passage of a water-soluble contrast challenge at either 8 hours or 24 hours is predictive of successful non-operative management (NOM) for an ASBO, but the long-term outcomes between these two groups are unknown. We hypothesized that patients who require longer transit times to the colon have a higher one-year recidivism of ASBO. METHODS: This was a 4-year review of patients with presumed ASBO undergoing successful NOM. Those requiring operation or those with an SBO due to something other than adhesions were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups (8 hour and 24 hour) based on when contrast reached their right colon. Patients were followed for one year to determine ASBO recurrence. RESULTS: 137 patients underwent NOM; 112 in the 8-hour group and 25 in the 24-hour group. One-year recurrence rate was 21.4% in the 8-hour group and 40% in the 24-hour group (P = 0.05). The median time to recurrence was 113 days in the 8-hour group and 13 days in the 24-hour group (P = 0.02). Of those who recurred in the 24-hour group, 60% recurred within 30 days (P = 0.01). On univariable analysis, first-time ASBO and 24-hour transit time were risk factors for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Adhesive small bowel obstruction patients undergoing NOM in the 24-hour group had a recurrence rate nearly twice that of patients in the 8-hour group and may benefit from an operative exploration during the index hospitalization at the 8-hour mark of a water-soluble contrast challenge, especially if experiencing a first-time ASBO.

Emergency department length of stay is an independent predictor of hospital mortality in trauma activation patients.

BACKGROUND: The early resuscitation occurs in the emergency department (ED) where intensive care unit protocols do not always extend and monitoring capabilities vary. Our hypothesis is that increased ED length of stay (LOS) leads to increased hospital mortality in patients not undergoing immediate surgical intervention. METHODS: We examined all trauma activation admissions from January 2002 to July 2009 admitted to the Trauma Service (n = 3,973). Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients taken to the operating room within the first 2 hours of ED arrival, nonsurvivable brain injury, and ED deaths. Patients spending >5 hours in the ED were not included in the analysis because of significantly lower acuity and mortality. RESULTS: Patients spent a mean of 3.2 hours ± 1 hour in the ED during their initial evaluation. Hospital mortality increases for each additional hour a patient spends in the ED, with 8.3% of the patients staying in the ED between 4 hours and 5 hours ultimately dying (p = 0.028). ED LOS measured in minutes is an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio, 1.003; 95% confidence interval, 1.010-1.006; p = 0.014) when accounting for Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and age. Linear regression showed that a longer ED LOS was associated with anatomic injury pattern rather than physiologic derangement. CONCLUSION: In this patient population, a longer ED LOS is associated with an increased hospital mortality even when controlling for physiologic, demographic, and anatomic factors. This highlights the importance of rapid progression of patients through the initial evaluation process to facilitate placement in a location that allows implementation of early goal directed trauma resuscitation.

Glucose metabolism, not obesity, predicts mortality in critically ill surgical patients.

Our hypothesis was to determine if insulin resistance and hyperglycemia, rather than obesity, are predictive of mortality in the surgically critically ill. An observational study of an automated protocol in surgical and trauma intensive care units was performed. Two groups were created based on body mass index (BMI): Obese (OB) defined as BMI > or = 30 (n = 338) and nonobese defined as BMI < 30 (n = 885). Euglycemia was maintained using an automated protocol using an adapting multiplier, which we used as our marker of stress insulin resistance. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. One thousand, two hundred and twenty-three patients met criteria with 73,225 glucose values. The OB group required more insulin (4.5 U/hr vs 3.2 U/hr, P < or = 0.01) and had a higher mean multiplier (0.07 vs 0.06, P < 0.01) reflecting insulin resistance. There was no difference in mortality between OB and nonobese (11.6% vs 11.5%, P = 0.96). Logistic regression showed that insulin dose (odds ratio 0.864; 95% confidence interval 0.772-0.967, P = 0.01), and not BMI, was an independent predictor of survival in this population. Obesity is not an independent risk factor for mortality in the surgical critical care population. Insulin resistance and subsequent hyperglycemia are increased in obesity and are independent predictors of mortality.

Surgical intensive care unit mobility is increased after institution of a computerized mobility order set and intensive care unit mobility protocol: a prospective cohort analysis.

