Automated Detection of Apical Foreshortening in Echocardiography Using Statistical Shape Modelling.

OBJECTIVE: Automated detection of foreshortening, a common challenge in routine 2-D echocardiography, has the potential to improve quality of acquisitions and reduce the variability of left ventricular measurements. Acquiring and labelling the required training data is challenging due to the time-intensive and highly subjective nature of foreshortened apical views. We aimed to develop an automatic pipeline for the detection of foreshortening. To this end, we propose a method to generate synthetic apical-four-chamber (A4C) views with matching ground truth foreshortening labels. METHODS: A statistical shape model of the four chambers of the heart was used to synthesise idealised A4C views with varying degrees of foreshortening. Contours of the left ventricular endocardium were segmented in the images, and a partial least squares (PLS) model was trained to learn the morphological traits of foreshortening. The predictive capability of the learned synthetic features was evaluated on an independent set of manually labelled and automatically curated real echocardiographic A4C images. RESULTS: Acceptable classification accuracy for identification of foreshortened views in the testing set was achieved using logistic regression based on 11 PLS shape modes, with a sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84, 0.82 and 0.84, respectively. Both synthetic and real cohorts showed interpretable traits of foreshortening within the first two PLS shape modes, reflected as a shortening in the long-axis length and apical rounding. CONCLUSION: A contour shape model trained only on synthesized A4C views allowed accurate prediction of foreshortening in real echocardiographic images.

Left ventricular assessment with artificial intelligence increases the diagnostic accuracy of stress echocardiography.

Aims: To evaluate whether left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS), automatically calculated by artificial intelligence (AI), increases the diagnostic performance of stress echocardiography (SE) for coronary artery disease (CAD) detection. Methods and results: SEs from 512 participants who underwent a clinically indicated SE (with or without contrast) for the evaluation of CAD from seven hospitals in the UK and US were studied. Visual wall motion scoring (WMS) was performed to identify inducible ischaemia. In addition, SE images at rest and stress underwent AI contouring for automated calculation of AI-LVEF and AI-GLS (apical two and four chamber images only) with Ultromics EchoGo Core 1.0. Receiver operator characteristic curves and multivariable risk models were used to assess accuracy for identification of participants subsequently found to have CAD on angiography. Participants with significant CAD were more likely to have abnormal WMS, AI-LVEF, and AI-GLS values at rest and stress (all P < 0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristics for WMS index, AI-LVEF, and AI-GLS at peak stress were 0.92, 0.86, and 0.82, respectively, with cut-offs of 1.12, 64%, and -17.2%, respectively. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that addition of peak AI-LVEF or peak AI-GLS to WMS significantly improved model discrimination of CAD [C-statistic (bootstrapping 2.5th, 97.5th percentile)] from 0.78 (0.69-0.87) to 0.83 (0.74-0.91) or 0.84 (0.75-0.92), respectively. Conclusion: AI calculation of LVEF and GLS by contouring of contrast-enhanced and unenhanced SEs at rest and stress is feasible and independently improves the identification of obstructive CAD beyond conventional WMSI.

Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Severe Coronary Artery Disease Using Artificial Intelligence.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish whether an artificially intelligent (AI) system can be developed to automate stress echocardiography analysis and support clinician interpretation. BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is the leading global cause of mortality and morbidity and stress echocardiography remains one of the most commonly used diagnostic imaging tests. METHODS: An automated image processing pipeline was developed to extract novel geometric and kinematic features from stress echocardiograms collected as part of a large, United Kingdom-based prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. An ensemble machine learning classifier was trained, using the extracted features, to identify patients with severe coronary artery disease on invasive coronary angiography. The model was tested in an independent U.S. STUDY: How availability of an AI classification might impact clinical interpretation of stress echocardiograms was evaluated in a randomized crossover reader study. RESULTS: Acceptable classification accuracy for identification of patients with severe coronary artery disease in the training data set was achieved on cross-fold validation based on 31 unique geometric and kinematic features, with a specificity of 92.7% and a sensitivity of 84.4%. This accuracy was maintained in the independent validation data set. The use of the AI classification tool by clinicians increased inter-reader agreement and confidence as well as sensitivity for detection of disease by 10% to achieve an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.93. CONCLUSIONS: Automated analysis of stress echocardiograms is possible using AI and provision of automated classifications to clinicians when reading stress echocardiograms could improve accuracy, inter-reader agreement, and reader confidence.