RESUMO
Brainstem metastases (BSM) present a significant neuro-oncological challenge, resulting in profound neurological deficits and poor survival outcomes. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) offer promising therapeutic avenues for BSM despite their precarious location. This international multicenter study investigates the efficacy and safety of SRS and FSRT in 136 patients with 144 BSM treated at nine institutions from 2005 to 2022. The median radiographic and clinical follow-up periods were 6.8 and 9.4 months, respectively. Predominantly, patients with BSM were managed with SRS (69.4%). The median prescription dose and isodose line for SRS were 18 Gy and 65%, respectively, while for FSRT, the median prescription dose was 21 Gy with a median isodose line of 70%. The 12-, 24-, and 36-month local control (LC) rates were 82.9%, 71.4%, and 61.2%, respectively. Corresponding overall survival rates at these time points were 61.1%, 34.7%, and 19.3%. In the multivariable Cox regression analysis for LC, only the minimum biologically effective dose was significantly associated with LC, favoring higher doses for improved control (in Gy, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.86, p < .01). Regarding overall survival, good performance status (Karnofsky performance status, ≥90%; HR: 0.43, p < .01) and prior whole brain radiotherapy (HR: 2.52, p < .01) emerged as associated factors. In 14 BSM (9.7%), treatment-related adverse events were noted, with a total of five (3.4%) radiation necrosis. SRS and FSRT for BSM exhibit efficacy and safety, making them suitable treatment options for affected patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/radioterapia , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/secundário , Neoplasias do Tronco Encefálico/mortalidade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fracionamento da Dose de Radiação , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , SeguimentosRESUMO
PURPOSE: We report results of the first German prospective multicenter single-arm phase II trial (ARO 2013-06; NCT02635256) of hypofractionated robotic stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with localized prostate cancer (HYPOSTAT). METHODS: Patients eligible for the HYPOSTAT study had localized prostate cancer (cT13 cN0 cM0), Gleason score ≤â¯7, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤â¯15â¯ng/ml, prostate volume ≤â¯80â¯cm3, and an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≤â¯12. Initially, inclusion was limited to patients ≥â¯75 years or patients 70-74 years with additional risk factors. The trial protocol was later amended to allow for enrolment of patients aged ≥â¯60 years. The treatment consisted of 35â¯Gy delivered in 5 fractions to the prostate and for intermediate- or high-risk patients, also to the proximal seminal vesicles using the CyberKnife system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Primary endpoint was the rate of treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary grade ≥â¯2 toxicity based on the RTOG scale 12-15 months after treatment. Secondary endpoints were acute toxicity, late toxicity, urinary function, quality of life, and PSA response. RESULTS: From July 2016 through December 2018, 85 eligible patients were enrolled and received treatment, of whom 83 could be evaluated regarding the primary endpoint. Patients mostly had intermediate-risk disease with a median PSA value of 7.97â¯ng/ml and Gleason score of 7a and 7b in 43.5% and 25.9% of patients, respectively. At the final follow-up 12-15 months after treatment, no patient suffered from treatment-related gastrointestinal or genitourinary grade ≥â¯2 toxicity. Acute toxicity was mostly mild, with three grade 3 events, and the cumulative rate of grade ≥â¯2 genitourinary toxicity was 8.4% (95% CI 4.1-16.4%). There were no major changes in urinary function or quality of life. The median PSA value dropped to 1.18â¯ng/ml 12-15 months after treatment. There was one patient who developed distant metastases. CONCLUSION: Robotic SBRT with 35â¯Gy in 5 fractions was associated with a favorable short-term toxicity profile. Recruitment for the HYPOSTAT2 trial (ARO-20184; NCT03795337), which further analyses the late toxicity of this regimen with a planned sample size of 500 patients, is ongoing.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Radiocirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Masculino , Humanos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the efficacy and safety of focal prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET)- and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-guided single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) local recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with PSMA-PET-positive PCa local recurrences treated with single-fraction SBRT between 2016 and 2020 were included. Identification for subsequent recurrences or metastatic spread based on increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were evaluated using PSMA-PET imaging. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were identified. Patients received various treatments before SBRT (31 patients with radical prostatectomy [RP], 18 external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] with RP, five EBRT, and the remaining 10 other combinations). The median follow-up was 21.6 months. The median PSA level before SBRT was 1.47 ng/mL. All patients received a single-fraction treatment with a median prescription dose and isodose line of 21 Gy and 65%, respectively. At the time of SBRT, six patients (9%) received an androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). PSA levels decreased after SBRT (P = 0.03) and three local recurrences were detected during the follow-up. The progression-free survival after 1-, 2-, and 3-years was 85.3%, 65.9%, and 51.2%, respectively. Six patients (9%) started ADT after SBRT due to disease progression. The rates of newly started ADT after 1-, 2-, and 3-years were 1.8%, 7.3%, and 22.7%, respectively. Grade 1 or 2 toxicities occurred in six patients (9%); no high-grade toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: While the available data for SBRT in the PCa local recurrence setting describe outcomes for fractionated irradiations, the findings of this first analysis of single-fraction, PSMA-PET- and mpMRI-guided focal SBRT are encouraging. Such treatment appears to be a safe, efficient, and time-saving therapy even in intensively pretreated patients. Recurrence-directed treatments can delay the use of ADT and could avoid prostate bed irradiation in selected patients.
Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias da Próstata , Radiocirurgia , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Próstata/patologia , Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive treatment option for primary renal cell carcinoma, for which long-term data are awaited. The primary aim of this study was to report on long-term efficacy and safety of SABR for localised renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: This study was an individual patient data meta-analysis, for which patients undergoing SABR for primary renal cell carcinoma across 12 institutions in five countries (Australia, Canada, Germany, Japan, and the USA) were eligible. Eligible patients had at least 2 years of follow-up, were aged 18 years or older, had any performance status, and had no previous local therapy. Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma or upper-tract urothelial carcinoma were excluded. SABR was delivered as a single or multiple fractions of greater than 5 Gy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed local failure per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, and was evaluated using cumulative incidence functions. FINDINGS: 190 patients received SABR between March 23, 2007, and Sept 20, 2018. Single-fraction SABR was delivered in 81 (43%) patients and multifraction SABR was delivered in 109 (57%) patients. Median follow-up was 5·0 years (IQR 3·4-6·8). 139 (73%) patients were men, and 51 (27%) were women. Median age was 73·6 years (IQR 66·2-82·0). Median tumour diameter was 4·0 cm (IQR 2·8-4·9). 96 (75%) of 128 patients with available operability details were deemed inoperable by the referring urologist. 56 (29%) of 190 patients had a solitary kidney. Median baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 60·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (IQR 42·0-76·0) and decreased by 14·2 mL/min per 1·73 m2 (IQR 5·4-22·5) by 5 years post-SABR. Seven (4%) patients required dialysis post-SABR. The cumulative incidence of local failure at 5 years was 5·5% (95% CI 2·8-9·5) overall, with single-fraction SABR yielding fewer local failures than multifraction (Gray's p=0·020). There were no grade 3 toxic effects or treatment-related deaths. One (1%) patient developed an acute grade 4 duodenal ulcer and late grade 4 gastritis. INTERPRETATION: SABR is effective and safe in the long term for patients with primary renal cell carcinoma. Single-fraction SABR might yield less local failure than multifraction, but further evidence from randomised trials is needed to elucidate optimal treatment schedules. These mature data lend further support for renal SABR as a treatment option for patients unwilling or unfit to undergo surgery. FUNDING: None.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias Renais , Radiocirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Renais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , RimRESUMO
PURPOSE: While neural networks gain popularity in medical research, attempts to make the decisions of a model explainable are often only made towards the end of the development process once a high predictive accuracy has been achieved. METHODS: In order to assess the advantages of implementing features to increase explainability early in the development process, we trained a neural network to differentiate between MRI slices containing either a vestibular schwannoma, a glioblastoma, or no tumor. RESULTS: Making the decisions of a network more explainable helped to identify potential bias and choose appropriate training data. CONCLUSION: Model explainability should be considered in early stages of training a neural network for medical purposes as it may save time in the long run and will ultimately help physicians integrate the network's predictions into a clinical decision.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagem , Interpretação de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Redes Neurais de Computação , Teorema de Bayes , Meios de Contraste , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Neurilemoma/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy is an emerging treatment for renal cell carcinoma. Our study objective was to evaluate this therapy in patients with a solitary kidney, focusing on oncologic and renal function outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from 9 IROCK (International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney) institutions in Germany, Australia, the United States of America, Canada and Japan. Median followup was 2.6 years. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the solitary and bilateral kidney cohorts. Predictors of renal function after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy were assessed by logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients with a solitary kidney underwent stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. Mean age was 67.3 years and 97.5% of patients had good performance status, including ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) 0-1 or KPS (Karnofsky Performance Status) 70% or greater. Median tumor diameter was 3.7 cm (IQR 2.5-4.3) and 37% of tumors were 4 cm or greater. The 138 patients in the bilateral cohort harbored larger tumors and were older (p <0.001) with a lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (p = 0.024). After stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the solitary kidney cohort the mean ± SD estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease was -5.8 ± 10.8 ml per minute (-9%). No patient with a solitary kidney required dialysis. After stereotactic ablative radiotherapy a tumor size of 4 cm or greater was