Does the use of fiber posts increase the fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth? A systematic review.

This systematic review aimed to assess if the use of fiber posts reinforces weakened immature teeth. A systematic review was conducted of laboratory studies that evaluated the fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth restored with fiber posts compared to teeth restored exclusively with resin. An electronic search was performed using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus and LILACS, BBO, and grey literature. Two independent researchers screened the titles and abstracts of the retrieved studies for relevance to the research question. Subsequently, the full texts of potentially relevant studies were screened based on the exclusion criteria. Ten out of 1792 unique records were included in this systematic review. Risk of bias was assessed using an adapted tool based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The laboratory studies included in this systematic review were performed on both human and bovine teeth. Eight studies concluded that fiber posts reinforce the structure of weakened roots, and two studies reported that fiber posts did not strengthen the radicular structure compared to teeth exclusively restored with resin composite. The highly heterogeneous data made it challenging to synthesize the results into a summary estimate, and thus no meta-analysis was undertaken. A summary effect could not be estimated without a meta-analysis. Although the laboratory literature suggests that fiber posts reinforce the structure of immature teeth, the results should be interpreted with caution, as most of the studies had an unclear or high risk of bias.

Physicochemical and Biological Properties of AH Plus Bioceramic.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical and biological properties of AH Plus Bioceramic (AHPB; Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC) in comparison to AH Plus (AHP, Dentsply Sirona) and EndoSequence BC Sealer (BC; Brasseler, Savannah, GA). METHODS: The setting time, radiopacity, flow, solubility, calcium ion release, and pH were evaluated following ISO guidelines. Surface characterization and chemical constitution were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The antibacterial effect was tested against Enterococcus faecalis. Sealer cytotoxicity was tested using the XTT cell viability assay. Analysis of variance, Tukey, and unpaired t tests were used with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The initial setting time of AHPB was shorter than AHP and BC (P ≤ .0001), whereas AHP showed a shorter final setting time (P ≤ .0001). AHPB was more radiopaque than BC (P = .0012) but less radiopaque than AHP (P = .0001). AHPB was more soluble than AHP (P ≤ .0001), whereas no difference was observed between AHPB and BC (P > .05). Immersion in phosphate-buffered saline decreased the solubility of AHPB and BC (P ≤ .005). AHPB calcium ion release was higher than AHP (P ≤ .05) but less than BC (P ≤ .0001). AHPB had the highest flow followed by AHP and BC (P > .05). All sealers were alkaline and able to eradicate E. faecalis. Surface morphology and chemical composition of all sealers changed after immersion in water and phosphate-buffered saline. Cell viability for AHPB and BC was higher than AHP (P ≤ .0001). CONCLUSIONS: AHPB presented adequate properties to be considered a good sealer, however, the high solubility may negatively impact the quality of the obturation.