A Comparison of Self-reported Pain Measures Between Sensory Phenotypes in HIV-associated Sensory Neuropathy.

Painful HIV-associated neuropathy (HIV-SN) is a prevalent co-morbidity of HIV infection. Sensory phenotyping, using quantitative sensory testing (QST) could allow for improved stratification to guide personalized treatment. However, previous methods of QST interpretation have demonstrated limited association with self-reported pain measures. This study sought to identify differences in self-reported pain measures between composite QST-derived sensory phenotypes, and to examine any differences in participants reporting multi-site, multi-etiology chronic pain. In this cross-sectional observational study of participants with HIV (n = 133), individuals were allocated to neuropathy and neuropathic pain groups through clinical assessment and nerve conduction testing. They completed symptom-based questionnaires and underwent standardized QST. Participants were assigned, by pre-determined algorithm, to a QST-derived sensory phenotype. Symptoms were compared between sensory phenotypes. Symptom characteristics and Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory scores differed between QST-derived sensory phenotypes: 'sensory loss' was associated with more paroxysmal and paraesthetic symptoms compared to 'thermal hyperalgesia' and 'healthy' phenotypes (P = .023-0.001). Those with painful HIV-SN and additional chronic pain diagnoses were more frequently allocated to the 'mechanical hyperalgesia' phenotype compared to those with painful HIV-SN alone (P = .006). This study describes heterogeneous sensory phenotypes in people living with HIV. Differences in self-reported pain outcomes between sensory phenotypes has the potential to guide future stratified trials and eventually more targeted therapy. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents quantitative sensory testing derived phenotypes, thought to reflect differing pathophysiological pain mechanisms and relates them to self-reported pain measures in people with HIV infection. This could help clinicians stratify patients to individualize analgesic interventions more effectively.

Beliefs about antiretroviral therapy, treatment adherence and quality of life in a 48-week randomised study of continuation of zidovudine/lamivudine or switch to tenofovir DF/emtricitabine, each with efavirenz.

Adherence may be facilitated by reducing perceptual and practical barriers to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Practical barriers include the complexity of daily dosing, while perceptual barriers include perceptions of the need for treatment and concerns about adverse effects. The study aim was to assess the effect of switching zidovudine plus lamivudine twice-daily (Combivir, CBV) to once-daily tenofovir DF plus emtricitabine (Truvada, TVD), each plus efavirenz (EFZ), on adherence, beliefs about ART and quality of life (QoL). Subjects stable on CBV + EFV were randomised 1:1 to continue this regimen or switch to TVD + EFV. Adherence was measured using the Medication Adherence Self-Report Inventory at 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Beliefs about ART (perceptions of necessity and concerns about adverse effects), treatment intrusiveness and QoL were measured by questionnaire at baseline 4, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. Viral load was assessed at each visit. Two hundred and thirty-four subjects initiated treatment. At week 48, the proportion of subjects reporting high adherence (≥95% taken as prescribed) was significantly greater in the TVD arm (p=0.049). Low adherence (reporting taking <95% as prescribed, discontinuing the study or having missing data) was associated with doubts about necessity (p=0.020), stronger concerns about adverse effects (p=0.010), greater treatment intrusiveness (p=0.010) and poorer mental health related QoL (p=0.008). At week 48, both concerns about ART (p=0.038) and treatment intrusiveness (p=0.004) were lower among those who switched to TVD. Furthermore, there was a decline in both concerns about ART (p=0.007) and treatment intrusiveness (p=0.057) over the 48 weeks among those who switched to TVD. There were no significant differences in necessity beliefs, QoL or viral load between randomised groups. Switching from CBV to TVD may improve patient reported outcomes including slightly better adherence, a greater reduction in concerns about adverse effects and less treatment intrusiveness.

Antiretroviral therapy with or without protease inhibitors impairs postprandial TAG hydrolysis in HIV-infected men.

Mechanisms underlying the lipodystrophy syndrome associated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV infection are not completely understood. We investigated the effect of ART on blood lipid concentrations in the fasting state and after consumption of a meal containing [1-13C]palmitic acid in HIV-positive men receiving nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI, n 7), NRTI combined with protease inhibitors (PI; NRTIPI, n 6), in HIV-positive but therapy-naïve men (noART, n 5) and in HIV-seronegative men (controls, n 6). HIV-positive subjects had higher fasting TAG concentrations and resting energy expenditure than controls. Subjects receiving NRTIPI therapy had higher fasting NEFA concentrations than the other groups. There were no significant differences in postprandial lipid metabolism between noART subjects and controls. NRTI therapy impaired hydrolysis of meal-derived TAG, most evidently when combined with PI (the NRTIPI group). Accumulation of 13C-label in the NEFA fraction was not different between groups. In the NRTIPI group, fasting and postprandial NEFA concentrations were significantly higher than other groups. Postprandial glucose and insulin responses in HIV-positive subjects did not differ from controls. These findings suggest that ART dyslipidaemia is associated with impaired postprandial TAG clearance, which is exacerbated by NRTIPI therapy. If dyslipidaemia is to be minimised in ART, the specific adverse effects of particular combinations during the fed state should be considered.

Treatment of altered body composition in HIV-associated lipodystrophy: comparison of rosiglitazone, pravastatin, and recombinant human growth hormone.

PURPOSE: Treatment options for HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome (HALS) remain limited. The objective of this randomized open-label study was to compare three emerging therapies, rosiglitazone, pravastatin, and growth hormone alone and together, in men and women with HALS. METHOD: Sixty-four subjects received daily rosiglitazone (4 mg, n = 14), pravastatin (40 mg, n = 11), or rosiglitazone plus pravastatin (n = 13) for 48 weeks or recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH; Serostim 2 mg, 12 weeks, n = 13) alone or combined with rosiglitazone (n = 13). Primary endpoint was body composition change by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: Rosiglitazone resulted in slow accrual of limb fat detected by DXA (+444 +/- 186 g; p < .05) but not CT. Pravastatin had no consistent significant effects on body composition, although it reduced total and LDL cholesterol. Negative interactions were observed between pravastatin and rosiglitazone. rhGH reduced abdominal fat by CT (-31 +/- 15 cm2, 26%; p < .05) and DXA (-1597 +/- 383 g, 27%; p < .05) and increased trunk and limb lean mass (+10% and +12%, respectively). However, effects largely disappeared within 12 weeks post treatment. rhGH alone impaired insulin sensitivity but not when combined with rosiglitazone. CONCLUSION: Prolonged rosiglitazone treatment slowly improves lipoatrophy. rhGH rapidly and selectively reduces visceral fat, although effects are short-lived; co-administered rosiglitazone abrogates rhGH-related insulin resistance.

Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on HIV-1-specific T-cell responses, thymic output and proviral DNA in patients on HAART: 48-week follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Efficacious immune-based therapy in treated chronic HIV-1 infection requires the induction of virus-specific CD4+ T cells and subsequent maturation and maintenance of specific memory CD8+ T cells. Concomitant daily administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was used in chronically infected patients with lipodystrophy in an attempt to reconstitute these virus-specific T-cell responses. METHODS: Individuals with chronic HIV-1 infection on HAART were enrolled on a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study to receive rhGH therapy. We assessed HIV-1-specific proliferative CD4+ and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-producing CD8+ T-cell responses, quantified thymic output and proviral HIV-1 DNA at the following time points: baseline; after 12 weeks of rhGH therapy; at 24 weeks, after randomization into three groups [placebo weeks 12-24 (Group A), alternate-day dosing weeks 12-24 (Group B), and twice-per-week dosing weeks 12-24 (Group C)]; and at 48 weeks after all patients had received HAART alone for the final 24 weeks. RESULTS: We found significant increases in both proliferative CD4+ and IFN-gamma-producing CD8+ HIV-1-specific T-cell responses after daily administration of rhGH. This increase was focused on HIV-1 Gag-specific T-cell responses. Following subsequent randomisation into different dosing regimens, HIV-1-specific proliferative CD4+ T-cell responses declined in patients receiving less frequent dosing of rhGH, while virus-specific IFN-gamma-producing CD8+ T-cell responses were maintained for longer periods of time. There was no significant change in thymic output and the cell-associated HIV-1 DNA remained stable in most patients. An increased anti-HIV-1 Nef-specific CD4+ T-cell proliferative response was correlated to a decrease in proviral load, and an increased HIV-1 Gag-specific IFN-gamma-producing CD8+ T-cell response correlated with an increase in proviral load. CONCLUSION: The implication of these data is that daily dosing of rhGH with HAART, in addition to improving HIV-1-associated lipodystrophy, may reverse some of the T-lymphocyte dysfunction seen in most treated HIV-1-positive patients, in a dose-dependent manner. Such immune-based therapeutic strategies used in treated, chronic HIV-1 infection may enable the induction of virus-specific CD4+ T cells essential for the subsequent 'kick-start' and expansion of virus-specific CD8+ T cells. TRIAL REGISTRATION: GH in Lipoatrophy IMP22350.

A randomized comparative trial of tenofovir DF or abacavir as replacement for a thymidine analogue in persons with lipoatrophy.

BACKGROUND: Long-term antiretroviral therapy, while dramatically reducing HIV-related morbidity and mortality, is associated with metabolic and morphological changes. Peripheral fat loss, lipoatrophy, appears most associated with prolonged therapy with thymidine nucleoside analogues. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, comparative study of switching from a thymidine nucleoside analogue to either tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) or abacavir in 105 individuals on successful antiretroviral therapy with clinically evident moderate to severe lipoatrophy. RESULTS: Individuals were randomized to tenofovir DF (52) or abacavir (53). The switch was well tolerated and the majority of patients completed 48 weeks of study. One individual in the tenofovir DF group and three in the abacavir group discontinued due to drug-related adverse events. Both groups similarly maintained virological control. Limb fat mass increased similarly in both groups: mean increases by week 48 of 329 and 483 g in tenofovir DF and abacavir groups, respectively [mean 95% confidence interval for difference, -154.3 (range -492.8 to 184.3)]. This change from baseline was statistically significant in both groups (tenofovir DF, P = 0.01; abacavir, P = 0.0001). Mean total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides improved modestly with switching to tenofovir DF but were unchanged with abacavir. The changes in these parameters were significantly greater in the tenofovir DF arm relative to abacavir. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from a thymidine nucleoside analogue to either tenofovir DF or abacavir leads to significant improvement in limb fat mass over 48 weeks. Tenofovir DF may have modest advantages over abacavir for changes in lipids. Peripheral lipoatrophy, when clinically apparent, resolves slowly following treatment switching.

Bone mineral abnormalities in persons with HIV infection: signal or noise?

Bone disorders such as osteopenia, osteoporosis, osteomalacia, and osteonecrosis have been reported in persons infected with HIV. Any specific contributions of HIV infection and its treatment to these disorders are unclear. The prevalence estimates vary widely among studies and may be influenced by the presence or absence of antiretroviral therapy, wasting and lipodystrophy, severity of HIV disease, and overlapping established bone mineral loss or osteonecrosis risk factors. Limited data exist regarding the consequences of HIV treatment choice and treatment modification on bone mineral density (BMD) outcomes. Available data suggest that while BMD may initially decline modestly afer the start of antiretroviral therapy, there is then a gradual recovery in BMD over time. This may reflect the observation that BMD declines as HIV disease progresses and that this decline may be arrested and partially corrected with successful antiretroviral therapy.

Considerations in selecting protease inhibitor therapy.