In some populations, intensive care unit (ICU) mobility has been shown to be safe and beneficial. We gathered data on 50 nonintubated surgical patients in a 10-bed surgical ICU (SICU) who met physiologic inclusion criteria beginning in May 2008 (A group). In January 2009, we began mandatory entry of computerized mobility orders as part of a standardized ICU order set. We also created a mobility protocol for nurses in this ICU. We then collected data on 50 patients in this postintervention cohort (B group). Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. A group patients had some form of mobility orders entered in 29 patients (58%) versus 47 patients (82%) in the B group, P < 0.05. In the A group, 11 patients (22%) were mobilized; in the B group, 40 patients (80%) were mobilized, P < 0.05. In our SICU patient population, mandatory entry of computerized mobility orders as part of a standard SICU order set and establishment of an ICU mobility nursing protocol was associated with an increase in number of mobility orders entered as well as an increase in SICU patient activity. Further studies should focus on measurement of the effect of mobility interventions on patient outcomes.

Severe hypoglycemia while on intensive insulin therapy is not an independent predictor of death after trauma.

BACKGROUND: Fear of the adverse effects of hypoglycemia has limited the widespread application of intensive insulin therapy (goal, 80-110 mg/dL) in the trauma population. We hypothesized that severe hypoglycemia (SH;

Intensive insulin therapy in practice: can we do it?

BACKGROUND: Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) is the standard of care in the ICU, but precise implementation of insulin protocols has been difficult in clinical practice. The authors' objective was to quantify adherence to an IIT protocol in a practice setting, and to describe how adherence impacts overall blood glucose (BG) control. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a cohort of critically ill patients treated with IIT was performed. Protocol adherence was evaluated by assessing the timing of BG measurements. Each measurement was categorized according to the time from the previous reading: early (<1 hour), on time (1-3 hours), and late (>3 hours). Outcome measures included mean and median BG for each time category as well as the proportion of values within the target range. RESULTS: In 1106 trauma and surgical ICU patients, 54,139 measurements were available for analysis. The overall mean BG (116 mg/dL) was near the target (80-110 mg/dL), but only 46% of values were within this range. There were 45,806 (86%) measurements on time, 2749 (5%) early, and 4478 (9%) were late. BG values of late measurements were less likely to be within range (34% vs 46% for on time measurements, P<.001). Of late measurements, 19% were >200 mg/dL, 13% were 150-200 mg/dL, and 16% were <60 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: IIT is difficult to implement precisely in a complex ICU environment. Measurement timing impacts overall BG control, with late measurements more often associated with severe hyperglycemic (BG>150 mg/dL) and hypoglycemic (BG<60 mg/dL) episodes.

Stress insulin resistance is a marker for mortality in traumatic brain injury.

BACKGROUND: Both hyper- and hypoglycemia have been associated with poor outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI). Neither the risks nor benefit of tight glucose control (goal range, 80-110 mg/dL) have been documented in the TBI population. OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether densely collected blood glucose data, using a computerized algorithm, to maintain tight glycemic control will reveal significant differences in blood glucose control between survivors and nonsurvivors in patients with TBI. METHODS: From October 2005 to April 2006, all ventilated, critically ill surgical patients with TBI Abbreviated Injury Scale score of >or=3 were placed on an automated, euglycemia protocol with every 2-hour blood glucose sampling. Mortalities within 24 hours were excluded. The protocol calculates the insulin rate using a linear equation (rate = blood glucose - 60[M]). M is an adapting multiplier and used here as a marker for insulin resistance (IR). RESULTS: Of 1,636 trauma intensive care unit admissions 160 patients, (median Injury Severity Score 34, mortality 13.1%) had 10,071 samples collected. Median glucose 115.6 mg/dL, with 41% of values between 80 and 110 mg/dL, 81% between 80 and 150 mg/dL, and 0.3% <40 mg/dL. The median blood glucose was statistically different but not clinically different among the patients who lived and died (114; interquartile range, 109-132 vs. 118; 111-136, p = 0.01). The median insulin dose was a unit per hour higher among the patient who died (4.2; 2.7-5.9 vs. 3.2; 2.4-5.0, p = 0.006). A logistic regression model demonstrated insulin rate (odds ratio 0.736, 95% confidence interval, 0.549-0.985, p = 0.039) to be the only independent predictor of mortality among the measures of blood glucose control. CONCLUSION: Nonsurvivors with TBI have significantly higher markers of IR (insulin rate and multiplier). Markers of glucose control (median glucose, hypoglycemic episodes, and the percentage of values in range) did not differ clinically among groups. Despite this stress IR, tight glycemic control appears possible and safe with low levels of hypoglycemic episodes in the TBI population.

Guidelines for prehospital fluid resuscitation in the injured patient.

Although the need and benefit of prehospital interventions has been controversial for quite some time, an increasing amount of evidence has stirred both sides into more frequent debate. Proponents of the traditional "scoop-and-run" technique argue that this approach allows a more timely transfer to definitive care facilities and limits unnecessary (and potentially harmful) procedures. However, advocates of the "stay-and-play" method point to improvement in survival to reach the hospital and better neurologic outcomes after brain injury. Given the lack of consensus, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma convened a Practice Management Guideline committee to answer the following questions regarding prehospital resuscitation: (1) should injured patients have vascular access attempted in the prehospital setting? (2) if so, what location is preferred for access? (3) if access is achieved, should intravenous fluids be administered? (4) if fluids are to be administered, which solution is preferred? and (5) if fluids are to be administered, what volume and rate should be infused?

The Golden Opportunity: Multidisciplinary Simulation Training Improves Trauma Team Efficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Every trauma patient has a golden hour, and resuscitation efficiency within that hour has large implications for patients. We instituted simulation based trauma resuscitation training with the hypothesis that it would improve trauma team efficiency. METHODS: Five simulation training sessions were conducted with immediate debriefing. Metrics collected in actual trauma resuscitations before and after simulation training included time of primary and secondary surveys and time to computed tomography (CT) scan. Study participants were from multidisciplinary specialties involved in trauma resuscitations as well as former trauma patients from the Trauma Survivors Network. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients undergoing trauma resuscitations were screened and 67 patients were included. Time to CT scan and secondary survey completion were significantly reduced in actual trauma patient activations following implementation of the curriculum (reduction of 23 to 16 minutes for CT scan p < 0.05, and reduction from 14 to 6 minutes for secondary survey, p < 0.05). Time to primary survey completion did not change (5 minutes). CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary simulation training was associated with improved trauma team efficiency in the form of reduced assessment time. As emergency department length of stay is an independent predictor of hospital mortality following trauma activation, team-based simulation training has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary involvement was a key factor, and Trauma Survivors Network involvement brought credibility from the patient perspective.

A computerized insulin infusion titration protocol improves glucose control with less hypoglycemia compared to a manual titration protocol in a trauma intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies reflect reduced morbidity and mortality with intensive blood glucose control in critically ill patients. Unfortunately, implementation of such protocols has proved challenging. This study evaluated the degree of glucose control using manual paper-based vs computer-based insulin protocols in a trauma intensive care unit. METHODS: Of 1455 trauma admissions from May 31 to December 31, 2005, a cohort of 552 critically ill patients met study entry criteria. The patients received intensive blood glucose management with IV insulin infusions. Using Fisher's exact test, the authors compared patients managed with a computerized protocol vs a paper-based insulin protocol with respect to the portion of glucose values in a target range of 80-110 mg/dL, the incidence of hyperglycemia (> or =150 mg/dL), and the incidence of hypoglycemia (< or =40 mg/dL). RESULTS: Three hundred nine patients were managed with a manual paper-based protocol and 243 were managed with a computerized protocol. The total number of blood glucose values across both groups was 21,178. Mean admission glucose was higher in the computer-based protocol group (170 vs 152 mg/dL; p < .001, t-test). Despite this finding by Fisher's exact test, glucose control was superior in the computerized group; a higher portion of glucose values was in range 80-110 mg/dL (41.8% vs 34.0%; p < .001), less hyperglycemia occurred (12.8% vs 15.1%; p < .001), and less hypoglycemia occurred (0.2% vs 0.5%; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A computerized insulin titration protocol improves glucose control by (1) increasing the percentage of glucose values in range, (2) reducing hyperglycemia, and (3) reducing severe hypoglycemia.

Blood glucose variability is associated with mortality in the surgical intensive care unit.

Intensive insulin therapy has widely and rapidly been adopted as the standard of care for the treatment of hyperglycemia in the intensive care unit (ICU). Variability in blood glucose is increasingly recognized as an important factor in outcomes in the chronic diabetic in addition to hemoglobin A1C. We tested the hypothesis that measures of blood glucose variability would be associated with mortality in the surgical ICU. A retrospective analysis of a cohort of ventilated, critically ill surgical and trauma ICU patients placed on an automated insulin protocol was performed. Blood glucose (BG) variability was measured by comparing standard deviation, percentile values, successive changes in blood glucose, and by calculating the triangular index for various glucose-related indices. Eight hundred and fifty-eight patients had 46,474 blood glucose and insulin dose data points. One hundred and twenty-one patients died for an overall mortality rate of 14 per cent. Several measures of blood glucose variability (maximum successive change in BG and the triangular index) were different between the groups despite similar mean BG between survivors (117 mg/dL) and nonsurvivors (118 mg/dL). Increased blood glucose variability is associated with mortality in the surgical ICU. Further studies should focus on the demographic, clinical, and genetic factors responsible for this observation and identify strategies to minimize BG variability.

