Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
N Engl J Med ; 388(25): 2349-2359, 2023 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37342923

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data to inform the switch from a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) to dolutegravir in patients living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection who do not have genotype information and who have viral suppression with second-line therapy containing a ritonavir-boosted PI have been limited. METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, open-label trial conducted at four sites in Kenya, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, previously treated patients without genotype information who had viral suppression while receiving treatment containing a ritonavir-boosted PI to either switch to dolutegravir or continue the current regimen. The primary end point was a plasma HIV type 1 RNA level of at least 50 copies per milliliter at week 48, assessed on the basis of the Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm. The noninferiority margin for the between-group difference in the percentage of participants who met the primary end point was 4 percentage points. Safety up to week 48 was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 795 participants were enrolled, with 398 assigned to switch to dolutegravir and 397 assigned to continue taking their ritonavir-boosted PI; 791 participants (397 in the dolutegravir group and 394 in the ritonavir-boosted PI group) were included in the intention-to-treat exposed population. At week 48, a total of 20 participants (5.0%) in the dolutegravir group and 20 (5.1%) in the ritonavir-boosted PI group met the primary end point (difference, -0.04 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -3.1 to 3.0), a result that met the criterion for noninferiority. No mutations conferring resistance to dolutegravir or the ritonavir-boosted PI were detected at the time of treatment failure. The incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events was similar in the dolutegravir group and the ritonavir-boosted PI group (5.7% and 6.9%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In previously treated patients with viral suppression for whom there were no data regarding the presence of drug-resistance mutations, dolutegravir treatment was noninferior to a regimen containing a ritonavir-boosted PI when the patients were switched from a ritonavir-boosted PI-based regimen. (Funded by ViiV Healthcare; 2SD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04229290.).


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Inibidores de Integrase de HIV , HIV-1 , Humanos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Anti-HIV/farmacologia , Fármacos Anti-HIV/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Compostos Heterocíclicos com 3 Anéis/efeitos adversos , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/genética , HIV-1/genética , Estudos Prospectivos , Piridonas/uso terapêutico , Ritonavir/efeitos adversos , Ritonavir/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Viral/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores de Integrase de HIV/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Integrase de HIV/farmacologia , Inibidores de Integrase de HIV/uso terapêutico , Quênia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA