Combined Phacoemulsification and Ahmed Glaucoma Drainage Implant Surgery for Patients With Refractory Glaucoma and Cataract.

PURPOSE: To examine the indications, safety, efficacy, and complications of combined phacoemulsification and Ahmed glaucoma drainage implant surgery. METHODS: A retrospective case review of 35 eyes (31 patients) subjected to combined phacoemulsification and Ahmed glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Demographic characteristics of the study population, indications for combined surgery, and operative and postoperative complications were recorded. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of glaucoma medications were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. Complete success was defined as IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg without medication, qualified success if IOP ≤ 21 mm Hg with ≥ 1 medications, and failure if IOP>21 mm Hg or ≤ 5 mm Hg on ≥ 2 consecutive visits. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 29.5 months (range, 6 to 87 mo). The most common indication for combined surgery was a history of prior failed trabeculectomy (60%). Postoperative visual acuity improved in 30 of 35 eyes (85%) (P<0.01) regardless of the indication for combined surgery. IOP was reduced from a mean of 24.7 to 15.0 mm Hg at the last follow-up visit (P<0.01). The number of IOP-lowering medications was reduced from a median of 3.1 preoperatively to 1.7 at the last follow-up (P<0.01). Overall, there were 31 eyes (89%) classified as qualified success and 4 eyes (11%) as complete success. The most common postoperative complication was a hypertensive phase in 18 eyes (51%). CONCLUSIONS: Combined phacoemulsification and Ahmed glaucoma drainage implant surgery seems to be a safe and effective surgical option, providing good visual rehabilitation and control of IOP for patients with refractory glaucoma and cataract.

Importancia clínica de la prueba calórica mínima / Clinical importance of the minimal caloric test

Introducción: En la evaluación de la patología vestibular habitualmente se utiliza la prueba calórica clásica de Fitzgerald y Hallpike (PCC). Sin embargo, esta sólo evalúa la función del nervio vestibular superior a través de la estimulación del canal semicircular lateral. La prueba calórica mínima (PCM) permite evaluar tanto la función del nervio vestibular superior como del nervio vestibular inferior a través de la estimulación del canal semicircular lateral y posterior respectivamente. Se desconoce el real impacto de la PCM en la evaluación clínica de pacientes con sintomatología vestibular. Objetivo: Cuantificar la utilidad diagnóstica de la PCM en pacientes con sintomatología vestibular. Material y método: Estudio diagnóstico transversal. Se obtuvo la sensibilidad y especificidad de la PCM al comparar la respuesta del canal semicircular lateral en la PCM con la prueba calórica convencional. Se evaluó en cuántos casos la información sobre la función del nervio vestibular inferior aportada por la PCM fue relevante en el diagnóstico vestibular. Resultados: Se estudió a 44 pacientes. Tanto la sensibilidad como la especificidad de la PCM para detectar patología al estimular el canal semicircular lateral fue de 93 por ciento (IC95 por ciento: 84 por ciento-100 por ciento y 80 por ciento-100 por ciento respectivamente). En 16 por ciento (N =7) de los casos la PCM detectó patología del nervio vestibular inferior con PCC normal. Conclusiones: La PCM es un examen complementario útil en la evaluación de pacientes con sintomatología vestibular, puesto que tiene una alta sensibilidad y especificidad para detectar patología del nervio vestibular superior a través de la estimulación del canal semicircular lateral y además, aporta información sobre el estado del nervio vestibular inferior a través de la estimulación del canal semicircular posterior, que no aporta la PCC.

Introduction: The classic Fitzgerald-Hallpike caloric test (CCT) is usually utilized for evaluation of vestibular pathology. With this test, however, superior vestibular nerve function is assessed through stimulation of the lateral semicircular canal only. The minimal caloric test (MCT) allows for evaluation of both superior and inferior vestibular nerve function, through horizontal and posterior semicircular canals stimulation, respectively. The actual impact of MCT on the clinical evaluation of patients presenting with vestibular symptoms is unknown. Purpose: To quantify the diagnostic usefulness of MCT in patients with vestibular symptoms. Material and Method: Transversal diagnostic study. Sensitivity and specificity of MCT were obtained by comparing the lateral semicircular canal response in both MCT and the conventional caloric test. We assessed the number of cases in which the vestibular nerve function information obtained with MCT was relevant for vestibular diagnostic. Results: 44 patients were studied. The sensitivity and specificity of MCT to detect pathologic conditions via lateral semicircular canal stimulation were 93 percent (Cl 95 percent: 84 percent-100 percent and 80 percent-100 percent, respectively). In 16 percent (n =7) of the cases, MCT detected inferior vestibular nerve involvement with normal CCT Conclusions: MCT is a complementary test, which can be useful for evaluation of patients with vestibular symptoms, given its high sensitivity and specificity to detect superior vestibular nerve pathology through lateral semicircular canal stimulation. In addition, it provides information on the inferior vestibular nerve status, through posterior semicircular canal stimulation. The latter is not provided by conventional CCT.