Multitrait GWAS to connect disease variants and biological mechanisms.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have uncovered a wealth of associations between common variants and human phenotypes. Here, we present an integrative analysis of GWAS summary statistics from 36 phenotypes to decipher multitrait genetic architecture and its link with biological mechanisms. Our framework incorporates multitrait association mapping along with an investigation of the breakdown of genetic associations into clusters of variants harboring similar multitrait association profiles. Focusing on two subsets of immunity and metabolism phenotypes, we then demonstrate how genetic variants within clusters can be mapped to biological pathways and disease mechanisms. Finally, for the metabolism set, we investigate the link between gene cluster assignment and the success of drug targets in randomized controlled trials.

Trait selection strategy in multi-trait GWAS: Boosting SNP discoverability.

Since the first genome-wide association studies (GWASs), thousands of variant-trait associations have been discovered. However, comprehensively mapping the genetic determinant of complex traits through univariate testing can require prohibitive sample sizes. Multi-trait GWAS can circumvent this issue and improve statistical power by leveraging the joint genetic architecture of human phenotypes. Although many methodological hurdles of multi-trait testing have been solved, the strategy to select traits has been overlooked. In this study, we conducted multi-trait GWAS on approximately 20,000 combinations of 72 traits using an omnibus test as implemented in the Joint Analysis of Summary Statistics. We assessed which genetic features of the sets of traits analyzed were associated with an increased detection of variants compared with univariate screening. Several features of the set of traits, including the heritability, the number of traits, and the genetic correlation, drive the multi-trait test gain. Using these features jointly in predictive models captures a large fraction of the power gain of the multi-trait test (Pearson's r between the observed and predicted gain equals 0.43, p < 1.6 × 10-60). Applying an alternative multi-trait approach (Multi-Trait Analysis of GWAS), we identified similar features of interest, but with an overall 70% lower number of new associations. Finally, selecting sets based on our data-driven models systematically outperformed the common strategy of selecting clinically similar traits. This work provides a unique picture of the determinant of multi-trait GWAS statistical power and outlines practical strategies for multi-trait testing.

Trait selection strategy in multi-trait GWAS: Boosting SNPs discoverability.

Since the first Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS), thousands of variant-trait associations have been discovered. However, the sample size required to detect additional variants using standard univariate association screening is increasingly prohibitive. Multi-trait GWAS offers a relevant alternative: it can improve statistical power and lead to new insights about gene function and the joint genetic architecture of human phenotypes. Although many methodological hurdles of multi-trait testing have been discussed, the strategy to select trait, among overwhelming possibilities, has been overlooked. In this study, we conducted extensive multi-trait tests using JASS (Joint Analysis of Summary Statistics) and assessed which genetic features of the analysed sets were associated with an increased detection of variants as compared to univariate screening. Our analyses identified multiple factors associated with the gain in the association detection in multi-trait tests. Together, these factors of the analysed sets are predictive of the gain of the multi-trait test (Pearson's ρ equal to 0.43 between the observed and predicted gain, P < 1.6 × 10-60). Applying an alternative multi-trait approach (MTAG, multi-trait analysis of GWAS), we found that in most scenarios but particularly those with larger numbers of traits, JASS outperformed MTAG. Finally, we benchmark several strategies to select set of traits including the prevalent strategy of selecting clinically similar traits, which systematically underperformed selecting clinically heterogenous traits or selecting sets that issued from our data-driven models. This work provides a unique picture of the determinant of multi-trait GWAS statistical power and outline practical strategies for multi-trait testing.