Optimizing outcomes in damage control resuscitation: identifying blood product ratios associated with improved survival.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent attention and impressive results with damage control resuscitation, the appropriate ratio of blood products to be transfused has yet to be defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether suggested blood product ratios yield superior survival rates. MATERIALS: After IRB approval, a retrospective evaluation was performed on all trauma exsanguination protocol (TEP, n = 118) activations from February 1, 2006 to July 31, 2007. A comparison cohort (pre-TEP, n = 140) was selected from all trauma admissions between August 1, 2004 and January 31, 2006 that (1) underwent immediate surgery by the trauma team and (2) received greater than 10 units of PRBC in the first 24 hours. We then compared those who received FFP:RBC (2:3) and platelet:RBC (1:5) ratios with those who did not reach these ratios. Multivariate analysis was performed for independent predictors of mortality. RESULTS: A total of 259 patients were available for study. Patients receiving FFP:RBC at a ratio of 2:3 or greater (n = 64) had a significant reduction in 30-day mortality compared with those who received less than a 2:3 ratio (n = 195); 41% versus 62%, p = 0.008. Patients receiving platelets:RBC at a ratio of 1:5 or greater (n = 63) had a lower 30-day mortality when compared with those with who received less than this ratio (n = 196); (38% vs. 61%, p = 0.001). Regression model demonstrated that a ratio of FFP to PRBC is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality, controlling for age and TRISS (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.01-3.14). CONCLUSIONS: Increased FFP:PRBC and PLT:PRBC ratios during a period of massive transfusion improved survival after major trauma. Massive transfusion protocols should be designed to achieve these ratios to provide maximal benefit.

Risk stratification tools in emergency general surgery.

The use of risk stratification tools (RST) aids in clinical triage, decision making and quality assessment in a wide variety of medical fields. Although emergency general surgery (EGS) is characterized by a comorbid, physiologically acute patient population with disparately high rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality, few RST have been explicitly examined in this setting. We examined the available RST with the intent of identifying a tool that comprehensively reflects an EGS patients perioperative risk for death or complication. The ideal tool would combine individualized assessment with relative ease of use. Trauma Scoring Systems, Critical Care Scoring Systems, Surgical Scoring Systems and Track and Trigger Models are reviewed here, with the conclusion that Emergency Surgery Acuity Score and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Programme Universal Surgical Risk Calculator are the most applicable and appropriate for EGS.

Ventilator Strategies for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

The management of the ventilator in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a dramatic effect on the overall outcome. The incidence of COPD is increasing as the US population grows older. The most effective means to deal with pulmonary complications is to avoid them, but both COPD and ARDS have evidence-based interventions that have been shown to improve outcomes. Pulmonary complications affect up to 40% of patients, and their occurrence is associated with an increased duration of hospital stay, and an increased mortality.

Surgical management of pancreatic necrosis: A practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic or peripancreatic tissue necrosis confers substantial morbidity and mortality. New modalities have created a wide variation in approaches and timing of interventions for necrotizing pancreatitis. As acute care surgery evolves, its practitioners are increasingly being called upon to manage these complex patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database using PubMed was performed. English language articles regarding pancreatic necrosis from 1980 to 2014 were included. Letters to the editor, case reports, book chapters, and review articles were excluded. Topics of investigation included operative timing, the use of adjuvant therapy and the type of operative repair. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology was applied to question development, outcome prioritization, evidence quality assessments, and recommendation creation. RESULTS: Eighty-eight studies were included and underwent full review. Increasing the time to surgical intervention had an improved outcome in each of the periods evaluated (72 hours, 12-14 days, 30 days) with a significant improvement in outcomes if surgery was delayed 30 days. The use of percutaneous and endoscopic procedures was shown to postpone surgery and potentially be definitive. The use of minimally invasive surgery for debridement and drainage has been shown to be safe and associated with reduced morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: Acute Care Surgeons are uniquely trained to care for those with pancreatic necrosis due their training in critical care and complex surgery with ongoing shock. In adult patients with pancreatic necrosis, we recommend that pancreatic necrosectomy be delayed until at least day 12. During the first 30 days of symptoms with infected necrotic collections, we conditionally recommend surgical debridement only if the patients fail to improve after radiologic or endoscopic drainage. Finally, even with documented infected necrosis, we recommend that patients undergo a step-up approach to surgical intervention as the preferred surgical approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review/guideline, level III.