Over the past 10 years, highly active antiretroviral therapy that included a protease inhibitor has played a significant role in reducing morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected individuals. The early protease inhibitors were associated, however, with some significant limitations that posed major obstacles to their use--limited potency, difficult side effects, high regimen complexity and potential for cross-resistance. Important advances in the protease inhibitor class, including ritonavir boosting and the approval of two new protease inhibitors with the potential for once daily dosing, have led to simpler, better-tolerated protease-inhibitor therapy with the potential for improved efficacy, less toxicity and a reduced risk of the development of HIV resistance. Protease inhibitor characteristics and patient preferences should be considered in selecting the protease inhibitor that maximizes the opportunity for long-term efficacy and tolerability of highly active antiretroviral therapy.

Changes in bone mineral density after 96 weeks of treatment with atazanavir/ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir plus tenofovir DF/emtricitabine in treatment-naive patients with HIV-1 infection: the CASTLE body composition substudy.

: Antiretroviral therapy initiation is associated with declines in bone mineral density (BMD), which seem greatest with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF)-containing regimens. Data comparing protease inhibitors are limited. This CASTLE substudy compared paired baseline with week 96 BMD in patients initiating tenofovir DF/emtricitabine plus atazanavir/ritonavir (n = 106) vs lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 70). In both groups, week 96 BMD declined significantly in arm, leg, trunk, and total body regions. Atazanavir/ritonavir was associated with smaller 96-week trunk and total body BMD declines compared with lopinavir/ritonavir [multivariate-adjusted least squares mean difference +2.00% (95% confidence interval: 0.52 to 3.45; P = 0.008) and +1.24% (95% confidence interval: 0.13 to 2.35; P = 0.029), respectively]. In addition, low baseline CD4 cell count (<50 cells per microliter) and increasing age were associated with larger declines in BMD.

A randomized comparative trial of continued abacavir/lamivudine plus efavirenz or replacement with efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in hypercholesterolemic HIV-1 infected individuals.

BACKGROUND: Drug choice and metabolic changes with antiretroviral therapy contribute to cardiovascular risk in persons with HIV-1 infection. METHODS: A randomized, 12 week, open-label, comparative study of the impact on lipids of continuation of abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) plus efavirenz (EFV) or replacement with the single tablet regimen of EFV/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF (EFV/FTC/TDF) in hypercholesterolaemic subjects on successful antiretroviral therapy, with a 12-week extension with all subjects on EFV/FTC/TDF. RESULTS: 157 subjects received study drug, 79 switched to EFV/FTC/TDF and 78 subjects continued ABC/3TC+EFV. At Week 12, 73 subjects on ABC/3TC+EFV switched to EFV/FTC/TDF. The switch was well tolerated and no subject experienced viral rebound. Median baseline fasting total cholesterol was 6.32 mmol/L. 12 weeks following switch, the difference in the means (LSM) between treatment groups (EFV/FTC/TDF minus ABC/3TC+EFV) in total cholesterol change from baseline was -0.74 mmol/l (95% CI -1.00, -0.47, p < 0.001). The median change from baseline in total cholesterol following switch in the EFV/FTC/TDF arm was -0.86 mmol/l (p < 0.001) compared with +0.01 mmol/l (p = 0.45) in the continuation arm at Week 12. Significant (p < 0.001) differences between treatment groups following switch were seen for all lipid fractions from baseline to Week 12: LDL cholesterol (-0.47 mmol/L [-0.70, -0.25]), HDL cholesterol (-0.15 mmol/L [-0.21, -0.08]), triglycerides (-0.43 mmol/L [-0.75, -0.11]), and non HDL cholesterol (-0.56 mmol/L [-0.80, -0.31]). In the extension phase, similar declines in total cholesterol were observed with a median change from Week 12 to Week 24 of -0.73 mmol/L (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Switching from ABC/3TC+EFV to EFV/FTC/TDF in persons with hypercholesterolemia maintains virological control and significantly improves key lipid parameters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00615810.

Hyperlactataemia and lactic acidosis during antiretroviral therapy: relevance, reproducibility and possible risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence, outcome and possible risk factors for hyperlactataemia and lactic acidosis in HIV-positive persons receiving antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: Cross-sectional and longitudinal data from a prospectively collected clinical database. Associations with antiretroviral regimen, clinical and laboratory parameters were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Patients naive to therapy and patients on current therapy for a minimum of 4 months were assessed. Median lactate was 1.1 mol/l in 253 untreated individuals and 1.4 mmol/l in 1239 patients stable on therapy for at least 4 months. At least two on-therapy samples were available for 750 of the 1239 individuals, taken a median 92 days apart. Lactate measurement showed a low positive predictive value of 38.9% but a high negative predictive value (98%) for normal values. Lactate was elevated > or = 2.4 mmol/l in 102 individuals on at least one occasion. In the multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model, no demographic characteristics were associated with hyperlactataemia. Didanosine-containing regimens doubled the relative hazard of hyperlactataemia compared with those sparing didanosine. Abacavir-containing regimens reduced the hazard of hyperlactataemia. Choice of thymidine analogue did not influence risk. Hyperlactataemia was associated with acid-base disturbance. Use of didanosine and female sex were over-represented amongst nine patients with severe hyperlactataemia (> 5 mmol/l) or lactic acidosis. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of lactate is of limited use in asymptomatic individuals on antiretroviral therapy. Raised lactate represents part of a spectrum of lactate and acid-base disturbance that infrequently includes lactic acidosis. Didanosine appears associated with an increased risk of hyperlactataemia.

Atazanavir enhances saquinavir hard-gel concentrations in a ritonavir-boosted once-daily regimen.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir hard-gel capsules/ritonavir/atazanavir co-administered once daily at 1600/100/300 mg in HIV-infected individuals. METHODS: Eighteen patients receiving saquinavir/ritonavir switched to 1600/100 mg once daily a minimum of 3 days before the study. On study day 1, levels of saquinavir and ritonavir were determined over 24 h. Atazanavir (300 mg once daily) was then added to the regimen. On day 11, a pharmacokinetic analysis was performed. Atazanavir was discontinued on day 32. Drug concentrations were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to compare saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetic parameters, with and without atazanavir. A safety analysis was performed at screening, days 1, 11, 32 and follow-up. RESULTS: After the addition of atazanavir, statistically significant increases in saquinavir trough plasma concentration (Ctrough GMR, 95% CI 2.12, 1.72-3.50), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax 1.42, 1.24-1.94), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0-24 h (AUC0-24 1.60, 1.35-2.43) and ritonavir Cmax (1.58, 1.32-2.08), AUC0-24 (1.41, 1.22-1.74) were observed. The pharmacokinetics of atazanavir compared with those obtained in patients receiving atazanavir/ritonavir without saquinavir. Four patients developed scleral icterus and two jaundice. Total and unconjugated bilirubin increased approximately fivefold during atazanavir therapy. CONCLUSION: The addition of atazanavir to saquinavir/ritonavir increased saquinavir Ctrough, Cmax and AUC0-24 by 112, 42 and 60%. Ritonavir Cmax and AUCo-24 increased by 34 and 41%. The regimen was well tolerated, with no significant change in laboratory parameters, except for the occurrence of hyperbilirubinemia.

Considerations in the choice of protease inhibitor-sparing regimens in initial therapy for HIV-1 infection.

The current standard of care for initial antiretroviral therapy is a combination of 2 nucleoside analogues with a third agent, a protease inhibitor (PI), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a third nucleoside analogue. Recent data heralding the arrival of potent PI-sparing regimens for initial anti-retroviral therapy and concerns regarding PI-related metabolic disturbances have led to significant shifts in treatment practices. Protease inhibitor-sparing regimens with optimal antiviral activity may have several advantages over PI-based therapy for initial or prolonged therapy. These advantages include more convenient, non-food dependent dosing regimens, lower tablet volume, fewer drug interactions, central nervous system penetration and the maintenance of PIs as an option for second line therapy. However, no data currently exist directly comparing triple therapy regimens based on the three leading PI-sparing agents, efavirenz, nevirapine or abacavir. All these agents have been compared in randomized controlled studies in treatment naïve patients to triple therapy with the PI indinavir. In these studies, similar responses to indinavir were observed with nevirapine or abacavir regimens, whereas superiority was observed with efavirenz. Limited data in high viral load patients treated with nevirapine based regimens currently exist. However, the superiority of efavirenz over indinavir based regimens was also observed in comparative data in this patient subset. PI-sparing approaches appear generally well tolerated with few individuals discontinuing in clinical studies due to adverse drug events. The majority of adverse events with efavirenz and nevirapine occur within the first month, are predictable and are manageable without therapy interruption. Similarly, apart from a rare (3%) hypersensitivity reaction, which requires therapy cessation without rechallenge, adverse effects with abacavir are uncommon.

Comparison of body composition changes between atazanavir/ritonavir and lopinavir/ritonavir each in combination with tenofovir/emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve patients with HIV-1 infection.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Antiretroviral drug regimen choice may influence changes in body composition. The objective of this study was to compare changes in body composition between ritonavir-boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) and ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) over 96 weeks using data from a substudy of CASTLE, which compared once-daily ATV/r with twice-daily LPV/r, both in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine in treatment-naïve patients with HIV-1 infection. METHODS: We examined 224 patients (125 on ATV/r; 99 on LPV/r) at baseline, 48 and 96 weeks using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computerised tomography. RESULTS: In the lowest baseline body mass index (BMI) group, there were significantly greater gains at week 96 for ATV/r than for LPV/r in subcutaneous adipose tissue and in visceral adipose tissue (VAT). By week 96, patients with lowest baseline CD4 cell counts on ATV/r had 28 % increases in VAT versus 14 % reductions for patients receiving LPV/r. Those with the lowest baseline BMI on ATV/r had 19 % increases in VAT versus reductions of 5 % for patients on LPV/r. In the highest baseline BMI group, the mean increase in triglycerides was 6 and 70 % in the ATV/r and LPV/r arms, respectively. Compared with baseline, an increase in proportion of patients with high waist circumference (WC)/high triglycerides at 96 weeks was noted in both treatment arms, but this increase was numerically greater with LVP/r (18 %) than with ATV/r (11 %). CONCLUSION: Truncal fat gains on ATV/r primarily led to increases in WC, which may reflect return to health, while on LPV/r increases in WC and triglycerides occurred. Changes in body composition with antiretroviral therapy are influenced by treatment choice and baseline characteristics.

96-Week results of abacavir/lamivudine versus tenofovir/emtricitabine, plus efavirenz, in antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected adults: ASSERT study.

BACKGROUND: Abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) are widely used as first-line antiretroviral therapies. However, there are limited data comparing the safety of these therapies with long-term use. The objective of this study was to assess the long-term safety of these commonly used first-line nucleoside/nucleotide combinations each administered with efavirenz (EFV). METHODS: This open-label, 96-week, randomized study compared the safety (renal, bone and metabolic) and efficacy of ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC plus EFV in HLA-B*5701-negative antiretroviral-naive adults. RESULTS: A total of 385 subjects were enrolled, and 249 (65%) subjects completed the study. The difference in changes from baseline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (calculated by the Modified Diet in Renal Disease equation) between treatment arms was not significant. There was a significant difference between the arms (P < 0.0001) for markers of tubular dysfunction (retinol-binding protein and ß-2 microglobulin) favouring ABC/3TC. Hip bone mineral density decreased from baseline in both arms, with a significantly greater decline with TDF/FTC (ABC/3TC -2.2% and TDF/FTC -3.5%; P < 0.001 at week 96). Subjects in the ABC/3TC arm had greater increases from baseline in median total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides. Adverse events were similar between arms. The virological failure rate was low in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: ABC/3TC and TDF/FTC in combination with EFV minimally affected estimated glomerular filtration rate over 96 weeks. TDF/FTC was associated with greater increases in tubular dysfunction and bone turnover marker levels, greater decreases in hip bone mineral density, and smaller increases in serum lipid levels.