associated with an estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease of 15 ml per minute or greater (OR 4.2, p = 0.029). At 2 years the rates of local control, and progression-free, cancer specific and overall survival in the solitary cohort were 98.0%, 77.5%, 98.2% and 81.5%, respectively. There was no significant difference in renal function or oncologic outcomes between the cohorts (p >0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the IROCK database stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in patients with a solitary kidney had an acceptable impact on renal function and achieved excellent oncologic outcomes, similar to those in patients with bilateral kidneys. Thus, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy represents a viable treatment option in patients with renal cell carcinoma in a solitary kidney.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Renais/radioterapia , Radiocirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rim Único/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging therapy for primary renal cell carcinoma. The authors assessed safety, efficacy, and survival in a multi-institutional setting. Outcomes between single-fraction and multifraction SABR were compared. METHODS: Individual patient data sets from 9 International Radiosurgery Oncology Consortium for Kidney institutions across Germany, Australia, the United States, Canada, and Japan were pooled. Toxicities were recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were stratified according to the number of radiotherapy fractions (single vs multiple). Survival outcomes were examined using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: Of 223 patients, 118 received single-fraction SABR, and 105 received multifraction SABR. The mean patient age was 72 years, and 69.5% of patients were men. There were 83 patients with grade 1 and 2 toxicity (35.6%) and 3 with grade 3 and 4 toxicities (1.3%). The rates of local control, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival were 97.8%, 95.7%, and 77.4%, respectively, at 2 years; and they were 97.8%, 91.9%, and 65.4%, respectively, at 4 years. On multivariable analysis, tumors with a larger maximum dimension and the receipt of multifraction SABR were associated with poorer progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.16 [P < .01] and 1.13 [P = .02], respectively) and poorer cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio, 1.28 [P < .01] and 1.33 [P = .01], respectively). There were no differences in local failure between the single-fraction cohort (n = 1) and the multifraction cohort (n = 2; P = .60). The mean ( ± standard deviation) estimated glomerular filtration rate at baseline was 59.9 ± 21.9 mL per minute, and it decreased by 5.5 ± 13.3 mL per minute (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: SABR is well tolerated and locally effective for treating patients who have primary renal cell carcinoma and has an acceptable impact on renal function. An interesting observation is that patients who receive single-fraction SABR appear to be less likely to progress distantly or to die of cancer. Cancer 2018;124:934-42. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Canadá , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Japão , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Técnicas Estereotáxicas , Estados UnidosRESUMO
AIM: To provide a multi-institutional consensus document for stereotactic body radiotherapy of primary renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS & METHODS: Eight international institutions completed a 65-item survey covering patient selection, planning/treatment aspects and response evaluation. RESULTS: All centers treat patients with pre-existing hypertension and solitary kidneys. Five institutions apply size constraints of 5-8 cm. The total planning target volume expansion is 3-10 mm. All institutions perform pretreatment imaging verification, while seven institutions perform some form of intrafractional monitoring. Number of fractions used are 1-12 to a total dose of 25 Gy-80 GyE. Imaging follow-up for local tumor response includes computed tomography (n = 8), PET-computed tomography (n = 1) and MRI (n = 5). Follow-up frequency is 3-6 months for the first 2 years and 3-12 months for subsequent 3 years. CONCLUSION: Key methods for safe implementation and practice for stereotactic body radiotherapy kidney have been identified and may aid standardization of treatment delivery.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Fase I como Assunto , Consenso , Gerenciamento Clínico , Prova Pericial , Seguimentos , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Terapia Assistida por Computador/métodosRESUMO
The SPine response assessment In Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) group is a committee of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and comprises a panel of international experts in spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Here, we present the group's first report on the challenges in standardising imaging-based assessment of local control and pain for spinal metastases. We review current imaging modalities used in SBRT treatment planning and tumour assessment and review the criteria for pain and local control in registered clinical trials specific to spine SBRT. We summarise the results of an international survey of the panel to establish the range of current practices in assessing tumour response to spine SBRT. The ultimate goal of the SPINO group is to report consensus criteria for tumour imaging, clinical assessment, and symptom-based response criteria to help standardise future clinical trials.
