Exercise-induced expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry receptors: impact of mask modality, sex, and exercise intensity.

BACKGROUND: Wearing a facemask affects physiological responses to exercise. We explored how exercising with a facemask affects the expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 [ACE2]) and some associated genes (angiotensin type-1 receptors [AT1R]; Mas receptor [MasR]; hypoxia-inducible factor 1α [HIF-1α]; endothelial nitric oxide synthase [eNOS]) among healthy males and females. METHODS: One hundred forty-four apparently healthy individuals (72 females; age: 30±6) were allocated to three mask groups of 48 (N95, Surgical, No Mask) with two exercise subgroups for each mask for both sexes. Participants in each experimental group performed either a submaximal (walking with no grade) or maximal (a modified Bruce Protocol) treadmill exercise test. Blood samples were collected before and after each exercise test and used to analyze the mRNA expression of the genes studied. RESULTS: The post-exercise expression of genes examined were comparable between Surgical, N95, and No Mask (P>0.05). ACE2 was significantly greater in Surgical and N95 against No Mask at baseline and following moderate-intensity exercise (P<0.05). Whilst similar expressions were noted for MasR and eNOS (P>0.05), AT1R was greater in N95 than Surgical following high-intensity exercise (P<0.05). HIF-1α following either exercise intensity was significantly lower in N95 than Surgical (P<0.05). AT1R and HIF-1α were similar between Surgical and N95 against No Mask (P>0.05). ACE2 and AT1R were significantly higher in either mask modality than No Mask in males at baseline and postexercise (P<0.05). HIF-1α, MasR, and eNOS expressions were comparable between all mask groups in either sex (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that wearing a facemask does not differentiate the gene expression of SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor following exercise among both sexes.

Does wearing a mask while exercising amid COVID-19 pandemic affect hemodynamic and hematologic function among healthy individuals? Implications of mask modality, sex, and exercise intensity.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated how wearing a mask - and its modality (surgical vs. N95) - affect hemodynamic and hematologic function in males and females across two exercise intensities (submaximal (SUB) and maximal (MAX)). METHODS: 144 individuals participated in the present study and were randomly allocated to three mask groups of 48 (N95, SURGICAL, and NO MASK) with two exercise subgroups for each mask group (MAX, n = 24; SUB, n = 24) for both sexes. Participants in each experimental group (N95SUB, N95MAX; SURSUB, SURMAX; SUB, MAX) were assessed for their hemodynamic and hematologic function at baseline and during recovery after exercise. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted for either hemodynamic or hematologic function at post-exercise as compared to baseline with regard to mask modality (P > 0.05). Heart rate (HR) for maximal intensity were significantly greater at 1 min post-exercise in N95 as compared to SURGICAL (P < 0.05). No differences were noted for hemodynamic and hematologic function with N95 and SURGICAL compared to NOMASK for either intensity (P > 0.05). Females showed significantly greater HR values at 1 min post-exercise in N95 as compared to NO MASK, but no significant differences were noted for hematological function between sexes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings show that wearing a face mask (N95/surgical) while exercising has no detrimental effects on hemodynamic/hematologic function in both males and females, and suggest that wearing a mask, particularly a surgical mask, while exercising during the ongoing pandemic is safe and poses no risk to individual's health. Future studies examining physiological responses to chronic exercise with masks are warranted.