Correlation of New Criteria for Malnutrition Assessment in Hospitalized Patients: AND-ASPEN Versus SGA.

Objectives: Identifying malnutrition in the hospitalized patient is important as it correlates with increased morbidity. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) is recognized in the literature as a standardized and validated method for diagnosing malnutrition. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (AND) and the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) developed a comprehensive method (AND-ASPEN criteria) for diagnosing malnutrition that has yet to be validated. In effort to validate the AND-ASPEN criteria for identifying malnutrition, this study investigated whether AND-ASPEN criteria would correlate with SGA in hospitalized patients.Methods: A cohort of patients >18 years old admitted to a tertiary hospital and assessed for malnutrition using AND-ASPEN criteria were randomly selected, and a retrospective review was completed. Criteria needed to perform SGA were extracted from the electronic medical record and SGA data were calculated and compared to AND-ASPEN malnutrition scoring. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between the SGA and AND-ASPEN malnutrition score. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, median or frequency.Results: A total of 409 patients were reviewed and 225 (55%) met inclusion criteria. SGA malnutrition scores classified 47.1% (n = 106) of subjects as well-nourished, 32% (n = 72) moderately malnourished, and 20.9% (n = 47) severely malnourished. The AND-ASPEN malnutrition scores classified 43.8% (n = 179) of the subjects as well-nourished, 26.2% (n = 107) as moderately malnourished, and 30.1% (n = 123) severely malnourished. The SGA score and AND-ASPEN malnutrition diagnosis were found to be correlated (p < 0.001). There was no association between age or length of stay with either assessment tool.Conclusions: The AND-ASPEN criteria for diagnosing malnutrition correlated with SGA in identifying nutritional status in hospitalized adult patients. Future prospective studies capturing the impact of malnutrition diagnosis, medical and nutrition interventions with patient outcomes are warranted to confirm the impact of early and accurate identification of malnutrition of patient outcomes.

Parenteral nutrition insecurity: ASPEN survey to assess the extent and severity of parenteral nutrition access and reimbursement issues.

BACKGROUND: Parenteral nutrition (PN) shortages and lack of qualified professional staff to manage PN impact safe, efficacious care and costs of PN. This American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN)-sponsored survey assessed the frequency and extent to which PN access affects PN delivery to patients. METHODS: Healthcare professionals involved with PN were surveyed. Questions were developed to characterize the respondent population and determine the extent and severity of PN access issues to components, devices, and healthcare professionals, as well as their effects on discharge and transfer issues. Reimbursement issues included cost, adequacy of therapy, and healthcare professional reimbursement. Burdens were types and frequency of errors, adverse events, and nutrition problems resulting from PN access issues. Impact on professionals and organizations was determined. RESULTS: Respondents (N = 350) worked in hospitals (75%) and home infusion (25%). Per day, clinicians cared for <15 patients receiving PN. All age populations were represented. Respondents reported shortages of macronutrients (72%, 233 of 324) and micronutrients (91%, 297 of 324). Issues with access to healthcare workers were observed. PN access issues contribute to increased costs of PN, and knowledge regarding the current rate of PN reimbursement is limited. Respondents (75%, 197 of 261) observed an error due to PN access issues. Adverse events (57%, 149 of 259) were observed leading to temporary or permanent harm (24%, 61 of 259) as well as near death (4%, 9 of 259) and death (1%, 2 of 259). Providers reported time away from other job responsibilities and workplace stress. CONCLUSION: PN access issues result in "PN insecurity" that negatively impacts patients and healthcare providers and leads to adverse events including death in patients receiving PN.