Assuntos
Dor nas Costas/cirurgia , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Medição da Dor , Radiocirurgia , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/secundário , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Irradiação Corporal Total , Dor nas Costas/diagnóstico , Dor nas Costas/etiologia , Comportamento Cooperativo , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Cooperação Internacional , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Imagem Multimodal , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Neoplasias da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: High dose local stereotactic radiosurgery was performed in select patients to improve local tumor control and overall survival. We report on patients with renal tumors treated with single fraction robotic stereotactic radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 40 patients with a median age of 64 years who had an indication for nephrectomy and subsequent hemodialysis were entered in a prospective case-control study of single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery. Of the patients 11 had transitional cell cancer and 29 had renal cell cancer. Tumor response, renal function, survival and adverse events were estimated every 3 months. Followup was at least 6 months. RESULTS: A total of 45 renal tumors were treated. Median followup was 28.1 months (range 6.0 to 78.3). The local tumor control rate 9 months after stereotactic radiosurgery was 98% (95% CI 89-99). There was a measurable size reduction in 38 lesions, including complete remission in 19. Renal function remained stable. Using the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation median creatinine clearance was 76.8 (range 25.3 to 126.3) and 70.3 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) (range 18.6 to 127.3) at baseline and followup, respectively (p = 0.89). Grade I erythrodermia developed in 1 patient, 3 reported grade I fatigue and 2 reported grade I nausea. Nephrectomy was avoided in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery as an outpatient procedure is a treatment modality with short-term safety and efficacy. It avoids treatment related loss of renal function and hemodialysis in select patients with transitional or renal cell cancer. At short followup oncologic results were similar to those of other ablative techniques for renal tumors. To date functional results have been excellent. Further studies are needed to determine the long-term results and limits of stereotactic radiosurgery in this setting.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate technical outcome and safety of computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous fiducial marker placement before CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 196 patients (106 men) undergoing CT fluoroscopy-guided fiducial marker placement in 222 consecutive procedures under local anesthesia from March 2006 to February 2012. Technical success was defined as fiducial marker location in the tumor or vicinity suitable for CyberKnife radiosurgery evaluated on postinterventional planning CT. Complications were classified per Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR). RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six patients (age, 61.5 y ± 13.1) underwent percutaneous placement of 321 fiducial markers (mean per tumor, 1.2 ± 0.5; range, 1-4) in 37 primary tumors and 227 metastases in the thorax (n = 121), abdomen (n = 122), and bone (n = 21). Fiducial marker placement was technically successful in all procedures: intratumoral localization in 193 (60.1%), at tumor margin in 50 (15.6%), and outside of tumor in 78 cases (24.3%; mean distance to marker, 0.4 cm ± 0.6; range, 0-2.9 cm). Complications were observed in 63 placement procedures (28.4%), including minor self-limiting pneumothorax (n = 21; SIR class B) and self-limiting pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 35; SIR class A), and major pneumothorax requiring thoracostomy/drainage insertion (n = 14; SIR class D) and systemic toxicity of local anesthetic drug (n = 1; SIR class D). CONCLUSIONS: CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous fiducial marker placement can be performed with high technical success under local anesthesia in various anatomic regions. Although self-limiting in most cases, pneumothorax and pulmonary hemorrhage are frequently observed during fiducial marker implantation into lung tumors.
