Defining the Role of Social Vulnerability in Treatment and Survival in Localized Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether variations in Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) are associated with disparities in colon cancer surgery and mortality. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Colon cancer mortality is influenced by health care access, which is affected by individual and community-level factors. Prior studies have not used the SVI to compare surgical access and survival in localized colon cancer patients. Further, it is unclear if those above 65 years are more vulnerable to variations in SVI. METHODS: We queried the Texas and California Cancer Registries from 2004-2017 to identify patients with localized colonic adenocarcinoma and categorized patients into <65 and ≥65 years. Our outcomes were survival and access to surgical intervention. The independent variable was census tract social vulnerability index, with higher scores indicating more social vulnerability. We used multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards for analysis. RESULTS: We included 73,923 patients with a mean age of 68.6 years (SD 13.0), mean SVI of 47.2 (SD 27.6), and 51.1% male. After adjustment, increasing SVI was associated with reduced odds of undergoing surgery (OR 0.996; 95% CI 0.995-0.997; P < 0.0001 and increased mortality (HR 1.002; 95% CI 1.001-1.002; P < 0.0001). Patients < 65 years were more sensitive to variation in SVI. CONCLUSIONS: Increased social vulnerability was associated with reduced odds of receiving surgery for early-stage colon cancer as well as increased mortality. These findings amplify the need for policy changes at the local, state, and federal level to address community-level vulnerability to improve access to surgical care and reduce mortality.

Effect of Hospital Cancer Designation on use of Multimodal Therapy and Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A State-Wide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) often requires multidisciplinary approach. However, multimodal treatment options (receipt of > 1 type of treatment) may not be uniformly delivered across health systems. We characterized the association between center-level cancer center designation and receipt of multimodal treatment and survival. METHODS: The Texas Cancer Registry was used to identify patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC from 2004-2017. We identified those who received care at either: a National Cancer Institute-designated (NCI-D), an American College of Surgeons-Commission on Cancer-designated (ACS-D), or an undesignated facility. We used multivariable logistic regression and Cox regression for analysis to assess receipt of one or more treatment modality and 5-year overall survival. RESULTS: Of 19,355 patients with stage IV CRC, 2955 (15%) received care at an NCI-D facility and 5871 (30%) received multimodal therapy. Both NCI-D (odds ratio [OR] 1.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-1.81) and ACS-D (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.27-1.48) were associated with increased likelihood of multimodal therapy compared with undesignated centers. NCI-D also was associated with significantly improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% CI 0.70-0.78), although ACS-D was associated with a modest improvement in survival (HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92-0.99). Receipt of multimodal therapy was strongly associated with improved survival (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.59-0.63). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with stage IV CRC, treatment at ACS-D and NCI-D facilities was associated with increased use of multimodality therapy and improved survival. However, only a small proportion of patients have access to these specialized centers, highlighting a need for expanded access to multimodal therapies at other centers.

Factors associated with failure to operate and its impact on survival in early-stage pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Curative intent for localized pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [PDAC]) requires surgery, but despite improved perioperative outcomes, surgery remains underutilized. This study analyzed the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) to identify resectable PDAC patients who underwent curative-intent surgery in Texas between 2004 and 2018. We then evaluated demographic and clinical factors associated with failure to operate and survival (OS). METHODS: We identified patients with localized PDAC or regional lymph node spread between 2004 and 2018 in the TCR. Resection rates were determined and multivariable regression and cox proportional hazards were used to identify factors associated with failure to OS. RESULTS: Of 4274 patients, 22% underwent resection, 57% were not offered surgery, 6% had comorbidities precluding surgery, and 3% refused. Resection rates decreased from 31% in 2004 to 22% in 2018. Increasing age was associated with failure to operate (odds ratio [OR] 2.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.80-3.61; p < 0.0001) while treatment at a Commission on Cancer (CoC) center correlated with reduced failure to operate (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.50-0.78; p < 0.0001). Resection correlated with survival (HR 0.34; 95% CI 0.31-0.38; p < 0.0001) as did treatment at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated center (hazard ratio 0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.89; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is underutilized for the treatment of resectable PDAC in Texas with decreasing utilization, annually. Evaluation at CoC was associated with improved resection rates and NCI was associated with increased survival. Expanding access to multidisciplinary care including trained hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgeons may improve outcomes for PDAC patients.

Social Determinants of Outcomes Disparity among Pediatric Patients with Solid Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic factors have a significant impact on healthcare outcomes. Metrics such as area deprivation index (ADI) are used to quantify the anticipated influence of these factors. Here, we sought to assess the impact of socioeconomic factors on clinical outcomes among pediatric patients with solid tumor in our region. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 3,863 pediatric patients who were diagnosed with a malignant solid tumor in the Texas Cancer Registry between 1995 and 2019. ADI was used to quantify socioeconomic determinants of health. These outcome variables were determined: stage of disease at diagnosis, time between diagnosis and treatment initiation, and overall mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression, linear regression, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. RESULTS: A total of 53.5% of patients were male and the average age at diagnosis was 4.5 years. Forty-seven percent of patients were White, 13.3% were Black, 36.2% were Hispanic, 1.7% were Asian, and other rare minority groups made up 1.8%. On multivariable analysis, increased risk of death was associated with Black race, rare minority race, residence in a border county, and increasing ADI score, with the risk of death at 5 years rising 4% with each increasing ADI point. CONCLUSIONS: Social determinants of health are associated with disparate outcomes among pediatric patients with solid tumor. Our results suggest that patients who are part of racial minority groups and those who reside in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods or regions near the Texas-Mexico border are at an increased risk of death. This information may be useful in strategizing outreach and expanding resources to improve outcomes in at-risk communities.

Implications of the interaction between travel burden and area deprivation for patients with pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Fragmentation of care and distance traveled are classically surrogates for poor access to care, but little is known about how social determinants of health interact with travel burden to affect survival for patients with pancreatic cancer (PC). We sought to characterize the individual and composite impact of these factors. METHODS: 20769 patients treated for PC between 2005 and 2019 in the Texas Cancer Registry were included. The Area Deprivation Index and Poverty Index were used to quantify social determinants of health. Survival analyses were performed at 2 years as well as subgroup analysis on patients with the greatest travel burden. RESULTS: Improved survival was associated with FC (HR 0.74, CI 0.71-0.77) and distance from an accredited cancer center (Quartile 4 HR 0.90, CI 0.81-1.00). High ADI led to worse outcomes while low ADI led to improved outcomes with increasing travel burden. CONCLUSIONS: This data shows a complex relationship between travel burden and survival for patients with pancreatic cancer where stratifying by area deprivation reveals divergent outcomes and the potential to exacerbate disparities.