RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether subjects who have recovered from COVID-19 smell and taste disturbance perform similarly to their COVID-naïve baseline, on gold-standard smell and taste tests. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: University of Miami Department of Otolaryngology in Miami, FL between September 2021, and August 2022. METHODS: Those previously COVID-19 positive composed the experimental group, those who reported being COVID-naïve composed the control group. Mean total score for the UPSIT Smell Test, and the Burghart Taste Strip test were the primary outcome measures. RESULTS: 70 adult subjects (35 former COVID-positive, 35 COVID-naïve) were enrolled, with 21 females and 14 males in each group. 87 % of all subjects were white and were almost distributed evenly between Hispanic and non-Hispanic. Mean UPSIT total score for the experimental group was 30.6 (95 % CI 28.9-32.3), mean UPSIT total score for the control group was 31.2 (95 % CI 29.7-32.8). Mean Burghart total score for the experimental group was 11.3 (95 % CI 10.6-12.0), mean Burghart total score for the control group was 10.7 (95 % CI 9.7-11.8). These showed a significant overlap of the 95 % CI of the mean total score between the control group and the experimental group, suggesting no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that COVID-19 patients who experience smell and taste disturbance and recover, regain sensory ability similar to their pre-COVID ability. Further study is needed to validate these findings, but the results are promising in the long-term recovery of COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos do Olfato , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Transtornos do Olfato/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Olfato , DisgeusiaRESUMO
Background: Acute hemorrhage, both traumatic and nontraumatic, leads to significant morbidity and mortality, both in the United States and globally. Traditional treatment of acute hemorrhage is focused on hemostasis and blood product replacement. Tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic agent that may reduce acute hemorrhage through inhibition of plasminogen. Newer research suggests that coagulopathy, specifically fibrinolysis, may contribute significantly to the pathology of acute hemorrhage. Methods: We searched the PubMed database for relevant articles from 2000 to 2018 for the terms "tranexamic acid," "TXA," "antifibrinolytic," "hyperfibrinolysis," and "coagulopathy." Our search was limited to studies published in the English language. Results: A total of 53 studies were included in this review. These articles suggest a potential role for tranexamic acid in the management of acute intracranial hemorrhage, epistaxis, hematuria, postpartum hemorrhage, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and trauma-related hemorrhage. A theoretical risk of thrombotic events following tranexamic acid use exists, though large clinical trials suggest this risk remains exceedingly small. Conclusions: Recent studies suggest a mortality benefit with tranexamic acid following acute hemorrhage. First responders such as emergency medical technicians and emergency department clinicians should consider tranexamic acid as an adjunct therapy in the management of acute, severe traumatic and nontraumatic hemorrhage.
RESUMO
Introduction: The influence of pre-existing humoral immunity, inter-individual demographic factors, and vaccine-associated reactogenicity on immunogenicity following COVID vaccination remains poorly understood. Methods: Ten-fold cross-validated least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and linear mixed effects models were used to evaluate symptoms experienced by COVID+ participants during natural infection and following SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination along with demographics as predictors for antibody (AB) responses to recombinant spike protein in a longitudinal cohort study. Results: In previously infected individuals (n=33), AB were more durable and robust following primary vaccination when compared to natural infection alone. Higher AB were associated with experiencing dyspnea during natural infection, as was the total number of symptoms reported during the COVID-19 disease course. Both local and systemic symptoms following 1st and 2nd dose (n=49 and 48, respectively) of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines were predictive of higher AB after vaccination. Lastly, there was a significant temporal relationship between AB and days since infection or vaccination, suggesting that vaccination in COVID+ individuals is associated with a more robust immune response. Discussion: Experiencing systemic and local symptoms post-vaccine was suggestive of higher AB, which may confer greater protection.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Imunidade Humoral , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos Longitudinais , Vacinação/efeitos adversos , RNA MensageiroRESUMO
Diabetes mellitus and complications arising from the disease are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. With increasing prevalence over the past 50 years and an estimated 20% of health-care spending dedicated to the disease, diabetes is considered by many to be a true public health emergency. Several protocols and management options exist to maximize glycemic control in the ambulatory setting, but the optimal glucose level in critically and noncritically ill inpatients is still debated. This review examines the evidence behind differing degrees of glycemic control across a variety of hospital settings and clinical scenarios. Patients presenting to the emergency department who are found to be hyperglycemic pose additional management challenges for clinicians. In this setting, no consensus exists for optimal serum glucose level and safe discharge parameters.