Assuntos
Marcadores Fiduciais , Pneumotórax/etiologia , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Radiocirurgia/instrumentação , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/instrumentação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise de Falha de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pneumotórax/diagnóstico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The SRS/SBRT Scientific Meeting 2014, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 7-10 May 2014. The Radiosurgery Society(®), a professional medical society dedicated to advancing the field of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), held the international Radiosurgery Society Scientific Meeting, from 7-10 May 2014 in Minneapolis (MN, USA). This year's conference attracted over 400 attendants from around the world and featured over 100 presentations (46 oral) describing the role of SRS/SBRT for the treatment of intracranial and extracranial malignant and nonmalignant lesions. This article summarizes the meeting highlights for SRS/SBRT treatments, both intracranial and extracranial, in a concise review.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , RadiocirurgiaRESUMO
CyberKnife spinal radiosurgery suffers from a lack of posterior beams due to workspace limitations. This is remedied by a newly available tracking modality for fiducial-free, respiration-compensated spine tracking in prone patient position. We analyzed the potential dosimetric benefit in a planning study. Fourteen exemplary cases were compared in three scenarios: supine (PTV=CTV), prone (PTV=CTV), and prone position with an additional margin (PTV=CTV+2 mm), to incorporate reduced accuracy of respiration-compensated tracking. Target and spinal cord constraints were chosen according to RTOG 0631 protocol for spinal metastases. Plan quality was scored based on four predefined parameters: dose to cord (D0.1cc and D1cc), high dose (V10Gy), and low dose (V4Gy) volume of healthy tissue. Prescription dose was 16 Gy to the highest isodose line encompassing 90% of the target. Results were related to target size and position. All plans fulfilled RTOG 0631 constraints for coverage and dose to cord. When no additional margin was applied, a majority of eight cases benefitted from prone position, mainly due to a reduction of V4Gy by 23% ± 26%. In the 2 mm prone scenario, the benefit was nullified by an average increase of V10Gy by 43% ± 24%, and an increase of D1cc to cord (four cases). Spinal cord D0.1cc was unchanged (< ± 1 Gy) in all but two cases for both prone scenarios. Conformity (nCI) and number of beams were equivalent in all scenarios, but supine plans used a significantly higher number of monitor units (+16%) than prone. Posterior beam access can reduce dose to healthy tissue in CyberKnife spinal radiosurgery when no additional margin is applied. When a target margin of 2 mm is added, this potential gain is lost. Relative anterior-posterior position and size of the target are selection criteria for prone treatment.
Assuntos
Posicionamento do Paciente , Radiocirurgia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador , Neoplasias da Medula Espinal/cirurgia , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Humanos , Órgãos em Risco , Decúbito Ventral , Radioterapia Conformacional , Decúbito DorsalRESUMO
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment modality for the management of uveal melanoma, achieving high tumor control and eye retention rates. There are several SRS treatment platforms available, including the recently developed self-shielding gyroscopic radiosurgery (GRS) system. We report the first use of GRS in the treatment of uveal melanoma. We report the treatment of a 63-year-old female patient with a left-sided uveal melanoma. Akinesia of the ocular globe in the orbit was achieved by retrobulbar anesthesia. The treatment plan used six isocenters (three with the 10 mm and three with the 7.5 mm apertures) and 140 beams to cover 99.2% of the planning target volume (PTV) with 21 Gy at the 54% isodose line. Treatment was delivered in a single session with the GRS device. The total workflow time from retrobulbar anesthesia to completion of treatment was 122 minutes. The procedure was flawless, clinically well tolerated by the patient, and reliably performed in an outpatient setting, thus comparable to our published experience with robotic SRS. The evaluation of new radiosurgery treatment platforms is critical to maintaining quality standards and refining future treatments.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Uveal melanoma (UM), although a rare malignancy, stands as the most prevalent intraocular malignancy in adults. Controversies persist regarding the dose dependency of local control (LC) through radiation therapy. This study sought to elucidate the significance of the prescription dose by employing time-dose-response models for patients with UM receiving photon-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The analysis included patients with UM treated between 2005 and 2019. All patients underwent single-fraction SRS. Datapoints were separated into 3 dose groups, with Kaplan-Meier analysis performed on each group, from which time-dose-response models for LC were created at 2, 4, and 7 years after SRS using maximum-likelihood fitted logistic models. RESULTS: Outcomes from 594 patients with 594 UMs were used to create time-dose-response models. The prescribed doses and the number of patients were as follows: 17 to 19 Gy (24 patients), 20 Gy (122 patients), 21 Gy (442 patients), and 22 Gy (6 patients). Averaged over all patients and doses, LC rates at 2, 4, and 7 years were 94.4%, 88.2%, and 69.0%, respectively. Time-dose-response models for LC demonstrated a dose-dependent effect, showing 2-year LC rates of more than 90% with 20 Gy and 95% with 22 Gy. For 4 years and a LC of 90%, a dose of approximately 21 Gy was required. After 7 years, the 21 Gy prescription dose was predicted to maintain a LC above 70%, sharply declining to less than 60% LC with 19 Gy and less than 40% with 18 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to prior findings, the time-dose-response models for UM undergoing photon-based SRS emphasize the critical role of the prescription dose in achieving lasting LC. The dose selection must be carefully balanced against toxicity risks, considering tumor geometry and individual patient characteristics to tailor treatments accordingly.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Although emerging clinical evidence supports robotic radiosurgery as a highly effective treatment option for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) less than 4 cm in diameter, delivery uncertainties and associated target volume margins have not been studied in detail. We assess intrafraction tumor motion patterns and accuracy of robotic radiosurgery in renal tumors with real-time respiratory tracking to optimize treatment margins. METHODS: Delivery log files from 165 consecutive treatments of RCC were retrospectively analyzed. Five components were considered for planning target volume (PTV) margin estimation: (a) The model error from the correlation model between patient breath and tumor motion, (b) the prediction error from an algorithm predicting the patient breathing pattern, (c) the targeting error from the treatment robot, (d) the inherent total accuracy of the system for respiratory motion tracking, and (e) the margin required to cover potential target rotation, simulated with PTV rotations up to 10°. RESULTS: The median tumor motion was 10.5 mm, 2.4 mm and 4.4 mm in the superior-inferior, left-right, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. The root of the sum of squares of all contributions to the system's inaccuracy results in a minimum PTV margin of 4.3 mm, 2.6 mm and 3.0 mm in the superior-inferior, left-right and anterior-posterior directions, respectively, assuming optimal fiducial position and neglecting target deformation. CONCLUSIONS: We have assessed kidney motion and derived PTV margins for the treatment of RCC with robotic radiosurgery, which helps to deliver renal treatments in a more consistent manner and potentially further improve outcomes.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Radiocirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células Renais/radioterapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/radioterapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Movimento , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Masculino , Feminino , Respiração , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , IdosoRESUMO
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery is a well-established treatment option for the management of various benign and malignant brain tumors. It can be delivered with several treatment platforms, usually requiring shielded radiation vaults to meet regulatory safety requirements. Recent technical advances have led to the first self-shielding platform enabling the delivery of gyroscopic radiosurgery (GRS). Given the limited number of GRS treatment platforms, the novelty of its characteristics, and the lack of available data, we report our prospective experience with the first 100 patients treated with GRS. Materials and methods Patients undergoing GRS for the treatment of intracranial tumors were enrolled in this prospective study. Patient and treatment characteristics, including patient satisfaction, were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 100 patients with 155 tumors were treated. The most commonly treated tumors comprised brain metastases (BM) (49%), vestibular schwannomas (31%), and meningiomas (14%). The median prescription dose for malignant and benign tumors was 20 and 13 Gy, respectively. The median prescription isodose line was 56%. Gross tumor volumes were small, with a median of 0.37 cc for BM and 0.92 cc for the other entities. The median total treatment time was 40 minutes. Dosimetric performance indices showed median values of 1.20 (conformity index), 1.24 (new conformity index), 1.74 (homogeneity index), and 3.13 (gradient index). Volumetric assessment of the treated tumors showed an overall decrease in size at the first available follow-up. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment experience. Conclusion Our first prospective experience of the use of GRS is favorable. Analyses of the dosimetric performance, treatment times, volumetric assessment, and patient satisfaction demonstrate its suitability for stereotactic treatments of intracranial tumors. Further prospective clinical and dosimetric analyses for GRS are pending.
RESUMO
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) have been used for the treatment of head and neck or skull base paraganglioma for a considerable time, demonstrating promising local control rates and a favorable safety profile compared with surgical approaches. Nevertheless, the choice of treatment must be carefully tailored to each patient's preferences, tumor location, and size, as well as anticipated treatment-related morbidity. This case-based review serves as a practical and concise guide for the use of SRS and FSRT in the management of head and neck or skull base paragangliomas, providing information on the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up considerations, and potential pitfalls.
Assuntos
Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço , Paraganglioma , Radiocirurgia , Neoplasias da Base do Crânio , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Paraganglioma/radioterapia , Paraganglioma/patologia , Paraganglioma/cirurgia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Neoplasias da Base do Crânio/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Base do Crânio/cirurgiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Renal function preservation is particularly important following nonoperative treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) since patients are often older with medical comorbidities. Our objective was to report long-term renal function outcomes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) including patients with a solitary kidney. METHODS: Patients with primary RCC treated with SABR with ≥2 yr of follow-up at 12 International Radiosurgery Consortium for Kidney institutions were included. Renal function was measured by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 190 patients (56 with a solitary kidney) underwent SABR and were followed for a median of 5.0 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.4-6.8). In patients with a solitary kidney versus bilateral kidneys, pre-SABR eGFR (mean [standard deviation]) was 61.1 (23.2) versus 58.0 (22.3) ml/min (p = 0.32) and the median tumor size was 3.65 cm (IQR: 2.59-4.50 cm) versus 4.00 cm (IQR: 3.00-5.00 cm; p = 0.026). At 5 yr after SABR, eGFR decreased by -14.5 (7.6) and -13.3 (15.9) ml/min (p = 0.67), respectively, and there were similar rates of post-SABR dialysis (3.6% [n = 2/56] vs 3.7% [n = 5/134]). A multivariable analysis demonstrated that increasing tumor size (odds ratio [OR] per 1 cm: 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.16, p = 0.0055) and baseline eGFR (OR per 10 ml/min: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.02-1.66, p = 0.034) were associated with an eGFR decline of ≥15 ml/min at 1 yr. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: With long-term follow-up after SABR, kidney function decline remains moderate, with no observed difference between patients with a solitary kidney and bilateral kidneys. Tumor size and baseline eGFR are dominant factors predictive of long-term renal function decline. PATIENT SUMMARY: With long-term follow-up, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) yields moderate long-term renal function decline and low dialysis rates even in patients with a solitary kidney. SABR thus represents a promising noninvasive, nephron-sparing option for patients with localized renal cell carcinoma.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiation therapy is an evolving modality to treat otherwise unresectable liver metastases. In this analysis, two local therapies: 1) single session robotic radiosurgery (RRS) and 2) percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were compared in a total of 60 heavily pretreated colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Thirty patients with a total of 35 colorectal liver metastases not qualifying for surgery that were treated in curative intent with RRS were prospectively followed. To compare efficacy of both treatment modalities, patients treated with RFA during the same period of time were matched according to number and size of the treated lesions. Local tumor control, local disease free survival (DFS), and freedom from distant recurrence (FFDR) were analyzed for efficacy. Treatment-related side effects were recorded for comparison. RESULTS: The median diameter of the treated lesions was 33 mm (7-53 mm). Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. One- and two-year local control rates showed no significant difference but favored RRS (85% vs. 65% and 80% vs. 61%, respectively). A significantly longer local DFS of patients treated with RRS compared to RFA (34.4 months vs. 6.0 months; p < 0.001) was found. Both, median FFDR (11.4 months for RRS vs. 7.1 months for RFA p = 0.25) and the recurrence rate (67% for RRS and 63% for RFA, p > 0.99) were comparable. CONCLUSION: Single session RRS is a safe and effective method to treat colorectal liver metastases. In this analysis, a trend towards longer DFS was seen in patients treated with RRS when compared to RFA.